A Farron

Grade I and II acromioclavicular dislocations: results of conservative treatment

The purpose of this study was to assess the results of acute grade I and II acromioclavicular (AC) joint sprains treated by conservative measures. Between 1993 and 1997, 37 consecutive patients were treated conservatively for AC joint sprains, grade I and II in the Tossy classification. Of these patients, 4 were excluded (three lost to follow-up and one sustained a further AC injury), leaving a series of 33 patients. Among them, in 9 (27%), chronic AC joint pathology that required subsequent surgery developed at a mean of 26 months after injury. The remaining 24 were reviewed clinically and radiologically at a mean of 6.3 years (range, 4-8 years) after injury. At the latest follow-up, 17 of the 33 patients (52%) remained asymptomatic. Of the 24 patients reviewed, 7 complained of activity-related pain. Eight patients presented with residual anteroposterior instability. Tenderness at the AC joint as well as a positive cross-body test was observed in 12 patients. The mean Constant score at follow-up was 82 points. The x-ray films showed degenerative changes in 13 patients, ossification of the coracoclavicular ligaments in 2, an association of degenerative changes with ossification of the coracoclavicular ligaments in 3, and distal clavicular osteolysis in 3. Only 4 cases had no radiographic changes after this kind of AC injury. On the basis of these results, we conclude that the severity of the consequences after grade I and II AC sprains is underestimated.

Heightened clinical utility of smartphone versus body-worn inertial system for shoulder function B-B score

Background The B-B Score is a straightforward kinematic shoulder function score including only two movements (hand to the Back + lift hand as to change a Bulb) that demonstrated sound measurement properties for patients for various shoulder pathologies. However, the B-B Score results using a smartphone or a reference system have not yet been compared. Provided that the measurement properties are comparable, the use of a smartphone would offer substantial practical advantages. This study investigated the concurrent validity of a smartphone and a reference inertial system for the measurement of the kinematic shoulder function B-B Score. Methods Sixty-five patients with shoulder conditions (with rotator cuff conditions, adhesive capsulitis and proximal humerus fracture) and 20 healthy participants were evaluated using a smartphone and a reference inertial system. Measurements were performed twice, alternating between two evaluators. The B-B Score differences between groups, differences between devices, relationship between devices, intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility were analysed. Results The smartphone mean scores (SD) were 94.1 (11.1) for controls and 54.1 (18.3) for patients (P < 0.01). The difference between devices was non-significant for the control (P = 0.16) and the patient group (P = 0.81). The analysis of the relationship between devices showed 0.97 ICC, −0.6 bias and −13.2 to 12.0 limits of agreement (LOA). The smartphone intra-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA −17.4 to 20.3. The smartphone inter-evaluator ICC was 0.92, the bias 1.5 and the LOA −16.9 to 20.0. Conclusions The B-B Score results measured with a smartphone were comparable to those of an inertial system. While single measurements diverged in some cases, the intra- and inter-evaluator reproducibility was excellent and was equivalent between devices. The B-B score measured with a smartphone is straightforward and as efficient as a reference inertial system measurement.