A. García-Curiel

Reliability of the E-Test Method for Detection of Colistin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii

ABSTRACT We compared the E-test to the broth microdilution method for testing the susceptibility of 115 clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to colistin. Twenty-two (19.1%) strains were resistant to colistin and 93 (80.8%) strains were susceptible according to the reference broth microdilution method. A categorical agreement of 98.2% was found, with only two (1.7%) very major errors. Agreement within 1 twofold dilution between the E-test and the broth microdilution was 16.5%. Complete agreement was found for the strains for which MICs fell within the range of 0.25 to 1 μg of colistin/ml. However, there was poor concordance, particularly in extreme dilutions with higher MICs by the E-test method.

Efficacy of Rifampin and Its Combinations with Imipenem, Sulbactam, and Colistin in Experimental Models of Infection Caused by Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

ABSTRACT There are currently no defined optimal therapies available for multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections. We evaluated the efficacy of rifampin, imipenem, sulbactam, colistin, and their combinations against MDR A. baumannii in experimental pneumonia and meningitis models. The bactericidal in vitro activities of rifampin, imipenem, sulbactam, colistin, and their combinations were tested using time-kill curves. Murine pneumonia and rabbit meningitis models were evaluated using the A. baummnnii strain Ab1327 (with MICs for rifampin, imipenem, sulbactam, and colistin of 4, 32, 32, and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively). Mice were treated with the four antimicrobials and their combinations. For the meningitis model, the efficacies of colistin, rifampin and its combinations with imipenem, sulbactam, or colistin, and of imipenem plus sulbactam were assayed. In the pneumonia model, compared to the control group, (i) rifampin alone, (ii) rifampin along with imipenem, sulbactam, or colistin, (iii) colistin, or (iv) imipenem plus sulbactam significantly reduced lung bacterial concentrations (10.6 ± 0.27 [controls] versus 3.05 ± 1.91, 2.07 ± 1.82, 2.41 ± 1.37, 3.4 ± 3.07, 6.82 ± 3.4, and 4.22 ± 2.72 log10 CFU/g, respectively [means ± standard deviations]), increased sterile blood cultures (0% versus 78.6%, 100%, 93.3%, 93.8%, 73.3%, and 50%), and improved survival (0% versus 71.4%, 60%, 46.7%, 43.8%, 40%, and 85.7%). In the meningitis model rifampin alone or rifampin plus colistin reduced cerebrospinal fluid bacterial counts (−2.6 and −4.4 log10 CFU/ml). Rifampin in monotherapy or with imipenem, sulbactam, or colistin showed efficacy against MDR A. baumannii in experimental models of pneumonia and meningitis. Imipenem or sulbactam may be appropriate for combined treatment when using rifampin.

Efficacy of rifampin, in monotherapy and in combinations, in an experimental murine pneumonia model caused by panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains

The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficacy of rifampin, and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam, in an experimental pneumonia model caused by two panresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains (HUVR99 and HUVR113). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) (μg/ml) of the strains were rifampin 128/>128 for both strains, imipenem 128/>256 and 256/>256 for HUVR99 and HUVR113, respectively, and sulbactam >256/>256 for both strains. In time–kill studies, at MICs, rifampin was bactericidal for both strains and sulbactam against the HUVR99 strain. Rifampin plus imipenem or sulbactam, at the MIC or mice Cmax, were synergistic. In vivo, against HUVR99 and HUVR113, rifampin (73% and 40%) and its combinations improved the survival with respect to the control group (20% and 0%, p < 0.05), respectively. Rifampin (87% and 46%) and its combinations improved the sterilization of blood cultures with respect to the control groups (0%, p < 0.05). In regard to the bacterial clearance from lungs, rifampin (2.57 ± 2.47 and 5.35 ± 3.03 log10 cfu/g) and its combinations with imipenem or sulbactam diminished the bacterial lung concentration with respect to the control group (10.89 ± 3.00 and 11.86 ± 0.49, p < 0.05) with both strains. In conclusion, rifampin alone or associated to imipenem or sulbactam were effective for the treatment of murine pneumonia caused by selected panresistant A. baumannii strains.