A Gupta

Poor sleep and depression are independently associated with a reduced pain threshold. Results of a population based study

&NA; To determine the relative contributions of psychological factors and sleep disturbance to reduced pain threshold we conducted a cross‐sectional two‐phase population‐based study. A total of 424 subjects were recruited, stratified by pain and distress status. Subjects completed a postal questionnaire that asked about current pain and covered aspects of psychological status and sleep disturbance. Samples of subjects stratified by the extent of bodily pain they reported and psychological status were invited to participate in an examination of pain threshold. The association between psychological status, sleep disturbance and a low pain threshold was examined using ordinal regression. High levels of psychological distress (OR=1.6, 95% CI (1.02, 2.5)), disturbed sleep (OR=2.2, 95% CI (1.4, 3.5)) and high scores on the HAD depression scale (OR=2.1, 95% CI (1.3, 3.2)) were all associated with having a low pain threshold. In multivariate analysis disturbed sleep and depression remained independently associated with a low pain threshold. These relationships persisted after adjustment for pain status. This study had demonstrated that depression and poor sleep are associated with a reduced pain threshold.

Psychological stress and fibromyalgia: a review of the evidence suggesting a neuroendocrine link

The present review attempts to reconcile the dichotomy that exists in the literature in relation to fibromyalgia, in that it is considered either a somatic response to psychological stress or a distinct organically based syndrome. Specifically, the hypothesis explored is that the link between chronic stress and the subsequent development of fibromyalgia can be explained by one or more abnormalities in neuroendocrine function. There are several such abnormalities recognised that both occur as a result of chronic stress and are observed in fibromyalgia. Whether such abnormalities have an aetiologic role remains uncertain but should be testable by well-designed prospective studies.

Pressure pain thresholds and tender point counts as predictors of new chronic widespread pain in somatising subjects

Background: : Tender points are a general measure of distress both in the community and in clinic subjects. It has been suggested that multiple tender points should be regarded as the early stages of somatisation of distress. Similarly, recent evidence suggests that chronic widespread pain (CWP) is one manifestation of the somatisation of distress. Objective: Given that a high tender point count and CWP are clinical hallmarks of the fibromyalgia syndrome, it was hypothesised that in somatising subjects, a high tender point count or a low pain threshold would predict the development of CWP in the future. Methods: In this population-based prospective study, 245 adults aged 25–65 years, free of CWP, were identified on the basis of a detailed questionnaire on pain and a psychosocial questionnaire comprising the Somatic Symptom Checklist and the Illness Behaviour subscale of the Illness Attitude Scales. These subjects took part in a pain threshold examination with a Fischer pressure algometer. Tender point counts were computed by including all areas with a pain threshold <4 kg/cm2. Individuals were followed up at 15 months, at which time 231 (93% of subjects still living at their baseline address) provided data on pain status, using the same instruments. Results: At follow-up, 26 (11%) subjects developed new CWP. Although subjects with a low baseline pain threshold were not at increased risk of developing symptoms, a high tender point count, adjusted for age, sex, baseline pain status and other confounding factors, predicted the development of new CWP. Conclusion: Subjects free of CWP are at an increased risk of its development if they have a high tender point count. However, a low-pressure pain threshold does not predict the onset of symptoms. Data from this population-based prospective study suggest that a low pain threshold in subjects with CWP is likely to be a secondary phenomenon as a result of pain or associated distress rather than the antecedent of symptoms.