A.H. Martin
University of Sydney
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A.H. Martin.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1926
A.H. Martin
IV.-Summary (1)In this necessarily condensed account there have been presented the personality systems of James, Freud, and McDougall, the first and the last of these exhibiting certain common factors, with certain extensions peculiar to each system. With the Freudian system these factors vaguely appear, but their form is badlydefined and their delineation incomplete. The criticism of the three systems may be summarised as follows:—that of James is lacking in content, i.e. of the sentiments, while that of McDougall is more in line with a simple self concept than that of a complete personality system and hence is lacking in organisation. That of Freud, while possessing some features in common with that of McDougall appears naive and undeveloped. By combining the systems of the first-mentioned pair, a final system may be obtained, whichmore completely explains personality than any one of them. (2)According to this final system the main features of personality consist of:— (a)A basic system of instincts whic...
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1925
A.H. Martin; R. Simmat
One of the chief branches of Industrial Psychology is Vocational Guidance. This attempts to discover the capacities required for different types of work and to guide young people into occupations for which their endowments fit them. Investigations have been made to determine vocational fitness in a variety of occupations; for instance, in many engineering processes, in printing, in telegraphic and telephonic work, and in clerical occupations. The article which follows gives a practical illustration of some of the methods used in ovcational investigations.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1932
A.H. Martin
Summary There are two opposed theories which attempt to account for the processes of problem solution involved in learning and intelligence. The former is neural in its basis and postulates the existence of a bare connection as a bonding or linkage of two experiences. The second theory, that of gestalt, implies that learning or apprehension involves a relationship of the parts of the experience to each other as well as to the whole. While these psychological schools are exclusive of and opposed to each other, yet they are merely extremes of what actually exists. There is a minimum level of learning in which associationism is operative and a maximum intellectual level at which explicit relationships predominate. An examination of experimental results will show this to be the case. The results of conditioned reflex experiments in both animals and man appear to show that there is present nothing beyond arbitrary linkage or bonding between the parts of the situation involved. On the other hand, one finds a ce...
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1925
A.H. Martin
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1923
A.H. Martin
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1934
A.H. Martin
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1930
A.H. Martin
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1931
A.H. Martin
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1930
A.H. Martin
Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 1926
A.H. Martin