A. Hosseini

Lacritin, a Novel Human Tear Glycoprotein, Promotes Sustained Basal Tearing and Is Well Tolerated

PURPOSE Lacritin is a novel human tear glycoprotein that promotes basal tear peroxidase secretion by rat lacrimal acinar cells in vitro. This study investigates whether lacritin is prosecretory when added topically to the ocular surface of normal living rabbits, and if so, what is its efficacy and tolerability versus cyclosporine and artificial tears. METHODS Purified recombinant human lacritin (1, 10, 50, or 100 μg/mL), inactive lacritin truncation mutant C-25 (10 μg/mL), cyclosporine (0.05%), or artificial tears were topically administered to eyes of normal New Zealand White rabbits either as a single dose or three times daily for 14 days with monitoring of basal tear production. Basal tearing under proparacaine anesthesia was repeatedly assessed throughout and 1 week after chronic treatment ceased. Eyes were examined weekly by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. RESULTS Lacritin acutely increased basal tearing to 30% over vehicle at 240 minutes. Three times daily treatment with 10-100 μg/mL lacritin was well tolerated. Basal tearing became progressively elevated 4, 7, and 14 days later and was 50% over baseline (50 μg/mL lacritin) 1 week after treatment had ceased. Cyclosporine elevated tearing to a similar level on days 4 and 7 but had little or no effect on day 14 and had returned to baseline 1 week after ending treatment. C-25 and artificial tears had no effect. CONCLUSIONS Lacritin acutely stimulates basal tear flow that is sustained for at least 240 minutes. Two weeks of lacritin treatment three times daily was well tolerated and progressively elevated the basal tear flow. One week after treatment ended, basal tearing was still 50% over baseline. In contrast, cyclosporine triggered mild to moderate corneal irritation and a temporary elevation in tearing.

Topical WIN55212-2 Alleviates Intraocular Hypertension in Rats Through a CB1 Receptor Mediated Mechanism of Action

INTRODUCTION Systemically administered cannabinoids can reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), but produce undesirable cardiovascular and central nervous system effects. In a chronic model of ocular hypertension, we examined the efficacy of acute topical administration of WIN55212-2 (WIN) in a novel commercially available vehicle and in combination with timolol. METHODS IOP was chronically elevated by the surgical ligature of vortex veins in Sprague Dawley rats. IOP was measured by using Goldmann applanation tonometry. IOP, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) were measured at baseline and 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the topical administration of WIN 1.0%, 0.25%, 0.06%, or 0.015%, the commercially available vehicle, timolol 0.5%, or a combination of WIN and timolol. SR141716 (CB1 antagonist) or SR144528 (CB2 antagonist) was administered topically 30 min before WIN to determine receptor specificity. To determine ocular and systemic penetration, 3H WIN 55212-2 was administered topically and tissues were collected at 60 and 120 min. Ocular irritation was evaluated by slit-lamp examination (SLE) at baseline and 120 min. RESULTS WIN significantly decreased IOP in the hypertensive eye, with no BP or HR effects. SR141716 pretreatment significantly inhibited the IOP effects of WIN 1.0% in a dose-dependent manner, while SR 144528 was not as effective. No significant additive effects were observed by combining WIN (0.5% or 1.0%) with timolol 0.5%. WIN was retained in ocular tissue with a t1/2 of 80-100 min. SLE at 120 min revealed no solvent or drug-related toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS In a chronic ocular hypertensive rat model, topically applied WIN is an effective, nontoxic ocular hypotensive agent with no hemodynamic side-effects. This effect was predominantly CB1 receptor mediated, but some CB2 contribution could not be ruled out.

Efficacy of a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer antisense compound in the inhibition of corneal transplant rejection in a rat cornea transplant model.

PURPOSE The cornea is one of the most commonly transplanted tissues. The morpholino-oligomer antisense compound AVI-5126 suppresses expression of proto-oncogene c-myc, a key factor in transplant rejection. AVI-5126 was evaluated in a rat cornea transplant model. METHODS Donor corneas obtained from August x Copenhagen Irish rats were stored in Optisol™ containing 1.0 or 0.5 mg/mL AVI-5126 or Optisol alone for 24 h before transplant. Recipient Lewis rats were treated topically 3x/d with TobraDex™ and with 1.0 or 0.5 mg/mL of AVI-5126 or saline with daily monitoring for rejection using a modified McDonald-Shadduck Slit Lamp Scale. Using the high-performance liquid chromatography technique, the stability of AVI-5126 (0.5 mg/mL) in Optisol was evaluated for 30 days. AVI-5126 corneal transport was measured using Ussing chamber mounted rabbit corneas. The potential ocular toxicity of AVI-5126 (0.5 mg/mL) was evaluated after 8 days of 3x/d topical application in rats and in-vitro by incubation of human corneas for 8 days. RESULTS Cornea storage in Optisol containing 1.0 mg/mL AVI-5126 plus post-transplant topical tid AVI-5126 (1.0 mg/mL) application significantly increased graft survival (7.0±1.6 days) versus 5.0±0.8 days for Optisol alone storage plus post-transplant topical tid saline application (P<0.001). After 30 days of storage, no significant degradation of AVI-5126 in Optisol was noted by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. After 24 h, 5 μg/mL (1% of total dose) crossed the corneas mounted in Ussing chambers. Neither extended topical application of AVI-5126 to rats nor incubation of human corneas in AVI-5126 decreased endothelial cell density. CONCLUSIONS Graft rejection was significantly delayed after pretransplantation storage of graft corneas in Optisol containing AVI-5126 followed by topical application of AVI-5126 post-transplantation. AVI-5126 was well tolerated, stable, and effectively penetrated the cornea.

Comparison of Topical and Intravenous Administration of WIN 55-212-2 in Normotensive Rabbits

Objective: This study compares the effect of topical versus intravenous (IV) administration of synthetic WIN 55-212–2 (WIN) or timolol on intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods: WIN or timolol were administered either topically or by IV in normotensive New Zealand white rabbits. IOP was measured at baseline and 30, 60, and 120 min after administration (n = 4 per group). Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured concomitantly with IOP. Results: IV administration of 0.1 mg/kg WIN reduced IOP by 30% after 30 min, which continued to decline for up to 120 min. Timolol injection (25 μ g/kg) also reduced IOP by 25% after 30 min but was not sustained. In comparison, both topical WIN (1.0%) and timolol (0.5%) reduced IOP by 20% from baseline after 30 min. IV injection of either WIN or timolol significantly reduced HR to 155.4 ± 11.4 bpm and 165.9 ± 11.1 bpm, respectively, from a baseline of 256.3 ± 9.9 bpm. Topical administration was well tolerated and did not affect behavior, BP, or HR. Conclusion: Topical administration of either WIN or timolol did not decrease IOP as much as IV administration, but the lack of systemic or local toxicity could make it the safer alternative.