A. Huibers
University College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. Huibers.
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2015
A. Huibers; D. Calvet; F Kennedy; Kr Czuriga-Kovacs; Roland L Featherstone; F.L. Moll; Martin M. Brown; Toby Richards; G.J. de Borst
Objective To decrease the procedural risk of carotid revascularisation it is crucial to understand the mechanisms of procedural stroke. This study analysed the features of procedural strokes associated with carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) to identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. Materials and methods Patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis (1,713) were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA. Procedural strokes were classified by type (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), time of onset (intraprocedural or after the procedure), side (ipsilateral or contralateral), severity (disabling or non-disabling), and patency of the treated artery. Only patients in whom the allocated treatment was initiated were included. The most likely pathophysiological mechanism was determined using the following classification system: (1) carotid-embolic, (2) haemodynamic, (3) thrombosis or occlusion of the revascularised carotid artery, (4) hyperperfusion, (5) cardio-embolic, (6) multiple, and (7) undetermined. Results Procedural stroke occurred within 30 days of revascularisation in 85 patients (CAS 58 out of 791 and CEA 27 out of 819). Strokes were predominately ischaemic (77; 56 CAS and 21 CEA), after the procedure (57; 37 CAS and 20 CEA), ipsilateral to the treated artery (77; 52 CAS and 25 CEA), and non-disabling (47; 36 CAS and 11 CEA). Mechanisms of stroke were carotid-embolic (14; 10 CAS and 4 CEA), haemodynamic (20; 15 CAS and 5 CEA), thrombosis or occlusion of the carotid artery (15; 11 CAS and 4 CEA), hyperperfusion (9; 3 CAS and 6 CEA), cardio-embolic (5; 2 CAS and 3 CEA) and multiple causes (3; 3 CAS). In 19 patients (14 CAS and 5 CEA) the cause of stroke remained undetermined. Conclusion Although the mechanism of procedural stroke in both CAS and CEA is diverse, haemodynamic disturbance is an important mechanism. Careful attention to blood pressure control could lower the incidence of procedural stroke.
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2015
A. Huibers; G.J. de Borst; S. Wan; F Kennedy; A. Giannopoulos; F.L. Moll; Toby Richards
Cerebrovascular Diseases | 2016
A. Huibers; Gert Jan de Borst; Dafydd J. Thomas; Frans L. Moll; R Bulbulia; Alison Halliday
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2017
A. Huibers; Jeroen Hendrikse; Martin M. Brown; S.A. Pegge; Marcel Arnold; F.L. Moll; L. J. Kapelle; G.J. de Borst
Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018
A. Huibers; Jan Westerink; E.E. de Vries; A. Hoskam; H.M. den Ruijter; F.L. Moll; G.J. de Borst
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2018
A. Huibers; Jan Westerink; Evelien E. de Vries; Anne Hoskam; Hester M. den Ruijter; Frans L. Moll; Gert Jan de Borst
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2017
D D de Waard; Alison Halliday; G.J. de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; A. Huibers; R Casana; Leo H. Bonati; V Tolva
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2017
D D de Waard; Alison Halliday; G.J. de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; A. Huibers; R Casana; Leo H. Bonati; V Tolva
Cerebrovascular Diseases | 2016
A. Huibers; D D de Waard; Richard Bulbulia; G.J. de Borst; Alison Halliday
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2015
A. Huibers; G.J. de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Alison Halliday