A King

Trabeculectomy in the 21st century: a multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of current trabeculectomy surgery in the United Kingdom. DESIGN Cross-sectional, multicenter, retrospective follow-up. PARTICIPANTS A total of 428 eyes of 395 patients. METHODS Consecutive trabeculectomy cases with open-angle glaucoma and no previous incisional glaucoma surgery from 9 glaucoma units were evaluated retrospectively. Follow-up was a minimum of 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Surgical success, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, complications, and interventions. Success was stratified according to IOP, use of hypotensive medications, bleb needling, and resuturing/revision for hypotony. Reoperation for glaucoma and loss of perception of light were classified as failures. RESULTS Antifibrotics were used in 400 cases (93%): mitomycin C (MMC) in 271 (63%), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 129 (30%), and no antifibrotic in 28 (7%). At 2 years, IOP (mean ± standard deviation) was 12.4 ± 4 mmHg, and 342 patients (80%) achieved an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% reduction of preoperative IOP without IOP-lowering medication, whereas 374 patients (87%) achieved an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and 20% reduction of preoperative IOP overall. An IOP ≤18 mmHg and 20% reduction of preoperative IOP were achieved by 337 trabeculectomies (78%) without IOP-lowering treatment and by 367 trabeculectomies (86%) including hypotensive medication. Postoperative treatments included suture manipulation in 184 patients (43%), resuturing or revision for hypotony in 30 patients (7%), bleb needling in 71 patients (17%), and cataract extraction in 111 of 363 patients (31%). Subconjunctival 5-FU injection was performed postoperatively in 119 patients (28%). Visual loss of >2 Snellen lines occurred in 24 of 428 patients (5.6%). A total of 31 of the 428 patients (7.2%) had late-onset hypotony (IOP <6 mmHg after 6 months). In 3 of these, visual acuity decreased by >2 Snellen lines. Bleb leaks were observed in 59 cases (14%), 56 (95%) of which occurred within 3 months. Two patients developed blebitis. Bleb-related endophthalmitis developed in 1 patient within 1 month postoperatively and in 1 patient at 3 years. There was an endophthalmitis associated with subsequent cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS This survey shows that good trabeculectomy outcomes with low rates of surgical complications can be achieved, but intensive proactive postoperative care is required.

Frequency of bleb manipulations after trabeculectomy surgery

Aim: To quantify the type and frequency of postoperative bleb manipulations undertaken after modern glaucoma surgery. Methods: Bleb manipulations were recorded after trabeculectomy surgery on 119 consecutive patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. The type of intervention and time after surgery were recorded. Statistical analysis identified success rates at various intraocular pressure (IOP) cut-off definitions and identified factors that increased the risk for bleb manipulation. Results: In all, 78.2% of trabeculectomies were followed by some form of bleb manipulation. Almost 49% of blebs underwent massage and a similar number required at least one suture removal, 31.1% required at least one 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection and 25.2% required at least one needling and 5-FU injection. The median time to the first intervention for massage, suture removal, 5-FU injection, and needling and 5-FU injection were 1, 14, 14 and 43 days, respectively. IOP measurements were higher at all follow-up time points in the intervention group. Failure to achieve specific IOP target pressures was also generally poorer in the 5-FU, and needling and 5-FU intervention groups. Conclusions: Postoperative intervention is a frequent occurrence after modern glaucoma surgery. This requires intensive postoperative follow-up and is a labour-intensive undertaking. Despite interventions in our group of patients, IOP in the intervention group was always higher than in the group that required no intervention.

Transscleral diode laser cycloablation in patients with good vision

Purpose To investigate the effect of diode laser cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma on central visual function in patients with good visual acuity (VA). Patients and methods Patients with preoperative VA 20/60 or better who had undergone cyclodiode treatment according to a standard protocol were evaluated retrospectively. The primary outcome variable was a recorded loss of two or more Snellen lines of best corrected VA during follow-up. Successful intraocular pressure (IOP) control was defined as being between 6 and 21 mmHg inclusive without oral acetazolamide or other glaucoma surgery. Results 49 eyes of 43 patients with a median pretreatment acuity of 20/30 were included (range 20/16–20/60). After a mean duration of follow-up of 5.0 years, median VA was 20/60 with a line loss of two or more recorded in 15 eyes (30.6%) (mean survival time 7.7 years). 67.3% (33/49) retained VA 20/60 or better, but VA deteriorated by one Snellen line or more in 31 (63.2%), and in 16.3% (8/49), final VA was <20/200. In cases experiencing a two-line loss in acuity, the main causes were glaucoma progression (nine cases) and macula oedema (four cases). Visual loss was unrelated to total treatment dose (mean 99.7 J), initial acuity or initial IOP level. IOP was controlled at final follow-up in 39/49 (79.6%) with no cases of hypotony. Conclusions Most of these eyes with difficult to manage glaucoma retained their good VA over long-term follow-up after undergoing diode laser cyclophotocoagulation. The proportion losing two Snellen lines is in line with that reported after trabeculectomy or tube surgery. These results suggest a possible role for the use of transscleral cyclodiode in selected eyes with significant visual potential. Further controlled prospective studies are required to better define this role.

Moving the Goal Posts: Definitions of Success after Glaucoma Surgery and Their Effect on Reported Outcome

PURPOSE To determine (1) the extent to which the definition of success of glaucoma surgery varies in the literature and (2) the degree to which the reported outcome after trabeculectomy is affected by the criteria used to define success. DESIGN A systematic review of the literature and application of definitions to a retrospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS A cohort of 100 patients who previously underwent trabeculectomy. METHODS A literature search was performed of PubMed using the search term trabeculectomy for a 5-year period. Studies presenting original data relating to longitudinal intraocular pressure (IOP) control after glaucoma surgery were included. The definitions of success and failure used were documented for each publication. Each IOP-related definition of success was applied to a cohort of patients who previously underwent trabeculectomy. Success rates were derived for each published definition up to 36 months after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. RESULTS From 100 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, 92 distinct IOP-related definitions of success were identified. Using these definitions, success rates for this series of 100 trabeculectomies varied between 36.0% and 98.0% after 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Over a recent 5-year period, there were nearly as many different definitions of success after glaucoma surgery as publications on the subject. The definition used markedly affects the quoted success rate after trabeculectomy, making interpretation of and comparison between published results extremely difficult. Standardization of published outcome parameters after glaucoma surgery is essential to allow meaningful comparisons between different study reports. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Raised intraocular pressure (IOP) and perioperative visual loss in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a catastrophe waiting to happen? A systematic review of evidence from other surgical specialities

BackgroundCase reports of healthy patients experiencing total perioperative visual loss (POVL) after elective laparoscopic surgery, including colorectal resection, are appearing increasingly frequently in the literature. We reviewed the literature exploring the relationship between patient positioning and intraocular pressure (IOP) across all surgical specialties. This was then applied to the potential risk of developing POVL in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.MethodsA systematic review of the relevant literature was performed to identify all studies exploring the relationship between intraocular pressure and patient positioning.ResultsEight relevant studies on both elective patients and healthy non-anaesthetised volunteers in the spinal, neurosurgical and urological fields were identified which explore the changes in IOP according to patient positioning. These all reported significant rises in IOP in both head-down positioning and prone positioning, and the strongest effects were seen in those patients placed in combined head-down and prone position (such as prone jackknife). Rises in IOP were time-dependent in all studies.ConclusionsPatients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a prolonged head-down position are likely to experience raised IOP and thus are at risk of POVL. Those having a laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision with prone positioning for the perineal component are probably those in the greatest danger. Surgeons need to be aware of this under-recognised but potentially catastrophic complication.

Views of glaucoma patients on provision of follow-up care; an assessment of patient preferences by conjoint analysis

Aims: To determine patients’ preferences for provision of glaucoma follow-up services examining preferences for location, access and personnel for delivery of this care. Methods: 100 patient patients attending the glaucoma outpatient clinic for follow-up review underwent an interview-based assessment during which they completed the visual function questionnaire 25 and ranking of scenario options for provision of follow-up care for their glaucoma. Percentage preferences for aspects of care offered in the conjoint analysis scenario packages and generation of utility values for each of the factor levels included in the scenario design were calculated. Results: Travel time and training of health professional were the most important factors for patients (accounting for over 60%) of their preference. Utility scores were generated for each factor, with shorter travel time and examination by a doctor being the most important features to the patients. Patients who lived furthest from the hospital and had severe visual disability considered the number of visits to complete an episode to be an important feature. Conclusion: Patients ideally would like to travel a short distance and be seen by a doctor when being followed up for their glaucoma.

24-Hour versus daytime intraocular pressure phasing in the management of patients with treated glaucoma

Aims To determine the value of daytime and 24-h phasing in patients treated for progressive glaucoma despite apparently adequate intraocular pressure (IOP) control. Methods A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients that had undergone either daytime phasing (08:00–18:00) or 24-h phasing was conducted. IOP measurements were compared between those taken in clinic, daytime phasing and 24-h phasing. The frequency with which phasing results changed clinical management was also compared between daytime and 24-h phasing. Results 76 patients fulfilling the study criteria were identified. Clinic and daytime phasing IOP were known for all 76 patients, nighttime IOP measurements were known for 41. There was no significant difference between mean IOP values measured in clinic and daytime phasing (p=0.062) or between clinic values and nighttime phasing (p=0.65). The mean daytime phasing IOP was significantly higher than the mean nighttime phasing IOP (p=0.038) (analysis of variance (ANOVA) for three groups, p=0.058). There was no significant difference between the mean peak IOP in clinic or daytime phasing (p=0.13) or between clinic and nighttime phasing (p=0.44). The mean daytime phasing IOP peak was significantly higher than the mean nighttime phasing IOP peak (p=0.015) (ANOVA for three groups, p=0.074). There was no significant difference in the frequency of a change in management that occurred as a result of phasing between the daytime and 24-h groups (p=0.65). Conclusions 24-H phasing offers little advantage over daytime phasing in the identification of IOP fluctuations or peaks in patients progressing despite acceptable clinic IOP readings. Daytime phasing is likely to be more cost-effective than 24-h phasing.

Outcome of repeat trabeculectomies.

Background:  To determine the success of repeat trabeculectomy augmented with mitomycin C in a cohort of patients who had undergone previously failed trabeculectomy surgery.

Early bleb leak after trabeculectomy and prognosis for bleb failure.

AimTo determine whether early bleb leak after MMC trabeculectomy affects intermediate intraocular pressure (IOP) outcome.MethodsRetrospective case note review. All cases of MMC trabeculectomy with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Cases where a bleb leak occurred within the first month were identified. All cases without an early bleb leak formed the control group. Patient demographics and clinical factors were analysed to determine any factors predisposing to bleb leakage. IOPs were compared for 1 year postoperatively and final follow-up.ResultsA total of 119 trabeculectomies were included. Of these 27 (22.7%) had an early bleb leak. The remaining 92 cases formed the control group. Mean age of cases was 70.7 years. Mean follow-up time was 19.5 months. Mean time of detection of the bleb leak was 9 days (range 1–21 days). Four cases (14.8%) were managed by primary resuturing. Thirteen cases (48.1%) were managed conservatively with a bandage contact lens. Ten cases (37.0%) resolved with expectant management. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regards to IOP measurement at any time point. Intervention rates were similar with regards to bleb massage, 5-fluorouracil injection, and needling revision. No factors were identified between the two groups that predisposed to bleb leaks occurring.ConclusionOur data suggest that early bleb leak is not a poor prognostic indicator for intermediate bleb survival and IOP control in patients undergoing MMC trabeculectomy. No additional bleb manipulations compared with the control group were required to achieve a satisfactory IOP outcome.

Predictive value of early IOP in mitomycin-C augmented trabeculectomy.

PurposeTo determine whether early intraocular pressure (IOP) after mitomycin-C (MMC) augmented trabeculectomy has any predictive value for intermediate IOP outcome. MethodsRetrospective case note review. All cases of trabeculectomy using MMC augmentation and at least 1-year follow-up during the study period were included. Cases where a bleb leak occurred were excluded from the analysis. Only first eyes operated upon during the study period were included. Patient demographics and postoperative course were documented and analyzed. Early IOP measurements at day 1, day 7, and month 1 postoperatively were correlated to IOP at 1 year or final follow-up. ResultsOne hundred nineteen trabeculectomies were identified. Of these 27 (22.7%) had an early bleb leak and were excluded. Further analysis was carried out on the remaining 92 cases. Mean age of cases was 70.8 years. Nine cases (9.8%) were repeat trabeculectomies. Mean follow-up time was 18.5 months (range 12 to 60 mo). Patients with a final IOP of ≤16 mm Hg (without drops or further surgery) (unqualified successes) had a mean day 1 IOP of 12.5 mm Hg compared with 17.4 mm Hg in those with an IOP more than 16 mm Hg at final follow-up (P=0.02). Patients with a final IOP of ≤16 mm Hg (with or without drops) (qualified successes) had mean day 1 IOP of 13.3 mm Hg compared with 17.1 mm Hg in those with an IOP of >16 mm Hg at final follow-up (P=0.06). At 1 month the mean IOPs were 10.7 mm Hg and 19.5 mm Hg, respectively (P<0.001). By logistic regression analysis at final recorded visit those cases in the lowest IOP quartile at 1 month were 14 times more likely to have an IOP ≤16 mm Hg without treatment than those in the highest quartile at 1 month. ConclusionsOur data suggests that a low early postoperative IOP measurement is a predictive factor for IOP value and success after intermediate length follow-up in patients undergoing trabeculectomy surgery augmented with MMC.