Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where A.L. Fowler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by A.L. Fowler.


Journal of Animal Science | 2015

Phosphorus digestibility and phytate degradation by yearlings and mature horses.

A.L. Fowler; T.L. Hansen; L.A. Strasinger; B.E. Harlow; L.M. Lawrence

Inorganic P is often added to growing horse diets because organic P, or phytate-P, is believed to have lower digestibility. If horses can efficiently digest organic P, then the need for inorganic P may be reduced. Much of the P in grain-based concentrates fed to growing horses is in the form of phytate-P. Little is known about the ability of growing horses to degrade phytate-P or whether horse age affects mineral digestion in horses. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of age on P, Ca, and Mg digestibility as well as phytate-P degradation. Four yearling geldings and 4 mature geldings were fed a diet of alfalfa cubes, timothy cubes, and a pelleted concentrate. The diet contained 0.28% total P and 17.4% of that P was in the phytate form. There was a 14-d diet adaptation period followed by a 4-d fecal collection period. Apparent total tract P digestibility was higher for yearlings than mature geldings ( = 0.036; 7.7 and -6.6% for yearlings and mature geldings, respectively). Phytate-P disappearance was 94.8% and did not differ between ages ( = 0.190). Apparent Ca digestibility was lower in mature geldings ( = 0.043), but apparent Mg digestibility did not differ between ages ( = 0.414). Phytate is broken down in the gastrointestinal tract, but the low P digestibilities suggest that either degradation occurs after the site of P absorption or liberated P is recycled back into the gastrointestinal tract. Yearlings can utilize organic P as well as mature horses; therefore, diets without inorganic P are acceptable for growing horses.


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2018

Effects of Sampling Time, Cultivar, and Methodology on Water- and Ethanol-Soluble Carbohydrate Profiles of Three Cool-Season Grasses in Central Kentucky

Isabelle A. Kagan; L.M. Lawrence; Dwight H. Seman; Kelly Prince; A.L. Fowler; S. Ray Smith

Abstract Cool‐season grasses (CSGs) accumulate variable amounts of water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSCs, monosaccharides and disaccharides, and fructans), depending on climate, time of day and year, and genotype. Fructan concentrations in CSG are sometimes estimated as the difference between concentrations of WSC and ethanol‐soluble carbohydrates (ESCs, monosaccharides and disaccharides, and variable amounts of fructan). Characterizing both WSC and ESC may improve understanding of soluble carbohydrate profiles in pastures and inform grazing management decisions, particularly for horses at risk for laminitis. Three CSG cultivars from Kentucky pastures were collected in the morning and afternoon on two springtime dates. Water‐soluble carbohydrates and ESC were extracted with water or 80% ethanol, respectively, and analyzed by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and a colorimetric assay. Method of analysis (HPLC or colorimetry), and extraction solvent, affected the composition of WSC or ESC determined in CSG samples, demonstrating the need to consider methodology when interpreting results. Total soluble carbohydrate (mean of WSC and ESC) concentrations across cultivars and harvests were generally higher in the afternoon than in the morning, based on both HPLC (P = .0023) and colorimetric (P < .0001) analysis. The diurnal variation was mainly due to sucrose (P < .0001). Among cultivars, monosaccharides and disaccharides constituted the majority of the averaged WSC and ESC concentrations. The proportions of water‐ and ethanol‐soluble fructan (P = .0101), and fructan chain lengths detected in water and ethanol extracts (P < .0001), differed among CSG cultivars. In choosing CSG cultivars for pastures, both soluble carbohydrate composition and concentrations should be considered. HighlightsMonosaccharides and disaccharides constituted the majority of total water‐soluble carbohydrate (WSC) or ethanol‐soluble carbohydrate (ESC) in three cultivars of different cool‐season grasses collected in mid‐springtime from central Kentucky plots.Relative amounts of glucose, fructose, and sucrose detected depended on extraction parameters.Most diurnal variation in the averaged WSC and ESC concentrations was due to sucrose, not to fructan.Fructan concentration and chain length varied with cultivar.In one cultivar, short‐chain fructans were abundant in both WSC and ESC extracts. Therefore, using the difference between WSC and ESC concentrations to calculate fructan is not a correct practice.


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2018

Effect of starch source in pelleted concentrates on fecal bacteria in pre- and postpartum mares

M.B. Pyles; A.L. Fowler; V.T. Bill; Andrea D. Crum; S.H. Hayes; B.E. Harlow; Michael D. Flythe; L.M. Lawrence

&NA; Dietary starch source has been shown to affect fecal bacterial communities of horses fed minimally processed cereal grains. However, processing may increase foregut starch digestibility, reducing effects of starch source on fecal bacterial communities. This study aimed to determine the effect of starch source in pelleted concentrates on fecal Lactobacillus spp., amylolytic bacteria, and cellulolytic bacteria in broodmares mares, during the prepartum and postpartum period. Thoroughbred mares (n = 18) were paired by last breeding date then randomly assigned to either an oat‐based or a corn and wheat middlings‐based pelleted concentrate fed with forage. Mares were fed their assigned concentrates beginning on 310 days of gestation, and fecal samples were collected at 324 days of gestation, before parturition, 1 day, 14 days, and 28 days postpartum. Fecal samples were enumerated by serial dilution and inoculation into selective, enriched media for Lactobacillus spp., amylolytic bacteria, and cellulolytic bacteria. Data were log transformed then analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA with repeated measures (SAS 9.3) to test the main effects of treatment, time of sample, and treatment by time interaction. Starch source did not affect enumerated bacterial communities (P > .05); thus, pelleting concentrates may alter some of the effects of starch sources on the hindgut microbiota. Sample date did not affect amylolytic bacteria (P > .05); however, lactobacilli and cellulolytic bacteria decreased 1 day postpartum (P < .05). Although we did not observe an effect of starch source on fecal bacteria in mares, parturition did appear to alter the hindgut microbiota.


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2013

The availability of dietary phosphorus to long yearlings and mature horses

A.L. Fowler; L.A. Strasinger; T.L. Hansen; B.E. Davis; S.H. Hayes; L.M. Lawrence


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2013

An in vitro method for determining phosphorus availability in horse feeds

A.L. Fowler; L.A. Strasinger; S.H. Hayes; L.M. Lawrence


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2013

Microbial species richness of equine fecal microflora in horses challenged with antibiotics

B.E. Harlow; L.M. Lawrence; Michael D. Flythe; S.H. Hayes; G.L. Gellin; L.A. Strasinger; M. Brummer; A.L. Fowler


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2016

Effect of Soaking on Nitrate Concentrations in Teff Hay

T.L. Hansen; A.L. Fowler; Laura A. Strasinger; B.E. Harlow; S.H. Hayes; L.M. Lawrence


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2013

Foal behavior during the early neonatal period

L.A. Strasinger; A.L. Fowler; S.H. Hayes; L.M. Lawrence


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2017

Relationships between total body water, ultrasonic measures of fat depots and morphometric measurements in horses

A.L. Fowler; M.B. Pyles; V.T. Bill; S.H. Hayes; Andrea D. Crum; J. Parsons; L. Walling; A. Moffett-Krotky; P.A. Harris; L.M. Lawrence


Journal of Equine Veterinary Science | 2017

Effect of probiotics on antibiotic-induced changes in fecal bacteria of horses

M.B. Pyles; A.L. Fowler; V.T. Bill; Andrea D. Crum; S.H. Hayes; Michael D. Flythe; L.M. Lawrence

Collaboration


Dive into the A.L. Fowler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S.H. Hayes

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M.B. Pyles

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B.E. Harlow

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V.T. Bill

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T.L. Hansen

University of Kentucky

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. E. Harlow

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge