A. L. Jones
Cardiff University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. L. Jones.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2001
A. L. Jones; Nicholas John Leighton Sheen; R. V. North; James Edwards Morgan
BACKGROUND/AIMS To determine the reproducibility of the Humphrey optical coherence tomography scanner (OCT), software version 5.0, for measurement of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness in normal subjects and to compare OCT measurements with published histological thickness of the human RNFL. METHODS Three independent measurements were obtained at each session for one eye from 15 normal subjects with a mean age of 30.8 (SD 10.9) years. Scans were taken in the peripapillary retina using the default setting (1.74 mm radius from centre of the optic disc) and were repeated 1 week later. Additional scans were obtained at the optic nerve head (ONH) margin overlying the scleral rim, for comparison with available histological data on the human RNFL. RESULTS For the 1.74 mm circular scan, the mean coefficient of variation (COV) for the global RNFL thickness measurement was 5% (SD 3%). This increased to 8% (3%) for quadrant measurements and to 9% (3%) with further subdivision into 12 segments. Significant differences (p<0.05) between sessions were only found when the data were divided into segments. The mean RNFL thickness for the 1.74 mm scan was 127.87 (9.81) μm. The RNFL was maximal at the superior disc pole, 161.44 μm (14.8), and minimal at the temporal pole, 83.1 (12.8) μm. Peak thickness values occurred superior temporal and inferior temporal to the vertical axis. RNFL thickness for every sector of the disc was greatest at the margin of the optic disc (mean 185.79 μm; SD 32.61). Although the variation in RNFL thickness around the disc follows published histology data, the OCT underestimates RNFL thickness by an average of 37% (SD 11; range 21–48%). CONCLUSION The OCT provides reproducible measurement of the retinal structures that are consistent with the properties of the RNFL. However, comparison with available studies of RNFL thickness in the human suggests that in its present form, the OCT underestimates RNFL thickness. Further refinement of this technology is required to improve the accuracy with which the OCT measures retinal nerve fibre layer thickness.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2010
R. V. North; A. L. Jones; Neville Drasdo; John Millington Wild; James Edwards Morgan
PURPOSE The quantification of early retinal ganglion cell damage in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. METHODS Thirty subjects under treatment for open-angle glaucoma, 23 subjects with ocular hypertension, and 28 healthy subjects in a control group were investigated by monocular pattern electroretinogram (ERG), L&M (long and medium wavelength) cone ERG, and S (short wavelength)-cone ERG. The diagnosis of glaucoma was based on masked assessment of digital stereoscopic optic nerve head images by three glaucoma specialists. The optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer was assessed by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography. RESULTS All types of ERG had reduced mean amplitudes in ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma groups compared with the control group. In the ocular hypertension group, the N95 and the L&M-pathway photopic negative response (PhNR) were significantly attenuated (by 19% and 18% compared with the control group, respectively; by 30% and 22%, respectively, in the open-angle glaucoma group compared with the control group). In the subjects with open-angle glaucoma, the pattern ERG P50-N95 was found to be the most sensitive electrophysiological test, and the cup-disc area ratio, when examined by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, was the most sensitive imaging parameter. Modest but not statistically significant correlations were found between the imaging and electrophysiologic parameters. CONCLUSIONS With disc appearance used for the classification of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, significant electrophysiological losses were found in both conditions. The modest correlation between the structural and electrophysiological measures suggests that these assess different aspects of the pathologic process; electrophysiology can be used to quantify retinal ganglion cell dysfunction that occurs before cell death.
Eye | 2006
R. V. North; A. L. Jones; E. Hunter; James Edwards Morgan; John Millington Wild
AimsTo compare the efficacy of the high specificity Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimeter Screening Program (C-20-1) to standard threshold automated perimetry in the diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma.MethodsA total of 100 consecutively presenting patients attending a glaucoma clinic who volunteered for the study (approximately 30% of whom were attending for an initial visit) were examined with the FDT C-20-1 Screening Program and with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) SITA Fast algorithm and Program 24-2.ResultsOf the patients, 17 were excluded due to unreliable visual field results or non-glaucomatous ocular abnormalities. In all, 10 patients were diagnosed as normal, 54 with open-angle glaucoma, eight with ocular hypertension, and 11 as glaucoma suspects. Of the 54 glaucomatous patients, 45 exhibited high-tension glaucoma and nine normal tension glaucoma. Perimetry with the HFA gave a sensitivity of 81.5% for the combined category of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect and a specificity of 83.3% for the combined category of normal and ocular hypertension. Perimetry with the FDT gave a sensitivity of 74.5% and a specificity of 85.2% compared to that of the HFA.ConclusionIn the detection of glaucoma, Program C-20-1 of the FDT perimeter exhibits high specificity. It exhibits low sensitivity for the detection of mild loss but high sensitivity for advanced field loss relative to Program 24-2 and the SITA Fast algorithm of the HFA.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2006
John Millington Wild; Catherine R. Robson; A. L. Jones; Ian A. Cunliffe; Philip E. M. Smith
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 1995
A. L. Jones
Journal of Clinical Nursing | 1995
A. L. Jones
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2002
R. V. North; John Millington Wild; E. Hunter; A. L. Jones; James Edwards Morgan
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2008
R. V. North; A. L. Jones; Katharine Eirlys Mortlock; L. Phillips; James Edwards Morgan; Neville Drasdo
Journal of Aapos | 2007
Patrick Watts; Ping Ji; Magaret Woodhouse; A. L. Jones; James Edwards Morgan
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2003
A. L. Jones; R. V. North; Y. H. Aldebasi; James Edwards Morgan; Neville Drasdo