A.M. Bergman

Basis for effective combination cancer chemotherapy with antimetabolites.

Most current chemotherapy regimens for cancer consist of empirically designed combinations, based on efficacy and lack of overlapping toxicity. In the development of combinations, several aspects are often overlooked: (1) possible metabolic and biological interactions between drugs, (2) scheduling, and (3) different pharmacokinetic profiles. Antimetabolites are used widely in chemotherapy combinations for treatment of various leukemias and solid tumors. Ideally, the combination of two or more agents should be more effective than each agent separately (synergism), although additive and even antagonistic combinations may result in a higher therapeutic efficacy in the clinic. The median-drug effect analysis method is one of the most widely used methods for in vitro evaluation of combinations. Several examples of classical effective antimetabolite-(anti)metabolite combinations are discussed, such as that of methotrexate with 6-mercaptopurine or leucovorin in (childhood) leukemia and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) with leucovorin in colon cancer. More recent combinations include treatment of acute-myeloid leukemia with fludarabine and arabinosylcytosine. Other combinations, currently frequently used in the treatment of solid malignancies, include an antimetabolite with a DNA-damaging agent, such as gemcitabine with cisplatin and 5FU with the cisplatin analog oxaliplatin. The combination of 5FU and the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan is based on decreased repair of irinotecan-induced DNA damage. These combinations may increase induction of apoptosis. The latter combinations have dramatically changed the treatment of incurable cancers, such as lung and colon cancer, and have demonstrated that rationally designed drug combinations offer new possibilities to treat solid malignancies.

Mechanisms of synergism between cisplatin and gemcitabine in ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines

Summary2′,2′-Difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine, dFdC) and cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum (cisplatin, CDDP) are active agents against ovarian cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). CDDP acts by formation of platinum (Pt)–DNA adducts; dFdC by dFdCTP incorporation into DNA, subsequently leading to inhibition of exonuclease and DNA repair. Previously, synergism between both compounds was found in several human and murine cancer cell lines when cells were treated with these drugs in a constant ratio. In the present study we used different combinations of both drugs (one drug at its IC25 and the other in a concentration range) in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, its CDDP-resistant variant ADDP, its dFdC-resistant variant AG6000 and two NSCLC cell lines, H322 (human) and Lewis lung (LL) (murine). Cells were exposed for 4, 24 and 72 h with a total culture time of 96 h, and possible synergism was evaluated by median drug effect analysis by calculating a combination index (CI; CI < 1 indicates synergism). With CDDP at its IC25, the average CIs calculated at the IC50, IC75 IC90 and IC95 after 4, 24 and 72 h of exposure were < 1 for all cell lines, indicating synergism, except for the CI after 4 h exposure in the LL cell line which showed an additive effect. With dFdC at its IC25, the CIs for the combination with CDDP after 24 h were < 1 in all cell lines, except for the Cls after 4 h exposure in the LL and H322 cell lines which showed an additive effect. At 72 h exposure all Cls were < 1. CDDP did not significantly affect dFdCTP accumulation in all cell lines. CDDP increased dFdC incorporation into both DNA and RNA of the A2780 cell lines 33- and 79-fold (P < 0.01) respectively, and tended to increase the dFdC incorporation into RNA in all cell lines. In the AG6000 and LL cell lines, CDDP and dFdC induced > 25% more DNA strand breaks (DSB) than each drug alone; however, in the other cell lines no effect, or even a decrease in DSB, was observed. dFdC increased the cellular Pt accumulation after 24 h incubation only in the ADDP cell line. However, dFdC did enhance the Pt–DNA adduct formation in the A2780, AG6000, ADDP and LL cell lines (1.6-, 1.4-, 2.9- and 1.6-fold respectively). This increase in Pt–DNA adduct formation seems to be related to the incorporation of dFdC into DNA (r = 0.91). No increase in DNA platination was found in the H322 cell line. dFdC only increased Pt–DNA adduct retention in the A2780 and LL cell lines, but decreased the Pt–DNA adduct retention in the AG6000 cell line. In conclusion, the synergism between dFdC and CDDP appears to be mainly due to an increase in Pt–DNA adduct formation possibly related to changes in DNA due to dFdC incorporation into DNA.

Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine of P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-overexpressing human cancer cell lines

Gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a deoxycytidine analogue that is activated by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) to its monophosphate and subsequently to its triphosphate dFdCTP, which is incorporated into both RNA and DNA, leading to DNA damage. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is characterised by an overexpression of the membrane efflux pumps P-glycoprotein (P-gP) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). Gemcitabine was tested against human melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, epidermoid carcinoma and ovarian cancer cells with an MDR phenotype as a result of selection by drug exposure or by transfection with the mdr1 gene. These cell lines were nine- to 72-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental cell lines. The doxorubicin-resistant cells 2R120 (MRP1) and 2R160 (P-gP) were nine- and 28-fold more sensitive to gemcitabine than their parental SW1573 cells, respectively (P<0.01), which was completely reverted by 25u2009μM verapamil. In 2R120 and 2R160 cells, dCK activities were seven- and four-fold higher than in SW1573, respectively, which was associated with an increased dCK mRNA and dCK protein. Inactivation by deoxycytidine deaminase was 2.9- and 2.2-fold decreased in 2R120 and 2R160, respectively. dFdCTP accumulation was similar in SW1573 and its MDR variants after 24u2009h exposure to 0.1u2009μM gemcitabine, but dFdCTP was retained longer in 2R120 (P<0.001) and 2R160 (P<0.003) cells. 2R120 and 2R160 cells also incorporated four- and six-fold more [3H]gemcitabine into DNA (P<0.05), respectively. P-glycoprotein and MRP1 overexpression possibly caused a cellular stress resulting in increased gemcitabine metabolism and sensitivity, while reversal of collateral gemcitabine sensitivity by verapamil also suggests a direct relation between the presence of membrane efflux pumps and gemcitabine sensitivity.

Differential effects of gemcitabine on ribonucleotide pools of twenty-one solid tumour and leukaemia cell lines

To gain a more detailed insight into the metabolism of 2, 2-difluoro-2-deoxycytidine (dFdC, gemcitabine, Gemzar) and its effect on normal ribonucleotide (NTP) metabolism in relation to sensitivity, we studied the accumulation of dFdCTP and the changes in NTP pools after dFdC exposure in a panel of 21 solid tumour and leukaemia cell lines. Both sensitivity to dFdC and accumulation of dFdCTP were clearly cell line-dependent: in this panel of cell lines, the head and neck cancer (HNSCC) cell line 22B appeared to be the most sensitive, whereas the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines were the least sensitive to dFdC. The human leukaemia cell line CCRF-CEM accumulated the highest concentration of dFdCTP, whereas the non-SCLC cell lines accumulated the least. Not only the amount of dFdCTP accumulation was clearly related to the sensitivity for dFdC (R=-0.61), but also the intrinsic CTP/UTP ratio (R=0.97). NTP pools were affected considerably by dFdC treatment: in seven cell lines dFdC resulted in a 1.7-fold depletion of CTP pools, in two cell lines CTP pools were unaffected, but in 12 cell lines CTP pools increased about 2-fold. Furthermore, a 1.6-1.9-fold rise in ATP, UTP and GTP pools was shown in 20, 19 and 20 out of 21 cell lines, respectively. Only the UTP levels after treatment with dFdC were clearly related to the amount of dFdCTP accumulating in the cell (R=0.64 (P<0.01)), but not to the sensitivity to dFdC treatment. In conclusion, we demonstrate that besides the accumulation of dFdCTP, the CTP/UTP ratio was clearly related to the sensitivity to dFdC. Furthermore, the UTP levels and the CTP/UTP ratio after treatment were related to dFdCTP accumulation. Therefore, both the CTP and UTP pools appear to play an important role in the sensitivity to dFdC.

Cross-resistance in the 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine)-resistant human ovarian cancer cell line AG6000 to standard and investigational drugs

Gemcitabine (2-2-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) is a deoxycytidine analogue which is effective against solid tumours, including lung cancer and ovarian cancer. dFdC requires phosphorylation by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) for activation. In the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and its 30,000-fold dFdC-resistant variant AG6000 (P<0.001), we investigated the cross-resistance profile to several drugs. AG6000, which has a complete dCK deficiency, was approximately 1000-10,000-fold resistant to other deoxynucleoside analogues such as 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl cytosine, 2-chloro-deoxyadenosine, aza-deoxycytidine and 2, 2-difluorodeoxyguanosine (dFdG) (P<0.001). dFdG can be activated by dCK and deoxyguanosine kinase (dGK), but the latter enzyme was not altered in AG6000 cells. Thus dFdG resistance was only due to dCK deficiency. AG6000 was 1.6- and 46.7-fold resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and ZD1694, respectively (the latter was significant; P<0.01), which may be due to the 1.7-fold higher thymidylate synthase (TS) activity, but AG6000 cells were also 2. 7-fold resistant to the lipophilic TS inhibitor AG337 (P<0.05). Remarkably, AG6000 cells were 2.5-fold more sensitive to methotrexate (MTX) (P<0.01) than A2780 cells, but 1.6-fold more resistant to trimetrexate (TMQ) (P<0.10). However, no differences in reduced folate carrier activity, folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) activity and polyglutamation of MTX were found between the cell lines. AG6000 cells were approximately 2 to 7.5-fold more resistant to doxorubicin (DOX), daunorubicin (DAU), epirubicin and vincristine (VCR) (the latter was significant; P<0.02) and approximately 4-fold more resistant to the microtubule inhibitors paclitaxel and docetaxel (P<0.001). Fluorescent activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis revealed no P-glycoprotein (Pgp) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) expression, but less fluorescence of intercalated DAU in AG6000 cells. An approximately 2-fold resistance to the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors etoposide, CPT-11 and SN38 was found in AG6000 cells. Topoisomerase I and IIalpha RNA expression was decreased in AG6000 cells. AG6000 was 2.4, 2.4, 2.3 and 3.7-fold more resistant to EO9 (P<0.02), mitomycin-C (MMC) (P<0.05), cisplatin (CDDP) (P<0.10) and maphosphamide (MAPH), respectively. DT-diaphorase (DTD), which activates EO9, was 2.2-fold lower in AG6000 cells. CDDP resistance might be related to a reduced retention of DNA adducts in AG6000. However, glutathione levels were equal in A2780 and AG6000 cells. A 24 h exposure to DOX, VCR and paclitaxel at equimolar and equitoxic concentrations, resulted in more double-strand breaks (1.5- to 2-fold) in A2780 than in AG6000 cells. MAPH at 1120 nM and 17 nM of EO9 did not cause DNA damage in either cell line. In conclusion, AG6000 is a cell line highly cross-resistant to a wide variety of drugs. This cross-resistance might be related to altered enzyme activities and/or increased DNA repair.

Mechanisms of synergism between gemcitabine and cisplatin.

2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (Gemcitabine, dFdC) is an antineoplastic agent with clinical activity against several cancer types.1 cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (cisplatin, CDDP) is a drug with long established anticancer activity, which acts by Platinum (Pt)-DNA adduct formation.2,3 Because of the low toxicity profile of dFdC and the differences in mechanism of cytotoxicity, preclinical studies were performed that demonstrated synergism between dFdC and CDDP in several cancer cell lines and in vivo,4–8 which is likely to be related to increased formation of Pt-DNA adducts.8 Pre-treatment with dFdC gave the best results both in vitro and in vivo.6,7,8 Several potential mechanisms underlying the synergism were studied in vitro, based on these results several schedules were studied in patients.

Differential effects of gemcitabine on nucleotide pools of 19 solid tumor cell lines.

2,2-Difluorodeoxycytidine (dFdC, Gemcitabine, Gemzar) is a deoxycytidine analogue, which is very active against murine experimental tumor models, human tumor xenografts and in clinical Phase II studies.12 After entering the cell gemcitabine is phos-phorylated to its active metabolite gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK),3,4 incorporated into the DNA, and then, after adding one more nucleotide, polymerisation stops.5 Gemcitabine not only acts on DNA but has several selfpotentiating interactions within the cell, such as incorporation into RNA6 and inhibition of ribonu-cleotide reductase, thereby depleting the cell of deoxyribonucleotides and favouring its own incorporation into DNA.7

Erratum: Determinants of resistance to 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) (Drug Resistance Updates (2002) 5 (19-33) S136876460200002X)

The inherent or induced resistance of tumors to cytostatic agents is a major clinical problem. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical mechanisms of acquired and inherent resistance to the fluorinated deoxycytidine analog gemcitabine (2,2-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC, Gemzar((R))), which has proven activity in non-small cell lung carcinoma, pancreatic and bladder cancer. Extensive research has been performed to elucidate the complex mechanism of action of this relatively new drug. Gemcitabine requires phosphorylation to mono-, di- and triphosphates to be active. Similar to the structurally and functionally related deoxycytidine analog ara-C, the first, crucial step in phosphorylation is catalyzed by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). However, in contrast to ara-C, gemcitabine has multiple intracellular targets; up- or down-regulation of these targets may confer resistance to this drug. Resistance is associated with altered activities of enzymes involved in the metabolism of the drug, of target enzymes, and of enzymes involved in programmed cell death. However, the only strong correlations with gemcitabine sensitivity are dCK activity and dFdCTP pools, with a potential important role for ribonucleotide reductase.

Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine (dFdC) of P-gP and MRP overexpressing human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines

Gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine, dFdC) is a deoxycytidine analog with proven activity in ovarian and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) both in vivo and in vitro (1–3). Deoxycytidine (dCyd) and dFdC are phosphorylated by deoxycytitidine kinase (dCK) to their monophosphates, which are subsequently phosphorylated to dCTP and dFdCTP, respectively. DFdCTP can be incorporated into both DNA and RNA (4,5). Other enzymes involved in deoxynucleoside metabolism are the mitochondrial enzyme thymid-ine kinase 2 (TK2) which phosphorylates the natural nucleosides thymidine (TdR), dCyd and deoxyuridine. This in contrast to the cytosolic enzyme thymidine kinase 1, which only phosphorylates thymidine but not dCyd (6). Since dCTP is the major feedback inhibitor of dCK and competes with dFdCTP for DNA polymerase, an increase in dCTP pools will decrease dFdC sensitivity (7,8).