A. M. Gianni

Efficacy, toxicity, and applicability of high-dose sequential chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer with 10 or more involved axillary nodes: five-year results.

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy, toxicity, and applicability of high-dose therapy administered as adjuvant initial treatment to women with breast cancer with extensive nodal involvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-seven patients with stage II to III breast cancer involving > or = 10 axillary nodes received a novel high-dose sequential (HDS) regimen, including the high-dose administration of three non-cross-resistant drugs (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and melphalan) given within the shortest interval of time as possible with hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. RESULTS Sixty-three patients completed the program as planned, one patient died of acute toxicity, and three patients were switched to standard-dose adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up duration of 48.5 months and a lead follow-up of 78 months, actuarial relapse-free survival for all 67 registered patients is 57% and overall survival is 70%, respectively. Comparison with a historical control group of 58 consecutive patients showed a significantly superior rate of freedom from relapse for the HDS-treated group (57% v 41%, respectively), in particular when two subgroups of patients, more homogeneous for their number of involved nodes, were compared (65% v 42%). Overall, treatment was of short duration (median, 70 days), required a median of 32 days of hospital stay, and was associated with only a few severe side effects (the most distressing being oral mucositis after melphalan therapy). CONCLUSION HDS therapy emerges as an effective and applicable regimen, whose major toxicity was occasional. Final assessment of its value in a randomized, multicenter trial is presently underway.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning can induce durable clinical and molecular remissions in relapsed lymphomas: pre-transplant disease status and histotype heavily influence outcome

The safety and efficacy of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for relapsed lymphomas remains unresolved. We conducted a prospective, multicentered, phase II trial. A total of 170 relapsed/refractory lymphomas received a RIC regimen followed by SCT from sibling donors. The primary study end point was non-relapse mortality (NRM). Histologies were non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHL) (indolent (LG-NHL), n=63; aggressive (HG-NHL), n=61; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), n=14) and Hodgkins disease (HD, n=32). Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 12–82). The results show that frequencies were as follows: cumulative NRM at 3 years, 14%; acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) 35 and 52%, respectively; 3-year overall survival (OS), 69% for LG-NHL, 69% for HG-NHL, 45% for MCL and 32% for HD (P=0.058); and 3-year relapse incidence, 29, 31, 35 and 81%, respectively (P<0.001). Relapse risk differed significantly at 3 years between follicular lymphoma (FL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (14 versus 46%, P=0.04). Molecular remission occurred in 94 and 40% (P=0.002) of patients with FL and CLL, respectively. On multivariate analysis, OS was influenced by chemorefractory disease (hazard ratio (HR)=3.6), diagnosis of HD (HR=3.5), and acute GVHD (HR=5.9). RIC allogeneic SCT is a feasible and effective salvage strategy in both indolent and aggressive NHL

High-dose sequential chemoradiotherapy, a widely applicable regimen, confers survival benefit to patients with high-risk multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE To assess the toxicity, efficacy, and applicability of high-dose therapy with bone marrow and/or peripheral-blood autotransplantation in high-risk, previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirteen consecutive patients with high-labeling index (LI) multiple myeloma received a novel high-dose sequential (HDS) regimen consisting in the high-dose administration of cyclophosphamide (7 g/m2) followed by vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) plus methotrexate (8 g/m2 with leucovorin rescue), etoposide (2 g/m2) and, finally, total-body irradiation (TBI; 10 Gy) plus melphalan (120 mg/m2) with autografting of peripheral-blood hematopoietic progenitor cells. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF; 5 micrograms/kg/d) was continuously infused after cyclophosphamide and etoposide both to accelerate hematopoietic recovery and to expand/mobilize the hematopoietic progenitor-cell pool. RESULTS Among 13 patients, 12 completed the program; 10 (or 77%) achieved a complete response and five are alive and disease-free after a median follow-up duration of 36 months (range, 24 to 52). The durations of both freedom from progression (FFP; median, 38 months) and overall survival (OS; median, 41 months) were significantly superior in the 13 HDS-treated patients as compared with 19 well-matched historical controls. CONCLUSION HDS emerges as a highly effective, well-tolerated, and widely accessible regimen capable of imparting a survival benefit to patients with high-LI multiple myeloma. Larger studies using this or similar programs in standard-risk myeloma are clearly warranted.

Prolonged survival in poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following front-line treatment with rituximab-supplemented, early-intensified chemotherapy with multiple autologous hematopoietic stem cell support: a multicenter study by GITIL (Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi)

A prospective multicenter program was performed to evaluate the combination of rituximab and high-dose (hd) sequential chemotherapy delivered with multiple autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support (R-HDS-maps regimen) in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and age-adjusted International Prognostic Score (aaIPI) score 2-3. R-HDS-maps includes: (i) three APO courses; (ii) sequential administration of hd-cyclophosphamide (CY), hd-Ara-C, both supplemented with rituximab, hd-etoposide/cisplatin, PBPC harvests, following hd-CY and hd-Ara-C; (iii) hd-mitoxantrone (hd-Mito)/L-Pam + 2 further rituximab doses; (iv) involved-field radiotherapy. PBPC rescue was scheduled following Ara-C, etoposide/cisplatin and Mito/L-Pam. Between 1999 and 2004, 112 consecutive patients aged <65 years (74 score 2, 38 score 3) entered the study protocol. There were five early and two late toxic deaths. Overall 90 patients (80%) reached clinical remission (CR); at a median 48 months follow-up, 87 (78%) patients are alive, 82 (73%) in continuous CR, with 4 year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) projections of 76% (CI 68–85%) and 73% (CI 64–81%), respectively. There were no significant differences in OS and EFS between subgroups with Germinal-Center and Activated B-cell phenotype. Thus, life expectancy of younger patients with aaIPI 2-3 DLB-CL is improved with the early administration of rituximab-supplemented intensive chemotherapy compared with the poor outcome following conventional chemotherapy.

High-dose ara-C with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support induces a marked progenitor cell mobilization: an indication for patients at risk for low mobilization

A high-dose (HD) chemotherapy scheme was designed for the collection of large numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in lymphoma patients who were candidates for myeloablative therapy with autograft. The scheme included the sequential administration of HD cyclophosphamide (CY) (7 g/m2) and HD ara-C (2 g/m2 twice a day for 6 consecutive days), followed by final consolidation with PBPC autograft. PBPC harvests were scheduled following both HD CY and HD ara-C. To minimize hematologic toxicity, small aliquots of PBPC (⩽3 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) collected following HD CY were reinfused following HD ara-C. The treatment was delivered to 112 patients (median age: 43 years) with lymphoid malignancies (107 non-Hodgkins lymphoma, four Hodgkins lymphoma, one amyloidosis); 75 patients were at disease onset, whereas 37 had relapsed or were refractory after first-line conventional therapy. PBPC mobilization was assessed in terms of peak values of circulating CD34+ cells/μl, as well as total CD34+ cells/kg collected. In a few patients CFU-GM/kg were also evaluated. At the time of maximal mobilization following HD CY, 93 ‘high-mobilizer’ patients had >20 circulating CD34+ cells/μl, whereas the remaining 19 ‘low-mobilizer’ patients did not reach this cut-off value. In spite of poor mobilization after HD CY, 16 out of 19 low mobilizers provided good harvests following HD ara-C; overall, median collected CD34+ cells × 106/kg were 1.4 (0–3.1) and 10.2 (0–37) after HD CY and HD ara-C, respectively (P = 0.00007). Similar patterns were observed when PBPC were evaluated by CFU-GM/kg. Complete and durable hemopoietic reconstitution followed autograft with post HD ara-C PBPC. Within the high-mobilizer group, 88 patients received HD ara-C and 79 (90%) still showed high mobilization; overall, median collected CD34+cells × 106/kg were 17.8 (range 3–94) and 19 (range 0–107) after HD CY and HD ara-C respectively (P = NS). Thus, the scheme allowed sufficient PBPC collections for autografting in low mobilizer patients; in addition, the scheme could be considered whenever extensive chemotherapy debulking is needed prior to PBPC collection.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion makes high-dose etoposide a safe outpatient regimen that is effective in lymphoma and myeloma patients.

PURPOSE This study assessed the efficacy of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) or recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) in ameliorating the extent and duration of hematologic toxicity after high-dose etoposide cancer therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-two non-Hodgkins lymphoma and myeloma patients were treated with 2 to 2.4 g/m2 etoposide infused intravenously (IV) during a 10- to 12-hour period, followed 72 hours later by subcutaneous administration of rhGM-CSF or rhG-CSF. Hematologic toxicity was compared with that observed in 29 patients who were treated with high-dose etoposide without growth factors. RESULTS The median duration of grade 4 neutropenia in growth factor-treated patients was 3 days, and granulocyte counts never decreased to less than 100/microL in approximately half of the patients. The corresponding figures in the control patients were 8 and 3 days, respectively (P < .0001). No effect was observed in platelet and RBC recovery. Growth factor-treated patients became eligible to receive additional myelotoxic chemotherapy a median of 5 days earlier than controls. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal. Grade 1 mucositis was observed in two of 61 patients (3%). Antitumor activity assessed within 1 month after etoposide administration was documented in 58% of 38 assessable patients. Finally, high-dose etoposide expanded and mobilized the pool of peripheral-blood hematopoietic progenitors. CONCLUSION The use of rhGM-CSF or rhG-CSF makes high-dose etoposide a safe outpatient regimen and should encourage the inclusion of this highly effective and well-tolerated drug in novel treatment strategies that use high-dose therapy early in the clinical course of chemosensitive tumors.

Adenovirus vectors for gene transduction into mobilized blood CD34 + cells

Mobilized blood CD34+ cells from cancer patients were ex vivo infected by a recombinant adenovirus vector carrying an alkaline phosphatase gene, whose expression is evaluable by flow cytometry. A mean of 40% CD34+ cells were infected by the vector, with high levels of expression of the transgene. Among attempts to improve infection efficiency by manipulating culture conditions, only reinfection by the same vector achieved a 10% increase of transgene expression. Transduced CD34+ cells were induced to differentiate along the myeloid and the dendritic lineage, and in either case AP+ cells were detectable among the differentiated cell population. We conclude that adenovirus vectors may be useful tools for gene transduction into mobilized blood CD34+ cells, particularly for those applications in which high transgene expression for limited periods of time is required.

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy.

PURPOSE We compared hematologic and clinical effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX, 7 g/m2), given as the first phase of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy program that includes a myeloablative therapy with mobilized progenitor cell autografting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-nine consecutive patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma, Hodgkins disease, or poor-prognosis breast cancer received GM-CSF (n = 27) or G-CSF (n = 22) after HD-CTX in two consecutive, nonrandomized studies. Cytokines were administered in continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 14 to 15 days at a median dose of 5.5 and 10 micrograms/kg/d, respectively, starting 24 hours after HD-CTX. RESULTS Neutrophil recovery was faster with G-CSF administration (11.5 v 13.2 days; P = .01), whereas platelet counts recovered more rapidly with GM-CSF (13.7 v 16.6 days; P = .01). Prophylactic platelet transfusions were administered more frequently to patients treated with G-CSF than with GM-CSF (66% v 22% of the patients; P = .02). No clinically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning days of absolute neutropenia or neutropenic fever. Both cytokines reduced the time to eligibility for subsequent chemotherapy administration compared with historical controls not given cytokine (14 to 16 v 20 days). Both cytokines increased circulation of hematopoietic progenitors. Most side effects were World Health Organization (WHO) median grade 1 to 2, were more frequent during GM-CSF than during G-CSF treatment, and were reversible by simple supportive measures and/or by dose reduction or suspension of the cytokine. Permanent suspension of cytokine administration was never required in either group. CONCLUSION GM-CSF or G-CSF administration after HD-CTX reduces hematologic toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and induces circulation of large amounts of hematopoietic progenitors suitable for autografting in cancer patients.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy and in vivo rituximab-purged stem cell autografting in mantle cell lymphoma: a 10-year update of the R-HDS regimen

High-dose sequential chemotherapy and in vivo rituximab-purged stem cell autografting in mantle cell lymphoma: a 10-year update of the R-HDS regimen

Perifosine and sorafenib combination induces mitochondrial cell death and antitumor effects in NOD/SCID mice with Hodgkin lymphoma cell line xenografts

The effects of the Akt inhibitor perifosine and the RAF/MEK/ERK inhibitor sorafenib were investigated using two CD30+Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines (L-540 and HDLM-2) and the CD30−HD-MyZ histiocytic cell line. The combined perifosine/sorafenib treatment significantly inhibited mitogen-activated protein kinase and Akt phosphorylation in two of the three cell lines. Profiling of the responsive cell lines revealed that perifosine/sorafenib decreased the amplitude of transcriptional signatures that are associated with the cell cycle, DNA replication and cell death. Tribbles homolog 3 (TRIB3) was identified as the main mediator of the in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of perifosine/sorafenib. Combined treatment compared with single agents significantly suppressed cell growth (40–80%, P<0.001), induced severe mitochondrial dysfunction and necroptotic cell death (up to 70%, P<0.0001) in a synergistic manner. Furthermore, in vivo xenograft studies demonstrated a significant reduction in tumor burden (P<0.0001), an increased survival time (81 vs 45 days, P<0.0001), an increased apoptosis (2- to 2.5-fold, P<0.0001) and necrosis (2- to 8-fold, P<0.0001) in perifosine/sorafenib-treated animals compared with mice receiving single agents. These data provide a rationale for clinical trials using perifosine/sorafenib combination.