A. M. Rodin
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. M. Rodin.
Physics Letters B | 1998
G. M. Ter-Akopian; A. M. Rodin; A. S. Fomichev; S. I. Sidorchuk; S. V. Stepantsov; R. Wolski; M. L. Chelnokov; V. A. Gorshkov; A.Yu. Lavrentev; V. I. Zagrebaev; Yu. Ts. Oganessian
Differential cross sections for the elastic scattering of 6 He exotic nuclei from a gaseous helium target has been measured in a wide angular range in the CM system at a 6 He beam energy of 151 MeV. The large cross-sections obtained at backward angles are discussed in terms of a two-neutron exchange process. The results of DWBA calculations show that this effect can account for the cross sections obtained between 1208 and 1608 assuming the spectroscopic factor to be about 1 for the di-neutron cluster as was predicted by theory for 6 He. q 1998 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Physics Letters B | 1999
R. Wolski; A. S. Fomichev; A. M. Rodin; S. I. Sidorchuk; S. V. Stepantsov; G. M. Ter-Akopian; M. L. Chelnokov; V. A. Gorshkov; A.Yu. Lavrentev; Yu. Ts. Oganessian; P. Roussel-Chomaz; W. Mittig; I. David
Abstract Angular distributions for elastic scattering and 1n and 2n transfer reactions were measured for the 6 He + 1 H system at 25 MeV/nucleon. The experimental data were analyzed in the framework of the one-step finite range DWBA model. The results suggest a lower triton spectroscopic amplitude for the 6 He nucleus as compared to the shell model calculation.
Physics Letters B | 2002
S. V. Stepantsov; D. D. Bogdanov; A. S. Fomichev; A. M. Rodin; S. I. Sidorchuk; R. S. Slepnev; G. M. Ter-Akopian; R. Wolski; M. L. Chelnokov; V. A. Gorshkov; Yu. Ts. Oganessian; N. Alamanos; F. Auger; V. Lapoux; G Lobo; K. Amos; P.K Deb; S. Karataglidis; M. S. Golovkov; A. A. Korsheninnikov; I. Tanihata; E. A. Kuzmin; E. Yu. Nikolskii; R.L Kavalov
The structure of 6 He is explored with proton elastic and inelastic scattering to the first 2 + excited state (Q =− 1. 8M eV) of 6 He in the inverse kinematics using a 24.5 A MeV 6 He beam. The distorted wave approximation (DWA) with an optical potential obtained by folding an effective nucleon–nucleon (NN) g-matrix with the 6 He density matrix elements as given by a large basis shell model is used to analyse the data. The comparison of predictions with the data confirms the view that 6 He has
Physical Review C | 2005
L. Giot; P. Roussel-Chomaz; C. E. Demonchy; W. Mittig; H. Savajols; N. Alamanos; F. Auger; A. Gillibert; C. Jouanne; V. Lapoux; L. Nalpas; E. C. Pollacco; J. L. Sida; F. Skaza; M. D. Cortina-Gil; J. Fernandez-Vasquez; R.S. Mackintosh; A. Pakou; S. Pita; A. M. Rodin; S. V. Stepantsov; G. M. Ter Akopian; K. Rusek; I. J. Thompson; R. Wolski
The +2n and t+t clustering of the 6He ground state were investigated by means of the transfer reaction 6He(p,t)4He at 25 MeV/nucleon. The experiment was performed in inverse kinematics at GANIL with the SPEG spectrometer coupled to the MUST array. Experimental data for the transfer reaction were analyzed by a distorted wave Born approximation (DWBA) calculation, including the two neutrons and the triton transfer. The couplings to the 6He4He+2n breakup channels were taken into account with a polarization potential deduced from a coupled-discretized-continuum channels analysis of the 6He+1H elastic scattering measured at the same time. The influence on the calculations of the +t exit potential and of the triton sequential transfer is discussed. The final calculation gives a spectroscopic factor close to one for the +2n configuration as expected. The spectroscopic factor obtained for the t+t configuration is much smaller than the theoretical predictions.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-beam Interactions With Materials and Atoms | 2003
A. M. Rodin; S. V. Stepantsov; D. D. Bogdanov; M. S. Golovkov; A. S. Fomichev; S. I. Sidorchuk; R. S. Slepnev; R. Wolski; G. M. Ter-Akopian; Yu. Ts. Oganessian; A. A. Yukhimchuk; V. V. Perevozchikov; Yu. I. Vinogradov; S. K. Grishechkin; A. M. Demin; S. V. Zlatoustovskiy; A. V. Kuryakin; S.V. Fil’chagin; R. I. Il'kaev
AbstractTheseparatorACCULINNAwasupgradedtoachievenewexperimentalrequirements.Thebeamlinewasextendedbynewion-opticalelementsbeyondthecyclotronhall.Thenewarrangementsyieldmuchbetterbackgroundcondi-tions.Theintensitiesof 6 Heand 8 Heradioactivebeamsproducedinfragmentationof35AMeV 11 Bionswereincreaseduptoafactorof10.Theupgradedbeamlinewasusedinexperimentstostudythe 5 Hresonancestatespopulatedinthet þt reaction.Acryogenicliquidtritiumtargetwasdesignedandinstalledattheseparatorbeamline. 2002ElsevierScienceB.V.Allrightsreserved. PACS:25.70.Mn;29.25.RmKeywords:Radioactive ion beams;Productiontarget;Profileddegrader;Liquidtritiumtarget 1.IntroductionTheseparatorACCULINNA[1]isinoperationsince1996.Highintensityprimarybeamsof 7 Li, 11 B, 13 C, 15 Nand 18 Owithenergyvaluesrangingbetween32and50AMeVaredeliveredbytheU-400Mcyclotrontotheproductiontargetoftheseparator.Thesecondarybeamsof 6 Heand 8 Henucleiwithenergiesofabout25AMeVallowedustogainnewinsightsintothestructureofneutronhalonucleithroughthestudyofone-andtwo-neutrontransferreactionsmadewithhydrogenandheliumtargets[2–5].Suchbeamsofferfavor-ableconditionsfortheproductionofsofarun-knownparticle-unstablenucleibeyondtheneutrondripline.Forthispurposeonecoulduseone-stepone-proton and two-neutron transfer reactionsoccurringwheneither
Physical Review C | 2007
M. S. Golovkov; L. V. Grigorenko; A. S. Fomichev; A. V. Gorshkov; V. A. Gorshkov; S. A. Krupko; Yu. Ts. Oganessian; A. M. Rodin; S. I. Sidorchuk; R. S. Slepnev; S. V. Stepantsov; G. M. Ter-Akopian; R. Wolski; A. A. Korsheninnikov; E. Yu. Nikolskii; V. A. Kuzmin; B. G. Novatskii; D. N. Stepanov; P. Roussel-Chomaz; W. Mittig
The spectrum of
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2000
V. Avdeichikov; A. S. Fomichev; B. Jakobsson; A. M. Rodin; G. M. Ter-Akopian
^{9}\mathrm{He}
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics | 2001
A. V. Ramayya; J. H. Hamilton; J. K. Hwang; C. J. Beyer; G.M. Ter Akopian; A.V. Daniel; J. O. Rasmussen; S. C. Wu; R. Donangelo; J. Kormicki; X. Q. Zhang; A. M. Rodin; A. Formichev; J. Kliman; L. Krupa; Yu. Ts. Oganessian; G. Chubaryan; D. Seweryniak; R. V. F. Janssens; W. C. Ma; R. B. Piercey; J. D. Cole
was studied by means of the
Physics of Atomic Nuclei | 2001
M. S. Golovkov; A. A. Korsheninnikov; I. Tanihata; D. D. Bogdanov; M. L. Chelnokov; A. S. Fomichev; V. A. Gorshkov; Yu. Ts. Oganessian; A. M. Rodin; S. I. Sidorchuk; S. V. Stepantsov; G. M. Ter-Akopian; R. Wolski; W. Mittig; P. Roussel-Chomaz; H. Savajols; E. A. Kuzmin; E. Yu. Nikolskii; B. G. Novatskii; A. A. Ogloblin
^{2}\mathrm{H}
Physics Letters B | 1982
D.D. Bogdanov; M.P. Ivanov; G.S. Popeko; A. M. Rodin; G. M. Ter-Akopian; V.I. Vakatov; A.S. Voronin
(