A.M.S Kumar
Drexel University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A.M.S Kumar.
Transplantation | 1998
Mysore S. Anil Kumar; D. Panigrahi; Christopher M. Dezii; George M. Abouna; Robert Chvala; Joseph Brezin; A.M.S Kumar; Shiela M. Katz; Mary McSorley; David A. Laskow
BACKGROUND Traditionally, elderly donor kidneys have not been widely accepted for transplantation on the assumption of inferior performance. However, the United Network for Organ Sharing reports an increase in the number of elderly donors from less than 2% in 1982 to 24% in 1995. This trend is commensurate with the increase of older dialysis patients and an overall increase in the elderly population in the United States (1). Optimal utilization of these kidneys is essential to overcome the acute organ shortage. METHODS In this study, we transplanted 25 kidneys from elderly donors (ages 56-72 years) into young adult recipients (ages 20-50 years) (group 1) over a 4-year period. We compared the results with matched recipients of young adult donor kidneys (group 2) with regard to long-term kidney function and graft survival. A pretransplant biopsy of elderly donor kidneys was carried out and a frozen section report was obtained. Only those kidneys showing glomerulosclerosis of less than 20% were accepted for transplantation. All cadaveric kidneys were preserved in University of Wisconsin solution. RESULTS Pretransplant biopsies of elderly donor kidneys showed structural deficits, which included glomerulosclerosis in 85%, arteriolar and/or mesangial thickening in 75%, and interstitial lymphocyte infiltration in 30%. The mean serum creatinine was 2.4+/-0.74, 2.2+/-0.56, and 2.9+/-0.76 mg/100 ml in group 1 and 1.5+/-0.55, 2.3+/-2.24, and 1.7+/-0.62 in group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The patient survival was 92%, 92%, and 88% in group 1, and 100%, 100%, and 100% in group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The graft survival was 80%, 64%, and 56% in group 1 and 100%, 96%, and 88% in group 2 at similar time intervals. The differences in the serum creatinine and graft survival between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Most of the elderly donor kidneys with structural deficits transplanted into young adults provided suboptimal function and inferior long-term graft survival. To maximize the utilization and optimize the survival of elderly donor kidneys, we propose transplantation of these kidneys into age-matched recipients with similar physiological requirements as those of donors, with regard to kidney function.
Pancreas | 2000
Ismail H. Al-abdullah; Gustavo Ayala; D. Panigrahi; A.M.S Kumar; Mysore S. Anil Kumar
Transplantation of progenitor cells for regeneration of islet cells could prove invaluable in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. This study provides evidence that in rats maintained on a copper-deficient diet containing the copper-chelating agent tetraethylenepentamine pentahydrochloride, regeneration of single &agr; and &bgr; endocrine cells in the ductules and acinar tissue of the adult rat pancreata occurred. These regenerated cells both in the ductules and acinar tissue stained positive for glucagon and insulin similar to cells within the islets and in addition to being reactive to proliferative cellular nuclear antigen, an intracellular marker of active proliferation. In contrast, the control group pancreata did not show any evidence of islet regeneration, proliferation, or proliferative cellular nuclear antigen reactivity pre-or posttransplantation. Transplantation of digested pancreatic tissues from the copper-deficient group into the spleen of syngeneic diabetic rats reversed diabetes, and this was confirmed histologically by demonstrating cells within ductules that stained positively for insulin. This study concludes that copper deprivation contributes to the neogenesis of pancreatic &agr; and &bgr; cells in the ductules and acinar tissue of adult pancreas in rat model and that transplanted stem cells maintain their functional capacity in the recipient after transplantation.
Transplantation Proceedings | 2001
Shoaib Chowdhury; R.K Kode; Karthik Ranganna; A.M Damask; A Lam; Billie Fyfe; Susan Stabler; A.M.S Kumar; M.B Tomeny; Mysore S. Anil Kumar; Oleh Pankewycz
Transplantation Proceedings | 1998
Mysore S. Anil Kumar; K Cahill; A.M.S Kumar; D. Panigrahi; D Seirka; R Singleton; I.H Al-Abdullah; D.A Laskow
Transplantation Proceedings | 2001
A.M.S Kumar; K Fa; R Vankawala; M Vora; R.K Kode; Oleh Pankewycz; M.R Lattavi; Billie Fyfe; A.M Damask; E Ferry; Susan Stabler; M.B Tomeny; K Phillips; R.M Lingaraju; Mysore S. Anil Kumar
Transplantation Proceedings | 2001
R.K Kode; A.M.S Kumar; Oleh Pankewycz; A.M Damask; D Seirka; A Lam; K Phillips; M Ardron; J Brezin; R Chvala; Mysore S. Anil Kumar
Transplantation Proceedings | 2001
Mysore S. Anil Kumar; R.K Kode; Oleh Pankewycz; M.R Laftavi; A.M.S Kumar; A.M Damask; M Vora; M.B Tomeny; E Ferry; B.C Samartino; Debra Sierka; R.M Lingaraju; Billie Fyfe
Transplantation | 2000
R.K Kode; O. Pankewycz; K. Ranganna; Debra Sierka; Meg Ardron; A.M.S Kumar; Mysore S. Anil Kumar
Transplantation | 2000
R.K Kode; A.M.S Kumar; Oleh Pankewycz; Billie Fyfe; Susan Stabler; K. Ranganna; A.M Damask; Mysore S. Anil Kumar
Transplantation Proceedings | 2001
R.K Kode; Clarence E. Foster; A.M.S Kumar; R Vankawala; A.M Damask; Billie Fyfe; D Seirka; M.R Laftavi; J Brezin; O Pankewycz; R Chvala; Mysore S. Anil Kumar