A. MacLeod

Does screw-bone interface modelling matter in finite element analyses?

The effect of screw-bone interface modelling strategies was evaluated in the setting of a tibial mid-shaft fracture stabilised using locking plates. Three interface models were examined: fully bonded interface; screw with sliding contact with bone; and screw with sliding contact with bone in an undersized pilot hole. For the simulation of the last interface condition we used a novel thermal expansion approach to generate the pre-stress that the bone would be exposed to during screw insertion. The study finds that the global load-deformation response is not influenced by the interface modelling approach employed; the deformation varied by less than 1% between different interaction models. However, interface modelling is found to have a considerable impact on the local stress-strain environment within the bone in the vicinity of the screws. Frictional and tied representations did not have significantly different peak strain values (<5% difference); the frictional interface had higher peak compressive strains while the tied interface had higher tensile strains. The undersized pilot hole simulation produced the largest strains. The peak minimum principal strains for the frictional interface were 26% of those for the undersized pilot hole simulation at a load of 770 N. It is concluded that the commonly used tie constraint can be used effectively when the only interest is the global load-deformation behaviour. Different contact interface models, however, alter the mechanical response around screw holes leading to different predictions for screw loosening, bone damage and stress shielding.

Age‐related optimisation of screw placement for reduced loosening risk in locked plating

When using locked plating for bone fracture fixation, screw loosening is reported as one of the most frequent complications and is commonly attributed to an incorrect choice of screw configuration. Choosing a patient‐optimized screw configuration is not straightforward as there are many interdependent variables that affect device performance. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence that locking screw configuration has on loosening risk and how this is influenced by bone quality. This study uses finite element models that incorporate cortical bone heterogeneity, orthotropy, and geometrical nonlinearity to examine the effect of screw configuration on variables associated with loosening and interfragmentary motion. Strain levels within the bone were used as indicators of regions that may undergo loosening. The study found that, in healthy bone under axial loading, the most important variables influencing strain levels within the bone were the size of the bridging span (working length) and the plate rigidity. Unlike healthy bone, osteoporotic bone was found to be particularly sensitive to the spacing of the screws within the plate. Using two empty screw holes between the screws closest to the fracture was found to reduce the strain levels at the first screw by 49% in osteoporotic bone (compared to only 2.4% in healthy bone). The study also found that under torsional loading the total number of screws used was the most important variable with a 59% reduction in the strain around the screws closest to the fracture when using six rather than four screws in osteoporotic bone.

Reasons why dynamic compression plates are inferior to locking plates in osteoporotic bone: a finite element explanation

While locking plate fixation is becoming increasingly popular for complex and osteoporotic fractures, for many indications compression plating remains the standard choice. This study compares the mechanical behaviour of the more recent locking compression plate (LCP) device, with the traditional dynamic compression plates (DCPs) in bone of varying quality using finite element modelling. The bone properties considered include orthotropy, inhomogeneity, cortical thinning and periosteal apposition associated with osteoporosis. The effect of preloads induced by compression plating was included in the models. Two different fracture scenarios were modelled: one with complete reduction and one with a fracture gap. The results show that the preload arising in DCPs results in large principal strains in the bone all around the perimeter of the screw hole, whereas for LCPs large principal strains occur primarily on the side of the screw proximal to the load. The strains within the bone produced by the two screw types are similar in healthy bone with a reduced fracture gap; however, the DCP produces much larger strains in osteoporotic bone. In the presence of a fracture gap, the DCP results in a considerably larger region with high tensile strains and a slightly smaller region with high compressive strains. These findings provide a biomechanical basis for the reported improved performance of locking plates in poorer bone quality.

Experimental and Numerical Investigation into the Influence of Loading Conditions in Biomechanical Testing of Locking Plate Fracture Fixation Devices

Objectives Secondary fracture healing is strongly influenced by the stiffness of the bone-fixator system. Biomechanical tests are extensively used to investigate stiffness and strength of fixation devices. The stiffness values reported in the literature for locked plating, however, vary by three orders of magnitude. The aim of this study was to examine the influence that the method of restraint and load application has on the stiffness produced, the strain distribution within the bone, and the stresses in the implant for locking plate constructs. Methods Synthetic composite bones were used to evaluate experimentally the influence of four different methods of loading and restraining specimens, all used in recent previous studies. Two plate types and three screw arrangements were also evaluated for each loading scenario. Computational models were also developed and validated using the experimental tests. Results The method of loading was found to affect the gap stiffness strongly (by up to six times) but also the magnitude of the plate stress and the location and magnitude of strains at the bone-screw interface. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the method of loading is responsible for much of the difference in reported stiffness values in the literature. It also shows that previous contradictory findings, such as the influence of working length and very large differences in failure loads, can be readily explained by the choice of loading condition. Cite this article: A. MacLeod, A. H. R. W. Simpson, P. Pankaj. Experimental and numerical investigation into the influence of loading conditions in biomechanical testing of locking plate fracture fixation devices. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:111–120. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0074.R2.

Computer Simulation of Fracture Fixation Using Extramedullary Devices: An Appraisal

Extramedullary devices are being extensively employed to treat fractures in normal and diseased bone. Studies conducted in hospitals have shown that there is a wide variability in the manner different surgeons employ these devices for similar fracture types. Clinically, fixation devices are required to be able to: sustain loads; minimise patient discomfort and possible implant loosening; and promote healing. Computer simulation of the mechanical behaviour of these devices can help clinicians in selecting a device and optimising its configuration. Numerical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of bone-fixator constructs has been used in the past to evaluate the performance of these devices with respect to some of the clinical requirements. This Chapter considers the mechanics of some of the most commonly used extramedullary devices, their peculiarities and modelling implications while appraising existing numerical modelling literature that has attempted to address the above clinical demands. It finds that while many of the clinical questions have been answered satisfactorily using simple models, answers to some others require complex and sophisticated modelling approaches.