A. Montagnani

Effect of simvastatin treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women: a 1-year longitudinal study

Although several studies have reported a lower risk of osteoporotic fracture in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, so far longitudinal studies on the effects of statins on bone are lacking. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover changes induced by 1-year simvastatin treatment on postmenopausal women. Thirty consecutive postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women (61.2 +/- 4.9 years) were treated for 12 months with 40 mg/day simvastatin and 30 normocholesterolemic age-matched postmenopausal women provided control data. In all subjects, at baseline and at 3-month intervals, serum lipids, calcium, phosphate, total and bone alkaline phosphatase (Bone-ALP), and carboxy-terminal fragment of type I collagen (CTx) were measured in a fasting blood sample. At baseline and after 6 and 12 months BMD was measured at lumbar spine (BMD-LS) and at femur (BMD-Ftot) and at femoral neck (BMD-Fn) by DXA. In the simvastatin-treated group Bone-ALP showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) with respect to baseline from the sixth month, whereas serum CTx showed a weak and nonsignificant increase over the study period. In treated women BMD-LS, BMD-Fn, and BMD-Ftot increased respectively by 1.1, 0.9, and 0.4% at Month 6; and by 2.8, 1.0, and 0.8% at Month 12. In controls BMD-LS, BMD-Fn, and BMD-Ftot at the end of the study period decreased by 1.6, 1.4, and 1.2%, respectively. The difference between controls and simvastatin-treated patients was significant (P < 0.05) for both BMD-LS and BMD-Fn only at Month 12. In conclusion our results, although obtained from a small sample of postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women, suggest a probable positive effect of simvastatin on bone formation and BMD.

Alendronate Treatment in Men With Primary Osteoporosis: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study

Bisphosphonates have been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis in women, whereas until now there have been few data on their use in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a 3-year alendronate treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in men with primary osteoporosis. We studied 77 osteoporotic men (aged 57.1 ± 10.8 yrs) who completed a 3-year treatment with alendronate (10 mg/day) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) (n = 39), or calcium alone (n = 38). At baseline and at a 12-month interval, we measured BMD at the lumbar spine and femur (femoral neck and total hip) by DXA (Hologic) and speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness (S) at the os calcis by Achilles plus (Lunar). Alendronate treatment had significantly increased lumbar spine BMD by 4.2% at year 1, by 6.3% at year 2, and 8.8% at year 3. BMD at the femoral neck and total hip had increased by 2.1% and 1.6% at year 1, by 3.2% and 2.9% at year 2, and by 4.2% and 3.9% at year 3, respectively. BUA and Stiffness showed a significant increase in the alendronate-treated group at year 2 (3.2% and 4.9%, respectively) and at year 3 (3.8% and 6%, respectively). BMD at the lumbar spine showed the best longitudinal sensitivity whereas longitudinal sensitivity of both QUS at the heel and femur BMD were similar. In conclusion, this study confirms that alendronate represents an important therapeutic advance in the management of male osteoporosis. BMD at the lumbar spine appears to be the best method for monitoring the effect of alendronate on bone mass in osteoporotic men.

Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men

Fragility fractures in men represent a major health problem, and this prompts a necessity for reliable tools for the identification of men at risk of fracture. In order to assess the ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the prediction of fracture risk in men and whether their combination might be useful in a clinical setting, we studied 401 men (age range 45–82 years, mean 60.3±12.5), of whom 133 had osteoporotic fractures and 268 did not. In all subjects we measured bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (BMD-LS) and at the femur, calculating thereafter the standard femoral subregions: neck (BMD-FN), total hip (BMD-T), trochanter (BMD-TR), intertrochanter (BMD-ITR), and Ward’s triangle (BMD-W), by DXA. We also performed ultrasound parameters at the calcaneus: speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness, by Achilles plus, and at the phalanxes: amplitude dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS) and the parameters of the graphic trace: bone transmission time (BTT), fast wave amplitude (FWA), signal dynamic (SDy) and ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI), by Bone Profiler. All DXA and QUS parameters, apart from FWA, were significantly (P<0.001) lower in patients with a history of fracture. BMD at the proximal femur showed the best ability in discriminating men with or without fractures. QUS at the heel showed discriminatory ability significantly better than QUS at the fingers. By logistic regression analysis, adjusted for age and BMI, BMD-T showed the best association with fragility fracture [odds ratio (OR)=3.43, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.47–4.77]. Among QUS parameters, the highest value of the OR was shown by stiffness (OR=3.18, CI=2.27–4.48). FWA and SDy were not associated with fragility fractures in men. If DXA and QUS were combined, the prediction of the OR of fragility fracture events in men increases; in fact Stiffness was able to increase the OR when added to BMD-LS (OR=5.44, CI=3.16–10.13) and BMD-T (OR=6.08, CI=2.63–14.27). SOS and BUA showed a similar pattern. AD-SoS improved the prediction of fracture only when combined with BMD-LS (OR=4.36, CI=1.99–9.57). If BMD-LS and BMD-FN or BMD-T were combined, the value of the OR increases (OR=4.59, CI=2.27–9.25 and OR=4.68, CI=2.24–9.76), respectively. Our study supports the effectiveness of QUS in the identification of osteoporotic fractures in men. QUS seems to play an independent and complementary role, with respect to DXA, in order to enhance the power for predicting osteoporotic fractures in men.

Osteoporosis and risk of fracture in patients with diabetes: an update.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoporotic fractures are two of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in older subjects. Recent data report a close association between fragility fracture risk and DM of both type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2). However, DM1 is associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD), whereas patients with DM2 generally have normal or increased BMD. This apparent paradox may be explained by the fact that, at a given level of BMD, diabetic patients present lower bone quality with respect to non-diabetics, as shown by several studies reporting that diabetes may affect bone tissue by means of various mechanisms, including hyperinsulinemia, deposition of advanced glycosylation endproducts (AGEs) in collagen, reduced serum levels of IGF-1, hypercalciuria, renal failure, microangiopathy and inflammation. In addition, the propensity to fall and several comorbidities may further explain the higher fracture incidence in DM patients with respect to the general population. It is reasonable to expect that close metabolic control of diabetes may improve bone status although its effect on reduction of fracture risk has not yet been demonstrated. However, metformin has a direct effect on bone tissue by reducing AGE accumulation, whereas insulin acts directly on osteoclast activity, and thiazolidinediones (TZD) may have a negative effect by switching mesenchymal progenitor cells to adipose rather than bone tissue. New prospects include the incretins, a class of antidiabetic drugs which may play a role linking nutrition and bone metabolism. Better knowledge on how diabetes and its treatments influence bone tissue may lie at basis of effective prevention of bone fracture in diabetic patients. Thus, close glycemic control, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, screening for low BMD, and prevention and treatment of diabetic complications are key elements in the management of osteoporosis in both DM1 and DM2. Attention should be paid to treating diabetes with TZD in women with DM2, particularly if elderly. Lastly, patients with osteoporosis and diabetes should be offered the same pharmacological treatments as non-diabetics, although specific trials on the effects of anti-osteoporotic drugs in the diabetic population are lacking.

Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Bone Turnover, Bone Density, and Ultrasound Parameters

Abstract. We studied 21 patients (11 men and 10 women) with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and 21 age- and sex-matched controls. In all patients we measured serum levels of total alkaline phosphatase (ALP), type I procollagen carboxy-terminal propeptide (PICP), osteocalcin (BGP), urinary excretion of hydroxyproline (HOP/Cr), and pyridinoline crosslinks (Pyr/Cr). Bone mineral density was measured at the distal radius (BMD-R) and at the lumbar spine (BMD-LS) by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Ultrasound parameters were also performed at the calcaneous with the Achilles device and at the phalanxes with DBM Sonic 1200. A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in BMD and in ultrasound parameters was found in OI patients compared with normals. PICP was significantly reduced in the OI patients compared with controls (P < 0.001); other markers of bone turnover were higher in OI than in controls, but the difference did not reach the statistical significance. A significant correlation (P < 0.05) was found between PICP and BMD at the lumbar spine and between PICP and ultrasound parameters at the calcaneous. On the basis of our data, we conclude that patients with OI show low values of BMD and ultrasound parameters; therefore in these patients, not only is bone mass disturbed but also bone quality. The reduced levels of PICP in OI patients confirm that most OI patients have defects in collagen I biosynthesis. These defects may contribute to the fragility of OI bone by interfering with complete mineralization and/or normal tissue structure. PICP may be considered a useful marker in the clinical management of OI.

Bone Turnover and the Response to Alendronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Abstract. This study investigated whether bone turnover influences the response to alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred postmenopausal osteoporotic women were randomized to receive either alendronate (10 mg/day) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) (n = 50) or calcium alone (n = 50). Vertebral and radial bone density, measured by DXA, and markers of bone turnover were assessed at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. At the end of treatment, alendronate users showed an increase of 5.0% and 2.3%, respectively, at the lumbar spine and ultradistal radius; in the group treated only with calcium, bone mineral density (BMD) decreased by 1.6% at the lumbar spine and 1.3% at the ultradistal radius. The difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.001). The patients were divided into high (HT) or low (LT) bone turnover groups, as assessed by 24-hour whole body retention (WBR%) of 99mTc-methylene-diphosphonate. The response to alendronate treatment was greater in HT patients compared with LT patients. In fact, at the end of the study period, BMD at the lumbar spine had increased by 7.9% in HT patients and by 3.0% in LT patients; the difference between the two groups was significant (P < 0.001). No significant difference between the two groups was found for BMD at the ultradistal radius. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that 2-year treatment with alendronate has highly positive effects on bone mass at both the lumbar spine and ultradistal radius. The increase in bone mass, especially at the axial level, is influenced by bone turnover. Therefore, the evaluation of bone turnover may be useful in predicting the response to alendronate treatment.

Heel ultrasonography in monitoring alendronate therapy: a four-year longitudinal study.

Abstract: The possibility of using quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in monitoring the response to antiresorptive drugs has yet to be defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether heel ultrasonography, considering its characteristics of long-term precision, is able to monitor osteoporotic patients treated with alendronate. We studied 150 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (age 59.6 ± 5.3 years) treated with alendronate and calcium (n= 74) or with calcium alone (n= 76) for 4 years. At baseline and after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, we measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic 4500), and speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness at the calcaneus by Achilles plus. Moreover, the longitudinal precision of QUS parameters was assessed by measuring 10 subjects once a month for 1 year and, on the basis of the coefficients of variation we obtained, we calculated the Least Significant Change between two measurements. In the alendronate-treated patients, at year 1, BMD increased by 4.2%, SOS by 0.4%, BUA by 1.1% and Stiffness by 3.2%; at year 2, BMD increased by 5.0%, SOS by 0.7%, BUA by 1.4% and Stiffness by 5.7%. At year 3, BMD increased by 6.2%, SOS by 0.9%, BUA by 1.8% and Stiffness by 7.6%. At the end of the study period, BMD increased by 7.6%, SOS by 1.2%, BUA by 1.9% and Stiffness by 9.0%. The minimal significant difference between two measurements was 0.8% for SOS, 5.6% for BUA and 5.0% for Stiffness. Among the QUS parameters, Stiffness showed the greatest total treatment effect and a longitudinal sensitivity which was only slightly lower than BMD. The MTI, which represents the period between scans required to show that a ‘true’ change has occurred, was 1.8, 2.7, 11.9 and 2.2 years for BMD, SOS, BUA and Stiffness respectively. Therefore, although the spinal BMD remains the optimal method, QUS at the heel, and in particular Stiffness, seems to be a sensitive tool for monitoring the response to alendronate.

Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after surgical treatment.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of ultrasound (QUS) parameters and bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) before and after surgical treatment. In 22 patients (age range 28–74 years) with PHPT we measured speed of sound (SOS), attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness at the calcaneus, amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS) at proximal phalanges, and bone mineral density at lumbar spine (BMD-LS) and at the mid-radius (BMD-MR) and ultradistal radius (BMD-UDR) before, 1 and 2 years after surgical operation. Twenty-two age- and sex-matched healthy subjects provided control data. Before surgery, all parameters apart from SOS were significantly lower in PHPT patients than in controls. At the end of the study period, BMD-LS increased by 7.0%, BMD-UDR by 7.4% and BMD-MR by 11.0%. The changes in ultrasound parameters after surgery were lower (0.44% for SOS, 2.2% for BUA, 3.3% for Stiffness and 2.6% for AD-SoS); however, the increase was statistically significant (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) only for Stiffness and AD-SoS. Our results indicate that parathyroidectomy increases both axial and appendicular BMD and influences QUS parameters differently at the calcaneus and at the phalanges. The combined use of BMD and QUS could improve the assessment of skeletal status in patients with PHPT before and after surgery.

Graphic Trace Analysis of Ultrasound at the Phalanges May Differentiate Between Subjects with Primary Hyperparathyroidism and with Osteoporosis: A Pilot Study

Bone loss characterizes both primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and osteoporosis (OP) but with a different histologic pattern, and this could partially explain the different fracture incidence in these two populations. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), influenced by bone structural parameters other than bone mineral density (BMD), could evidence these differences, opening new perspectives in the evaluation of patients with metabolic bone diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of QUS graphic trace parameters, assessed at the phalanx, in discriminating between PHPT bone disease and osteoporosis. We studied 34 patients with PHPT (mean age 59.7 ± 12.7 years), 35 patients with OP (mean age 60.6 ± 7.1 years) and 34 healthy subjects as controls (mean age 59.1 ± 9.4 years). In all subjects QUS measurements were performed at the phalanx with a Bone Profiler (IGEA, Italy), obtaining the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS), fast wave amplitude (FWA), signal dynamic (SDy), bone transmission time (BTT) and ultrasound bone profile index (UBPI). Moreover, serum calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH), bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP) and ionized calcium were measured in all subjects in the morning under fasting conditions. In PHPT patients BTT was correlated with PTH, ionized calcium and B-ALP levels (r=–0.47, –0.57 and –0.44, respectively; p <0.01), whereas FWA, SDy and UBPI correlated only with B-ALP (r=–0.43, –0.46 and –0.50, respectively; p <0.01). Moreover, FWA, SDY and UBPI were significantly (p<0.01) lower and BTT significantly (p<0.001) higher in OP than in PHPT patients. UBPI, BTT, FWA and the BTT/FWA ratio, but not SDy, were able to discriminate between the two groups (area under the curve =0.66, 0.69, 0.67 and 0.81, respectively). Our findings show that ultrasound signal parameters are differently influenced by bone changes characterizing primary hyperparathyroidism or osteoporosis. This suggests that the QUS signal could be a useful instrument in discriminating and studying some of the bone alterations typical of metabolic bone diseases.

Treatment of post‐menopausal osteoporosis with recombinant human growth hormone and salmon calcitonin: a placebo controlled study

OBJECTIVE The usefulness of GH in the treatment of post‐menopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is still debated. We have studied the effects of recombinant human GH (rhGH) given alone or in combination with salmon calcitonin (sCT) in the treatment of PMO.