A. Mosahebi

A prospective, multicentre study on the use of epidermal grafts to optimise outpatient wound management

Current wound management through the use of a split‐thickness skin graft often requires hospital admission, a period of immobility, attentive donor site wound care and pain management. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a novel epidermal graft‐harvesting device (CelluTome) that allows pain‐free epidermal skin grafting in the outpatient clinic setting. A prospective series of 35 patients was performed in 2 centres, involving 10 acute and 25 chronic wounds. All patients were subjected to epidermal grafting in the outpatient specialist clinic, without the use of anaesthesia, and allowed to return home after the procedure. Completely healed wounds were noted in 22 patients (62·9%). The overall mean time for 50% and 100% reduction in wound size was 3·31 ± 2·33 and 5·91 ± 3·48 weeks, respectively. There was no significant difference in healing times between the acute and chronic wounds (50% reduction in wound size; acute 2·20 ± 0·91 weeks versus chronic 3·73 ± 2·63 weeks, P = 0·171. Hundred percent reduction in wound size; acute 4·80 ± 1·61 weeks versus chronic 6·83 ± 4·47 weeks, P = 0·183). The mean time for donor site healing was 5·49 ± 1·48 days. The mean pain score during graft harvest was 1·42 ± 0·95, and the donor site Vancouver Scar Scale was 0 for all cases at 6 weeks. This automated device offers autologous skin harvesting in the outpatient setting with minimal or no pain and a scar free donor site, equally benefiting both the acute and chronic wounds. It has the potential to save NHS resources by eliminating the need for theatre space and a hospital bed while at the same time benefiting patient care.

Cross-specialty developments: a summary of the mutually relevant recent literature from the journal of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery

Keeping abreast of current developments is increasingly challenging when the volume of specialty articles being published is rising exponentially, and it is most acute when surgical specialties overlap, as in the case of head, neck, and facial reconstructive surgery. Here, the potential for missing key developments presents a compelling case for a summary article that highlights articles likely to be of mutual relevance. We evaluated 129 original studies and 6 reviews published in the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery between September 2012 and August 2014, and summarised the main papers of interest and merit under the subheadings of head and neck reconstruction, cleft lip and palate, craniomaxillofacial surgery, facial palsy, facial trauma, and aesthetic surgery. Most of the evidence presented (86%) is level 4.

Review of the analgesia options for patients undergoing TRAM and DIEP flap breast reconstruction

BackgroundThe mainstay of autologous breast reconstruction involves abdominal wall-based tissue transfer in the form of free or pedicled TRAMs or more recently free DIEP flaps. Although excellent choices for breast reconstruction, all of these techniques do have significant morbidity when considering donor-site pain. This can lead to other complications such as reduced mobility, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli, respiratory infections, heavy opiate use, constipation and prolonged in hospital stay. Minimising postoperative donor-site pain is therefore of paramount importance. This article provides a review of the forms of analgesia available in the literature and in use in clinical practise. It is a summary of the published studies and exciting future options in this field.MethodsA literature search was performed through Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar for any previous research publications pertaining to postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal tissue. We reviewed all articles with the aim to evaluate the current knowledge and evidence of analgesic techniques in autologous breast reconstruction including benefits, limitations, indications and patient outcomes.ResultsThe literature search yielded a total of 31 articles identifying 6 analgesic techniques: patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), epidural analgesia, continuous wound infusion with local anaesthetic, intermittent boluses of local anaesthetic, transverse abdominis plane (TAP) blocks and slow release bupivicaine.ConclusionsVarious anaesthetic techniques are used to reduce postoperative mortality in autologous breast reconstruction. Knowledge of these techniques is paramount as it reduces complications and expedites discharge in this group of patients.Level of Evidence: Not ratable.