A. Paradiso

Thymidilate synthase and p53 primary tumour expression as predictive factors for advanced colorectal cancer patients

The purpose of this work was to analyse the ability of p53 and thymidilate synthase (TS) primary tumour expression to retrospectively predict clinical response to chemotherapy and long-term prognosis in patients with advanced colorectal cancers homogeneously treated by methotrexate (MTX)-modulated–5-fluorouracil (5-FU-FA). A total of 108 advanced colorectal cancer patients entered the present retrospective study. Immunohistochemical p53 (pAb 1801 mAb) and TS (TS106 mAb) expression on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumour specimens was related to probability of clinical response to chemotherapy, time to progression and overall survival. p53 was expressed in 53/108 (49%) tumours, while 54/108 (50%) showed TS immunostaining. No relationship was demonstrated between p53 positivity and clinical response to chemotherapy (objective response (OR): 20% vs 23%, in p53+ and p53– cases respectively) or overall survival. Percent of OR was significantly higher in TS-negative with respect to TS-positive tumours (30% vs 15% respectively; P< 0.04); simultaneous analysis of TS and p53 indicated 7% OR for p53-positive/TS-positive tumours vs 46% for p53-positive/TS-negative tumours (P< 0.03). Logistic regression analysis confirmed a significant association between TS tumour status and clinical response to chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR): 2.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.34–1.01; two-sided P< 0.05). A multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that only a small number of metastatic sites was statistically relevant (HR 1.89; 95% CI 2.85–1.26; two-sided P< 0.03). Our study suggests that immunohistochemical expression of p53 and TS could assist the clinician in predicting response of colorectal cancer patients to modulated MTX-5-FU therapy.

The effect of gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) in combination with oxaliplatin is schedule-dependent in colon cancer cell lines

BackgroundClinical trials of gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) in combination with cytotoxic agents have been carried out or are ongoing in several varieties of tumor. To provide a rationale for future clinical trials, the effects of combining gefitinib with oxaliplatin in different sequences of administration and different dose ratios in two colon cancer cell lines were evaluated.Materials and methodsThe colon cancer cell lines HT-29 and LoVo were used. The methods consisted of median effect and combination index analysis, Western blot, mass spectrometry, and a cell death ELISA.ResultsIn vitro analysis demonstrated that the combination effects of the two agents were sequence-dependent. Changing the sequence of administration from gefitinib first to gefitinib last changed the combination effect from antagonism to synergy. The dose ratio between the two agents affected the combination effects. When equiactive doses of the two agents were used with the sequence gefitinib following oxaliplatin, the greatest level of synergism was obtained (CI=0.6±0.2, P=0.032). Further evaluation revealed that gefitinib significantly inhibited removal of Pt-DNA adducts (P<0.05), providing a potential explanation for the sequence-dependent synergy observed with gefitinib following oxaliplatin. However, this effect was not dose-dependent. Additional studies demonstrated that gefitinib enhanced the effects of oxaliplatin by maintaining oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis, and equiactive dose of gefitinib following oxaliplatin induced prominent enhancement of apoptosis.ConclusionsOxaliplatin followed by an equiactive relative dose of gefitinib is an appropriate combination for evaluation in colon cancer.

Molecular Pathways and Related Target Therapies in Liver Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a frequent neoplasia which still misses a therapeutical gold standard. Recently, new acquisitions in cancerogenesis process evidenced the genetic and epigenetic alterations of genes involved in the different metabolic pathways of liver cancer suggesting that antibodies, small molecules, demethylating agents, etc. specifically acting against molecular target can be utilized alone or in combination in clinical practice. The main altered targets are: cell membrane receptors, in particular tyrosine kinase receptors, factors involved in cell signalling, specifically Wnt/beta-catenin, Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways, proteins linked to cell cycle regulation pathway (i.e. p53, p16/INK4, cyclin/cdk complex) or in invasiveness (EMT, TGFbeta) and proteins involved in DNA metabolism. Genetic or epigenetic changes in these molecules have been used in preclinical settings and, some of them also in clinical trials of phase II and III. This scenario opens new avenues for the prevention and the treatment of HCC. In the present review the main metabolic pathways and molecular alterations have been described together with recent advances in molecular and gene therapy.

Expression of apoptosis-related markers and clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

The clinical relevance of bax and bcl-2 protein expression has been investigated in 84 patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer submitted to a chemotherapy regimen including methotrexate and fluorouracil/leucovorin. Cytoplasmic immunostaining of bax and bcl-2 was present in 65.5% and 38%, respectively, of the tumours. No association was found between bax and bcl-2 or between p53 and bax or bcl-2 protein expression. Moreover, the biomarkers were unrelated to patient and tumour characteristics known to affect the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients. In general, the apoptosis-related markers did not appear indicative of short- and long-term clinical response nor of prognosis. Bcl-2-negative lesions were more frequent among patients who reached an objective clinical response, which is in agreement with previously reported data regarding other tumour types. When the interrelationship between p53 and bax expression was examined, a better response rate (40%) was found for patients whose tumours did not express p53 and bax, and a better prognosis (2-year probability of overall survival 75%) for patients with p53-positive and bax-negative tumours. In the present series of patients with advanced colorectal cancer submitted to systemic chemotherapy we did not find a clear association between expression of apoptosis-related markers and clinical outcome, even in the subset of patients in which the apoptotic index as determined by the TUNEL approach was investigated.

Quality control for biomarker determination in oncology: The experience of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT)

Biomarker analysis and evaluation in oncology is the product of a number of processes (including managerial, technical and interpretation steps) which need to be monitored and controlled to prevent and correct errors and guarantee a satisfactory level of quality. Several biomarkers have recently moved to clinical validation studies and successively to clinical practice without any definition of standard procedures and/or quality control (QC) schemes necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the laboratory information. In Italy several national scientific societies and single researchers have activated – often on a pilot level – specific external quality assessment protocols, thereby potentially jeopardizing the clinical reality even further. In view of the seriousness of the problem, in 1998 the Italian Ministry of Health sponsored a National Survey Project to coordinate and standardize the procedures and to develop QC programs for the analysis of cancer biomarkers of potential clinical relevance. Twelve QC programs focused on biomarkers and concerning morphological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, molecular, and immunoenzymatic assays were coordinated and implemented. Specifically, external QC programs for the analytical phase of immunohistochemical p53, Bcl-2, c-erb-2/neu/HER2, and microvessel density determination, of morphological evaluation of tumor differentiation grade, and of molecular p53 analysis were activated for the first time within the project. Several hundreds of Italian laboratories took part in these QC programs, the results of which are available on the web site of the Network (www.cqlaboncologico.it). Financial support from the Italian Government and the National Research Council (CNR) will guarantee the pursuit of activities that will be extended to new biomarkers, to preanalytical phases of the assays, and to revision of the criteria of clinical usefulness for evaluating the cost/benefit ratio.

A randomised factorial trial of sequential doxorubicin and CMF vs CMF and chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

The sequential doxorubicin → CMF (CMF=cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil) regimen has never been compared to CMF in a randomised trial. The role of adding goserelin and tamoxifen after chemotherapy is unclear. In all, 466 premenopausal node-positive patients were randomised to: (a) CMF × 6 cycles (CMF); (b) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles (A → CMF); (c) CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (CMF → GT); and (d) doxorubicin × 4 cycles followed by CMF × 6 cycles followed by goserelin plus tamoxifen × 2 years (A → CMF → GT). The study used a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design to assess: (1) the effect of the chemotherapy regimens (CMF vs A → CMF or arms a+c vs b+d) and (2) the effect of adding GT after chemotherapy (arms a+b vs c+d). At a median follow-up of 72 months, A → CMF as compared to CMF significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) with a multivariate hazard ratio (HR)=0.740 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.556–0.986; P=0.040) and produced a nonsignificant improvement of overall survival (OS) (HR=0.764; 95% CI: 0.489–1.193). The addition of GT after chemotherapy significantly improved DFS (HR=0.74; 95% CI: 0.555–0.987; P=0.040), with a nonsignificant improvement of OS (HR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.54–1.32). A → CMF is superior to CMF. Adding GT after chemotherapy is beneficial for premenopausal node-positive patients.

Heterogeneity of Intratumour Proliferative Activity in Primary Breast Cancer: Biological and Clinical Aspects

The present retrospective study was undertaken to verify whether the extent of intratumour proliferative activity variation or the method of quantifying tumour proliferative activity is related to biological characteristics and clinical outcome in a series of operable node-negative breast cancer patients. For tumour proliferative activity evaluation, the 3H-thymidine autoradiographic assay was used. After incubation of 3-8 samples from different areas of the equatorial section of each tumour for 1 h at 37 degrees C with 3H-thymidine, the following methods were used for evaluation of tumour cell labelling: mean tumour labelling index (LI), the highest labelling value from a specific area (LI-max), and the extent of intratumour labelling variation from several samples (LI-CV). LI-max was related to ER and PgR status, and linearly correlated with LI (c.c. = 0.92, P < 10(-6)) whereas LI-CV was independent of tumour size, grade ER and PgR status, but dependent on the number of tumour samples analysed for each tumour. After 5 years of median follow-up, disease-free survival was only related to tumour size (T1 versus T2: 84 versus 64%, P < 0.04 by log rank analysis) and different LI values (low versus high 3H-Tdr-LI:86 versus 61%, P < 0.03 by log rank analysis). LI-max and LI-CV values were not significantly related to clinical outcome. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic value of LI and tumour size on disease-free survival.

Carboplatin plus ifosfamide as salvage treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a pilot study.

PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of carboplatin (PPL) and ifosfamide (IFO) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin (CDDP)-containing regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS From July 1989 to December 1991, 35 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer relapsed or refractory to CDDP as first-line chemotherapy were treated. PPL was administered at a dose of 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and IFO at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 every 3 to 4 weeks. Criteria for evaluating previous response to CDDP were strictly defined. RESULTS The overall response rate was 43% (complete response [CR], 6%; partial response [PR], 37%) and the median duration of response was 7 months (range, 3 to 16). In potentially platinum-sensitive (PPS; relapsed) patients, the overall response rate was 56%. None of the primary platinum-resistant (PPR) patients obtained a clinical response to PPL plus IFO, whereas one of five secondary platinum-resistant (SPR) patients obtained a PR. The regimen was easily manageable. CONCLUSION PPL plus IFO is useful and well-tolerated combination in salvage treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, clear synergism between PPL and IFO that could overcome intrinsic or acquired CDDP resistance was not observed. The advantage of PPL plus IFO as compared with CDDP-containing regimens is represented by the increased tolerability and the reduced neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and ototoxicity as compared with CDDP-containing regimens. It is essential that the patient population be defined according to their previous response to platinum therapy in trials involving second-line therapy of ovarian cancer.

Correlation between ERICA and DCC Assay in Hormone Receptor Assessment of Human Breast Cancer

To study the basic relationships between estrogen receptor immunocytochemical assay (ERICA) and dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) techniques, 116 women affected by breast cancer were admitted to the study from June 1985. In 56% of cases the tumor sample came from patients with operable disease and in 44% from patients with advanced inoperable disease. We found an overall agreement of 80% between the two methods characterized by a high sensitivity (95%) and a low specificity of ERICA versus DCC. ER/ICA negative results were found in 20 out of 78 ER/DCC positive cases; on the contrary, discordant results were found in only 3 out of 38 cases described by DCC as ER negative. 29 patients with advanced disease and ER/DCC positive tumors were considered for clinical analysis and reliability of each hormone receptor assay. A clinical response was reached in 69% of ER/DCC positive patients and on 64% of ER/ICA positive ones (16/25). However, it must be noted that 4/29 cases described as negative by ERICA were clinically responsive to hormone therapy.

Relevance of cell kinetics to hormonal response of receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

SummaryThe relationship between cell kinetics and hormonal status and the relevance of the cell kinetic variable on success of hormonetherapy in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast tumors were analyzed in patients with advanced disease. Cell kinetics were evaluated as in vitro3H-thymidine labeling index (LI), and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) with the dextran-coated charcoal technique. The analyses performed on primary tumor or soft tissue metastases from 52 patients showed a general association between the presence of hormone receptors and low proliferative activity, or the absence of receptors and high proliferative activity (ER and L.I.: p>0.05; PgR and L.I.: p = 0.05). However, hormonal status and cell kinetic status were unrelated in about 40% of the cases. Clinical response to additive hormonotherapy was analyzed in relation to pretreatment LI in 29 patients with ER+ tumors. Time to reach maximum response was significantly longer in slow than in fast proliferating tumors, but complete remission was reached in 88% of slow proliferating tumors compared to only 46% of fast proliferating tumors. These preliminary results show that ER+ fast proliferating tumors largely escape hormonal control, and if confirmed on larger series, could identify cell kinetics as an important tool to select patients who will benefit from hormonal treatment.