A. Pelissier

Current state of anterior cruciate ligament registers

PURPOSE The purpose of this work was to report the main characteristics and results of all active anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction registers along with the differences between them. METHODS We systematically searched on Google and Medline via PubMed to identify ACL registers. National or regional registers were included if they were active and took into account ACL reconstructions. The main results and characteristics, namely the number of inclusions, exhaustivity, data collection methods and results dissemination methods were determined. The collected information was then submitted to each register for validation. RESULTS Four registers (3 national, 1 regional) were identified that routinely included every ACL reconstruction procedure. Register data were collected either through dedicated websites or on paper forms. All the registers used the same two outcome measures, namely the revision rate and a subjective patient score (KOOS score). Register results were made available through scientific publications or annual reports. The main differences between registers were in the graft choice and presence of associated meniscus and cartilage injuries. CONCLUSIONS Although there are only a few ACL reconstruction-specific registers, their scientific contribution is undeniable thanks to the quality of the collected data and the organization and collaboration between registers. Their impact on health care and science should grow in the future.

Does the PFNA™ nail limit impaction in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fracture? A 115 case-control series

INTRODUCTION Femoral neck shortening after dynamic fixation of extra-capsular fracture may impair functional results, but is rarely assessed. The present study measured impaction in stable and unstable fractures (on the Ender classification) treated by PFNA™ nail. The objectives were: 1) to validate the Ender classification to assess fracture stability; 2) to determine whether neck shortening and head purchase quality varied with stability; and 3) to determine the functional impact of femoral neck shortening. HYPOTHESIS The study hypothesis was that the PFNA™ nail stabilizes unstable as well as stable fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients, aged over 70 years, operated on for intertrochanteric fracture using the PFNA™ nail were followed up prospectively for 6 months. Multivariate analysis, including age, gender, assembly quality and body-mass index, was applied to assess the predictive power of the Ender classification with respect to femoral neck shortening. Secondly, patients were grouped according to stable versus unstable fracture (n=70 and 45, respectively), and impaction and femoral head purchase were assessed on a dedicated radiographic protocol. Functional results were assessed on Parker score. RESULTS In the unstable fracture group, 3 assembly failures required revision by total hip replacement. Ender grade>2 was significantly predictive of>5mm neck shortening. Neck shortening was greater in unstable fracture: 8.1 ± 8.4mm (range, 4-32 mm), versus 2.5 ± 3.7 mm (range, 3-14 mm) (P=0.0004). Mean blade cut-through was 1.2 ± 2.9 mm (range, 1-12 mm) in unstable fracture, versus 0.3 ± 1.3 mm (range, 1-6mm) (P=0.02). Mean cut-out was 2.3 ± 6 mm (range, 2-21 mm) in unstable fracture, versus 0.5 ± 2.6 mm (range, 1-8mm) (P=0.03). Parker scores diminished comparably in the two groups, without significant difference at follow-up: 3.9 ± 2.6 (range, 0-9) in stable and 3.1 ± 1.9 (range, 0-8) in unstable fracture; reduction in Parker score showed no correlation with femoral neck shortening (r=0.013, P=0.88). DISCUSSION The PFNA™ nail provides poorer stabilization of unstable compared to stable fracture. Femoral neck shortening should be taken into account in assessing internal fixation hardware perfomances. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III. Prospective case-control study.