A Peña

Gastroesophageal reflux in diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE:Although abnormal gastroesophageal (GE) reflux is the most frequent alteration of the gastrointestinal tract, its prevalence in diabetes mellitus (DM) is not widely known. The objective of this study was to analyze both the presence of abnormal GE reflux in diabetic patients with no esophageal symptoms and the influence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CVAN) in the development of abnormal GE reflux.METHODS:Fifty insulin-dependent diabetic patients, averaging 29.2 ± 9.0 yr of age, who had had diabetes for > 5 yr and showed no symptoms or history of gastroesophageal disease, were compared with a control group composed of 36 healthy volunteers (18 men, 18 women) whose average age was 35.9 ± 10.1 yr. The cardiovascular autonomic nervous system was examined in the diabetics and control subjects who complied with inclusion criteria. Long-term (24-h) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring was performed, as well as a manometric study of the lower esophageal sphincter.RESULTS:The parameters obtained from the monitoring showed significant differences (p < 0.01) between DM and control subjects. Abnormal GE reflux, defined as any percentage of time with esophageal pH < 4 exceeding 3.5% of total time (8.7 ± 5.6%; range, 4.1–24.4%), was detected in 14 patients. Diabetic subjects were classified according to cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy tests (without CVAN [n = 19, 38%] and with abnormal CVAN tests [n = 31, 62%]). The pH monitoring parameters showed significant differences between these two groups (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:A higher prevalence (28%) of abnormal GE reflux appeared among asymptomatic diabetic patients than among the general population. The presence of abnormal GE reflux in diabetic patients was associated with the existence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (abnormal GE reflux = 38.7% in diabetic patients with abnormal CVAN tests vs 10.5% in diabetic patients without CVAN).

A risk score system for identification of patients with upper-GI bleeding suitable for outpatient management

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to develop a risk score system for identification of patients with upper-GI hemorrhage who are suitable for outpatient management. METHODS From a prospective cohort of 983 consecutive patients with upper-GI hemorrhage not associated with portal hypertension, 581 cases that did not meet pre-established criteria for admission were selected, and a logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with two adverse outcomes: recurrent bleeding and/or the need for emergency surgery. The risk score system was developed by using the beta coefficients of the logistic model, and its performance was evaluated. The results of this model were combined with pre-established criteria for admission to build a simplified scoring system for identification of patients who can be managed safely on an outpatient basis. RESULTS Chronic alcoholism, active malignancy, prior upper digestive tract surgery, wasting syndrome, hemodynamic compromise, duodenal ulcer as the cause of upper-GI hemorrhage, and hemorrhage of unknown cause were independently associated with a greater risk of unfavorable outcomes in the group that did not meet pre-established criteria for admission. The logistic model showed a high capacity for discrimination (C statistic: 0.87) and good calibration (p value for Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, 0.62), with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 64%. The simplified score had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 29% for adverse outcomes, and sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 38% for mortality. CONCLUSIONS The score system developed in this study may be helpful in deciding between hospitalization and outpatient management for patients with upper-GI hemorrhage, but it remains to be validated in patient groups other than those used for its development.

Usefulness of alanine and aspartate aminotransferases in the diagnosis of microlithiasis in idiopathic acute pancreatitis

SummaryBackground. It has been shown that biochemical laboratory values only are useful parameters in distinguishing gallstone from nongallstone acute pancreatitis. We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) for identification of occult microlithiasis in idiopathic acute pancreatitis.Methods. Ninety-one patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis who underwent microscopic examination of stimulated duodenal bile sediments were retrospectively studied. According to earliness of ALT and AST assay after the onset of abdominal pain, patients were divided into two groups: group A, within the first 24 h (n=56) and group B, between 24 and 72 h (n=35).Results: ALT and AST values expressed as number of elevations of the upper limits of normal were higher in group A patients with positive biliary drainage than in group B. Median (range) ALT and AST values were 2.5 (0.1–18.1) vs 0.4 (0.1–8.6) and 3 (0.3–17.4) vs 0.5 (0.3—11.9), respectively. In the univariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, ALT within the first 24 h showed a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 86%, and positive predictive value of 92% for a cutoff of 1.2 elevations of the upper limit of normal. These values were slightly higher, although without statistically significant differences, than those of AST (73, 80, and 89%, respectively).Conclusion. Serum increases of aminotransferases, especially alanine aminotransferase (ALT), were suggestive of microlithiasis in idiopathic acute pancreatitis, particularly when assessed early after the onset of abdominal pain.

Outpatient Management of Upper Digestive Hemorrhage Not Associated With Portal Hypertension: A Large Prospective Cohort

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the safety of outpatient management of upper GI hemorrhage (UGIH) not associated with portal hypertension.METHODS:A prospective cohort of 983 subjects who went to the Accident & Emergency Department (A&ED) of a University hospital in Valencia (Spain), for UGIH not associated with portal hypertension during 1994 to 1997 were evaluated. After evaluation in the A&ED, 216 patients (22%) were discharged and referred for outpatient follow-up, but 15 patients could not be located thus, reducing the follow-up to 201 subjects. The main outcome measures were rebleeding within 10 days, emergency surgery within 15 days, and mortality for any cause during the 30 days after the initial hemorrhaging episode.RESULTS:UGIH in subjects under outpatient care were less severe than those subjects in the hospitalized group. Hemorrhaging recurred in 7.3% of inpatients versus 0.5% of outpatients (p < 0.01); emergency surgery was required in 5.6% of the hospitalized patients and 0.5% of the outpatients (p < 0.01); a total of 20 deaths occurred in the hospitalized group (2.6%), while three (1.5%) occurred in outpatients (p = 0.26). After adjusting for several significant risk factors, outpatient management was not associated with outcomes that were worse.CONCLUSIONS:Treatment under an outpatient regime is a safe alternative for a large percentage of selected patients with UGIH not associated with portal hypertension.