A Rossi
CERN
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A Rossi.
Physical Review Special Topics-accelerators and Beams | 2014
Roderik Bruce; G. Robert-Demolaize; R. Assmann; V. Boccone; Chiara Bracco; M. Brugger; Marija Cauchi; F. Cerutti; D Deboy; A. Ferrari; L Lari; Aurelien Marsili; Alessio Mereghetti; Daniele Mirarchi; Elena Quaranta; Stefano Redaelli; A Rossi; Belen Salvachua; Eleftherios Skordis; Claudia Tambasco; Gianluca Valentino; T Weiler; V. Vlachoudis; D Wollmann
The CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is designed to collide proton beams of unprecedented energy, in order to extend the frontiers of high-energy particle physics. During the first very successful running period in 2010--2013, the LHC was routinely storing protons at 3.5--4 TeV with a total beam energy of up to 146 MJ, and even higher stored energies are foreseen in the future. This puts extraordinary demands on the control of beam losses. An un-controlled loss of even a tiny fraction of the beam could cause a superconducting magnet to undergo a transition into a normal-conducting state, or in the worst case cause material damage. Hence a multi-stage collimation system has been installed in order to safely intercept high-amplitude beam protons before they are lost elsewhere. To guarantee adequate protection from the collimators, a detailed theoretical understanding is needed. This article presents results of numerical simulations of the distribution of beam losses around the LHC that have leaked out of the collimation system. The studies include tracking of protons through the fields of more than 5000 magnets in the 27 km LHC ring over hundreds of revolutions, and Monte-Carlo simulations of particle-matter interactions both in collimators and machine elements being hit by escaping particles. The simulation results agree typically within a factor 2 with measurements of beam loss distributions from the previous LHC run. Considering the complex simulation, which must account for a very large number of unknown imperfections, and in view of the total losses around the ring spanning over 7 orders of magnitude, we consider this an excellent agreement. Our results give confidence in the simulation tools, which are used also for the design of future accelerators.
arXiv: Accelerator Physics | 2014
G. Stancari; Alexander Valishev; Valentina Previtali; Roderik Bruce; Stefano Redaelli; A Rossi; Belén Salvachua Ferrando
Collimation with hollow electron beams is a technique for halo control in high-power hadron beams. It is based on an electron beam (possibly pulsed or modulated in intensity) guided by strong axial magnetic fields which overlaps with the circulating beam in a short section of the ring. The concept was tested experimentally at the Fermilab Tevatron collider using a hollow electron gun installed in one of the Tevatron electron lenses. Within the US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) and the European FP7 HiLumi LHC Design Study, we are proposing a conceptual design for applying this technique to the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. A prototype hollow electron gun for the LHC was built and tested. The expected performance of the hollow electron beam collimator was based on Tevatron experiments and on numerical tracking simulations. Halo removal rates and enhancements of halo diffusivity were estimated as a function of beam and lattice parameters. Proton beam core lifetimes and emittance growth rates were checked to ensure that undesired effects were suppressed. Hardware specifications were based on the Tevatron devices and on preliminary engineering integration studies in the LHC machine. Required resources and a possible timeline were also outlined, together with a brief discussion of alternative haloremoval schemes and of other possible uses of electron lenses to improve the performance of the LHC.
Archive | 2010
D Wollmann; M Magistris; O. Aberle; M Mayer; J. P. Bacher; R de Morais Amaral; M Malabaila; A Nordt; S Mathot; L Lari; F Caspers; I. Baishev; M Donze; E Chiaveri; S. Calatroni; A. Ferrari; Delphine Jacquet; G. Bellodi; D. Kaltchev; A Cherif; John M. Jowett; J M Geisser; I. Kurochkin; Chiara Bracco; J Lendaro; P Francon; Alessandro Masi; Vlachoudis; Aurelien Marsili; Nicolas Mounet
Physical Review Special Topics-accelerators and Beams | 2012
Gianluca Valentino; R. Assmann; Roderik Bruce; Stefano Redaelli; A Rossi; Nicholas Sammut; Daniel Wollmann
Archive | 2010
O. Aberle; R. Assmann; J. P. Bacher; Vincent Baglin; Giulia Bellodi; A. Bertarelli; Patrick Bestmann; R. Billen; V. Boccone; A. P. Bouzoud; Chiara Bracco; Hans Heinrich Braun; Roderik Bruce; Markus Brugger; S. Calatroni; F Caspers; Marija Cauchi; F. Cerruti; R. Chamizo; Ahmed Cherif; Enrico Chiaveri; A. Dallochio; D Deboy; B. Dehning; Mathieu Donze; Noel Hilleret; Eva Barbara Holzer; Delphine Jacquet; Jean-Bernard Jeanneret; Jose Miguel Jimenez
Archive | 2013
Belen Salvachua; Stefano Redaelli; D Mirarchi; Gianluca Valentino; D Deboy; Elena Quaranta; A Rossi; L Lari; Ralph Assmann; Aurelien Marsili; Roderik Bruce; Marija Cauchi
Physical Review Special Topics-accelerators and Beams | 2014
Marija Cauchi; O. Aberle; R. Assmann; A. Bertarelli; Federico Carra; K. Cornelis; Alessandro Dallocchio; D Deboy; L Lari; Stefano Redaelli; A Rossi; Belen Salvachua; Pierluigi Mollicone; Nicholas Sammut
Archive | 2010
Stefano Redaelli; Roderik Bruce; A Rossi; D Wollmann
7th Int. Particle Accelerator Conf. (IPAC'16), Busan, Korea, May 8-13, 2016 | 2016
Elena Quaranta; A. Bertarelli; Nicolo Biancacci; Roderik Bruce; Federico Carra; Elias Métral; Stefano Redaelli; A Rossi; Benoit Salvant
Archive | 2015
Stefano Redaelli; A. Bertarelli; A Rossi; G. Stancari; Belen Salvachua; Roderik Bruce; D. Perini; Alexander Valishev