A. Szanto de Toledo
University of São Paulo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. Szanto de Toledo.
Physical Review Letters | 1999
Mahananda Dasgupta; David Hinde; Rachel D Butt; R Anjos; Annette Berriman; N. Carlin; P R S Gomes; Clyde Morton; J.O. Newton; A. Szanto de Toledo; K. Hagino
Complete fusion excitation functions for
Physics Reports | 1999
S. Sanders; A. Szanto de Toledo; C. Beck
{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}{+}^{208}\mathrm{Pb}
Journal of Physics G | 2012
L. Lamia; C. Spitaleri; V. Burjan; N. Carlin; S. Cherubini; V. Crucillà; M. Gameiro Munhoz; M. Gimenez del Santo; M. Gulino; Z. Hons; G. G. Kiss; V. Kroha; S. Kubono; M. La Cognata; C. Li; J. Mrazek; A. M. Mukhamedzhanov; R. G. Pizzone; S. M. R. Puglia; Qungang Wen; G. G. Rapisarda; C. Rolfs; S. Romano; M. L. Sergi; E. Somorjai; F. A. Souza; A. Szanto de Toledo; G. Tabacaru; A. Tumino; Y. Wakabayashi
have been measured to high precision at near barrier energies. The experimental fusion barrier distribution extracted from these data allows reliable prediction of the expected complete fusion cross sections. However, the measured cross sections are only 68% of those predicted. The large cross sections observed for incomplete fusion products support the interpretation that this suppression of fusion is caused by
Nuclear Physics | 2009
F. A. Souza; C. Beck; N. Carlin; N. Keeley; R. Liguori Neto; M. M. de Moura; Marcelo Gameiro Munhoz; M. G. Del Santo; A. A. P. Suaide; E.M. Szanto; A. Szanto de Toledo
{}^{9}\mathrm{Be}
Physical Review C | 2001
C. Bhattacharya; M. Rousseau; C. Beck; V. Rauch; R. M. Freeman; D. Mahboub; R. Nouicer; P. Papka; O. Stezowski; A. Hachem; E. Martin; A. K. Dummer; S. Sanders; A. Szanto de Toledo
breaking up into charged fragments before reaching the fusion barrier. Implications for the fusion of radioactive nuclei are discussed.
Physical Review C | 2014
C. Spitaleri; L. Lamia; S. M. R. Puglia; S. Romano; M. La Cognata; V. Crucillà; R. G. Pizzone; G. G. Rapisarda; M. L. Sergi; M. Gimenez del Santo; N. Carlin; M. G. Munhoz; F. A. Souza; A. Szanto de Toledo; A. Tumino; B. F. Irgaziev; A. M. Mukhamedzhanov; G. Tabacaru; V. Burjan; V. Kroha; Z. Hons; J. Mrazek; Shu Hua Zhou; Cheng-Bo Li; Qungang Wen; Y. Wakabayashi; H. Yamaguchi; E. Somorjai
A review of the characteristic features found in fully energy-damped, binary decay yields from light heavy-ion reactions with 20≤Atarget+Aprojectile≤80 is presented. The different aspects of these yields that have been used to support models of compound-nucleus (CN) fission and deep-inelastic dinucleus orbiting are highlighted. Cross-section calculations based on the statistical phase space at different stages of the reaction are presented and compared to the experimental results. Although the statistical models are found to reproduce most of the observed experimental behaviors, an additional reaction component corresponding to a heavy-ion resonance or orbiting mechanism is also evident in certain systems. The system dependence of this second component is discussed. The extent to which the binary yields in very light systems (ACN≤32) can be viewed as resulting from a fusion–fission mechanism is explored. A number of unresolved questions, such as whether the different observed behaviors reflect characteristically different reaction times, are discussed.
Physical Review C | 2002
M. Rousseau; C. Beck; C. Bhattacharya; V. Rauch; O. Dorvaux; K. Eddahbi; C. Enaux; R. M. Freeman; F. Haas; D. Mahboub; R. Nouicer; P. Papka; O. Stezowski; S. Szilner; A. Hachem; E. Martin; S. Sanders; A. K. Dummer; A. Szanto de Toledo
A new measurement of the 11B(p,?0)8Be has been performed applying the Trojan horse method (THM) to the 2H(11B,?80Be)n quasi-free reaction induced at a laboratory energy of 27 MeV. The astrophysical S(E) factor has been extracted from ?600 keV down to zero energy by means of an improved data analysis technique and it has been compared with direct data available in the literature. The range investigated here overlaps with the energy region of the light element LiBeB stellar burning and with that of future aneutronic fusion power plants using the 11B+p fuel cycle. The new investigation described here confirms the preliminary results obtained in the recent TH works. The origin of the discrepancy between the direct estimate of the 11B(p,?0)8Be S(E)-factor at zero energy and that from a previous THM investigation is quantitatively corroborated. The results obtained here support, within the experimental uncertainties, the low-energy S(E)-factor extrapolation and the value of the electron screening potential deduced from direct measurements.
Physical Review C | 1996
C. Beck; A. Szanto de Toledo
Abstract The reactions induced by the weakly bound 6 Li projectile interacting with the intermediate mass target 59 Co were investigated. Light charged particles singles and α – d coincidence measurements were performed at the near barrier energies E lab = 17.4 , 21.5, 25.5 and 29.6 MeV. The main contributions of the different competing mechanisms are discussed. A statistical model analysis, Continuum-Discretized Coupled-Channels (CDCC) calculations and two-body kinematics were used as tools to provide information to disentangle the main components of these mechanisms. A significant contribution of the direct breakup was observed through the difference between the experimental sequential breakup cross section and the CDCC prediction for the non-capture breakup cross section.
Physics Letters B | 1985
G.S.F. Stephans; D. G. Kovar; R. V. F. Janssens; G. Rosner; H. Ikezoe; B. Wilkins; D. Henderson; K.T. Lesko; J.J. Kolata; C. K. Gelbke; B. V. Jacak; Z.M. Koenig; G. D. Westfall; A. Szanto de Toledo; E.M. Szanto; Peter L. Gonthier
Velocity and energy spectra of the light charged particles emitted in the
Physical Review C | 1999
R. Nouicer; C. Beck; R. M. Freeman; F. Haas; N. Aissaoui; T. Bellot; D. Disdier; G. Duchene; A. Elanique; A. Hachem; F. Hoellinger; D. Mahboub; V. Rauch; S. Sanders; A. K. Dummer; F. W. Prosser; A. Szanto de Toledo; Sl. Cavallaro; E. Uegaki; Y. Abe
{}^{28}\mathrm{Si}{(E}_{\mathrm{lab}}=112 \mathrm{MeV}{)+}^{28}\mathrm{Si}