Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A.T. Lin.
European Urology Supplements | 2015
H. Li; E. Huang; Allen W. Chiu; A.T. Lin; K-K. Chen
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Paramount to financial success in the current health care environment is controlling expenses and managing budgets. Repair of expensive equipment and delicate instruments, such as flexible ureteroscopes, has become a focus on controlling costs. Here we analyze a high volume single institutions experience regarding flexible ureteroscope repairs utilizing the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) versus third-party companies (TPC). METHODS: A retrospective collection of data from July 2011 to present was performed. Collected data encompassed a period of three years; the most recent 18-month segment (1/1/13 e 6/30/14) included repairs made by the TPC, while data for the previous 18 months (7/1/11 e 12/31/12) included repairs made by the OEM. Data on the number of repairs/replacements, costs, and the number of urological cases involving flexible ureteroscope were compared. RESULTS: Total number of cases performed during the OEM period was 933 and 815 cases were performed during TPC period. When comparing the OEM period with the TPC period, the total numbers of replacements or repairs performed were 58 and 184, respectively. The total costs of repairs/replacements were
European Urology Supplements | 2014
E.Y-H. Huang; H.J. Chung; C-C. Lin; R-S. Peng; Allen W. Chiu; A.T. Lin; K-K. Chen
361,291 and
European Urology Supplements | 2017
S.H. Lu; M.-C. Tai; T.-P. Lin; E.Y.-H. Huang; X.-J. Zhong; A.T. Lin; Kuang-Kuo Chen
477,900, respectively. The costs per procedure were
European Urology Supplements | 2016
H.J. Chung; A.T. Lin; C-C. Lin; Y.H. Fan; T.J. Chen; K-K. Chen
387 and
European Urology Supplements | 2016
C-C. Lin; H.J. Chung; A.T. Lin; Y.H. Fan; Kuang-Kuo Chen; T.Z. Chen
586, respectively. Frequency of repairs (repairs/month) was 3 versus 10, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Institutions, especially high volume centers, should continuously monitor the costs and quality of repairs. Our data suggests a potential benefit in overall cost to repairs made by the OEM versus TPC.
European Urology Supplements | 2016
E.Y-H. Huang; H.J. Chung; C-C. Lin; Y.H. Fan; R.S. Peng; Y-H. Chang; A.T. Lin; Kuang-Kuo Chen
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The AUA offers Best Practice recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis for urologic surgeries. Despite these recommendations, the duration and class of antibiotics administered by urologists varies considerably. Improper administration of antibiotics may lead to increased costs, antibiotic resistance, predispose to hospital-acquired infections, and induce adverse drug reactions. We examined index urologic procedures and assessed compliance with AUA guidelines for antibiotic class and duration. METHODS: From the Premier Perspectives Database, we identified 53,450 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), 4,732 undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), 44,133 undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy (Nephx), 202,740 undergoing ureteroscopy/shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), 91,279 undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), 21,469 undergoing percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL), 54,908 undergoing transvaginal surgery, 8,612 undergoing penile prosthesis (IPP), 11,487 patients undergoing brachytherapy, and 114,132 undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), based on ICD-9 procedure codes, from 2007-2012. Antibiotic class and duration were abstracted from patient billing data. Overall compliance with the AUA Best Practice Policy Statement was defined as receiving the appropriate antibiotic class (or antibiotic class combination) in conjunction with duration not extending beyond 24 hours post-surgery as detailed in the AUA Best Practice Policy Statement. RESULTS: Surgery-specific rates of compliance with AUA guidelines for selected procedures are listed in the Table. Correct antibiotic class was ordered in 67% of cases (range 34-80% for the different procedures). The correct duration (<24 hours post-surgery) was observed in 78% of cases overall (range 1.2-98%). Average length of antibiotic prophylaxis ranged from 1.1 days after brachytherapy to 10.3 days following RC. Overall compliance was 53.4%, ranging from 0.6% in RC to 68.3% in ESWL. Over time, compliance increased, ranging from a low of 46.2% overall compliance in 2007 to 58.9% overall compliance in 2012. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis after surgery is subject to considerable variation. Increased compliance in recent years may relate to better dissemination of AUA guidelines. Efforts are needed to further improve standardization of antibiotic administration for common urologic procedures.
European Urology Supplements | 2016
T-C. Wei; T-P. Lin; A.T. Lin; K-K. Chen
European Urology Supplements | 2015
Y.H. Fan; H.J. Chung; E. Huang; A.T. Lin; K-K. Chen
European Urology Supplements | 2014
H. Li; H.J. Chung; A.T. Lin; K-K. Chen
European Urology Supplements | 2013
E.Y-H. Huang; C-C. Lin; H.J. Chung; J-P. Lin; A.T. Lin; K-K. Chen