A. Unsal
Gazi University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. Unsal.
Urology | 2014
Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Brian C. Sninsky; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Tevfik Ziypak; Gokhan Atis; Mansur Daggulli; Berkan Resorlu; Turhan Caskurlu; A. Unsal
OBJECTIVE To present the outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) and laser lithotripsy for the treatment of calculi within pelvic ectopic kidney (PEK). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 26 patients with calculi in PEK treated with F-URS in 5 referral hospitals between 2010 and 2013. Patient demographics and stone characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, stone size, location, history of shock wave lithotripsy or kidney surgery), and perioperative measures (duration of operation, fluoroscopic imaging, and hospitalization and success and complication rates) were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 26 patients with mean age of 41.1 ± 15.8 years (7-72 years) were included in the study. The mean stone size was 17.0 ± 5.1 mm (10-28 mm). The mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were calculated as 52.1 ± 27.7 minutes (30-120 minutes) and 54.8 ± 48.9 seconds (10-180 seconds), respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.8 days (1-9 days). Treatment was deemed successful in 22 patients (84.6%). Ureteroscopy failed in 4 patients (15.4%) due to impaired passage of fragments (n = 3) or inability to reach the stone secondary to the location in an isolated lower calyx (n = 1). Minor postoperative complications were observed in 5 patients (19.2%; persistent hematuria [n = 1], fever [n = 1], renal colic [n = 2], and urinary tract infection [n = 1]). No severe complications or mortality occurred. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that F-URS is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment modality for small- and medium-sized stones in PEK.
Urology Journal | 2018
Cagri Senocak; Cihat Ozcan; Tolga Sahin; Gulden Yilmaz; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Selçuk Sarıkaya; Berkan Resorlu; Ural Oguz; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; A. Unsal; Oztug Adsan
PURPOSE To determine the perioperative risk factors for postoperative infections among patients undergoing flexible uretero-renoscopy with laser lithotripsy (FURSLL). In addition, the resistance patterns of pathogens isolated from positive preoperative urine cultures were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 492 consecutive patients who had undergone FURSLL for stone disease in our department. Postoperative infection was defined as fever (? 38°C) with pyuria (? 10 white blood cells per high power field), or systemic inflammatory response syndrome, or sepsis. Pre-operative and intra-operative characteristics between patients with and without postoperative infectious complications were compared using univariate analyses. Significant variables on univariate analyses were included in a multivariatelogistic regression analysis to evaluate risk factors associated with postoperative infection following FURSLL. RESULTS 42 (8.5%) of 492 patients had postoperative infectious complications after FURSLL. 59 (12%) of 492 patients had a positive preoperative urine culture. 19 (32.2% of 59) patients had multidrug resistance (MDR) isolates recovered from positive preoperative urine cultures. 75% (9/12 cultures) of the positive preoperative urine cultures of patients in whom a postoperative infectious complication developed consisted of gram-negative pathogens. On multivariate analysis positive preoperative MDR urine culture (OR:4.75;95%CI:1.55-14.56; P = .006) was found to be significant with the dependent variable as the postoperative infectious complications despite appropriate preoperative antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION We found that positive preoperative MDR urine culture is a significant risk factor for infectious complications after FURSLL. Our findings point to the need for further research on assessment of risk factors forMDR infections to reduce the rate of postoperative infectious complications.
Urology | 2009
A. Unsal; Berkan Resorlu; C. Kara; Mirze Bayindir
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy (defined by stone-free rates) and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in the treatment of medium sized (1-2 cm) symptomatic lower pole renal calculi, and establishment of the short-term morbidity. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 60 evaluable patients who had undergone PNL for 1 to 2 cm diameter lower-pole (LP) stones between November 2006 to March 2009 and compared these results with other treatment modalities in published literature. RESULTS In all cases, stones were located in the lower calix. Thirty-six procedures were performed on the left side, and 24 were performed on the right side. The mean time to access the collecting system was 20.4 minutes (range 8-70 min) and mean operative time was 62.2 minutes (range 13-155 min). Abdominal radiography performed on postoperative day 1 demonstrated a stone free status in 56 (93.3%) patients. However, 4 patients (6.7%) required ancillary procedures (secondary PNL in 1, retrograde intrarenal surgery in 1, and SWL in 2). After this secondary procedures a complete stone-free status was achieved in 98.3% of patients. The morbidity of patients undergoing PNL at our hospital was minimal, with a mean hospital stay of 3.7 days. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that, PNL is a safe and effective method for medium sized (1 to 2 cm) lower pole renal calculi and percutaneous removal should be considered the primary approach for lower pole stones greater than 10 mm.
World Journal of Urology | 2016
Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tuna Karatag; Adem Tok; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Ibrahim Buldu; Sina Kardas; Okkes Taha Kucukdagli; A. Unsal
Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia | 2015
Ekrem Ozyuvali; Berkan Resorlu; Ural Oguz; Yildiray Yildiz; Tolga Sahin; Cagri Senocak; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Erman Damar; Murat Yildirim; A. Unsal
Urological Research | 2014
Ural Oguz; Melih Balci; Gokhan Atis; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; Altug Tuncel; Fikret Halis; Yilmaz Aslan; Ismail Okan Yildirim; Cagri Senocak; Mustafa Yordam; Ali Atan; Turhan Caskurlu; A. Unsal
International Urology and Nephrology | 2014
Ural Oguz; Berkan Resorlu; A. Unsal
Urological Research | 2017
Ramazan Kocaaslan; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Muhammed Tosun; Mehmet Mazhar Utangac; Tolga Karakan; Ekrem Ozyuvali; Namık Kemal Hatipoglu; A. Unsal; Kemal Sarica
Urological Research | 2014
Şenol Adanur; Tevfik Ziypak; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Berkan Resorlu; Haluk Söylemez; Mansur Daggulli; İsa Özbey; A. Unsal
Urological Research | 2018
Cagri Senocak; Rıdvan Özbek; Omer Faruk Bozkurt; A. Unsal