A. Venturi

Prophylaxis of pouchitis onset with probiotic therapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS We have recently documented the efficacy of a highly concentrated probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in the prevention of flare-up in patients with chronic pouchitis. The aim of this study was to compare probiotic therapy with VSL#3 versus placebo in the ability to prevent the onset of acute pouchitis during the first year after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS Forty consecutive patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either VSL#3 (1 packet containing 900 billion bacteria/day) (n = 20) or an identical placebo (n = 20) immediately after ileostomy closure for 1 year. The patients were assessed clinically, endoscopically, and histologically after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire. RESULTS Two of the 20 patients (10%) treated with VSL#3 had an episode of acute pouchitis compared with 8 of the 20 patients (40%) treated with placebo (log-rank test, z = 2.273; P < 0.05). Treatment with VSL#3 determined a significant improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, whereas this was not the case with placebo. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with VSL#3 is effective in the prevention of the onset of acute pouchitis and improves quality of life of patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Impact on the composition of the faecal flora by a new probiotic preparation: preliminary data on maintenance treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis

: Although 5‐aminosalicylic acid (5‐ASA) oral compounds are the standard maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis in remission, some patients cannot use them because of side‐effects. Clinical and experimental observations have suggested the potential role of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease therapy.

Antibiotic combination therapy in patients with chronic, treatment-resistant pouchitis

: Pouchitis is the major long‐term complication after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. About 15% of patients have a chronic, treatment‐resistant disease.

Effect of probiotic strains on interleukin 8 production by HT29/19A cells

OBJECTIVES:Promising results from clinical studies on the effect of probiotics as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease and in the prevention of onset of pouchitis ask for studies to unravel the still poorly understood mechanism of action of probiotics.METHODS:To evaluate whether the probiotic bacteria that were used in the clinical studies (VSL#3, Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, and Lactobacillus GG) are able to induce chemokine production in epithelial cells, HT29/19A monolayers were incubated with cell debris and cell extract fractions of single strains of the probiotic bacteria in doses ranging from 103 to 109 colony-forming units/ml for 32 h. Supernatants were measured for interleukin 8 by ELISA.RESULTS:Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria strains from VSL#3 and Lactobacillus GG did not induce interleukin 8, whereas both cell debris and cell extracts from E. coli Nissle 1917 induced interleukin 8 production in a dose-dependent way. Cell extracts from streptococcal strains induced interleukin 8 when applied at high concentrations.CONCLUSIONS:Probiotic Gram-positive bacteria did not induce interleukin 8, whereas the nonpathogenic, Gram-negative E. coli Nissle 1917 strain induced interleukin 8 in a dose-dependent way in this culture model. These results suggest that probiotic Gram-positive bacteria and E. coli Nissle 1917 may exert their beneficial effects on the host by a different mechanism of action.

Probiotics in infective diarrhoea and inflammatory bowel diseases

Bacteria are present throughout the gastrointestinal tract, but their pattern and concentration vary greatly. Probiotics are living organisms that supply beneficial health effects to the host. So far the beneficial effects of probiotics have been shown, almost exclusively, under poorly defined experimental conditions. There are little convincing data from well‐designed, double‐blind controlled trials supporting health‐promoting effects. The use of probiotics to treat gastrointestinal infections has produced contrasting results. Apart from information on rotavirus infection in children, there is no convincing evidence from controlled studies on the efficacy of probiotics in the prevention or treatment of infective diarrhoea. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that there are potential therapeutic roles for probiotics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. This review focuses on the available data concerning the mechanisms of action of probiotics, and on the results from clinical studies using probiotics to treat infective diarrhoea and inflammatory bowel disease.

Comparison of oral with rectal mesalazine in the treatment of ulcerative proctitis

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral mesalazine with mesalazine suppositories in patients with active ulcerative proctitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A four-week, randomized, single-blind trial was performed in 58 patients with active, histologically confirmed ulcerative proctitis (≤15 cm) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral 800-mg mesalazine tablets taken three times per day (n=29) compared with 400 mg of mesalazine suppositories administered three times per day (n=29). Patients were evaluated at study entry and after two and four weeks. Efficacy evaluations included a disease activity index, which represents a score with four variables: stools frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance, and physicians assessment of disease severity. Histologic activity was also assessed at study entry and after two and four weeks in accordance with the criteria by Truelove and Richard. Safety assessment included clinical laboratory parameters and adverse event reports. RESULTS: There were no significant differences with regard to baseline comparisons of demographics and severity between the two treatment groups. Improvement in mean disease activity index score was significantly greater with suppositories compared with oral mesalazine, both at two-week and four-week visits (mean disease activity index scores at baseline, two, and four weeks: suppositories = 7.7, 2.59, and 1.48; tablets = 7.42, 5.72, and 3.48, respectively (P<0.001)). The rate of histologic remission was significantly greater with suppositories compared with tablets both at two and four weeks (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in adverse events or clinical laboratory results between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study indicate that treatment with mesalazine suppositories produces earlier and significantly better results than oral mesalazine in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis.

Probiotics - Role in inflammatory bowel disease

The aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease is still unclean. Whilst a specific pathogen agent associated with these diseases has not been found, the rationale for probiotic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease is based on convincing evidence involving intestinal bacteria in their pathogenesis. Encouraging results have been obtained with probiotic therapy in several animal models of experimental colitis. The administration of highly concentrated probiotic preparations represents a valid approach both for the prevention of pouchitis onset and relapses. The encouraging results obtained in ulcerative colitis and Crohns disease need to be further assessed in large double-blind trials.

Comparison of mesalazine suppositories in proctitis and distal proctosigmoiditis

Mesalazine suppositories at 500 mg b.d. are a safe and effective treatment for patients with ulcerative proctitis or distal proctosigmoiditis. Recently a mesalazine 1 g suppository (Pentasa) has been developed.

Probiotics for the treatment of postoperative complications following intestinal surgery

Probiotics are living micro-organisms that belong to the normal enteric flora and exert a beneficial effect on health and well-being. The rationale for the therapeutic use of probiotics in pouchitis (the most frequent long-term complication following pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis) and postoperative recurrence in Crohns disease is based on convincing evidence suggesting a crucial role for the endogenous intestinal microflora in the pathogenesis of these conditions. Positive results have been obtained with the administration of highly concentrated probiotic preparations in preventing the onset and relapses of pouchitis. Further controlled studies are needed to establish the efficacy of probiotics in the prophylaxis of postoperative recurrences of Crohns disease and in the treatment of mild pouchitis.

Long-term efficacy of bismuth carbomer enemas in patients with treatment-resistant chronic pouchitis

Background: Mucosal inflammation of the ileal pouch (pouchitis) is the major long‐term complication after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Broad‐spectrum antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment, however, 15% of patients with pouchitis have a chronic, treatment‐resistant disease.