A. Webb

Randomized trial comparing epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced esophagogastric cancer.

PURPOSE We report the results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECF regimen) with the standard combination of 5-FU, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) in previously untreated patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred seventy-four patients with adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized and analyzed for survival, tumor response, toxicity, and quality of life (QL). RESULTS The overall response rate was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36% to 54%) with ECF and 21% (95% CI, 13% to 29%) with FAMTX (P = .0002). Toxicity was tolerable and there were only three toxic deaths. The FAMTX regimen caused more hematologic toxicity and serious infections, but ECF caused more emesis and alopecia. The median survival duration was 8.9 months with ECF and 5.7 months with FAMTX (P = .0009); at 1 year, 36% (95% CI, 27% to 45%) of ECF and 21% (95% CI, 14% to 29%) of FAMTX patients were alive. The median failure-free survival duration was 7.4 months with ECF and 3.4 months with FAMTX (P = .00006). The global QL scores were better for ECF at 24 weeks, but the remaining QL data showed no differences between either arm of the study. Hospital-based cost analysis on a subset of patients was similar for each arm and translated into an increment cost of

Long-term survival after epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil for gastric cancer: results of a randomized trial

975 per life-year gained. CONCLUSION The ECF regimen results in a survival and response advantage, tolerable toxicity, better QL and cost-effectiveness compared with FAMTX chemotherapy. This regimen should now be considered the standard treatment for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

FDG–PET in the prediction of survival of patients with cancer of the pancreas: a pilot study

We report the final results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECF regimen) with the standard combination of 5-FU, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in previously untreated patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Between 1992 and 1995, 274 patients with adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized from eight oncology centres in the UK and analysed for response and survival. The overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval (CI), 37–55%) with ECF, and 21% (95% CI, 13–28%) with FAMTX (P = 0.00003). The median survival was 8.7 months with ECF and 6.1 months with FAMTX (P = 0.0005). The 2-year survival rates were 14% (95% CI, 8–20%) for the ECF arm, and 5% (95% CI, 2–10%) for the FAMTX arm (P = 0.03). Histologically complete surgical resection following chemotherapy was achieved in ten patients in the ECF arm (three pathological complete responses to chemotherapy) and three patients in the FAMTX arm (no pathological complete responses). The ECF regimen resulted in a response and survival advantage compared with FAMTX chemotherapy. The probability of long-term survival following surgical resection of residual disease is increased by this treatment. The high response rates seen with ECF support its use in the neoadjuvant setting.

Impact of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil with or without interferon alfa-2b on tumor response, survival, and quality of life in advanced colorectal cancer.

Carcinoma of the pancreas is an aggressive tumour with an extremely poor prognosis. Recent studies have shown that chemotherapy can improve survival as well as quality of life. Since the prognosis is generally poor, the identification of early responders to chemotherapy is important to avoid unnecessary toxicity in patients who are not responding. Response assessment by conventional radiographic methods is problematical because treatment induces fibrosis and makes tumour measurements difficult. The aim of this pilot study was to assess 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) as an early marker of the benefit of chemotherapy. Eleven patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with protracted venous infusional 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) alone or PVI 5-FU and mitomycin C (MMC) FDG-PET scans were performed prior to and at 1 month following the commencement of chemotherapy. FDG uptake was compared with the tumour dimensions measured on a computer tomographic (CT) scan. Patients were followed up for relapse, death and symptomatic response. Three of the 11 patients had no measurable FDG uptake prior to chemotherapy. Of the eight patients who had measurable uptake prior to treatment, seven had a reduction in uptake at 1 month. Six out of the 11 patients had no measurable FDG uptake at 1 month. The overall survival (OS) in these patients ranged from 124 to 1460 days, with a median of 318.5 days. This was superior in comparison to patients who had residual FDG uptake at 1 month (median survival 318.5 days vs 139 days; P = 0.034) and there was a trend to improved symptoms (84% [5/6] vs 20% [1/5]; P = 0.13). There was no statistically significant correlation between best CT response and FDG uptake at 1 month. These results suggest that the absence of FDG uptake at 1 month following chemotherapy for carcinoma of the pancreas is an indicator of improved overall survival. This suggests that FDG-PET may be superior to response assessment by conventional radiographic methods and FDG-PET may have the potential to help make difficult treatment decisions in the management of pancreatic cancer. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.

The prognostic value of serum and immunohistochemical tumour markers in advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding interferon alfa-2b (IFN) to protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) from the start of treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who attended our unit with histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive either PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d via Hickman line, and IFN 5 MU subcutaneously three times weekly, or PVI 5-FU alone. Treatment was given for a maximum of two 10-week blocks, with a 2-week gap for reassessment of all parameters. Quality of life (QL) was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) pretreatment and every 6 weeks thereafter. RESULTS A total of 160 patients were randomized, with 155 eligible for assessment. Radiologic response was observed in 43 patients (28%): 17 of 77 (22%) in the 5-FU-plus-IFN arm (all partial responses [PRs]) and 26 of 78 (33%) in the 5-FU-alone group (complete responses [CRs] and 22 PRs) (difference not significant). Symptomatic improvement occurred in the majority of patients, and equally in both arms: 61% to 80% depending on the symptom. There was no significant difference between the two groups in failure-free survival (median, 161 v 193 days) or overall survival (median, 328 v 357 days). However, patients who received IFN did experience significantly more toxicity in the form of leukopenia (P = .001), neutropenia (P = .04), mucositis (P = .008), and alopecia (P = .0002). There were no toxic deaths and few notable differences in QL between the two arms. CONCLUSION This study confirms that PVI 5-FU is effective in treating the symptoms associated with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, with only mild to moderate toxicity and maintenance of QL. IFN 5 MU three times weekly does not enhance these palliative benefits.

Are 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging useful in the prediction of relapse in lymphoma residual masses

Using a prospectively acquired database of 290 patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, the prognostic significance of serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (237 patients), alphafeto protein (AFP) (164 patients), beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (beta HCG) (165 patients), CA19-9 (64 patients) and CA125 (104 patients) and tissue staining for C-erb B-2 (160 patients) and beta HCG (160 patients) was investigated. Serum was taken prior to 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy and immunohistochemistry was performed on diagnostic specimens. In the univariate analysis, tumour markers of poor prognosis were CEA > or = 5 micrograms/l (P = 0.01; median survival (MS) 42 versus 35 weeks), serum beta HCG > or = 4 U/l (P = 0.02; MS 42 versus 25 weeks), CA125 > or = 35 U/ml (P = 0.03; MS 43 versus 31 weeks) and CA125 > or = 350 U/ml (P = 0.001; MS 42 versus 17 weeks). Other significant factors were poor performance status, the presence of metastases and poorly differentiated tumour histology. Tumours markers of poor prognosis in the multivariate analysis were serum beta HCG > or = 4 IU/l [hazard ratio (HR) 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-1.1] and CA125 > or = 350 U/ml (HR 2.2; CI 4.2-1.2). There was a degree of subgroup variability in this model but, in general, other factors correlating with a poor survival were poor performance status, metastases and poorly differentiated tumour histology. This is the largest prognostic study of each tumour marker in advanced disease and demonstrates that serum beta HCG and CA125 in gastric cancer prior to chemotherapy do convey an independent poor prognosis which may reflect not just tumour burden but aggressive biology.

A phase III trial comparing CHOP to PMitCEBO with or without G-CSF in patients aged 60 plus with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Treatment of both Hodgkins disease (HD) and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) frequently results in a residual mass visible radiologically. Such patients may receive radiotherapy unnecessarily because the residual mass may represent benign fibrotic tissue rather than residual active lymphoma. Radiotherapy has been shown to have significant short and more worrying long-term toxicity. Refining the criteria for its use would be a major advance. A number of clinical investigations have been evaluated to more accurately determine the nature of such lesions, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and high-dose gallium-67 scanning (HDGS) but none has proven utility. 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is an imaging technique that has been shown to be useful in distinguishing fibrosis from residual active disease in solid tumours. The aim of this study was to compare FDG PET and MRI in the assessment of residual masses following treatment for lymphoma. Patients with NHL/HD who had a residual mass following chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Patients had a combination of MRI and/or PET. All scans were completed within 5 months of the end of treatment. Patients were followed-up for relapse. 56 patients had an MRI scan, 24 had a PET scan and 22 patients had both investigations. Overall sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were for MRI 45% and 74%, PET 50% and 69%, and PET/MRI concurring 50% and 67%. There was a trend for improved relapse-free survival (RFS) with a negative result of both MRI and PET, but this was not statistically significant. The predictive value for both tests failed to reach statistical significance. Subgroup analysis suggests that PET may be better at predicting relapse in patients with NHL, especially those with masses above the diaphragm. There is no convincing evidence that either MRI or PET or the combination can reliably predict relapse within residual masses after treatment for lymphoma. A negative PET scan however appears to be more informative than a positive result and may well aid clinical decision making. There are a number of factors that may produce false-positive results, including post-treatment inflammatory changes, the sensitivity of the test in the setting of minimal residual disease and the heterogeneity of the histological subtypes studied. A negative PET (or MRI) result in lymphoma residual masses following therapy may negate the necessity for further therapy such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy and their concomitant toxicities.

Oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-fluorouracil pretreated colorectal cancer

The management of older patients with aggressive non-Hodgkins lymphoma presents a challenge to the physician. Age is a poor prognostic indicator, due to reduced ability to tolerate and maintain dose-intensive chemotherapy. Generally, older patients demonstrate a lower response rate, reduced survival and increased toxicity, although the majority of large randomised trials exclude older patients. This randomised trial was conducted in patients 60 years or over to compare CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg m−2, doxorubicin 50 mg m−2, vincristine 1.4 mg m−2, prednisolone 100 mg) with PMitCEBO (mitoxantrone 7 mg m−2, cyclophosphamide 300 mg m−2, etoposide 150 mg m−2, vincristine 1.4 mg m−2, bleomycin 10 mg m−2 and prednisolone 50 mg). Due to the myelosuppressive nature of these regimens, patients were also randomised to the addition of G-CSF. The formal results of this trial with long-term follow-up are now reported. Data were analysed to assess efficacy and toxicity. Overall response rate was 84% in the CHOP arm and 83% in the PMitCEBO arm, with overall response rates of 83% for the use of G-CSF and 84% for no G-CSF. At median 44 months follow-up, there was no significant difference in failure-free, progression-free or overall survival between the CHOP and PMitCEBO arms. At 3 years, the actuarial failure-free survival was 44% in CHOP recipients and 42% in PMitCEBO recipients and the 3-year actuarial overall survival was 46% and 45% respectively. There was no significant difference in the failure-free, progression-free or overall survival with the addition of G-CSF.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer with epirubicin, cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (ECF): a Royal Marsden pilot study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-FU pretreated colorectal cancer. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with documented progression on or within 6 months following 5-FU or thymidylate synthase inhibitor containing chemotherapy were recruited between June 1997 and September 2000. Oxaliplatin (100 mg m–2) was given every 2 weeks and PVI 5-FU (300 mg m–2day–1) was administered. Median age of patients was 61 years. 17 patients had >2 sites of disease involvement. 10 had received 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy. 16 received oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU as second-line chemotherapy for advanced disease and 22 as third or subsequent lines. Median follow up was 6.1 months. The best achieved objective tumour response rate was 29% (11 partial responses 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15–46%). 20 patients (52.6%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 3.9 months. Even for patients who had previously received both 5-FU and irinotecan (n= 22), 27.3% had partial response with oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU. 37 patients had symptoms on entry into the study. 25 patients had pain, 10 had anorexia and 28 had lethargy. 64%, 70% and 17.9% had symptomatic improvement after treatment respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities were anaemia 10.6%, neutropenia 2.6%, thrombocytopenia 5.2%, diarrhoea 18.9%, nausea and vomiting 2.7%, infection 5.4% and lethargy 37.8%. The median survival was 9.1 months. Probability of overall survival at 6 months was 58.4% (95% CI = 38.7–73.7%). The median failure-free survival was 4 months. Oxaliplatin and PVI 5FU is an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers: The Royal Marsden Hospital experience

Previous trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer have shown only modest or no improvement in survival. However, the regimens used in these studies produce low response rates in patients with advanced disease. ECF is a new regimen which results in higher response rates and may therefore be more effective in the adjuvant setting. Twenty-nine patients who had undergone a potentially curative resection for oesphagogastric carcinoma were treated with ECF [epirubicin 50 mg m-2 and cisplatin 60 mg m-2 for 18 weeks]. The median age was 52.5 years. Three patients had oesophageal tumours, 14 had tumours of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) and 12 had gastric tumours. All were adenocarcinomas apart from one undifferentiated carcinoma. One patient had stage I disease, nine stage II, 17 stage II and two stage IV. The mean number of chemotherapy cycles per patient was 5.2 (range 2-8). The median follow-up was 8.4 months (1.5-36.3 months). Eleven patients relapsed during follow-up (38%). One patient had an anastomotic recurrence and ten patients distant metastases. Overall 3 year survival was 61.5% (95% confidence interval 42-79); 3 year survival in stage II was 50% (21.2-86.3) and in stage III 65.6% (40-86). Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with grade 3/4 toxicity as follows: leucopenia 13.5%, nausea and vomiting 10%, diarrhoea 3.5%, infection 3.5% and thrombocytopenia 3.5%. There were no treatment-related deaths. We conclude that ECF can be administered safely as adjuvant treatment to patients with surgically resected gastro-oesophageal carcinoma. The results, especially in patients with stage III disease, are encouraging and support the investigation of this regimen within a prospective randomised trial.