A. William Blackstock

Phase I trial of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nineteen patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied at the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 20 mg/m(2) by 30-minute intravenous infusion each Monday and Thursday for 5 weeks concurrent with 50.4 Gy of radiation to the pancreas. Gemcitabine doses were escalated in 20-mg/m(2) increments in successive cohorts of three to six additional patients until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. RESULTS The dose-limiting toxicities at 60 mg/m(2) given twice-weekly were nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Twice-weekly gemcitabine at a 40-mg/m(2) dose was well tolerated. Of the eight patients eligible for a minimum follow-up of 12 months, three remain alive, one of whom has no evidence of disease progression. CONCLUSION A dose of twice-weekly gemcitabine at 40 mg/m(2) produced mild thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting when delivered with concurrent radiation to the upper abdomen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. These data suggest this regimen is well tolerated and may possess significant activity. These data and other observations have resulted in a phase II Cancer and Leukemia Group B study to ascertain the efficacy of this treatment regimen in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Predictive value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in the identification of responders to chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Objective:To evaluate the utility of 18F-FDG-PET in predicting response to concomitant chemoradiation in locally-advanced esophageal cancer. Summary Background Data:Approximately 25% of esophageal cancer patients experience a pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Computed tomography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound are unable to identify patients experiencing a pCR. Growing evidence supports the use of 18F-FDG-PET in the staging of esophageal cancer in its ability to detect occult metastatic and lymph nodal disease. The identification of patients with a pCR to chemoradiation could potentially spare those patients the morbidity associated with a resection. Methods:Eligibility criteria included T3-T4N0M0 or T1-T4N1M0 esophageal cancer. Patients underwent an initial 18F-FDG-PET before treatment and then repeated 4 to 6 weeks after chemoradiation, prior to the esophagectomy. Chemoradiation consisted of: cisplatinum, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation to a median dose of 50.4 Gy. Pathologic response was determined from a systematic review of the esophagectomy specimens. Results:Sixty-four patients have completed therapy to date. Response was as follows: pCR 27%, pathologic residual microscopic (pCRmicro) 14.5%, partial response 19%, and stable or progressive disease 39.5%. A pretreatment standardized uptake value (SUVmax1hour) ≥15 was associated with an observed 77.8% significant response (pCR + pCRmicro) compared with 24.2% for patients with a pretreatment SUVmax1hour <15 (P = 0.005). Significant response was observed in 71.4% of patients with a decrease in SUVmax1hour ≥10 compared with 33.3% when the SUVmax1hour decreased <10 (P = 0.004). Conclusions:Pretreatment and posttreatment 18F-FDG-PET can be useful for predicting significant response to chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. These data should be considered in evaluation of patients for esophagectomy after chemoradiation.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemotherapy and Dose-Escalated Thoracic Conformal Radiotherapy (74 Gy) in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer : CALGB 30105

PURPOSE To evaluate 74 Gy thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with induction and concurrent chemotherapy in stage IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIA/B NSCLC were randomly assigned to induction chemotherapy with either carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC], 6; days 1 and 22) with paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2); days 1 and 22; arm A) or carboplatin (AUC, 5; days 1 and 22) with gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2); days 1, 8, 22, and 29; arm B). On day 43, arm A received weekly carboplatin (AUC, 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)) while arm B received biweekly gemcitabine (35 mg/m(2)) both delivered concurrently with 74 Gy of TRT utilizing three-dimensional treatment planning. The primary end point was survival at 18 months. RESULTS Forty-three and 26 patients were accrued to arms A and B, respectively. Arm B was closed prematurely due to a high rate of grade 4 to 5 pulmonary toxicity. The overall response rate was 66.6% (95% CI, 50.5% to 80.4%) and 69.2% (95% CI, 48.2% to 85.7%) on arm A and B, respectively. The median survival time (MST) and 1-year survival rate was 24.3 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 36.4) and 66.7% (95% CI, 50.3 to 78.7) and 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.4 to 27.6) and 50.0% (95% CI, 29.9 to 67.2) for arms A and B, respectively. The primary toxicities included esophagitis, pulmonary, and fatigue. CONCLUSION Arm A reached the primary end point with an estimated MST longer than 18 months and will be compared with a standard dose of TRT in a planned randomized phase III trial in the United States cooperative groups.

Cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 89805: Phase II chemoradiation trial using gemcitabine in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

AbstractPurose. Determine the safety and efficacy of twice weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation to the upper abdomen followed by weekly gemcitabine in patients with surgically staged, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods. Patients with surgically staged, locally advanced, nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with intravenous gemcitabine administered twice weekly (40 mg/m2/d) for 5 wk concurrent with upper abdominal radiation (50.4 Gy in 180 cGy daily fractions over 5.5 wk). At the completion of the chemoradiation, patients without disease progression were given gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) weekly for five cycles. Each cycle consisted of 3 wk of treatment followed by 1 wk without treatment. Disease progression and response were assessed at 6- to 8-wk intervals. Results. From February through December 1999, 43 patients were entered into this phase II trial, 39 of whom were evaluable for treatment response. The median age was 59 yr (range: 39–84 yr); there were 18 males (47%) in the study. Grade III and IV hematologic toxicity occurred in 48 and 21% of patients, respectively, and was primarily leukocytopenia and neutropenia. Grade III and IV gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 31 and 10% of patients, respectively. There was one death attributed to sepsis. The concurrent gemcitabine and radiation portion of the study was completed without treatment interruptions in 56% of patients. The overall median survival was 8.2 mo and the median survival in the 44% of patients demonstrating a sustained CA-19-9 response was 13.5 mo. Only six patients experienced local regional progression as their first site of failure. Two patients (5%) were still alive at 35 and 41 mo posttreatment. Conclusions. These results confirm the feasibility of twice weekly gemcitabine and radiation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Although this treatment strategy produced good local regional control, this did not result in a survival advantage. Stratifying patients by performance status and CA-19-9 response in future trials may be of value.

Definitive Chemoradiation for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

A third of patients with newly diagnosed non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have locally advanced disease not amenable for curative resection. Addition of chemotherapy to thoracic radiation improves survival in patients with locally advanced NSCLC when compared with thoracic radiation alone. Over the past two decades, we have made slow but steady progress in improving the outcomes of therapy in this subset of patients. This review summarizes the past two decades of research and outlines the direction we need to pursue to significantly enhance the outcomes. The widespread use of positron emission tomography (identifying those with occult distant metastatic disease and sparing them combined-modality therapy), improved radiation techniques, and better supportive care resulting in improved chemotherapy delivery have resulted in improved outcomes. There is considerable interest in studying the role of higher doses of thoracic radiation (74 Gy) in this disease, and this is the subject of an ongoing intergroup study. Despite some recent setbacks, molecularly targeted therapies need to be studied carefully in combination with chemoradiotherapy. There is an urgent need to develop regimens that incorporate chemotherapy agents that can be administered at doses that are systemically active and yet tolerable.

Outcomes of Patients With Esophageal Cancer Staged With [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET): Can Postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET Predict the Utility of Resection?

PURPOSE To determine whether [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can delineate patients with esophageal cancer who may not benefit from esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed records of 163 patients with histologically confirmed stage I to IVA esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with or without resection with curative intent. All patients received surgical evaluation. Initial and postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET scans and prognostic/treatment variables were analyzed. FDG-PET complete response (PET-CR) after chemoradiotherapy was defined as standardized uptake value ≤ 3. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients received trimodality therapy and 75 received chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was deferred primarily due to medical inoperability or unresectable/metastatic disease after chemoradiotherapy. A total of 105 patients were evaluable for postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET response. Thirty-one percent achieved a PET-CR. PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (2-year overall survival, 71% v 11%, P < .01; 2-year freedom from local failure [LFF], 75% v 28%, P < .01), but not trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, PET-CR is the strongest independent prognostic variable (survival hazard ratio [HR], 9.82, P < .01; LFF HR, 14.13, P < .01). PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes regardless of histology, although patients with adenocarcinoma achieved a PET-CR less often. CONCLUSION Patients treated with trimodality therapy found no benefit with PET-CR, likely because FDG-PET residual disease was resected. Definitive chemoradiotherapy patients achieving PET-CR had excellent outcomes equivalent to trimodality therapy despite poorer baseline characteristics. Patients who achieve a PET-CR may not benefit from added resection given their excellent outcomes without resection. These results should be validated in a prospective trial of FDG-PET-directed therapy for esophageal cancer.

The risk of death from heart disease in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer who receive postoperative radiotherapy: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

This study was designed to investigate whether the mortality from heart disease, a manifestation of intercurrent disease after postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), has decreased over time for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Phase I Study of Accelerated Conformal Radiotherapy for Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Pulmonary Dysfunction: CALGB 39904

PURPOSE The optimal treatment for medically inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been defined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial 39904 prospectively assessed accelerated, once-daily, three-dimensional radiotherapy for early-stage NSCLC. The primary objectives were to define the maximally accelerated course of conformal radiotherapy and to describe the short-term and long-term toxicity of therapy. Entry was limited to patients with clinical stage T1N0 or T2N0 NSCLC (< 4 cm) and pulmonary dysfunction. The nominal total radiotherapy dose remained at 70 Gy, while the number of daily fractions in each successive cohort was reduced. RESULTS Thirty-nine eligible patients were accrued (eight patients each on cohorts 1 to 4 and seven patients on cohort 5) between January 2001 and July 2005. One grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity was observed in both cohort 3 (dyspnea) and cohort 4 (pain). The major response rate was 77%. After a median follow-up time of 53 months, the actuarial median survival time of all eligible patients was 38.5 months. Local relapse was observed in three patients. CONCLUSION Accelerated conformal radiotherapy was well tolerated in a high-risk population with clinical stage I NSCLC. Outcomes are comparable to prospective reports of alternative therapies, including stereotactic body radiation therapy and limited resection, with less apparent severe toxicity. Further investigation of this approach is warranted.

Phase I study of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent thoracic radiation for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent thoracic radiation in patients with Stage IIIa/IIIb non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventeen patients with histologically confirmed Stage IIIa and IIIb NSCLC were studied. Gemcitabine was administered via a 30-min i.v. infusion twice weekly for 6 weeks concurrent with 60 Gy of thoracic radiation. Gemcitabine, starting at a twice-weekly dose of 10 mg/m2 (20 mg/m2/week), was escalated in 10-15 mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of 3 to 6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. RESULTS Of the 17 patients entered, 16 were evaluable for toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicity at 50 mg/m2 given twice weekly (100 mg/m2/week) was Grade 3 pneumonitis observed in 1 patient, Grade 3 pulmonary fibrosis in a second patient, and Grade 4 esophagitis observed in two additional patients. Twice-weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 35 mg/m2 was determined to be the MTD. The overall response rate for the 16 evaluable patients was 88%. The median survival for the entire group is 16.0 months. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of twice-weekly gemcitabine is 35 mg/m2 (70 mg/m2/week) given with thoracic radiation. A Phase II study within the Cancer and Leukemia Group B to ascertain the potential efficacy of this treatment regimen is in development.

Incorporating Bevacizumab and Erlotinib in the Combined-Modality Treatment of Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Phase I/II Trial

PURPOSE Bevacizumab and erlotinib have been shown to improve survival in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase I/II trial was designed to incorporate these agents with induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received induction chemotherapy (carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 6, paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2), and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on days 1 and 22) followed by concurrent chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 45 mg/m(2) weekly with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every other week for four doses) and thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) to 74 Gy. In the phase I portion, cohort 1 received no erlotinib, whereas cohorts 2 and 3 received erlotinib at 100 and 150 mg, respectively, Tuesday through Friday, during TCRT. Consolidation therapy with erlotinib (150 mg daily) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was planned 3 to 6 weeks later for six cycles. RESULTS Forty-five eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rates to induction and overall treatment were 39% (95% CI, 24% to 55%) and 60% (95% CI, 44% to 75%), respectively. The median progression-free and overall survival times were 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 18.3 months) and 18.4 months (95% CI, 13.4 to 31.7 months), respectively. The principal toxicity was esophagitis (29% grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, with one patient with grade 3 tracheoesophageal fistula), which was often prolonged. Consolidation therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib was not feasible. CONCLUSION The use of bevacizumab and erlotinib as administered in this trial is not recommended given the lack of an efficacy signal and the substantial risk of esophageal toxicity.