Aabra Ahmed

Immunobiology of spinal cord injuries and potential therapeutic approaches

The incidence of spinal cord injuries (SCI) is high every year. As the spinal cord is the highway that allows for the brain to control the rest of the body, spinal cord injuries greatly impact the quality of life of the patients. The SCI include the primary response consisting of the initial accident-induced damage and the secondary response that is characterized by damage due to inflammation and biological responses. Astrocytes are the first to act at the site of the injury, forming a glial scar and attracting immune cells. The immune system plays a role in cleaning out the debris caused by the injury, as well as preventing neurons to grow and heal. The secondary injury caused by the inflammatory response is the major target to combat SCI. This article critically reviews the key players in the inflammatory SCI response and potential therapies, specifically targeting astrocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages. These cells are both beneficial and detrimental following SCI, depending on the released molecules and the types of cells infiltrated to the site of injury. Indeed, depending on the subtype of macrophages, M1 or M2, beneficial or detrimental response could be incited. Therapeutic strategies to regulate and manipulate the immune cells via increasing or decreasing their recruitment to the site of injury could be developed together with upregulating and downregulating the release of certain chemicals from the infiltrated cells.

Impact of siltuximab on patient-related outcomes in multicentric Castleman’s disease

Multicentric Castleman’s disease (MCD) is a rare, widespread lymphoproliferative disorder and a life-threatening disease involving hyperactivity of the immune system, excessive proinflammatory cytokine release, immune cell proliferation, and organ system dysfunction. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of MCD, as it is involved in the synthesis of acute-phase reactants and aids in the induction of B-cell proliferation. Siltuximab is an anti-IL-6 chimeric monoclonal antibody that acts as a novel treatment modality to bind to IL-6 with high affinity, thus neutralizing the cytokine bioactivity and inhibiting B-cell proliferation. Clinical trials with siltuximab have shown early clinical promise for patients with MCD for many years, leading to recent US Food and Drug Administration approval as a novel agent for the treatment of MCD. Here, a systematic review was conducted to include 171 cases of MCD patients treated with siltuximab. While traditional treatment methods were able to achieve a 5-year survival rate of only 55%–77%, results of siltuximab treatment demonstrated 5-year survival rates of nearly 96.4% (only 2 deaths reported out of 55 patients with follow-up data). Ultimately, the results from multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that siltuximab is extremely efficacious in alleviating disease symptoms (fatigue, pain, and lymphadenopathy) while simultaneously achieving disease remission, thus extending progression-free survival for years longer than the average 5-year survival rates for MCD.

Socioeconomic status and survival for patients with melanoma in the United States: an NCDB analysis

The importance of socioeconomic factors and healthcare treatment and outcomes for lower income patients is tremendous, affecting not only those afflicted by poverty and decreased quality of care but also physicians, healthcare professionals, and society at large.

Association Between Primary Payer Status and Survival in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: An National Cancer Database Analysis

Background: Colon cancer is the third most frequent cancer diagnosis, and primary payer status has been shown to be associated with treatment modalities and survival in cancer patients. The goal of our study was to determine the between‐insurance differences in survival in patients with clinical stage III colon cancer using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Materials and Methods: We identified 130,998 patients with clinical stage III colon cancer in the NCDB diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Kaplan‐Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the association between insurance status and survival. Results: Patients with private insurance plans were 28%, 30%, and 16% less likely to die than were uninsured patients, Medicaid recipients, and Medicare beneficiaries, respectively. Medicare patients were 14% were less likely to die compared with uninsured patients. Patients receiving chemotherapy were, on average, 65% less likely to die compared with the patients not receiving chemotherapy. Conclusion: Private insurance and a greater socioeconomic status were associated with increased patient survival compared with other insurance plans or the lack of insurance. Future research should continue to unravel how socioeconomic status and insurance status contribute to the quality of care and survival of oncologic patients. Micro‐Abstract The goal of our study was to determine the between‐insurance differences in survival in patients with pathologic stage III colon cancer using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We identified 130,998 patients with pathologic stage III colon cancer in the NCDB diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Patients with private insurance plans were 28%, 30%, and 16% less likely to die than were uninsured patients, Medicaid recipients, and Medicare beneficiaries, respectively.

Factors Affecting Adjuvant Therapy in Stage III Pancreatic Cancer—Analysis of the National Cancer Database

Background: Adjuvant therapy after curative resection is associated with survival benefit in stage III pancreatic cancer. We analyzed the factors affecting the outcome of adjuvant therapy in stage III pancreatic cancer and compared overall survival with different modalities of adjuvant treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with stage III pancreatic cancer listed in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. Patients were stratified based on adjuvant therapy they received. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed. Results: We analyzed a cohort included 1731 patients who were recipients of adjuvant therapy for stage III pancreatic cancer within the limits of our database. Patients who received adjuvant chemoradiation had the longest postdiagnosis survival time, followed by patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, and finally patients who received no adjuvant therapy. On multivariate analysis, advancing age and patients with Medicaid had worse survival, whereas Spanish origin and lower Charlson comorbidity score had better survival. Conclusions: Our study is the largest trial using the NCDB addressing the effects of adjuvant therapy specifically in stage III pancreatic cancer. Within the limits of our study, survival benefit with adjuvant therapy was more apparent with longer duration from date of diagnosis.