Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aaron Curtis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aaron Curtis.


Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems | 2017

A CO2‐gas precursor to the March 2015 Villarrica volcano eruption

Alessandro Aiuppa; M. Bitetto; Vincenzo Francofonte; Gabriela Velasquez; Claudia Bucarey Parra; G. Giudice; Marco Liuzzo; Roberto Moretti; Yves Moussallam; Nial Peters; Giancarlo Tamburello; Oscar. A. Valderrama; Aaron Curtis

We present here the first volcanic gas compositional time-series taken prior to a paroxysmal eruption of Villarrica volcano (Chile). Our gas plume observations were obtained using a fully autonomous Multi-component Gas Analyser System (Multi-GAS) in the 3 month-long phase of escalating volcanic activity that culminated into the March 3 2015 paroxysm, the largest since 1985. Our results demonstrate a temporal evolution of volcanic plume composition, from low CO2/SO2 ratios (0.65-2.7) during November 2014-January 2015 to CO2/SO2 ratios up to ≈ 9 then after. The H2O/CO2 ratio simultaneously declined to <38 in the same temporal interval. We use results of volatile saturation models to demonstrate that this evolution toward CO2-enriched gas was likely caused by unusual supply of deeply sourced gas bubbles. We propose that separate ascent of over-pressured gas bubbles, originating from at least 20-35 MPa pressures, was the driver for activity escalation toward the March 3 climax.


Archive | 2018

Enceladus Vent Explorer Concept

Masahiro Ono; Karl Mitchel; Aaron Parness; Kalind Carpenter; Saverio Iacoponi; Ellie Simonson; Aaron Curtis; Mitch Ingham; Charles John Budney; Tara Estlin; Carolyn Parcheta; Renaud Detry; Jeremy Nash; Jean-Pierre de la Croix; Jessie Kawata; Kevin P. Hand

Enceladus Vent Explorer (EVE) is a robotic mission to enter Enceladus vents. It would send two types of modules: Surface Module (SM) and Descent Module (DM). SM is a lander that lands within a few hundred meters from the entrance of an erupting vent. After a successful landing, it deploys a single or multiple DMs. First, a DM moves to a vent and descends into it. It then performs in-situ science investigations in the vent using miniaturized instruments such as microscopic imager and a microfluidics chip. Finally, it collects samples in the vent and delivers to instruments on SM for detailed analysis. Out trade study concluded that the most robust configuration of the DM would be a limbed robot that climbs down the vent using ice screws. The ice screw is a hollow metal screw used by ice climbers for making a strong anchor on ice walls. DM would rely on a power and communication link provided by SM through a tether. Should EVE be realized, it could enable not only the direct confirmation of extraterrestrial life but also the characterization of it. Comparative study of lives on different worlds would provide clues to the secret of the genesis of life.


international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services | 2014

Video: Remote sensor placement

David Mascareñas; Logan Ott; Aaron Curtis; Sara Brambilla; Amy Larson; Steven P. Brumby; Charles R Farrar

The goal of this work is to develop a new autonomous capability for remotely deploying precisely located sensor nodes without damaging the sensor nodes in the process. Over the course of the last decade there has been significant interest in research to deploy sensor networks. This research is driven by the fact that the costs associated with installing sensor networks can be very high. In order to rapidly deploy sensor networks consisting of large numbers of sensor nodes, alternative techniques must be developed to place the sensor nodes in the field. To date much of the research on sensor network deployment has focused on strategies that involve the random dispersion of sensor nodes [1]. In addition other researchers have investigated deployment strategies utilizing small unmanned aerial helicopters for dropping sensor networks from the air. [2]. The problem with these strategies is that often sensor nodes need to be very precisely located for their measurements to be of any use. The reason for this could be that the sensor being used only have limited range, or need to be properly coupled to the environment which they are sensing. The problem with simply dropping sensor nodes is that for many applications it is necessary to deploy sensor nodes horizontally. In addition, to properly install many types of sensors, the sensor must assume a specific pose relative to the object being measured. In order to address these challenges we are currently developing a technology to remotely and rapidly deploy precisely located sensor nodes. The remote sensor placement device being developed can be described as an intelligent gas gun (Figure 1). A laser rangefinder is used to measure the distance to a specified target sensor location. This distance is then used to estimate the amount of energy required to propel the sensor node to the target location with just enough additional energy left over to ensure the sensor node is able to attach itself to the target of interest. We are currently in the process of developing attachment mechanisms for steel, wood, fiberglass (Figure 2). In this demonstration we will perform a contained, live demo of our prototype pneumatic remote sensor placement device along with some prototype sensor attachment mechanisms we are developing.


international conference on mobile systems, applications, and services | 2014

Demo: A remote sensor placement device for scalable and precise deployment of sensor networks

David Mascareñas; Logan Ott; Aaron Curtis; Sara Brambilla; Amy Larson; Steven P. Brumby; Charles R Farrar

The goal of this work is to develop a new autonomous capability for remotely deploying precisely located sensor nodes without damaging the sensor nodes in the process. Over the course of the last decade there has been significant interest in research to deploy sensor networks. This research is driven by the fact that the costs associated with installing sensor networks can be very high. In order to rapidly deploy sensor networks consisting of large numbers of sensor nodes, alternative techniques must be developed to place the sensor nodes in the field. The goal of this work is to develop a new autonomous capability for remotely deploying precisely located sensor nodes without damaging the sensor nodes in the process. Over the course of the last decade there has been significant interest in research to deploy sensor networks. This research is driven by the fact that the costs associated with installing sensor networks can be very high. In order to rapidly deploy sensor networks consisting of large numbers of sensor nodes, alternative techniques must be developed to place the sensor nodes in the field. To date much of the research on sensor network deployment has focused on strategies that involve the random dispersion of sensor nodes [1]. In addition other researchers have investigated deployment strategies utilizing small unmanned aerial helicopters for dropping sensor networks from the air. [2]. The problem with these strategies is that often sensor nodes need to be very precisely located for their measurements to be of any use. The reason for this could be that the sensor being used only have limited range, or need to be properly coupled to the environment which they are sensing. The problem with simply dropping sensor nodes is that for many applications it is necessary to deploy sensor nodes horizontally. In addition, to properly install many types of sensors, the sensor must assume a specific pose relative to the object being measured. In order to address these challenges we are currently developing a technology to remotely and rapidly deploy precisely located sensor nodes. The remote sensor placement device being developed can be described as an intelligent gas gun (Figure 1). A laser rangefinder is used to measure the distance to a specified target sensor location. This distance is then used to estimate the amount of energy required to propel the sensor node to the target location with just enough additional energy left over to ensure the sensor node is able to attach itself to the target of interest. We are currently in the process of developing attachment mechanisms for steel, wood, fiberglass (Figure 2). In this demonstration we will perform a contained, live demo of our prototype pneumatic remote sensor placement device along with some prototype sensor attachment mechanisms we are developing.


Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2016

Sustaining persistent lava lakes: Observations from high-resolution gas measurements at Villarrica volcano, Chile

Yves Moussallam; Philipson Bani; Aaron Curtis; Talfan Barnie; Manuel Moussallam; Nial Peters; C. Ian Schipper; Alessandro Aiuppa; G. Giudice; Álvaro Amigo; Gabriela Velasquez; Carlos Cardona


Geophysical Research Letters | 2011

Geothermal point sources identified in a fumarolic ice cave on Erebus volcano, Antarctica using fiber optic distributed temperature sensing

Aaron Curtis; Philip R. Kyle


Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research | 2017

Volcanic gas emissions and degassing dynamics at Ubinas and Sabancaya volcanoes; implications for the volatile budget of the central volcanic zone

Yves Moussallam; Giancarlo Tamburello; Nial Peters; Fredy Apaza; Ian C.I. Schipper; Aaron Curtis; Alessandro Aiuppa; Pablo Masias; Marie Boichu; Sophie Bauduin; Talfan Barnie; Philipson Bani; G. Giudice; Manuel Moussallam


Bulletin of Volcanology | 2017

Magmatic gas percolation through the old lava dome of El Misti volcano

Yves Moussallam; Nial Peters; Pablo Masias; Fredy Apaza; Talfan Barnie; C. Ian Schipper; Aaron Curtis; Giancarlo Tamburello; Alessandro Aiuppa; Philipson Bani; G. Giudice; David C. Pieri; Ashley Gerard Davies; Clive Oppenheimer


Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research | 2017

Methods for mapping and monitoring global glaciovolcanism

Aaron Curtis; Philip R. Kyle


Volcanica | 2018

Unrest at the Nevados de Chillán volcanic complex: a failed or yet to unfold magmatic eruption?

Yves Moussallam; Philipson Bani; C. Ian Schipper; Carlos Cardona; Luis Franco; Talfan Barnie; Álvaro Amigo; Aaron Curtis; Nial Peters; Alessandro Aiuppa; G. Giudice; Clive Oppenheimer

Collaboration


Dive into the Aaron Curtis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nial Peters

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philipson Bani

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Ian Schipper

Victoria University of Wellington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Mascareñas

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip R. Kyle

New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amy Larson

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge