Aaron M. Drucker
Women's College Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Aaron M. Drucker.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology | 2017
Aaron M. Drucker; Annie R. Wang; Wen-Qing Li; Erika Sevetson; Julie Block; Abrar A. Qureshi
To assess the patient-level and societal burden of atopic dermatitis, we comprehensively reviewed the literature related to quality of life, social, economic, academic, and occupational impacts. Atopic dermatitis has profound impacts on patient and family quality of life. A conservative estimate of the annual costs of atopic dermatitis in the United States is
British Journal of Dermatology | 2016
Joanne R. Chalmers; Eric L. Simpson; Christian Apfelbacher; Kim S Thomas; L.B. von Kobyletzki; Jochen Schmitt; Jasvinder A. Singh; Åke Svensson; Hywel C. Williams; Katrina Abuabara; Valeria Aoki; M. Ardeleanu; M. Awici-Rasmussen; S. Barbarot; Teresa Løvold Berents; Joel A. Block; A. Bragg; T. Burton; K. K. Bjerring Clemmensen; A. Creswell-Melville; M. Dinesen; Aaron M. Drucker; L. Eckert; Carsten Flohr; M. Garg; L. A. A. Gerbens; A. L. B. Graff; Jon M. Hanifin; Daniel Heinl; Rosemary Humphreys
5.297 billion (in 2015 USD). People with atopic dermatitis may change their occupation because of their skin disease. Research gaps include quality of life assessments outside of tertiary care centers, impacts on partners and families of adult patients, and updated comprehensive cost estimates.
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2017
Chante Karimkhani; Danny V. Colombara; Aaron M. Drucker; Scott A. Norton; Roderick J. Hay; Daniel Engelman; Andrew C. Steer; Margot Whitfeld; Mohsen Naghavi; Robert P. Dellavalle
This article is a report of the fourth meeting of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative held in Malmö, Sweden on 23–24 April 2015 (HOME IV). The aim of the meeting was to achieve consensus over the preferred outcome instruments for measuring patient‐reported symptoms and quality of life for the HOME core outcome set for atopic eczema (AE). Following presentations, which included data from systematic reviews, consensus discussions were held in a mixture of whole group and small group discussions. Small groups were allocated a priori to ensure representation of different stakeholders and countries. Decisions were voted on using electronic keypads. For the patient‐reported symptoms, the group agreed by vote that itch, sleep loss, dryness, redness/inflamed skin and irritated skin were all considered essential aspects of AE symptoms. Many instruments for capturing patient‐reported symptoms were discussed [including the Patient‐Oriented SCOring Atopic Dermatitis index, Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Self‐Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index, Itch Severity Scale, Atopic Dermatitis Quickscore and the Nottingham Eczema Severity Score] and, by consensus, POEM was selected as the preferred instrument to measure patient‐reported symptoms. Further work is needed to determine the reliability and measurement error of POEM. Further work is also required to establish the importance of pain/soreness and the importance of collecting information regarding the intensity of symptoms in addition to their frequency. Much of the discussion on quality of life concerned the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis; however, consensus on a preferred instrument for measuring this domain could not be reached. In summary, POEM is recommended as the HOME core outcome instrument for measuring AE symptoms.
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2017
Eric L. Simpson; Marjolein S. de Bruin-Weller; Carsten Flohr; Michael R. Ardern-Jones; S. Barbarot; Mette Deleuran; Thomas Bieber; Christian Vestergaard; Sara J. Brown; Michael J. Cork; Aaron M. Drucker; Lawrence F. Eichenfield; Regina Foelster-Holst; Emma Guttman-Yassky; Audrey Nosbaum; Nick Reynolds; Jonathan I. Silverberg; Jochen Schmitt; M.M.B. Seyger; Phyllis I. Spuls; J.-F. Stalder; John Su; Roberto Takaoka; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann; Jacob P. Thyssen; Jorien van der Schaft; Andreas Wollenberg; Alan D. Irvine; Amy S. Paller
Summary Background Numerous population-based studies have documented high prevalence of scabies in overcrowded settings, particularly among children and in tropical regions. We provide an estimate of the global burden of scabies using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2015. Methods We identified scabies epidemiological data sources from an extensive literature search and hospital insurance data and analysed data sources with a Bayesian meta-regression modelling tool, DisMod-MR 2·1, to yield prevalence estimates. We combined prevalence estimates with a disability weight, measuring disfigurement, itch, and pain caused by scabies, to produce years lived with disability (YLDs). With an assumed zero mortality from scabies, YLDs were equivalent to disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We estimated DALYs for 195 countries divided into 21 world regions, in both sexes and 20 age groups, between 1990 and 2015. Findings Scabies was responsible for 0·21% of DALYs from all conditions studied by GBD 2015 worldwide. The world regions of east Asia (age-standardised DALYs 136·32), southeast Asia (134·57), Oceania (120·34), tropical Latin America (99·94), and south Asia (69·41) had the greatest burden of DALYs from scabies. Mean percent change of DALY rate from 1990 to 2015 was less than 8% in all world regions, except North America, which had a 23·9% increase. The five individual countries with greatest scabies burden were Indonesia (age-standardised DALYs 153·86), China (138·25), Timor-Leste (136·67), Vanuatu (131·59), and Fiji (130·91). The largest standard deviations of age-standardised DALYs between the 20 age groups were observed in southeast Asia (60·1), Oceania (58·3), and east Asia (56·5), with the greatest DALY burdens in children, adolescents, and the elderly. Interpretation The burden of scabies is greater in tropical regions, especially in children, adolescents, and elderly people. As a worldwide epidemiological assessment, GBD 2015 provides broad and frequently updated measures of scabies burden in terms of skin effects. These global data might help guide research protocols and prioritisation efforts and focus scabies treatment and control measures. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Allergy | 2017
L. A A Gerbens; Cecilia A.C. Prinsen; Joanne R. Chalmers; Aaron M. Drucker; L.B. von Kobyletzki; J. Limpens; Helen Nankervis; Åke Svensson; C. B. Terwee; J. Zhang; Christian Apfelbacher; P. I. Spuls
Background: Although most patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are effectively managed with topical medication, a significant minority require systemic therapy. Guidelines for decision making about advancement to systemic therapy are lacking. Objective: To guide those considering use of systemic therapy in AD and provide a framework for evaluation before making this therapeutic decision with the patient. Methods: A subgroup of the International Eczema Council determined aspects to consider before prescribing systemic therapy. Topics were assigned to expert reviewers who performed a topic‐specific literature review, referred to guidelines when available, and provided interpretation and expert opinion. Results: We recommend a systematic and holistic approach to assess patients with severe signs and symptoms of AD and impact on quality of life before systemic therapy. Steps taken before commencing systemic therapy include considering alternate or concomitant diagnoses, avoiding trigger factors, optimizing topical therapy, ensuring adequate patient/caregiver education, treating coexistent infection, assessing the impact on quality of life, and considering phototherapy. Limitations: Our work is a consensus statement, not a systematic review. Conclusion: The decision to start systemic medication should include assessment of severity and quality of life while considering the individuals general health status, psychologic needs, and personal attitudes toward systemic therapies.
Allergy | 2016
Daniel Heinl; Cecilia A.C. Prinsen; Stefanie Deckert; Joanne R. Chalmers; Aaron M. Drucker; Robert Ofenloch; Rosemary Humphreys; Tracey Sach; Sarah L. Chamlin; Jochen Schmitt; Christian Apfelbacher
Symptoms have been identified as a core outcome domain for atopic eczema (AE) trials. Various instruments exist to measure symptoms in AE, but they vary in quality and there is a lack of standardization between clinical trials. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the quality of the evidence on the measurement properties of AE symptom instruments, thereby informing consensus discussions within the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative regarding the most appropriate instruments for the core outcome domain symptoms.
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery | 2009
Aaron M. Drucker; Elena Pope; Sanjay Mahant; Miriam Weinstein
BACKGROUND The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has identified quality of life (QoL) as a core outcome domain to be evaluated in every eczema trial. It is unclear which of the existing QoL instruments is most appropriate for this domain. Thus, the aim of this review was to systematically assess the measurement properties of existing measurement instruments developed and/or validated for the measurement of QoL in adult eczema. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase identifying studies on measurement properties of adult eczema QoL instruments. For all eligible studies, we assessed the adequacy of the measurement properties and the methodological quality with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. A best evidence synthesis summarizing findings from different studies was the basis to assign four degrees of recommendation (A-D). RESULTS A total of 15 articles reporting on 17 instruments were included. No instrument fulfilled the criteria for category A. Six instruments were placed in category B, meaning that they have the potential to be recommended depending on the results of further validation studies. Three instruments had poor adequacy in at least one required adequacy criterion and were therefore put in category C. The remaining eight instruments were minimally validated and were thus placed in category D. CONCLUSIONS Currently, no QoL instrument can be recommended for use in adult eczema. The Quality of Life Index for Atopic Dermatitis (QoLIAD) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) are recommended for further validation research.
British Journal of Dermatology | 2017
Daniel Heinl; Cecilia A.C. Prinsen; Tracey Sach; Aaron M. Drucker; Robert Ofenloch; Carsten Flohr; Christian Apfelbacher
Background: Historically, patients with the consumptive coagulopathy Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS) have been treated with systemic corticosteroids as first-line therapy, but many patients do not respond. Recently, there have been increasing reports of the use of the chemotherapeutic drug vincristine in these patients. Objective: To report a case of a newborn with a kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) of the right leg associated with KMS treated successfully with vincristine and oral corticosteroids. Methods: The patients chart and the literature on the subject were reviewed using Medline and PubMed. Results: Treatment with vincristine and corticosteroids lead to sustained shrinking of the tumor and correction of the thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy through 1 year of age. We believe this is the first report in the North American literature of corticosteroids and vincristine being used concomitantly as first-line therapy for KHE with KMS. Conclusion: Vincristine and corticosteroids should be considered first-line treatment for KMS.
European Journal of Haematology | 2013
Aaron M. Drucker; Shenhong Wu; Ellin Berman; Iris Amitay-Laish; Mario Lacouture
Quality of life (QoL) is one of the core outcome domains identified by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative to be assessed in every eczema trial. There is uncertainty about the most appropriate QoL instrument to measure this domain in infants, children and adolescents.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2007
Sandra R. Knowles; Aaron M. Drucker; Elizabeth Weber; Neil H. Shear
Nilotinib and dasatinib are second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In clinical trials, they have both been reported to cause rash in a significant number of patients, but its incidence varies significantly and has not been characterized clinically or histologically. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of rash with nilotinib and dasatinib, and to provide a clinical and histopathological description of the rash.