Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aaron Spaulding is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aaron Spaulding.


Journal of Healthcare Management | 2014

Success Factors for Strategic Change Initiatives: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Administrators' Perspectives

Bita A. Kash; Aaron Spaulding; Christopher E. Johnson; Larry Gamm

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Success factors related to the implementation of change initiatives are well documented and discussed in the management literature, but they are seldom studied in healthcare organizations engaged in multiple strategic change initiatives. The purpose of this study was to identify key success factors related to implementation of change initiatives based on rich qualitative data gathered from health leader interviews at two large health systems implementing multiple change initiatives. In‐depth personal interviews with 61 healthcare leaders in the two large systems were conducted and inductive qualitative analysis was employed to identify success factors associated with 13 change initiatives. Results from this analysis were compared to success factors identified in the literature, and generalizations were drawn that add significantly to the management literature, especially to that in the healthcare sector. Ten specific success factors were identified for the implementation of change initiatives. The top three success factors were (1) culture and values, (2) business processes, and (3) people and engagement. Two of the identified success factors are unique to the healthcare sector and not found in the literature on change models: service quality and client satisfaction (ranked fourth of 10) and access to information (ranked ninth). Results demonstrate the importance of human resource functions, alignment of culture and values with change, and business processes that facilitate effective communication and access to information to achieve many change initiatives. The responses also suggest opportunities for leaders of healthcare organizations to more formally recognize the degree to which various change initiatives are dependent on one another.


Journal of Strategy and Management | 2014

Healthcare Strategic Management and the Resource Based View

Bita A. Kash; Aaron Spaulding; Larry Gamm; Christopher E. Johnson

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how two large health systems formulate and implement strategy with a specific focus on differences and similarities in the nature of strategic initiatives across systems. The aim is to gain a better understanding of the role of resource dependency theory (RDT) and resource based view (RBV) in healthcare strategic management.Design/methodology/approach – A comparative case study design is used to describe, categorize and compare strategic change initiatives within a children’s health and a multi-hospital system located in two competitive metropolitan markets. A total of 61 in-person semi-structured interviews with healthcare administrators were conducted during 2009. Summary statistics and qualitative content analysis were employed to examine strategic initiatives.Findings – The two health systems have as their top initiatives very similar pursuits, thus indicating that both utilize an externally oriented RDTmethod of strategy formulation. The relevance of the RBV becomes apparent during resource deployment for strategy implementation. The process of healthcarestrategic decision-making incorporates RDT and RBV as separate and compatible activities that are sequential.Research limitations/implications – Results from this comparative case study are based on only two health systems. Further, the RBV perspective only takes managerial resources and time into consideration.Practical implications – Given that external resources are likely to become more constrained, it is important that hospitals leverage relevant internal resources, in the identification of competitive advantages and effective execution of strategic initiatives.Originality/value – The author propose a refined healthcare strategic management framework that takes both RDT and RBV into consideration by systematically linking strategy formulation with deployment of resources.


Health Policy | 2014

Value-based purchasing and hospital acquired conditions: Are we seeing improvement?

Aaron Spaulding; Mei Zhao; D. Rob Haley

OBJECTIVE To determine if the Value-Based Purchasing Performance Scoring system correlates with hospital acquired condition quality indicators. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING This study utilizes the following secondary data sources: the American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Value-Based Purchasing and Hospital Acquired Conditions databases. STUDY DESIGN Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to examine the effect of CMS total performance score on counts of hospital acquired conditions. Hospital structure variables including size, ownership, teaching status, payer mix, case mix, and location were utilized as control variables. DATA COLLECTION The secondary data sources were merged into a single database using Stata 10. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Total performance scores, which are used to determine if hospitals should receive incentive money, do not correlate well with quality outcome in the form of hospital acquired conditions. CONCLUSIONS Value-based purchasing does not appear to correlate with improved quality and patient safety as indicated by Hospital Acquired Condition (HAC) scores. This leads us to believe that either the total performance score does not measure what it should, or the quality outcome measurements do not reflect the quality of the total performance scores measure.


The health care manager | 2015

Value-based purchasing, efficiency, and hospital performance.

Mei Zhao; D. Rob Haley; Aaron Spaulding; Holly A. Balogh

The Medicare hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) program that links Medicare payments to quality of care became effective in 2013 in the United States. Hospital efficiency will be added to the HVBP in 2015. It is unclear whether hospital efficiency–specific hospital characteristics are associated with HVBP performance scores and the subsequent incentive payments. Using data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey the Medicare Hospital Compare, this article examines the association of hospital efficiency hospital characteristics with the HVBP performance scores. The results indicate that less efficient hospitals are more likely to have lower patient satisfaction scores and total performance scores compared with more efficient hospitals. Hospital size, ownership, and payer mix also have significant impact on HVBP performance scores. The findings of this study provide significant policy practice implications. On the one hand, hospitals should consider investing their limited resources into identifying implementing the most cost-effective procedures to improve their patient experience total performance scores. On the other hand, policymakers should consider the unintended negative impact that these new payment incentives will likely have on hospitals that serve a higher proportion of low-income racial ethnic minority populations.


Hospital Topics | 2010

Studer Unplugged: Identifying Underlying Managerial Concepts

Aaron Spaulding; Larry Gamm; Jennifer M. Griffith

Abstract There is evidence that the application of Quint Studers Hardwiring Excellence approach to organizational change is associated with significant accomplishments in hospitals. The authors’ review finds the Studer approach to be closely aligned with management-related concepts of motivation and feedback, social networks, human capital, social capital, management by objectives, evidence based management, and organizational learning. The article is intended to familiarize more managers and management researchers with the content of the Studer approach, demonstrate its grounding in management concepts and principles, and stimulate additional discussion around the utility of such human resources-focused interventions in significant organizational change.


Physical Therapy | 2018

Immediate Physical Therapy Initiation in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Is Associated With a Reduction in Downstream Health Care Utilization and Costs

Xinliang Liu; William J. Hanney; Michael Masaracchio; Morey J. Kolber; Mei Zhao; Aaron Spaulding; Meghan Hufstader Gabriel

Background. Physical therapy is an important treatment option for patients with low back pain (LBP). However, whether to refer patients for physical therapy and the timing of initiation remain controversial. Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of receiving physical therapy and the timing of physical therapy initiation on downstream health care utilization and costs among patients with acute LBP. Design. The design was a retrospective cohort study. Methods. Patients who had a new onset of LBP between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013, in New York State were identified and grouped into different cohorts on the basis of whether they received physical therapy and the timing of physical therapy initiation. The probability of service use and LBP‐related health care costs over a 1‐year period were analyzed. Results. Among 46,914 patients with acute LBP, 40,246 patients did not receive physical therapy and 6668 patients received physical therapy initiated at different times. After controlling for patient characteristics and adjusting for treatment selection bias, health care utilization and cost measures over the 1‐year period were the lowest among patients not receiving physical therapy, followed by patients with immediate physical therapy initiation (within 3 days), with some exceptions. Among patients receiving physical therapy, those receiving physical therapy within 3 days were consistently associated with the lowest health care utilization and cost measures. Limitations. This study was based on commercial insurance claims data from 1 state. Conclusions. When referral for physical therapy is warranted for patients with acute LBP, immediate referral and initiation (within 3 days) may lead to lower health care utilization and LBP‐related costs.


Health Care Management Review | 2017

Organizational capacity for change in health care: Development and validation of a scale.

Aaron Spaulding; Bita A. Kash; Christopher E. Johnson; Larry Gamm

Background: We do not have a strong understanding of a health care organization’s capacity for attempting and completing multiple and sometimes competing change initiatives. Capacity for change implementation is a critical success factor as the health care industry is faced with ongoing demands for change and transformation because of technological advances, market forces, and regulatory environment. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a tool to measure health care organizations’ capacity to change by building upon previous conceptualizations of absorptive capacity and organizational readiness for change. Methodology/Approach: A multistep process was used to develop the organizational capacity for change survey. The survey was sent to two populations requesting answers to questions about the organization’s leadership, culture, and technologies in use throughout the organization. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to validate the survey as a measurement tool for organizational capacity for change in the health care setting. Findings: The resulting organizational capacity for change measurement tool proves to be a valid and reliable method of evaluating a hospital’s capacity for change through the measurement of the population’s perceptions related to leadership, culture, and organizational technologies. Practical Implications: The organizational capacity for change measurement tool can help health care managers and leaders evaluate the capacity of employees, departments, and teams for change before large-scale implementation.


Health Care Management Review | 2014

Multiproject interdependencies in health systems management: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Aaron Spaulding; Larry Gamm; Jungyeon Kim; Terri Menser

Background: A health care organization often engages in the simultaneous implementation of multiple organization change initiatives. However, the degree to which these initiatives are implemented and can be enhanced based on their interdependencies is an open question. How organizations and the change initiatives they pursue might benefit from more careful examination of potential interdependencies among projects was explored in this article. Purpose: The aim of this study was to introduce a multiproject management conceptualization that stresses project interdependencies and suggests synergies can be found to enhance overall project and organizational performance. It examines this conceptualization in the context of a health system pursuing several major initiatives to capture insights into the nature of such interdependencies. Methodology/Approach: Longitudinal qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with hospital leaders attempting to manage multiple initiatives being implemented by the system’s leadership team was used in this study. Findings: The implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR) is empirically identified as the most central among multiple projects based on other projects dependencies on the EMR. Furthermore, concerns for data are identified most frequently as success factors across all projects. This reinforces the depiction of the EMR as a central organizational focus. Practical Implications: A unique perspective on multiproject management in hospitals and on EMR projects is presented. In addition, the interdependency conceptualization and its application and results provide insights into multiproject management that can help ensure that benefits of individual projects are more fully optimized or exploited in leveraging the effectiveness of other project initiatives.


Hospital Topics | 2014

Physician Engagement: Strategic Considerations among Leaders at a Major Health System.

Aaron Spaulding; Larry Gamm; Terri Menser

Abstract The authors utilize qualitative interviews with 38 health administrators at one large metropolitan, multihospital system to help identify perspectives regarding physician engagement. Here they focus on 1) lessons learned from past physician engagement efforts, 2) strategic considerations concerning the engagement of physicians, and 3) recommendations for future action. The authors conclude that current hospital leaders have learned from the failures of the past based on the identification of success factors critical to physician engagement. However, future success may relate directly to the increased attention to criteria by which the organization assesses the success of such engagement.


International journal of healthcare management | 2017

Does value-based purchasing affect US hospital utilization pattern: A comparative study

Hanadi Hamadi; Aaron Spaulding; D. Rob Haley; Mei Zhao; Aurora Tafili; Nazik M.A. Zakari

ABSTRACT We evaluated the effect US hospital performance as measured by the Medicare hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) program has on the volume of hospitals inpatient and outpatient services. We analyzed data from the 2013 to 2014 American Hospital Association database, HVBP total performance scores database through Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the area health resources files database through CMS. This study utilized a multinomial logistic regression and transaction cost economic theory, adjusting for the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, number of facility beds, beds per thousand, individuals 65+, teaching status, location, ownership, and system affiliation. The prominent study findings indicate a significant relationship between percent utilization of inpatient, outpatient and HVBP score. Furthermore, environmental factors such as the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index, and system participation were found to significantly impact hospitals ratio of inpatient to outpatient. Relative risk ratios show that hospitals with overall lower HVB are more likely to be in the top 25 percentile for outpatient services. With the decline in inpatient volume of services and the rise in outpatient utilization, inpatient metrics will continue to be relevant as key indicators of quality of care. Inpatient services will never become irrelevant to the overall financial profile of hospital performance.

Collaboration


Dive into the Aaron Spaulding's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mei Zhao

University of North Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hanadi Hamadi

University of North Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Rob Haley

University of North Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emma Apatu

University of North Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge