Abbie L. Fields

BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Analysis of 208 Ashkenazi Jewish Women with Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is a component of the autosomal-dominant hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome and may be due to a mutation in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Two mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and one mutation in BRCA2 (6174delT) are common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. One of these three mutations is present in approximately 2% of the Jewish population. Each mutation is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, and it is expected that a significant proportion of Jewish women with ovarian cancer will carry one of these mutations. To estimate the proportion of ovarian cancers attributable to founding mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Jewish population and the familial cancer risks associated with each, we interviewed 213 Jewish women with ovarian cancer at 11 medical centers in North America and Israel and offered these women genetic testing for the three founder mutations. To establish the presence of nonfounder mutations in this population, we also completed the protein-truncation test on exon 11 of BRCA1 and exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2. We obtained a detailed family history on all women we studied who had cancer and on a control population of 386 Ashkenazi Jewish women without ovarian or breast cancer. A founder mutation was present in 41.3% of the women we studied. The cumulative incidence of ovarian cancer to age 75 years was found to be 6.3% for female first-degree relatives of the patients with ovarian cancer, compared with 2.0% for the female relatives of healthy controls (relative risk 3.2; 95% CI 1.5-6.8; P=.002). The relative risk to age 75 years for breast cancer among the female first-degree relatives was 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-3.0; P=.0001). Only one nonfounder mutation was identified (in this instance, in a woman of mixed ancestry), and the three founding mutations accounted for most of the observed excess risk of ovarian and breast cancer in relatives.

Altered expression of transforming growth factor‐β1 in cervical neoplasia as an early biomarker in carcinogenesis of the uterine cervix

Transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1) is a potent growth inhibitor of epithelial cell growth, but can also stimulate stromal cell growth. Loss of responsiveness to TGF‐β1 or loss of TGF‐β1 itself may be important in the progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to invasive cervical carcinoma.

Patterns of failure after the multimodality treatment of uterine papillary serous carcinoma

PURPOSE Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is an aggressive variant of endometrial carcinoma. The majority of patients with clinical Stage I UPSC are found to have extrauterine disease at the time of surgery. Most authors report survival rates of 35-50% for Stage I-II and 0-15% for Stage III and IV UPSC. Surgical treatment as the sole therapy for patients with Stage I-IV UPSC is unacceptable because of high recurrence rates. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both have been added after surgery in an attempt to improve survival. However, the survival benefit to patients from such multimodality therapy remains uncertain. This study analyzes the patterns of failure in patients with FIGO Stages I-IV UPSC treated by multimodality therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-two women with FIGO Stages I-IV UPSC who were treated by multimodality therapy were analyzed retrospectively between 1988 and 1998. Data were obtained from tumor registry, hospital, and radiotherapy chart reviews, operative notes, pathology, and chemotherapy flow sheets. All the patients underwent staging laparotomy, peritoneal cytology, total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingo oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling, omentectomy, and cytoreductive surgery, when indicated followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Therapy consisted of external beam radiation therapy in 11 patients (26%), systemic chemotherapy in 20 (48%), and both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 11 (26%). The treatments were not assigned in a randomized fashion. The dose of external beam radiation therapy ranged from 45-50.40 Gy (median 45). Of the 31 patients (74%) who received chemotherapy, 18 received single-agent (58%), whereas 13 received multiagent chemotherapy (42%). RESULTS Median follow-up for all patients was 19 months (range 4-72). Median follow-up for the surviving patients was 36 months (range 21-72). Their median age was 65 years. Six patients (14%) had Stage I, 8 patients (19%) had Stage II, 10 (24%) had Stage III, and 18 (43%) had Stage IV disease. Twenty-nine patients (69%) had suffered recurrence at the time of last follow-up. The actuarial failure rate at 2 and 5 years was 58% and 67%, respectively. The majority of the patients (19/29) recurred in the abdomen, vagina, or pelvis (66%). Metastases outside the abdomen were much less common as the first site of failure (17%). Twenty-five patients (60%) had died at the time of reporting; the observed survival rate at 2 years and 5 years was 52% and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that, after multimodality therapy of FIGO Stage I-IV UPSC, most patients developed abdominopelvic (locoregional) failure, and the great majority of the failures occurred in the abdomen, vagina, and pelvis (66%). Abdominopelvic failure as a component of distant failure occurred in an additional 5 patients (17%). Distant failure alone occurred in 17% of the patients.We propose that future studies should combine whole abdominal radiotherapy (WART) with pelvic and vaginal boosts, in addition to chemotherapy for FIGO Stage I-IV UPSC, especially in patients with minimal residual disease, to attempt to improve the dismal prognosis of patients with UPSC.

How often should a port-A-cath be flushed?

While it is important during treatment to flush the port-A-cath (PAC) with heparin regularly, catheter maintenance needs to be evaluated in those patients who, after completion of therapy, retained their ports for extended periods of time. The manufacturer has recommended monthly accession to maintain catheter patency and function. Our objective is to demonstrate that a longer interval between maintenance accessions of PACs still may be medically safe, convenient, and more efficient. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had undergone PAC insertion from 1988 to 1993 at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and from 1997 to 2002 at the New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens. An adequate maintenance time is defined as a period of at least 6 months without chemotherapy or total parenteral nutrition. Data collected included date and location of PAC insertion, date of PAC accessions, PAC complications, and results of attempts at flushing the catheters with no venous blood return. All data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and analyzed. The difference in interval accessions in patients without any complication to patients with complication was calculated using the Mann-Whitney “U” test. A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Compliance with visits for PAC maintenance varied considerably with the individual median accession times varying between 28 and 262 days with an overall median of 42 days. The individual means ranged from 29.5 to 244 days with an overall mean of 53.6 days. Seven patients in the group had episodes where the provider was unable to draw blood from the port during routine accession. The average intervals between accessions for each of these patients ranged from 38 to 244 days. The average intervals of accession among those patients who had no blood return during PAC accession was 79 days, versus 63 days for those without any difficulty. The difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Monthly maintenance of PAC is excessive, inconvenient for the patients, and expensive. Extending the interval of PAC maintenance proves to be medically safe and beneficial to the patients, the physicians and the health care system. Our clinical experience suggests that less frequent accessions of PACs is safe and feasible. We strongly advocate future prospective investigation of alternative PAC maintenance protocols in gynecologic cancer patients.

Two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of cervix cancer: clinical experience with and without chemotherapy

PURPOSE In recent years, high-dose-rate brachytherapy has become popular in the management of carcinoma of the uterine cervix, because it eliminates many of the problems associated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. However, the optimum time-dose-fractionation remains controversial. Two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy are convenient for patients, but most radiation oncologists in the United States do not use them, because of fear that they could lead to excessive rectal or bladder toxicity. Here we present our experience, which suggests that a two-fraction regimen is indeed safe and effective. METHODS We treated 49 patients with Stages I-III biopsy-proven carcinoma of the uterine cervix by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), plus two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy. The histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 43 patients (88%) and nonsquamous in 6 (12%). The median size of the primary tumor was 6 cm (range: 3-10 cm). Each patient received EBRT to the pelvis to a median dose of 45 Gy (range: 41.4-50.4 Gy), followed by a parametrial boost when indicated. Thirty patients (61%) also received irradiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes to a dose of 45 Gy. After EBRT, each patient underwent two applications of high-dose-rate brachytherapy, 1 week apart. The dose delivered to point A was 9 Gy per application for 49 applications (50%) and 9.4 Gy for 43 applications (44%), and it varied from 7 to 11 Gy for the rest (6%). The total dose to the rectum from both high-dose-rate brachytherapy applications ranged from 4.7 to 11.7 Gy (median: 7.1 Gy), and the total dose to the bladder from 3.8 to 15.5 Gy (median: 10.5 Gy). Twenty-five of the 49 patients (51%) received concomitant chemotherapy (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) during the first and fourth weeks of EBRT and once after the second high-dose-rate brachytherapy application. Chemotherapy was not assigned in a randomized fashion. The use of chemotherapy increased during the time period spanned by this study as increasing evidence supporting the use of chemotherapy began to appear. RESULTS The observed survival rates after 2, 3, and 5 years were 83%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. The surviving patients have been followed up for a median of 3 years (range: 2-6 years). Eight of the 49 patients suffered local failures. Among patients treated without chemotherapy, the 3-year local control rate was 77%; it was 88% among those receiving chemotherapy. There have been no regional failures. Four patients developed distant metastases. At 3 years, 91% of the patients in each group were free of distant metastases. Ten of the 49 patients (20%) suffered Grade 3 acute toxicity; 11 (22%) had Grade 4. Among the 24 patients treated without chemotherapy, only 1 (4%) suffered Grade 3 toxicity. Among the 25 patients receiving chemotherapy, in contrast, 8 (32%) suffered Grade 3 and 12 (48%) Grade 4 acute toxicity. Only 2 patients suffered late toxicity: One suffered Grade 2 and the other Grade 3 late toxicity. The actuarial risk of Grade 2 or worse late toxicity was 5%, with or without chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Our experience suggests that two fractions of high-dose-rate brachytherapy are safe and effective in the management of cervix cancer, even in conjunction with concomitant cisplatin. The fears that the use of two fractions would lead to excessive rectal or bladder toxicity proved unfounded. Guidelines for ensuring a low complication rate are discussed.

A phase I safety and dose escalation trial of docetaxel combined with GEM®231, a second generation antisense oligonucleotide targeting protein kinase A R1α in patients with advanced solid cancers

SummaryPurpose: GEM®231 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide targeting the mRNA of the R1α regulatory subunit of cAMP dependent protein kinase A. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity when GEM®231 is combined with docetaxel. This trial assesses the safety of this combination. Experimental Design: Docetaxel was administered once every three weeks (one-cycle) at doses between 50–75 mg/m2. GEM®231 was administered twice weekly at 220 mg/m2 for 3 (schedule-A), or 2 (schedule-B) weeks. Results: Twenty patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced cancer received a total of 39 cycles of therapy. Six patients in schedule-A received docetaxel 50 mg/m2, and 14 patients in schedule-B received docetaxel 50–75 mg/m2. In schedule-A, 2 of 6 patients developed cycle-1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT)-grade-3 fatigue or grade-3 serum transaminase elevation. In schedule-B, 1 of 4 patients developed cycle-1 DLT at the highest dose of docetaxel tested (75 mg/m2)—grade–3 febrile neutropenia. Subsequent dose escalations were not pursued since the overall incidence of grade-3 toxicities (including those that occurred after cycle 1) was 75%, and this dose was close to the single agent MTD of docetaxel. Grade-3 toxicities included fatigue (2 patients), transaminase elevation (4 patients), and altered mentation (1 patient). The mean post-infusion aPTT was significantly higher than the pre-infusion value [14.8 seconds; p<0.001]; however, there were no hemorrhagic episodes. Conclusions: The recommended dose for further development of the combination of docetaxel and GEM®231 is 75 mg/m2 and 220 mg/m2, respectively. It is important to administer GEM®231 twice weekly for 2 consecutive weeks followed by a one-week break.

Promising new therapies in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

Advanced stage ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer. Despite initial response rates of 60–80% with platinum‐based chemotherapy, more than 75% of women with this malignancy die of complications associated with this disease. There is a pressing need to find new chemotherapeutic agents for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

PHASE I CLINICAL TRIAL OF PARENTERAL HYDROXYUREA IN COMBINATION WITH PELVIC AND PARA-AORTIC EXTERNAL RADIATION AND BRACHYTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SQUAMOUS CELL CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX

PURPOSE Oral hydroxyurea (HU) is a potent radiation sensitizer, but in vitro studies have suggested that prolonged exposure to HU by way of continuous parenteral infusion would enhance clinical efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose and identify the toxicities of continuous infusion HU in combination with pelvic and para-aortic external beam radiotherapy (RT) and intrauterine brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS This Phase I study of concomitant RT was designed with an escalating dose schedule of HU administered by continuous infusion. HU was administered parenterally as a continuous infusion, 5 d/wk, during the first 21 days of external radiation, during the final 5 days of external beam RT, followed by another 5-day infusion schedule bracketing the single fraction of brachytherapy. The maximal tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose level at which 3 of 3 or 5 of 6 patients could be treated without dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS At dose level 1 (0.25 mg/m(2)/min), 0 of 4 patients experienced Grade 4 toxicities and 2 patients experienced Grade 3 hematologic toxicities that were not considered dose-limiting. One of the first 4 patients at level 2 (0.375 mg/m(2)/min) had Grade 3 diarrhea, but the 3 subsequent patients tolerated the dose. At level 3 (0.5 mg/m(2)/min), 4 of 5 patients failed to complete therapy without a >7-day interruption in HU. CONCLUSIONS The maximal tolerated dose of parenteral HU was 0.375 mg/m(2)/min when administered with concomitant RT. The most common toxicities were hematologic. A new trial, incorporating concurrent cisplatin, HU, and RT is planned.

Evaluation of low-dose intraperitoneal interferon-α for palliation of ascites in patients with non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVE Intraperitoneal interferon-alpha (IP-IFNalpha) has shown some benefit in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer. Our goal was to evaluate the use of low-dose IP-IFNalpha for the palliative control of ascites in non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies, including primary peritoneal and uterine papillary serous carcinomas. METHODS Fifteen patients with non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies received one or two doses of 10 MU (10 x 10(6) U/m(2)) of IP-IFNalpha via single-use drum catheter for the symptomatic control of ascites. The median age for this patient group was 61 years (range 40-84). Histopathologic diagnoses were confirmed on all patients. Eleven of 15 (73%) patients had uterine cancers. Four of 15 (27%) patients had papillary serous primary peritoneal carcinomas. Thirteen of 15 (87%) patients had Stage III disease or more. All patients had been heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and all had progressive disease. RESULTS Specific parameters used to evaluate IP-IFNalpha were (1) median survival; (2) number of days to recurrent ascites; (3) number of subsequent paracenteses required for symptomatic relief; and (4) symptomatology and side effects. Median overall survival was 3 months (range 0.5-13). Seven of 15 (47%) patients survived >3 months. Twelve of 15 (80%) patients had recurrent ascites within 30 days of treatment. However, 3/15 (20%) patients had a prolonged, >30-day period, without symptomatic ascites. One patient (6%) had a 270-day response with no ascites. Toxicity was minimal from IP-IFNalpha infusion. The most common side effect was fever in 6/15 (40%) patients. CONCLUSION IP-IFNalpha was well tolerated and may have some benefit in a subset of patients. Although 80% of patients had recurrent ascites within 30 days, 20% had a prolonged, >30-day response. Further study is warranted to determine the role of immune modulators, such as IP-IFNalpha, in the palliative management of patients with non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies that cause ascites.