Abdul H. Sultan

Anal-Sphincter Disruption during Vaginal Delivery

Background Lacerations of the anal sphincter or injury to sphincter innervation during childbirth are major causes of fecal incontinence, but the incidence and importance of occult sphincter damage during routine vaginal delivery are unknown. We sought to determine the incidence of damage to the anal sphincter and the relation of injury to symptoms, anorectal physiologic function, and the mode of delivery. Methods We studied 202 consecutive women six weeks before delivery, 150 of them six weeks after delivery, and 32 with abnormal findings six months after delivery. Symptoms of anal incontinence and fecal urgency were assessed, and anal endosonography, manometry, perineometry, and measurement of the terminal motor latency of the pudendal nerves were performed. Results Ten of the 79 primiparous women (13 percent) and 11 of the 48 multiparous women (23 percent) who delivered vaginally had anal incontinence or fecal urgency when studied six weeks after delivery. Twenty-eight of the 79 primiparous women (35 p...

Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair

Objectives To determine (i) risk factors in the development of third degree obstetric tears and (ii) the success of primary sphincter repair. Design (i) Retrospective analysis of obstetric variables in 50 women who had sustained a third degree tear, compared with the remaining 8553 vaginal deliveries during the same period. (ii) Women who had sustained a third degree tear and had primary sphincter repair and control subjects were interviewed and investigated with anal endosonography, anal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements Setting: Antenatal clinic in teaching hospital in inner London. Subjects (i) All women (n=8603) who delivered vaginally over a 31 month period. (ii) 34 women who sustained a third degree tear and 88 matched controls. Main outcome measures : Obstetric risk factors, defaecatory symptoms, sonographic sphincter defects, and pudendal nerve damage. Results - (i) Factors significantly associated with development of a third degree tear were: forceps delivery (50% v 7% in controls; P=0.00001), primiparous delivery (85% v 43%; P=0.00001), birth weight >4 kg (P=0.00002), and occipitoposterior position at delivery (P=0.003). No third degree tear occurred during 351 vacuum extractions. Eleven of 25 (44%) women who were delivered without instruments and had a third degree tear did so despite a posterolateral episiotomy. (ii) Anal incontinence or faecal urgency was present in 16 women with tears and 11 controls (47% v 13%;20P=0.00001). Sonographic sphincter defects were identified in 29 with tears and 29 controls (85% v 33%; P=0.00001). Every symptomatic patient had persistent combined internal and external sphincter defects, and these were associated with significantly lower anal pressures. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements were not significantly different. Conclusions Vacuum, extraction is associated with fewer third degree tears than forceps delivery. An episiotomy does not always prevent a third degree tear. Primary repair is inadequate in most women who sustain third degree tears, most having residual sphincter defects and about half experiencing anal incontinence, which is caused by persistent mechanical sphincter disruption rather than pudendal nerve damage. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and surgical techniques of repair.

Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth

Objective To establish the effect of childbirth on pudendal nerve function and identify obstetric factors associated with such damage.

Occult anal sphincter injuries—myth or reality?

Objectives  To establish the true prevalence of clinically recognisable and occult obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry.

To determine the normal and anatomy in vivo, and endosonography and manometry were performed in 93 nulliparous females, and endosonography alone in 21 healthy males. Endosonography did not reveal any plane of cleavage between the components of the external and sphincter, though a changing pattern at different levels conforming to a trilaminar arrangement was apparent. The deep (proximal) aspect of the external sphincter was annular in 72% of females and 76% of males. The superficial external sphincter was elliptical in 76% and 86%, the subcutaneous part conical in 56% and 57%, respectively. The external sphincter was shorter anteriorly in females. Aberrant insertions from the external sphincter anteriorly were identified in 14%. The longitudinal muscle layer could be distinguished sonographically in all males, as the external sphincter was relatively hypoechoic, but in 60% of the females the longitudinal muscle and external sphincter were of similar echogenicity and sonographically indistinguishable. The subepithelial tissues and internal sphincter were identified in each subject. The external sphincter was thicker bilaterally (P = 0.001) in males (8.6 +/- 1 mm, mean +/- S.D.) compared to females (7.7 +/- 1.1), which related to the higher weight of the males (73 +/- 7 vs 65 +/- 11 kg, P < 0.0001). The mean maximum lateral thickness of the internal sphincter (1.8 +/- 0.5 vs 1.9 +/- 0.6) and the longitudinal muscle (2.5 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9) in females and males were not significantly different. There was no relationship between the manometric resting or squeeze pressures in the anal canal, and the internal or external sphincter thickness.

Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano.

PURPOSE: Successful management of anal fistulas depends upon accurate assessment of the primary tract and any secondary extensions. Preoperative imaging has, to date, been disappointing. METHODS: A prospective study of 35 patients with a clinical diagnosis of fistula-in-ano was performed comparing magnetic resonance imaging with the independently documented operative findings. Magnetic resonance imaging was also compared with anal endosonography in 20 patients. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate and demonstrates pathology missed at surgery by experienced coloproctologists. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to anal endosonography. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is advocated as the method of choice when imaging is required for anal fistulas.

Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of a new technique of primary overlap anal sphincter repair instead Setting A teaching hospital and a district general hospital.

Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth–elective caesarean section?

13 Lindgren CL, Smyth CN. Measurement and interpretation of the pressures upon the cervix during normal and abnormal labour. J Obsstet Gynaecol Br Comnwlrh 1961; 68: 901-914. 14 Gee H. Uterine activity and cervical resistance determining cervical change in labour [MD thesis] University of Liverpool, England, 1981. 15 Gough GW, Randall NJ, Genevier ES, Sutherland IA, Steer PJ. Head-to-cervix forces and their relationship to the outcome of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 613-618. 16 Olhh KS, Gee H, Brown JS. Measurement of the cervical response to uterine activity in labour and observations on the mechanism of cervical effacement. J Perinat Med 1991; 19 Suppl 2: 245.

State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography

Surgical management of pelvic floor disorders depends on a comprehensive understanding of the structural integrity and function of the pelvic floor. For visualizing this region, ultrasonography has emerged as a procedure that is relatively easy to perform, cost‐effective and widely available. In this review, pelvic floor ultrasonography, including two‐dimensional (2D), three‐dimensional (3D) and 4D imaging as well as transvaginal, endoanal and transperineal techniques, is discussed from a global and multicompartmental perspective, rather than using a compartmentalized approach. The role of the different sonographic modalities in the major disorders of the pelvic floor—urinary and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and obstructed defecation syndrome—is evaluated critically. Copyright

Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the effects of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse and identify the risk factors for failure. METHODS: All women referred to a specialist urogynecology unit with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse who elected to use a pessary were included in this study. All completed the Sheffield pelvic organ prolapse symptom questionnaire before use and after 4 months of use. The primary outcome measure was change of symptoms from baseline to 4 months. RESULTS: Of 203 consecutive women fitted with a pessary, 153 (75%) successfully retained the pessary at 2 weeks, and 97 completed the questionnaires at 4 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that failure to retain the pessary was significantly associated with increasing parity (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–2.02, P = .004) and hysterectomy (OR 4.57, 95% CI 1.71–12.25, P = .002). In the success group at 4 months (n = 97), a significant improvement in voiding was reported by 39 participants (40%, P = .001), in urinary urgency by 37 (38%, P = .001), in urge urinary incontinence by 28 (29%, P = .015), in bowel evacuation by 27 (28%, P = .045), in fecal urgency by 22 (23%, P = .018), and in urge fecal incontinence by 19 (20%, P = .027), but there was no significant improvement in stress urinary incontinence in 22 participants (23% P = .275). Of the 26 (27%) who were sexually active, 16 (17%, P = .001) reported an increase in frequency of sexual activity, and 11 (11%, P = .041) had improved in sexual satisfaction. CONCLUSION: A vaginal pessary is an effective and simple method of alleviating symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse and associated pelvic floor dysfunction. Failure to retain the pessary is associated with increasing parity and previous hysterectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3