Abdullah Al Ali

Role of multislice computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) required precise knowledge of the anatomic dimensions and physical characteristics of the aortic valve, annulus, and aortic root. Most groups currently use angiography, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to assess aortic annulus dimensions and anatomy. However, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) may allow more detailed 3-dimensional assessment of the aortic root. Twenty-six patients referred for TAVR underwent MSCT. Scans were also obtained for 18 patients after TAVR. All patients underwent pre- and postprocedural aortic root angiography, TTE, and TEE. Mean differences in measured aortic annular diameters were 1.1 mm (95% confidence interval 0.5, 1.8) for calibrated angiography and TTE, -0.9 mm (95% confidence interval -1.7, -0.1 mm) for TTE and TEE, -0.3 mm (95% confidence interval -1.1, 0.6 mm) for MSCT (sagittal) and TTE, and -1.2 mm (95% confidence interval -2.2, -0.2 mm) for MSCT (sagittal) and TEE. Coronal systolic measurements using MSCT, which corresponded to angiographic orientation, were 3.2 mm (1st and 3rd quartiles 2.6, 3.9) larger than sagittal systolic measurements, which were in the same anatomic plane as standard TTE and TEE views. There was no significant association between either shape of the aortic annulus or amount of aortic valve calcium and development of perivalvular aortic regurgitation. After TAVR, the prosthesis extended to or beyond the inferior border of the left main ostium in 9 of 18 patients (50%), and in 11 patients (61%), valvular calcium was <5 mm from the left main ostium. In conclusion, MSCT identified that the aortic annulus was commonly eccentric and often oval. This may in part explain the small, but clinically insignificant, differences in measured aortic annular diameters with other imaging modalities. MSCT after TAVR showed close proximity of both the prosthesis and displaced valvular calcium to the left main ostium in most patients. Neither eccentricity nor calcific deposits appeared to contribute significantly to severity of paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR.

Impact of coronary artery disease on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) negatively impacts prognosis of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement and revascularization is generally recommended at the time of surgery. Implications of CAD and preprocedural revascularization in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are not known. Method: Patients who underwent successful TAVI from January 2005 to December 2007 were retrospectively divided into five groups according to the extent of CAD assessed with the Duke Myocardial Jeopardy Score: no CAD, CAD with DMJS 0, 2, 4, and ≥6. Study endpoints included 30‐day and 1‐year survival, evolution of symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and mitral regurgitation (MR) and need of revascularization during follow‐up. Results: One hundred and thirty‐six patients were included, among which 104 (76.5%) had coexisting CAD. Thirty‐day mortality in the five study groups was respectively 6.3, 14.6, 7.1, 5.6, and 17.7% with no statistically significant difference between groups (P = 0.56). Overall survival rate at one year was 77.9% (95% CL: 70.9, 84.9) with no difference between groups (P = 0.63). Symptoms, LVEF, and MR all significantly improved in the first month after TAVI, but the extent of improvement did not differ between groups (P > 0.08). Revascularization after TAVI was uncommon. Conclusion: The presence of CAD or nonrevascularized myocardium was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events in this initial cohort. On the basis of these early results, complete revascularization may not constitute a prerequisite of TAVI. This conclusion will require re‐assessment as experience accrues in patients with extensive CAD.

A New Transcatheter Aortic Valve and Percutaneous Valve Delivery System

OBJECTIVES We describe procedural and clinical outcomes in a high-risk cohort undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early next-generation transcatheter valve and delivery systems. BACKGROUND Percutaneous aortic valve replacement is gaining acceptance as a viable option in patients at high surgical risk. Broader application will require further advances in valve and delivery system technology. METHODS Transarterial aortic valve replacement was attempted in 25 patients (mean age 85 years) determined to be at high surgical risk due to comorbidities. A new delivery catheter system (RetroFlex 2, Edwards Lifesciences, Irving, California) was utilized in combination with either a balloon-expandable SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences) valve or a next-generation low-profile cobalt-chromium bovine pericardial SAPIEN XT (Edwards Lifesciences) valve. RESULTS Percutaneous valve replacement was successful in all 25 high-risk patients. Aortic valve area increased from 0.59 +/- 0.15 cm(2) to 1.60 +/- 0.27 cm(2). In this high-risk cohort (Society of Thoracic Surgeons and logistic EuroSCORE estimates of surgical mortality were 8.9% and 21.0%, respectively), 30-day mortality was 0%. CONCLUSIONS Technical and procedural advances in catheter systems and prosthetic valves designed for percutaneous aortic valve delivery may contribute to increased procedural success and improved clinical outcomes.

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 1-year outcome in 26 patients

BACKGROUND We reported the first case of successful transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a human subject in 2005 and have now completed a 12-month follow-up on our first 26 patients. This is, to date, the longest follow-up of patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation. METHODS Between October 2005 and January 2007, 26 patients (13 female) underwent transcatheter transapical aortic valve implantation with either 23- or 26-mm Edwards Lifesciences transcatheter bioprostheses. All patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis were declined for conventional aortic valve replacement because of unacceptable operative risks and were not candidates for transfemoral aortic valve implantation because of poor arterial access. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed before discharge and at 1, 6, and 12 months. Data from the 17 patients who survived over 12 months were used for comparisons of the baseline and follow-up results. RESULTS The mean age was 80 +/- 9 years, and the predicted operative mortality was 37% +/- 20% by using logistic EuroSCORE and 11% +/- 6% by using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Calculator. Valves were successfully implanted in all patients. Six patients died within 30 days (30-day mortality, 23%), and 3 patients died from noncardiovascular causes after 30 days (late mortality, 12%). Among patients who survived at least 30 days, 12-month survival was 85%. There were no late valve-related complications. New York Heart Association functional class improved significantly. The aortic valve area and mean gradient remained stable at 12 months (1.6 +/- 0.3 cm(2) and 9.6 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, respectively). CONCLUSION Our 1-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes suggest that transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a viable alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients.

Prevention and management of transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve malposition†

Early clinical outcomes in selected high‐risk patients undergoing catheter‐based aortic valve replacement (AVR) compare favorably with conventional surgical AVR. Improved understanding of the mechanisms of success and failure of transcatheter AVR will likely improve outcomes further. To this end, we examined our experience during the developmental phases of transcatheter AVR and describe the causes and management of prosthetic valve malposition.

Eosinophilic myocarditis: case series and review of literature.

Although the etiology of eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) is not always apparent, several causes are identified, including hypersensitivity to a drug or substance, with the heart as the target organ. However, symptoms and signs of hypersensitivity are not found in all patients. EM can lead to progressive myocardial damage with destruction of the conduction system and refractory heart failure. The present report describes three cases of biopsy-proven EM with different presentations, including acute coronary syndrome, cardiogenic shock and newly diagnosed heart failure. In one patient, hypersensitivity to sumatriptan was suspected to be the underlying cause. All patients responded well to treatment with steroids, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers. There was a complete recovery of the ventricular function in all cases.

Acute stent thrombosis in a patient with giant cell arteritis

A 70-year-old man presented with a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction attributable to a 99% occlusion of his mid-left anterior descending artery and concomitant symptoms suggestive of giant cell arteritis. He underwent bare metal stenting, with an excellent angiographic result, and was placed on dual antiplatelet therapy, as well as oral prednisone 30 mg twice daily, while awaiting confirmatory temporal artery biopsy. Unfortunately, 70 h after percutaneous coronary intervention, he developed acute stent thrombosis. Platelet aggregometry demonstrated that he was responsive to acetylsalicylic acid, but marginally responsive to clopidogrel. Over the next 30 days, he had a marked clinical improvement, with an improvement in platelet response to clopidogrel that paralleled the clinical resolution of his vasculitis. The present case reports the first incidence of acute stent thrombosis associated with giant cell arteritis, and suggests that the proinflammatory milieu of acute inflammatory arthritides may warrant prolonged, aggressive antiplatelet therapy in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome.