Abid Mohiuddin

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Myeloma: Diagnostic and Clinical Implications

PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) permits the detection of diffuse and focal bone marrow infiltration in the absence of osteopenia or focal osteolysis on standard metastatic bone surveys (MBSs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Both baseline MBS and MRI were available in 611 of 668 myeloma patients who were treated uniformly with a tandem autologous transplantation-based protocol and were evaluated to determine their respective merits for disease staging, response assessment, and outcome prediction. RESULTS MRI detected focal lesions (FLs) in 74% and MBS in 56% of imaged anatomic sites; 52% of 267 patients with normal MBS results and 20% of 160 with normal MRI results had FL on MRI and MBS, respectively. MRI- but not MBS-defined FL independently affected survival. Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) and more than seven FLs on MRI (MRI-FLs) distinguished three risk groups: 5-year survival was 76% in the absence of both more than seven MRI-FLs and CA (n = 276), 61% in the presence of one MRI-FL (n = 262), and 37% in the presence of both unfavorable parameters (n = 67). MRI-FL correlated with low albumin and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatinine, but did not correlate with age, beta-2-microglobulin, and CA. Resolution of MRI-FL, occurring in 60% of cases and not seen with MBS-defined FL, conferred superior survival. CONCLUSION MRI is a more powerful tool for detection of FLs than is MBS. MRI-FL number had independent prognostic implications; additionally, MRI-FL resolution identified a subgroup with superior survival. We therefore recommend that, in addition to MBS, MRI be used routinely for staging, prognosis, and response assessment in myeloma.

Incorporating bortezomib into upfront treatment for multiple myeloma: early results of total therapy 3.

Total therapy 3 incorporated bortezomib into a melphalan‐based tandem transplant regimen for 303 newly diagnosed patients with myeloma. Induction chemotherapy prior to and consolidation chemotherapy after transplants each consisted of two cycles of VTD‐PACE (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone and 4‐d continuous infusions of cis‐platin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide); 3‐year maintenance comprised monthly cycles of VTD in the first and TD in the remaining years. The median age was 59 years (age >64 years, 28%). A minimum of 20 × 106 CD34 cells/kg was collected in 87% of patients; 83% completed both transplants, and only 5% suffered a treatment‐related death. At 24 months, 83% had achieved near‐complete remission, which was sustained in 88% at 2 years from its onset. With a median follow‐up of 20 months, 2‐year estimates of event‐free and overall survival were 84% and 86% respectively. The 44 patients who experienced an event more often had a high‐risk gene array profile, cytogenetic abnormalities and indicators of high lactate dehydrogenase, beta‐2‐microglobulin, creatinine and International Staging System stage. Toxicities of grade > 2 included thrombo‐embolic events in 27% and peripheral neuropathy in 12%. Results of this phase‐2 study demonstrated that bortezomib could be safely combined with multi‐agent chemotherapy, effecting near‐complete remission status and 2‐year survival rates in more than 80% of patients.

Benefit of complete response in multiple myeloma limited to high-risk subgroup identified by gene expression profiling.

Experimental Design: To determine whether the clinical benefit of complete remission (CR) may depend on prognostic subgroups of patients with multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with myeloma received a tandem autotransplant regimen. Using multivariate regression analyses, we examined the prognostic implications of time-dependent onset of CR on overall survival and event-free survival in the context of standard prognostic factors (SPF) and gene expression profiling–derived data available for 326 patients. Results: CR benefited patients regardless of risk status when only SPFs were examined. With knowledge of gene array data, a survival (and event-free survival) benefit of CR only pertained to the small high-risk subgroup of 13% of patients (hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.001), whereas the majority of patients with low-risk disease had similar survival expectations whether or not CR was achieved (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = 0.128). Conclusions: Access to gene expression information permitted the recognition of a small very high-risk subgroup of 13% of patients, in whom prolonged survival critically depended on achieving CR. Absence of such benefit in the remainder should lead to a reassessment of clinical trial designs that rely on this end point as a surrogate for long-term prognosis.

Testing standard and genetic parameters in 220 patients with multiple myeloma with complete data sets: superiority of molecular genetics

Prognostic models for multiple myeloma have been fraught with tremendous heterogeneity in outcome among subgroups. In the context of Total Therapy 2, a tandem transplant trial for newly diagnosed myeloma, comprehensive information was available in 220 patients on standard prognostic factors (SPF), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐defined focal lesions, cytogenetic abnormalities (CA), fluorescence‐in‐situ‐hybridisation (FISH)‐derived amplification of chromosome 1q21 (amp1q21) and deletion of 13q14, as well as gene expression profiling (GEP). Five multivariate analysis‐based survival models were derived, utilising SPF only (model 1), with progressive addition of CA (model 2), MRI (model 3), FISH (model 4) and GEP (model 5). The R2 value, a measure of accounting for clinical outcome variability, increased progressively from 18% in model 1 to 38% in model 5. The hazard ratio for overall survival was highest for GEP (3·07, P < 0·001) followed by amp1q21 (1·71, P = 0·05). According to the presence of none (49%), one (35%) or both of these two risk features (16%), 3‐year survival decreased progressively from 92% to 78% to 43% (P < 0·0001). Thus, the dominance over other prognostic parameters of molecular genetics justifies the generation of quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction methodology (‘MM genetic kit’) for the optimal risk stratification of patients participating in therapeutic trials.

A Phase II trial of weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone in veterans with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not eligible for or who deferred autologous stem cell transplantation

Once‐weekly administration of bortezomib has reduced bortezomib‐induced peripheral neuropathy without affecting response rates, but this has only been demonstrated prospectively in three‐ and four‐ drug combinations. We report a phase II trial of alternate dosing and schedule of bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are not eligible for or refused autologous stem cell transplantation. Bortezomib 1·6 mg/m2 intravenously was given once‐weekly for six cycles, together with dexamethasone 40 mg on the day of and day after bortezomib. Fifty patients were enrolled; 58% did not require any dose modification. The majority of patients had multiple co‐morbidities, including cardiovascular (76%) and renal insufficiency (54%), and the median number of medications prior to enrollment was 13. Of all evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 79% and at least 45% had at least a very good partial response. The median time to first response was 1·3 months (range, 0·25–2·4 months). The progression‐free and overall survivals were 8 months and 46·5 months, respectively. Twenty‐four percent developed worsening neuropathy. We conclude that alternate dosing and scheduling of bortezomib and dexamethasone is both safe and effective for management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in frail patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01090921).