Abir Mukherjee

Role of LPA4/p2y9/GPR23 in negative regulation of cell motility.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a ligand of multiple G protein-coupled receptors. The LPA(1-3) receptors are members of the endothelial cell differentiation gene (Edg) family. LPA(4)/p2y9/GPR23, a member of the purinergic receptor family, and recently identified LPA(5)/GPR92 and p2y5 are structurally distant from the canonical Edg LPA receptors. Here we report targeted disruption of lpa(4) in mice. Although LPA(4)-deficient mice displayed no apparent abnormalities, LPA(4)-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were hypersensitive to LPA-induced cell migration. Consistent with negative modulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase pathway by LPA(4), LPA(4) deficiency potentiated Akt and Rac but decreased Rho activation induced by LPA. Reconstitution of LPA(4) converted LPA(4)-negative cells into a less motile phenotype. In support of the biological relevance of these observations, ectopic expression of LPA(4) strongly inhibited migration and invasion of human cancer cells. When coexpressed with LPA(1) in B103 neuroblastoma cells devoid of endogenous LPA receptors, LPA(4) attenuated LPA(1)-driven migration and invasion, indicating functional antagonism between the two subtypes of LPA receptors. These results provide genetic and biochemical evidence that LPA(4) is a suppressor of LPA-dependent cell migration and invasion in contrast to the motility-stimulating Edg LPA receptors.

Sp-1 and c-Myc Mediate Lysophosphatidic Acid–Induced Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Ovarian Cancer Cells via a Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1–Independent Mechanism

Purpose: Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which is present in ascites of ovarian cancer patients, stimulates expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF is essential for the development and abdominal dissemination of ovarian cancer. We examined how LPA drives VEGF expression to gain a better understanding of tumor angiogenesis under normoxic conditions. Experimental Design: ELISA, Northern blotting, immunoblotting, quantitative PCR, and promoter reporter analysis in combination with small interfering RNA and pharmacologic inhibitors were used to examine LPA-induced VEGF expression and the underlying mechanisms. Results: LPA stimulated expression of multiple VEGF variants. A 123-bp fragment proximal to the transcriptional initiation site was identified to be functional promoter region responsible for the response to LPA. The fragment harbors consensus sites for several transcription factors including c-Myc and Sp-1 but not hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Blockade of Rho, ROCK, or c-Myc reduced LPA-dependent VEGF production and promoter activation, suggesting that the G12/13-Rho-ROCK-c-Myc cascade partially contributes to VEGF induction by LPA. More significantly, the multiple Sp-1 sites within the responsive region of the VEGF promoter were essential for LPA-mediated transcription. LPA induced Sp-1 phosphorylation and DNA-binding and transcriptional activities. The silencing of Sp-1 expression with small interfering RNA or inhibition of Sp-1 with pharmacologic inhibitors blocked VEGF production induced by LPA. Conclusions: LPA stimulates hypoxia-inducible factor-1-independent VEGF expression to promote tumor angiogenesis through activation of the c-Myc and Sp-1 transcription factors.

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms for lysophosphatidic acid-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in ovarian cancer cells

Emerging evidence suggests that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a physiological regulator of cyclooxygenase‐2 (Cox‐2) expression. Herein we used ovarian cancer cells as a model to investigate the molecular mechanisms that link the LPA G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) to Cox‐2 expression. LPA stimulated Cox‐2 expression and release of prostaglandins though the LPA1, LPA2, and LPA5 receptors. The effect of LPA involves both transcriptional activation and post‐transcriptional enhancement of Cox‐2 mRNA stability. The consensus sites for C/EBP in the Cox‐2 promoter were essential for transcriptional activation of Cox‐2 by LPA. The NF‐ΚB and AP‐1 transcription factors commonly involved in inducible Cox‐2 expression were dispensable. Dominant‐negative C/EPBβ inhibited LPA activation of the Cox‐2 promoter and expression. Furthermore, LPA stimulated C/EBPβ phosphorylation and activity through a novel mechanism integrating GPCR signals and a permissive activity from a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). This role of RTK was not consistent with LPA activation of C/EBP through transactivation of RTK, as full activation of RTKs with their own agonists only weakly stimulated C/EBP. In addition to the transcriptional activation, the RNA stabilization protein HuR bound to and protected Cox‐2 mRNA in LPA‐stimulated cells, indicating an active role for HuR in sustaining Cox‐2 induction during physiological responses.—Oyesanya, R. A., Lee, Z. P., Wu, J., Chen, J., Song, Y., Mukherjee, A., Dent, P., Kordula, T., Zhou, H., Fang, X. Transcriptional and post‐transcriptional mechanisms for lysophosphatidic acid‐induced cyclooxygenase‐2 expression in ovarian cancer cells. FASEB J. 22, 2639–2651 (2008)

Molecular Pathways: Trafficking of Metabolic Resources in the Tumor Microenvironment

A model of tumor metabolism is proposed that describes how the complementary metabolic functions of the local stroma and the tumor cells contribute to cancer progression. Cancer cells alter the metabolism of cancer-associated fibroblasts to obtain lactate and amino acids, which are utilized for energy production, rapid growth, and resistance to chemotherapy drugs. Cancer cells use glutamine supplied by cancer-associated fibroblasts to replenish tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and as a nitrogen source for nucleotide synthesis. Moreover, adipocytes in the microenvironment attract cancer cells through the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and proteases. The cancer cells then induce metabolic changes in the adipocytes to acquire free fatty acids that are oxidized by cancer cells to generate energy for proliferation. Increasing knowledge about the metabolic symbiosis within the tumor has led to novel therapeutic strategies designed to restrict metabolic adaptation, including inhibiting lactate transporters and repurposing antidiabetic drugs (thiazolidinediones, metformin). Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 680–6. ©2015 AACR.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Activates Lipogenic Pathways and de Novo Lipid Synthesis in Ovarian Cancer Cells

Background: Mechanisms underlying the lipogenic phenotype of cancer cells are poorly understood. Results: Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) via its receptor LPA2 activates lipogenic pathways and de novo lipid synthesis in ovarian cancer cells. Conclusion: LPA is causally linked to the aberrant lipogenesis in cancer. Significance: This study offers a new strategy to inhibit lipid anabolism in a cancer cell-specific manner. One of the most common molecular changes in cancer is the increased endogenous lipid synthesis, mediated primarily by overexpression and/or hyperactivity of fatty acid synthase (FAS) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). The changes in these key lipogenic enzymes are critical for the development and maintenance of the malignant phenotype. Previous efforts to control oncogenic lipogenesis have been focused on pharmacological inhibitors of FAS and ACC. Although they show anti-tumor effects in culture and in mouse models, these inhibitors are nonselective blockers of lipid synthesis in both normal and cancer cells. To target lipid anabolism in tumor cells specifically, it is important to identify the mechanism governing hyperactive lipogenesis in malignant cells. In this study, we demonstrate that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a growth factor-like mediator present at high levels in ascites of ovarian cancer patients, regulates the sterol regulatory element binding protein-FAS and AMP-activated protein kinase-ACC pathways in ovarian cancer cells but not in normal or immortalized ovarian epithelial cells. Activation of these lipogenic pathways is linked to increased de novo lipid synthesis. The pro-lipogenic action of LPA is mediated through LPA2, an LPA receptor subtype overexpressed in ovarian cancer and other malignancies. Downstream of LPA2, the G12/13 and Gq signaling cascades mediate LPA-dependent sterol regulatory element-binding protein activation and AMP-activated protein kinase inhibition, respectively. Moreover, inhibition of de novo lipid synthesis dramatically attenuated LPA-induced cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that LPA signaling is causally linked to the hyperactive lipogenesis in ovarian cancer cells, which can be exploited for development of new anti-cancer therapies.

Differential requirement of the epidermal growth factor receptor for G protein-mediated activation of transcription factors by lysophosphatidic acid

BackgroundThe role of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in provoking biological actions of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been one of the most disputed subjects in the field of GPCR signal transduction. The purpose of the current study is to identify EGFR-mediated mechanisms involved in activation of G protein cascades and the downstream transcription factors by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA).ResultsIn ovarian cancer cells highly responsive to LPA, activation of AP-1 by LPA was suppressed by inhibition of EGFR, an effect that could be reversed by co-stimulation of another receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met with hepatocyte growth factor, indicating that LPA-mediated activation of AP-1 requires activity of a RTK, not necessarily EGFR. Induction of AP-1 components by LPA lied downstream of Gi, G12/13, and Gq. Activation of the effectors of Gi, but not Gq or G12/13 was sensitive to inhibition of EGFR. In contrast, LPA stimulated another prominent transcription factor NF-κB via the Gq-PKC pathway in an EGFR-independent manner. Consistent with the importance of Gi-elicited signals in a plethora of biological processes, LPA-induced cytokine production, cell proliferation, migration and invasion require intact EGFR.ConclusionsAn RTK activity is required for activation of the AP-1 transcription factor and other Gi-dependent cellular responses to LPA. In contrast, activation of G12/13, Gq and Gq-elicited NF-κB by LPA is independent of such an input. These results provide a novel insight into the role of RTK in GPCR signal transduction and biological functions.

Sperm Associated Antigen 6 (SPAG6) Regulates Fibroblast Cell Growth, Morphology, Migration and Ciliogenesis.

Mammalian Spag6 is the orthologue of Chlamydomonas PF16, which encodes a protein localized in the axoneme central apparatus, and regulates flagella/cilia motility. Most Spag6-deficient mice are smaller in size than their littermates. Because SPAG6 decorates microtubules, we hypothesized that SPAG6 has other roles related to microtubule function besides regulating flagellar/cilia motility. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated from Spag6-deficient and wild-type embryos for these studies. Both primary and immortalized Spag6-deficient MEFs proliferated at a much slower rate than the wild-type MEFs, and they had a larger surface area. Re-expression of SPAG6 in the Spag6-deficient MEFs rescued the abnormal cell morphology. Spag6-deficient MEFs were less motile than wild-type MEFs, as shown by both chemotactic analysis and wound-healing assays. Spag6-deficient MEFs also showed reduced adhesion associated with a non-polarized F-actin distribution. Multiple centrosomes were observed in the Spag6-deficient MEF cultures. The percentage of cells with primary cilia was significantly reduced compared to the wild-type MEFs, and some Spag6-deficient MEFs developed multiple cilia. Furthermore, SPAG6 selectively increased expression of acetylated tubulin, a microtubule stability marker. The Spag6-deficient MEFs were more sensitive to paclitaxel, a microtubule stabilizer. Our studies reveal new roles for SPAG6 in modulation of cell morphology, proliferation, migration, and ciliogenesis.

Gene expression of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 is a target of transforming growth factor beta

The lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor LPA1/Edg2 is the first identified LPA receptor. Although its wide tissue distribution and biological functions have been well studied, little is known about how LPA1 is transcriptionally regulated. In the current study, we showed that LPA1 is a physiological target of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ)-mediated repression. In both normal and neoplastic cells, TGFβ inhibits LPA1 promoter activity, LPA1 mRNA expression and LPA1-dependent chemotaxis and tumor cell invasion. Knockdown of the TGFβ intracellular effector Smad3 or Smad4 with lentivirally transduced short hairpin RNA relieved these inhibitory effects of TGFβ. Interestingly, the LPA1 promoter contains two potential TGFβ inhibitory elements (TIEs), each consisting of a Smad-binding site and an adjacent E2F4/5 element, structurally similar to the TIE found on the promoter of the well-defined TGFβ target gene c-myc. Deletion and point mutation analyses indicate that the distal TIE located at 401 bp from the transcription initiation site, is required for TGFβ repression of the LPA1 promoter. A DNA pull-down assay showed that the −401 TIE was capable of binding Samd3 and E2F4 in TGFβ-treated cells. TGFβ-induced binding of the Smad complex to the native −401 TIE sequence of the LPA1 gene promoter was further verified by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. We therefore identified a novel role of TGFβ in the control of LPA1 expression and LPA1-coupled biological functions, adding LPA1 to the list of TGFβ-repressed target genes.

Adipocyte-induced CD36 expression drives ovarian cancer progression and metastasis

Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is characterized by widespread and rapid metastasis in the peritoneal cavity. Visceral adipocytes promote this process by providing fatty acids (FAs) for tumour growth. However, the exact mechanism of FA transfer from adipocytes to cancer cells remains unknown. This study shows that OvCa cells co-cultured with primary human omental adipocytes express high levels of the FA receptor, CD36, in the plasma membrane, thereby facilitating exogenous FA uptake. Depriving OvCa cells of adipocyte-derived FAs using CD36 inhibitors and short hairpin RNA knockdown prevented development of the adipocyte-induced malignant phenotype. Specifically, inhibition of CD36 attenuated adipocyte-induced cholesterol and lipid droplet accumulation and reduced intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) content. Metabolic analysis suggested that CD36 plays an essential role in the bioenergetic adaptation of OvCa cells in the adipocyte-rich microenvironment and governs their metabolic plasticity. Furthermore, the absence of CD36 affected cellular processes that play a causal role in peritoneal dissemination, including adhesion, invasion, migration and anchorage independent growth. Intraperitoneal injection of CD36-deficient cells or treatment with an anti-CD36 monoclonal antibody reduced tumour burden in mouse xenografts. Moreover, a matched cohort of primary and metastatic human ovarian tumours showed upregulation of CD36 in the metastatic tissues, a finding confirmed in three public gene expression data sets. These results suggest that omental adipocytes reprogram tumour metabolism through the upregulation of CD36 in OvCa cells. Targeting the stromal-tumour metabolic interface via CD36 inhibition may prove to be an effective treatment strategy against OvCa metastasis.

Lysophosphatidic Acid–Induced p21Waf1 Expression Mediates the Cytostatic Response of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cells to TGFβ

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a multifunctional intercellular phospholipid mediator present in blood and other biological fluids. In cancer cells, LPA stimulates expression or activity of inflammatory cytokines, angiogenic factors, matrix metalloproteinases, and other oncogenic proteins. In this study, we showed that LPA upregulated expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21Waf1 in TGFβ-sensitive breast and ovarian cancer cells, but not in TGFβ-resistant ones. We examined the possibility that LPA-induced p21 might contribute to the cytostatic response to TGFβ. In serum-free conditions, TGFβ alone induced p21 expression weakly in TGFβ-sensitive cells. Serum or serum-borne LPA cooperated with TGFβ to elicit the maximal p21 induction. LPA stimulated p21 via LPA1 and LPA2 receptors and Erk-dependent activation of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta transcription factor independent of p53. Loss or gain of p21 expression led to a shift between TGFβ-sensitive and -resistant phenotypes in breast and ovarian cancer cells, indicating that p21 is a key determinant of the growth inhibitory activity of TGFβ. Our results reveal a novel cross-talk between LPA and TGFβ that underlies TGFβ-sensitive and -resistant phenotypes of breast and ovarian cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res; 9(11); 1562–70. ©2011 AACR.