Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Abram Recht is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Abram Recht.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2002

Revision of the American Joint Committee on cancer staging system for breast cancer

S. Eva Singletary; Craig Allred; Pandora Ashley; Lawrence W. Bassett; Donald A. Berry; Kirby I. Bland; Patrick I. Borgen; Gary M. Clark; Stephen B. Edge; Daniel F. Hayes; Lorie L. Hughes; Robert V. P. Hutter; Monica Morrow; David L. Page; Abram Recht; Richard L. Theriault; Ann D. Thor; Donald L. Weaver; H. Samuel Wieand; Frederick L. Greene

PURPOSE To revise the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Breast Task Force submitted recommended changes and additions to the existing staging system that were (1) evidence-based and/or consistent with widespread clinical consensus about appropriate diagnostic and treatment standards and (2) useful for the uniform accrual of outcome information in national databases. RESULTS Major changes included the following: size-based discrimination between micrometastases and isolated tumor cells; identifiers to indicate usage of innovative technical approaches; classification of lymph node status by number of involved axillary lymph nodes; and new classifications for metastasis to the infraclavicular, internal mammary, and supraclavicular lymph nodes. CONCLUSION This revised staging system will be officially adopted for use in tumor registries in January 2003.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2000

Outcome at 8 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: Influence of Margin Status and Systemic Therapy on Local Recurrence

Catherine C. Park; Michihide Mitsumori; Asa J. Nixon; Abram Recht; James L. Connolly; Rebecca Gelman; Barbara Silver; Stella Hetelekidis; Anthony Abner; Jay R. Harris; Stuart J. Schnitt

PURPOSE To examine the relationship between pathologic margin status and outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population comprised 533 patients with International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II breast cancer who had assessable margins, who received at least 60 Gy to the primary tumor bed, and who had more than 8 years of potential follow-up. Each margin was scored (according to the presence of invasive or in situ disease that touched the inked surgical margin) as one of the following: negative, close, focally positive, or extensively positive. Outcome at 8 years was calculated using crude rates of first site of failure. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed. Median follow-up time was 127 months. RESULTS At 8 years, patients with close margins and those with negative margins both had a rate of local recurrence (LR) of 7%. Patients with extensively positive margins had an LR rate of 27%, whereas patients with focally positive margins had an intermediate rate of LR of 14%. In the polychotomous logistic regression model, margin status and the use of systemic therapy were the only two variables that had significant effects on the risk ratio of LR to remaining alive and free of disease. Among the 45 patients with focally positive margins who received systemic therapy, the crude LR rate was 7% at 8 years (95% confidence interval, 1% to 20%). CONCLUSION Pathologic margin status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy are the most important factors associated with LR among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.


Cancer | 1994

The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy

Stuart J. Schnitt; Anthony Abner; Rebecca Gelman; James L. Connolly; Abram Recht; Rosemary B. Duda; Timothy J. Eberlein; Kathleen Mayzel; Barbara Silver; Jay R. Harris

Background. The relationships among the involvement of tumor at the final margins of resection, the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC), and the risk of local recurrence are important considerations in patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer but have not been defined adequately.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1994

Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer.

Asa J. Nixon; Donna Neuberg; Daniel F. Hayes; Rebecca Gelman; James L. Connolly; Stuart J. Schnitt; Anthony Abner; Abram Recht; Frank A. Vicini; Jay R. Harris

PURPOSE This analysis was performed to clarify the relationship of young age at diagnosis to the pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis in patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,398 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging stage I or II breast cancer treated by breast-conserving therapy between 1968 and 1985. One hundred seven patients were younger than 35 years at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up duration for the 1,032 survivors was 99 months. RESULTS Patients younger than 35 years had a significantly higher overall recurrence rate (P = .002), as well as a greater risk for developing distant metastases (P = .03), when compared with older patients. The cancers in younger patients more commonly showed factors associated with a worse prognosis (including grade 3 histology, lymphatic vessel invasion [LVI], necrosis, and estrogen receptor [ER] negativity) as compared with older patients. In a proportional hazards model that included clinical and treatment-related variables, as well as these pathologic features, age younger than 35 years remained a significant predictor for time to recurrence (relative risk [RR], 1.70), time to distant failure (RR, 1.60), and overall mortality (RR, 1.50). CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients younger than 35 years have a worse prognosis than older patients. This difference is only partially explained by a higher frequency of adverse pathologic factors seen in younger patients.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1996

The Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy after Conservative Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Abram Recht; Steven E. Come; I. Craig Henderson; Rebecca Gelman; Barbara Silver; Daniel F. Hayes; Lawrence N. Shulman; Jay R. Harris

BACKGROUND Patients with early-stage breast cancer who are at substantial risk for systemic metastases are increasingly treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is not clear. METHODS Two hundred forty-four patients with stage I or II breast cancer who were at substantial risk for distant metastases were randomly assigned to receive a 12-week course of chemotherapy either before or after radiation therapy. All had had breast-conserving surgery. The median length of follow-up in surviving patients was 58 months (range, 10 to 124). RESULTS The five-year actuarial rates of cancer recurrence at any site and of distant metastases in the radiotherapy-first group and the chemotherapy-first group were 38 percent and 31 percent (P = 0.17) and 36 percent and 25 percent (P = 0.05), respectively. Overall survival was 73 percent and 81 percent (P = 0.11), respectively. The five-year crude rates of first recurrence according to site in the radiotherapy-first and chemotherapy-first groups, respectively, were 5 percent and 14 percent for local recurrence and 32 percent and 20 percent for distant or regional recurrence or both. This difference in the pattern of recurrence was of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that for patients ar substantial risk for systemic metastases, it is preferable to give a 12-week course of chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy, rather than radiation therapy followed by chemotherapy.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1999

Locoregional Failure 10 Years After Mastectomy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Tamoxifen Without Irradiation: Experience of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

Abram Recht; Robert Gray; Nancy E. Davidson; Barbara Fowble; Lawrence J. Solin; Frank J. Cummings; Geoffrey Falkson; H. C. Falkson; Samuel G. Taylor; Douglass C. Tormey

PURPOSE To assess patterns of failure and how selected prognostic and treatment factors affect the risks of locoregional failure (LRF) after mastectomy in breast cancer patients with histologically involved axillary nodes treated with chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen without irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population consisted of 2,016 patients entered onto four randomized trials conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. The median follow-up time for patients without recurrence was 12.1 years (range, 0.07 to 19.1 years). RESULTS A total of 1,099 patients (55%) experienced disease recurrence. The first sites of failure were as follows: isolated LRF, 254 (13%); LRF with simultaneous distant failure (DF), 166 (8%); and distant only, 679 (34%). The risk of LRF with or without simultaneous DF at 10 years was 12.9% in patients with one to three positive nodes and 28.7% for patients with four or more positive nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing tumor size, increasing numbers of involved nodes, negative estrogen receptor protein status, and decreasing number of nodes examined were significant for increasing the rate of LRF with or without simultaneous DF. CONCLUSION LRF after mastectomy is a substantial clinical problem, despite the use of chemotherapy with or without tamoxifen. Prospective randomized trials will be necessary to estimate accurately the potential disease-free and overall survival benefits of postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients in particular prognostic subgroups treated with presently used and future systemic therapy regimens.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1992

Long-term radiation complications following conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with early stage breast cancer

Susan M. Pierce; Abram Recht; Tatiana I. Lingos; Anthony Abner; F. A. Vicini; Barbara Silver; Andrew G. Herzog; Jay R. Harris

The frequency of brachial plexopathy, rib fracture, tissue necrosis, pericarditis, and second non-breast malignancies occurring in the treatment field among 1624 patients with early stage breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy between 1968 and 1985 is reported. The median follow-up time for survivors was 79 months (range 5-233 months). Brachial plexopathy was related to the use of a third field, the use of chemotherapy and the total dose to the axilla. Brachial plexopathy developed in 20 of 1117 women (1.8%) who received supraclavicular irradiation with or without axillary irradiation. The median time to its occurrence was 10.5 months (range 1.5-77 mo), and the majority (80%) of cases completely resolved. Among patients treated with a three-field technique, the incidence of brachial plexopathy was 1.3% (13/991) in patients treated with a dose to the axilla of less than or equal to 50 Gy, compared with 5.6% (7/126) in women treated with an axillary dose of greater than 50 Gy. The incidence of brachial plexopathy was 4.5% (15/330) among patients receiving chemotherapy, compared with 0.6% (5/787) when chemotherapy was not used (p less than 0.0001). Rib fracture was seen in 29 patients (1.8%), at a median time of 12 months following treatment (range 1-57). In all cases, the rib fracture healed without intervention. The incidence of rib fracture was 2.2% (28/1300) among patients treated on a 4 MV linear accelerator, compared with 0.4% (1/276) for patients treated on a 6 or 8 MV machine (p = 0.05). Of patients treated on a 4 MV machine, 0.4% (1/279) developed a rib fracture when a whole breast dose of 45 Gy or less was given, 1.4% (10/725) after receiving between 45 and 50 Gy, and 5.7% (17/296) following 50 Gy or higher. Tissue necrosis requiring surgical correction developed in three patients (0.18%) 22, 25, and 114 months after treatment. Presumed pericarditis (requiring hospitalization) was seen in 0.4% of women (3/831) who received radiation therapy to the left breast 2, 2, and 11 months after the start of treatment. Three women (0.18%) developed sarcomas in the treatments field at 72, 107, and 110 months, for a 10-year actuarial rate of 0.8%. Two of these sarcomas developed in areas of probable match-line overlap. One patient (0.06%) developed an in-field basal cell carcinoma at 42 months. In conclusion, the risk of significant complications following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer is low.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1991

Radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy

Tatiana I. Lingos; Abram Recht; F. A. Vicini; Anthony Abner; Barbara Silver; Jay R. Harris

The likelihood of radiation pneumonitis and factors associated with its development in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy have not been well established. To assess these, we retrospectively reviewed 1624 patients treated between 1968 and 1985. Median follow-up for patients without local or distant failure was 77 months. Patients were treated with either tangential fields alone (n = 508) or tangents with a third field to the supraclavicular (SC) or SC-axillary (AX) region (n = 1116). Lung volume treated in the tangential fields was generally limited by keeping the perpendicular distance (demagnified) at the isocenter from the deep field edges to the posterior chest wall (CLD) to 3 cm or less. Seventeen patients with radiation pneumonitis were identified (1.0%). Radiation pneumonitis was diagnosed when patients presented with cough (15/17, 88%), fever (9/17, 53%), and/or dyspnea (6/17, 35%) and radiographic changes (17/17) following completion of RT. Radiographic infiltrates corresponded to treatment portals in all patients, and in 12 of the 17 patients, returned to baseline within 1-12 months. Five patients had permanent scarring on chest X ray. No patient had late or persistent pulmonary symptoms. The incidence of radiation pneumonitis was correlated with the combined use of chemotherapy (CT) and a third field. Three percent (11/328) of patients treated with a 3-field technique who received chemotherapy developed radiation pneumonitis compared to 0.5% (6 of 1296) for all other patients (p = 0.0001). When patients treated with a 3-field technique received chemotherapy concurrently with radiation therapy, the incidence of radiation pneumonitis was 8.8% (8/92) compared with 1.3% (3/236) for those who received sequential chemotherapy and radiation therapy (p = 0.002). A case:control analysis was performed to determine if the volume of lung irradiated (as determined using central lung distance [CLD]) was related to the risk of developing radiation pneumonitis. Three control patients were matched to each case of radiation pneumonitis based on age, side of lesion, chemotherapy (including sequencing), use of a third field, and year treated. Lung volumes were similar in the radiation pneumonitis cases and controls. We conclude that radiation pneumonitis following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for breast cancer is a rare complication, and that it is more likely to occur in patients treated with both a 3-field technique and chemotherapy (particularly given concurrently with radiation therapy). Over the limited range of volumes treated, lung volume was not associated with an increased risk of radiation pneumonitis.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1986

Edema of the arm as a function of the extent of axillary surgery in patients with stage I–II carcinoma of the breast treated with primary radiotherapy

David A. Larson; Mark Weinstein; Itzhak D. Goldberg; Barbara Silver; Abram Recht; Blake Cady; William Silen; Jay R. Harris

Edema of the arm can be a significant complication following treatment of breast cancer. To determine the risk of arm edema and factors associated with this risk in patients treated with primary radiotherapy, we reviewed the records of 475 women with early breast cancer treated between 1968 and 1980. During this period, the use of axillary surgery prior to radiation gradually increased, and all patients received full axillary irradiation until late in the series. Based on the surgeons report, the extent of axillary surgery was classified as either a sampling, a lower dissection, or a full dissection. Edema of the arm was scored on clinical grounds and ranged from mild hand swelling to an increased arm circumference of 8 cm. At 6 years, the actuarial risk of developing arm edema was 8% for the entire study population. This risk was 13% for 240 patients who had axillary surgery and 4% for 235 patients not undergoing axillary surgery (p = 0.006). For patients undergoing axillary surgery, the risk of arm edema was 37% with full dissection compared to 5% with sampling (p = 0.0003), and 8% with lower dissection (p = 0.03). The risk of arm edema at 6 years was 28% if more than ten nodes were removed, and 9% if one to ten nodes were removed (p = 0.03). However, the extent of axillary dissection was stronger predictor of subsequent edema than was the number of nodes obtained. The role of axillary irradiation could not be evaluated since 91% of patients received axillary irradiation. The use of chemotherapy, the site or size of the primary tumor, clinical nodal status, patient age and weight, type of suture, the use of a drain, and subsequent local or distant failure did not appear to be significant risk factors. We conclude that the combination of full dissection and full axillary irradiation results in an unacceptably high risk of arm edema.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1996

Fifteen-year results of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Lawrence J. Solin; John M. Kurtz; A. Fourquet; Robert Amalric; Abram Recht; Bruce A. Bornstein; Robert R. Kuske; Marie E. Taylor; W. L. Barrett; Barbara Fowble; Bruce G. Haffty; Delray Schultz; I-Tien Yeh; Beryl McCormick; Marsha D. McNeese

PURPOSE To determine the 15-year outcome for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, intraductal carcinoma) of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS An analysis was performed of 270 intraductal breast carcinomas in 268 women from 10 institutions in Europe and the United States. In all patients, breast-conserving surgery included complete gross excision of the primary tumor followed by definitive breast irradiation. When performed, pathologic axillary lymph node staging was node-negative (n=86). The median follow-up time was 10.3 years (range, 0.9 to 26.8). RESULTS The 15-year actuarial overall survival rate was 87%, and the 15-year actuarial cause-specific survival rate was 96%. The 15-year actuarial rate of freedom from distant metastases was 96%. There were 45 local recurrences in the treated breast, and the 15-year actuarial rate of local failure was 19%. The median time to local failure was 5.2 years (range, 1.4 to 16.8). A number of clinical and pathologic parameters were evaluated for correlation with local failure, and none were predictive for local failure (all P > or = .15). CONCLUSION The results from the present study demonstrate high rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, and freedom from distant metastases following the treatment of DCIS of the breast using breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. These results support the use of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of DCIS of the breast.

Collaboration


Dive into the Abram Recht's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Silver

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stuart J. Schnitt

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James L. Connolly

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John M. Varlotto

University of Massachusetts Amherst

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence J. Solin

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge