Abul Bashar
Queensland University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Abul Bashar.
web intelligence | 2016
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li; Yang Gao
Understanding or acquiring a users information needs from their local information repository (e.g. a set of example-documents that are relevant to user information needs) is important in many applications. However, acquiring the users information needs from the local information repository is very challenging. Personalised ontology is emerging as a powerful tool to acquire the information needs of users. However, its manual or semi-automatic construction is expensive and time-consuming. To address this problem, this paper proposes a model to automatically learn personalised ontology by labelling topic models with concepts, where the topic models are discovered from a users local information repository. The proposed model is evaluated by comparing against ten baseline models on the standard dataset RCV1 and a large ontology LCSH. The results show that the model is effective and its performance is significantly improved.
australasian joint conference on artificial intelligence | 2017
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li
Topic modelling is a popular technique in text mining. However, discovered topic models are difficult to interpret due to incoherence and lack of background context. Many applications require an accurate interpretation of topic models so that both users and machines can use them effectively. Taking the advantage of random set and a domain ontology, this research can interpret the topic models. The interpretation is evaluated by comparing it with different baseline models on two standard datasets. The results show that the performance of the interpretation is significantly better than baseline models.
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery | 2018
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li
Patterns are used as a fundamental means to analyse data in many text mining applications. Many efficient techniques have been developed to discover patterns. However, the excessive number of discovered patterns and lack of grounded (e.g. a priori defined) semantics have made it difficult for a user to interpret and explore the patterns. An insight into the meanings of the patterns can benefit users in the process of exploring them. In this regard, this paper presents a model to automatically interpret patterns by achieving two goals: (1) providing the meanings of patterns in terms of ontology concepts and (2) providing a new method for generating and extracting features from an ontology to describe the relevant information more effectively. Taking advantage of a domain ontology and a set of relevant statistics (e.g. term frequency in a document, inverse term frequency in a domain ontology, etc.), our proposed model can give an insight into the hidden meanings of the patterns. The model is evaluated by comparing it with different baseline models on three standard datasets. The results show that the performance of the proposed model is significantly better than baseline models.
computational intelligence | 2017
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li; Yan Shen; Yang Gao; Wei Huang
Patterns are used as a fundamental means for analyzing data in many data mining applications. Many efficient techniques have been developed to discover patterns. However, the excessive number of discovered patterns and the lack of semantic information have made it difficult for a user to interpret and explore the patterns. A rough idea of the meanings of patterns can benefit the user in the process of exploring them. To address this issue, this paper presents a model for automatically annotating patterns with concepts. In addition, in a given context, the relative importance of each term that defines a concept is not the same. To define a context, there are a number of related information sources, such as documents, patterns, concepts, and an ontology. The question is which information sources are useful for estimating the relative importance of the terms? Should the most accurate one to be focused on or all of them be used to define the context? This research investigated these questions and defined an effective annotation context to estimate the relative importance of the terms, where the aim is to improve the performance of a machine that relies on the subject matter of a pattern set. The model is evaluated by comparing it with different baseline models on 2 standard datasets. The results show that the performance of the proposed model is significantly better.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology | 2017
Yang Gao; Yuefeng Li; Raymond Y. K. Lau; Yue Xu; Abul Bashar
Topic modelling methods such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) have been successfully applied to various fields, since these methods can effectively characterize document collections by using a mixture of semantically rich topics. So far, many models have been proposed. However, the existing models typically outperform on full analysis on the whole collection to find all topics but difficult to capture coherent and specifically meaningful topic representations. Furthermore, it is very challenging to incorporate user preferences into existing topic modelling methods to extract relevant topics. To address these problems, we develop a novel personalized Association-based Topic Selection (ATS) model, which can identify semantically valid and relevant topics from a set of raw topics based on the semantical relatedness between users’ preferences and the structured patterns captured in topics. The advantage of the proposed ATS model is that it enables an interactive topic modelling process driven by users’ specific interests. Based on three benchmark datasets, namely, RCV1, R8, and WT10G under the context of information filtering (IF) and information retrieval (IR), our rigorous experiments show that the proposed ATS model can effectively identify relevant topics with respect to users’ specific interests, and hence to improve the performance of IF and IR.
Science & Engineering Faculty | 2016
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li; Yang Gao
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science; Science & Engineering Faculty | 2017
Abul Bashar
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science; Science & Engineering Faculty | 2017
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science; Science & Engineering Faculty | 2017
Yang Gao; Yuefeng Li; Raymond Y. K. Lau; Yue Xu; Abul Bashar
School of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science; Science & Engineering Faculty | 2017
Abul Bashar; Yuefeng Li; Yan Shen; Yang Gao; Wei Huang