Achilles Alon

Intensification of Statin Therapy Results in a Rapid Reduction in Atherosclerotic Inflammation Results of a Multicenter Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES The study sought to test whether high-dose statin treatment would result in greater reductions in plaque inflammation than low-dose statins, using fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomographic imaging (FDG-PET/CT). BACKGROUND Intensification of statin therapy reduces major cardiovascular events. METHODS Adults with risk factors or with established atherosclerosis, who were not taking high-dose statins (n = 83), were randomized to atorvastatin 10 versus 80 mg in a double-blind, multicenter trial. FDG-PET/CT imaging of the ascending thoracic aorta and carotid arteries was performed at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks after randomization and target-to-background ratio (TBR) of FDG uptake within the artery wall was assessed while blinded to time points and treatment. RESULTS Sixty-seven subjects completed the study, providing imaging data for analysis. At 12 weeks, inflammation (TBR) in the index vessel was significantly reduced from baseline with atorvastatin 80 mg (% reduction [95% confidence interval]: 14.42% [8.7% to 19.8%]; p < 0.001), but not atorvastatin 10 mg (% reduction: 4.2% [-2.3% to 10.4%]; p > 0.1). Atorvastatin 80 mg resulted in significant additional relative reductions in TBR versus atorvastatin 10 mg (10.6% [2.2% to 18.3%]; p = 0.01) at week 12. Reductions from baseline in TBR were seen as early as 4 weeks after randomization with atorvastatin 10 mg (6.4% reduction, p < 0.05) and 80 mg (12.5% reduction, p < 0.001). Changes in TBR did not correlate with lipid profile changes. CONCLUSIONS Statin therapy produced significant rapid dose-dependent reductions in FDG uptake that may represent changes in atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. FDG-PET imaging may be useful in detecting early treatment effects in patients at risk or with established atherosclerosis.

Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain

&NA; The objective of this study was to evaluate how enrichment for responders increases assay sensitivity in an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) proof‐of‐concept (POC) study in neuropathic pain. Adults with moderate to severe peripheral neuropathic pain entered a 3‐ to 4‐day screening period, followed by a 12‐day titration to the highest tolerated dose that provided pain control (pregabalin 50–200 mg t.i.d.), and then a 9‐day maintenance period. Subjects were stratified as primary responders (⩾30%), secondary responders (⩾10% to <30%), or nonresponders (<10%) based on decrease in pain intensity and were randomized to placebo or pregabalin during the randomized withdrawal period. The primary endpoint was mean of average 24‐h pain intensity during the last 3 days of treatment period relative to the 3 days before randomization. Time‐to‐efficacy‐failure was the key secondary endpoint. Other features included not requiring discontinuation of current analgesic therapies and blinding investigators to study design elements that could contribute to non–treatment‐related responses. Effect size (ES) (mean treatment difference/SD) was used to measure assay sensitivity. Pregabalin‐treated subjects (n = 52) had significantly less pain than those receiving placebo (n = 51) (P ⩽ .003). Effect size of the primary endpoint was 0.72 for primary responders and decreased if secondary and nonresponders were included in the analysis. The highest ES (1.68) was demonstrated for the endpoint time‐to‐efficacy‐failure seen in primary responders with painful diabetic neuropathy. The EERW trial design using time‐to‐efficacy‐failure may provide a sensitive and efficient method to conduct POC studies of novel therapies in patients with neuropathic pain. Enriching a study population with patients who have achieved a 30% decrease in pain with an investigational therapy, and using time‐to‐efficacy‐failure during the randomized withdrawal phase as the primary endpoint, can be used for a proof‐of‐concept study to optimize assay sensitivity and efficiently determine the analgesic potential of a new treatment for neuropathic pain.

Coronary Plaque Morphology and the Anti-Inflammatory Impact of Atorvastatin: A Multicenter 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic/Computed Tomographic Study.

Background—Nonobstructive coronary plaques manifesting high-risk morphology (HRM) associate with an increased risk of adverse clinical cardiovascular events. We sought to test the hypothesis that statins have a greater anti-inflammatory effect within coronary plaques containing HRM. Methods and Results—In this prospective multicenter study, 55 subjects with or at high risk for atherosclerosis underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic/computed tomographic imaging at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment with atorvastatin. Coronary arterial inflammation (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, expressed as target-to-background ratio) was assessed in the left main coronary artery (LMCA). While blinded to the PET findings, contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography was performed to characterize the presence of HRM (defined as noncalcified or partially calcified plaques) in the LMCA. Arterial inflammation (target-to-background ratio) was higher in LMCA segments with HRM than those without HRM (mean±SEM: 1.95±0.43 versus 1.67±0.32 for LMCA with versus without HRM, respectively; P=0.04). Moreover, atorvastatin treatment for 12 weeks reduced target-to-background ratio more in LMCA segments with HRM than those without HRM (12 week-baseline &Dgr;target-to-background ratio [95% confidence interval]: −0.18 [−0.35 to −0.004] versus 0.09 [−0.06 to 0.26]; P=0.02). Furthermore, this relationship between coronary plaque morphology and change in LMCA inflammatory activity remained significant after adjusting for baseline low-density lipoprotein and statin dose (&bgr;=−0.27; P=0.038). Conclusions—In this first study to evaluate the impact of statins on coronary inflammation, we observed that the anti-inflammatory impact of statins is substantially greater within coronary plaques that contain HRM features. These findings suggest an additional mechanism by which statins disproportionately benefit individuals with more advanced atherosclerotic disease. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00703261.

The pain quality response profile of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain

Objective:To identify and describe the response profile of pregabalin on the qualities of pain associated with peripheral neuropathy. Methods:A post hoc analysis to examine the effects of pregabalin on pain quality in patients with moderate-to-severe peripheral neuropathic pain was performed using data from an enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal proof-of-concept study. Patients rated the quality of their pain experience using the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) at baseline, after a 12-day titration period, after a 9-day maintenance period, and after a 19-day randomized withdrawal period. Pretitration to posttitration and prewithdrawal to postwithdrawal changes in PQAS paroxysmal, surface, and deep pain scale scores were examined. Results:PQAS data were available for 99 of the 104 participants who entered all phases of the study. There were significant (P<0.006, Bonferroni adjusted for multiple tests) improvements pretitration to posttitration in all 3 PQAS subscales, with a greater effect on paroxysmal and deep pain than on surface pain. During the withdrawal phase, pregabalin was significantly (P<0.006) more effective than placebo for improvements in paroxysmal and surface pain only, although the pregabalin group continued to show numerical improvement in deep pain relative to placebo. Discussion:Pregabalin had a greater effect on PQAS-assessed paroxysmal pain than on surface or deep pain in patients with peripheral neuropathy. The findings corroborate previous research demonstrating differential effects of analgesic drugs across pain qualities, further emphasizing the need to assess individual pain qualities in addition to overall pain intensity.

Variability of urodynamic parameters in patients with overactive bladder.

To report interpatient, intrapatient, and study site variability of urodynamic study (UDS) parameters in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

Segmental Bioimpedance for Measuring Amlodipine-Induced Pedal Edema: A Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND The development of antihypertensives requires efficient and accurate tools for identifying pedal edema. Methodologies used to gauge the potential of an agent to induce pedal edema in short-term (<4-week) clinical trials have not been reported in the literature. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify a robust and practical method for measuring drug-induced pedal edema for use in the clinical development of antihypertensives. The efficacy of segmental bioimpedance in the detection of increased pedal edema was compared with that of clinical pitting assessment, ankle circumference, and water displacement volumetry. METHODS The study population consisted of male and female healthy subjects and patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension who were otherwise healthy. Participants were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine 10 mg or placebo once daily in this 6-week, double-blind, parallel-group study. Amlodipine was used as a means of inducing ankle edema, and not for the treatment of hypertension. Patients with hypertension were required to undergo a washout of antihypertensive therapies. Edema was evaluated using segmental bioimpedance at 10 kHz, clinical pitting assessment, ankle circumference, and water displacement at weeks 2, 4, and 6. The ANOVA model used included treatment and baseline values as covariates, with treatment pairs compared via t tests derived from the model. RESULTS A total of 47 individuals were randomized (49% male; 29 [62%] with hypertension; mean [SD] age, 59 [5.9] years; baseline body mass index, 28.6 kg/m(2) [2.8]; blood pressure 146.6 [10.7]/93.5 [6.5] and 139.3 [8.3]/89.5 [4.5] in individuals with and without hypertension, respectively; amlodipine 10 mg, n = 24; placebo, n = 23). At weeks 2, 4, and 6, statistically significant treatment differences in changes from baseline were detected using water displacement (mean [90% CI] treatment differences, +39.0 g [+17.9 to +60.1], +61.9 g [+36.1 to +87.6], and +72.2 g [+42.3 to +102.1], respectively; all, P ≤ 0.001), ankle circumference (+4.74 mm [+2.38 to +7.11; P < 0.001], +2.92 mm [+0.33 to +5.49; P = 0.032], and +5.16 mm [+2.21 to +8.11; P = 0.002]), and bioimpedance (-11.7 Ω [-18.1 to -5.4], -18.3 Ω [-26.2 to -10.4], and -20.9 Ω [-29.7 to -12.0]; all, P≤0.001), but no significant differences were detected using clinical assessment of pitting. CONCLUSION In this population of healthy subjects and patients with hypertension, segmental bioimpedance was comparable to water displacement and ankle circumference and outperformed clinical assessment of pitting for the detection of ankle edema, supporting the use of segmental bioimpedance as a drug-development tool to objectively quantify amlodipine-induced pedal edema.

Predicting response to pregabalin from pretreatment pain quality: clinical applications of the pain quality assessment scale.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) in predicting pregabalin in peripheral neuropathic pain (NP). STUDY DESIGN Post hoc analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal trial evaluating pregabalin in 99 patients with NP who completed the PQAS, which comprises 20 questions regarding individual pain domains and qualities that are scored into three scales: paroxysmal, deep, and surface. METHODS Patients rated the average pain intensity and pain quality using the PQAS at baseline; average pain intensity was assessed again after 40 days of treatment with pregabalin. Associations between pretreatment PQAS scores and treatment response were estimated using Pearsons r. Logistic regression was used to identify pretitration PQAS scores contributing unique variance to predicting treatment response. RESULTS Fifty participants provided baseline PQAS scores and received pregabalin for the entire length of the study. Nine of 23 PQAS baseline scales and items were significantly associated with treatment response to pregabalin: the paroxysmal and deep scales, and the items assessing the following pain domains and qualities: intensity, electric, tingling, cramping, radiating, throbbing, and deep (P values range, 0.002-0.045; rs range, 0.28-0.43). The PQAS items assessing sharp, hot, and unpleasant pain items demonstrated nonsignificant trends (P < 0.10) to be associated with treatment response. In the logistic regression analysis, pretitration PQAS scores had 77% sensitivity and 83% specificity to correctly identify pregabalin responders. Significantly correlated PQAS items had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 76%. CONCLUSION Pretitration PQAS scores reliably predicted pregabalin responders in patients with NP.

An LC-MRM method for measuring intestinal triglyceride assembly using an oral stable isotope-labeled fat challenge.

AIM A traditional oral fatty acid challenge assesses absorption of triacylglycerol (TG) into the periphery through the intestines, but cannot distinguish the composition or source of fatty acid in the TG. Stable isotope-labeled tracers combined with LC-MRM can be used to identify and distinguish TG synthesized with dietary and stored fatty acids. RESULTS Concentrations of three abundant TGs (52:2, 54:3 and 54:4) were monitored for incorporation of one or two (2)H11-oleate molecules per TG. This method was subjected to routine assay validation and meets typical requirements for an assay to be used to support clinical studies. CONCLUSION Calculations for the fractional appearance rate of TG in plasma are presented along with the intracellular enterocyte precursor pool for 12 study participants.