Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Adam A. Scaife is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Adam A. Scaife.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Skillful long‐range prediction of European and North American winters

Adam A. Scaife; Alberto Arribas; E. W. Blockley; Anca Brookshaw; Robin T. Clark; Nick Dunstone; Rosie Eade; David Fereday; Chris K. Folland; Margaret Gordon; Leon Hermanson; Jeff R. Knight; D. J. Lea; Craig MacLachlan; Anna Maidens; Matthew Martin; A. K. Peterson; Doug Smith; Michael Vellinga; Emily Wallace; J. Waters; Andrew Williams

This work was supported by the Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101), the UK Public Weather Service research program, and the European Union Framework 7 SPECS project. Leon Hermanson was funded as part of his Research Fellowship by Willis as part of Willis Research Network (WRN).


Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2011

The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 6.0/6.1 and JULES Global Land 6.0/6.1 configurations

D. N. Walters; M. J. Best; A. C. Bushell; D. Copsey; John M. Edwards; Pete Falloon; Chris Harris; A. P. Lock; James Manners; Cyril J. Morcrette; Malcolm J. Roberts; R. A. Stratton; S. Webster; J. M. Wilkinson; M. R. Willett; I. A. Boutle; P. D. Earnshaw; Peter G. Hill; C. MacLachlan; G. M. Martin; W. Moufouma-Okia; M. D. Palmer; Jon Petch; G. G. Rooney; Adam A. Scaife; Keith D. Williams

We describe Global Atmosphere 6.0 and Global Land 6.0 (GA6.0/GL6.0): the latest science configurations of the Met Office Unified Model and JULES (Joint UK Land Environment Simulator) land surface model developed for use across all timescales. Global Atmosphere 6.0 includes the ENDGame (Even Newer Dynamics for General atmospheric modelling of the environment) dynamical core, which significantly increases mid-latitude variability improving a known model bias. Alongside developments of the model’s physical parametrisations, ENDGame also increases variability in the tropics, which leads to an improved representation of tropical cyclones and other tropical phenomena. Further developments of the atmospheric and land surface parametrisations improve other aspects of model performance, including the forecasting of surface weather phenomena. We also describe GA6.1/GL6.1, which includes a small number of long-standing differences from our main trunk configurations that we continue to require for operational global weather prediction. Since July 2014, GA6.1/GL6.1 has been used by the Met Office for operational global numerical weather prediction, whilst GA6.0/GL6.0 was implemented in its remaining global prediction systems over the following year. Copyright statement. The works published in this journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license does not affect the Crown copyright work, which is re-usable under the Open Government Licence (OGL). The Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License and the OGL are interoperable and do not conflict with, reduce or limit each other.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2005

A stratospheric influence on the winter NAO and North Atlantic surface climate

Adam A. Scaife; Jeff R. Knight; Geoff K. Vallis; Chris K. Folland

[1] The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) has a profound effect on winter climate variability around the Atlantic basin. Strengthening of the NAO in recent decades has altered surface climate in these regions at a rate far in excess of global mean warming. However, only weak NAO trends are reproduced in climate simulations of the 20th Century, even with prescribed climate forcings and historical sea-surface conditions. Here we show that the unexplained strengthening of the NAO can be fully simulated in a climate model by imposing observed trends in the lower stratosphere. This implies that stratospheric variability needs to be reproduced in models to fully simulate surface climate variations in the North Atlantic sector. Despite having little effect on global mean warming, we show that downward coupling of observed stratospheric circulation changes to the surface can account for the majority of change in regional surface climate over Europe and North America between 1965 and 1995.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007

Decadal to multidecadal variability and the climate change background

D. E. Parker; Chris K. Folland; Adam A. Scaife; Jeff R. Knight; Andrew W. Colman; Peter G. Baines; Buwen Dong

(1) Three prominent quasi-global patterns of variability and change are observed using the Met Offices sea surface temperature (SST) analysis and almost independent night marine air temperature analysis. The first is a global warming signal that is very highly correlated with global mean SST. The second is a decadal to multidecadal fluctuation with some geographical similarity to the El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). It is associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and its Pacific-wide manifestation has been termed the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation (IPO). We present model investigations of the relationship between the IPO and ENSO. The third mode is an interhemispheric variation on multidecadal timescales which, in view of climate model experiments, is likely to be at least partly due to natural variations in the thermohaline circulation. Observed climatic impacts of this mode also appear in model simulations. Smaller-scale, regional atmospheric phenomena also affect climate on decadal to interdecadal timescales. We concentrate on one such mode, the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). This shows strong decadal to interdecadal variability and a correspondingly strong influence on surface climate variability which is largely additional to the effects of recent regional anthropogenic climate change. The winter NAO is likely influenced by both SST forcing and stratospheric variability. A full understanding of decadal changes in the NAO and European winter climate may require a detailed representation of the stratosphere that is hitherto missing in the major climate models used to study climate change.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2006

Multidecadal modulation of El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variance by Atlantic Ocean sea surface temperatures

Buwen Dong; Rowan Sutton; Adam A. Scaife

[1] Observations suggest a possible link between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability, with the warm AMO phase being related to weaker ENSO variability. A coupled ocean-atmosphere model is used to investigate this relationship and to elucidate mechanisms responsible for it. Anomalous sea surface temperatures (SSTs) associated with the positive AMO lead to change in the basic state in the tropical Pacific Ocean. This basic state change is associated with a deepened thermocline and reduced vertical stratification of the equatorial Pacific ocean, which in turn leads to weakened ENSO variability. We suggest a role for an atmospheric bridge that rapidly conveys the influence of the Atlantic Ocean to the tropical Pacific. The results suggest a non-local mechanism for changes in ENSO statistics and imply that anomalous Atlantic ocean SSTs can modulate both mean climate and climate variability over the Pacific.


Journal of Climate | 2008

European Climate Extremes and the North Atlantic Oscillation

Adam A. Scaife; Chris K. Folland; Lisa V. Alexander; Anders Moberg; Jeff R. Knight

The authors estimate the change in extreme winter weather events over Europe that is due to a long-term change in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) such as that observed between the 1960s and 1990s. Using ensembles of simulations from a general circulation model, large changes in the frequency of 10th percentile temperature and 90th percentile precipitation events over Europe are found from changes in the NAO. In some cases, these changes are comparable to the expected change in the frequency of events due to anthropogenic forcing over the twenty-first century. Although the results presented here do not affect anthropogenic interpretation of global and annual mean changes in observed extremes, they do show that great care is needed to assess changes due to modes of climate variability when interpreting extreme events on regional and seasonal scales. How changes in natural modes of variability, such as the NAO, could radically alter current climate model predictions of changes in extreme weather events on multidecadal time scales is also discussed.


Journal of Climate | 2013

A Comparison between Gravity Wave Momentum Fluxes in Observations and Climate Models

Marvin A. Geller; M. Joan Alexander; Peter T. Love; Julio T. Bacmeister; M. Ern; Albert Hertzog; Elisa Manzini; Peter Preusse; Kaoru Sato; Adam A. Scaife; Tiehan Zhou

Forthefirsttime,aformalcomparisonismadebetweengravitywavemomentumfluxesinmodelsandthose derivedfromobservations. Althoughgravitywavesoccuroverawiderangeofspatialandtemporalscales,the focusofthispaperisonscalesthatarebeingparameterizedinpresentclimatemodels,sub-1000-kmscales.Only observational methodsthatpermitderivationofgravitywavemomentumfluxesoverlargegeographical areas are discussed, and these are from satellite temperature measurements, constant-density long-duration bal- loons,andhigh-vertical-resolutionradiosondedata.Themodelsdiscussedincludetwohigh-resolutionmodels in which gravity waves are explicitly modeled, Kanto and the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), and three climate models containing gravity wave parameterizations, MAECHAM5, Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model 3 (HadGEM3), and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) model. Measurements generally show similar flux magnitudes as in models, except that the fluxes derived from satellite measurements fall off more rapidly with height. This is likely due to limitations on the observable range of wavelengths, although other factors may contribute. When one accounts for this more rapid fall off, the geographical distribution of the fluxes from observations and models compare reasonably well, except for certain features that depend on the specification of the nonorographic gravity wave source functions in the climate models. For instance, both the observed fluxes and those in the high-resolution models are very small at summer high latitudes, but this is not the case for some of the climate models. This comparison between gravity wave fluxes from climate models, high-resolution models, and fluxes derived from observations in- dicates that such efforts offer a promising path toward improving specifications of gravity wave sources in climate models.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2000

Realistic quasi-biennial oscillations in a simulation of the global climate

Adam A. Scaife; Neal Butchart; Christopher D. Warner; David A. Stainforth; W. A. Norton; John Austin

The tropical quasi-biennial oscillation is one of the most spectacular examples of low frequency variability observed in the Earths atmosphere, yet the oscillation is noted for its absence from numerical simulations of the global climate. Recent studies suggest that much of the required wave forcing for the oscillation is likely to come from buoyancy (gravity) waves [Sato and Dunkerton, 1997; Dunkerton, 1997] that are not well resolved in the numerical models currently used for climate prediction and global weather forecasting. Here we show that when the effects of these missing waves are parametrized in a comprehensive numerical model of the atmosphere, the simulation of the climate is improved by the generation of a realistic quasi-biennial oscillation in the stratosphere.


Monthly Weather Review | 2011

The GloSea4 Ensemble Prediction System for Seasonal Forecasting

Alberto Arribas; Matthew Glover; Anna Maidens; K. Peterson; Margaret Gordon; Craig MacLachlan; Richard Graham; David Fereday; Joanne Camp; Adam A. Scaife; P. Xavier; P. McLean; Andrew W. Colman; Stephen Cusack

AbstractSeasonal forecasting systems, and related systems for decadal prediction, are crucial in the development of adaptation strategies to climate change. However, despite important achievements in this area in the last 10 years, significant levels of skill are only generally found over regions strongly connected with the El Nino–Southern Oscillation. With the aim of improving the skill of regional climate predictions in tropical and extratropical regions from intraseasonal to interannual time scales, a new Met Office global seasonal forecasting system (GloSea4) has been developed. This new system has been designed to be flexible and easy to upgrade so it can be fully integrated within the Met Office model development infrastructure. Overall, the analysis here shows an improvement of GloSea4 when compared to its predecessor. However, there are exceptions, such as the increased model biases that contribute to degrade the skill of Nino-3.4 SST forecasts starting in November. Global ENSO teleconnections an...


Journal of Climate | 2010

Atmospheric Blocking and Mean Biases in Climate Models

Adam A. Scaife; Tim Woollings; Jeff R. Knight; Gill Martin; Tim Hinton

Models often underestimate blocking in the Atlantic and Pacific basins and this can lead to errors in both weather and climate predictions. Horizontal resolution is often cited as the main culprit for blocking errors due to poorly resolved small-scale variability, the upscale effects of which help to maintain blocks. Although these processes are important for blocking, the authors show that much of the blocking error diagnosed using common methods of analysis and current climate models is directly attributable to the climatological bias of the model. This explains a large proportion of diagnosed blocking error in models used in the recent Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change report. Furthermore, greatly improved statistics are obtained by diagnosing blocking using climate model data corrected to account for mean model biases. To the extent that mean biases may be corrected in low-resolution models, this suggests that such models may be able to generate greatly improved levels of atmospheric blocking.

Collaboration


Dive into the Adam A. Scaife's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge