Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Adam Henderson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Adam Henderson.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2010

Casting Loop Quantum Cosmology in the Spin Foam Paradigm

Abhay Ashtekar; Miguel Campiglia; Adam Henderson

The goal of spin foam models is to provide a viable path integral formulation of quantum gravity. Because of background independence, their underlying framework has certain novel features that are not shared by path integral formulations of familiar field theories in Minkowski space. As a simple viability test, these features were recently examined through the lens of loop quantum cosmology (LQC). Results of that analysis, reported in a brief communication (Ashtekar A et al 2009 Phys. Lett. B 681 347?52), turned out to provide concrete arguments in support of the spin foam paradigm. We now present detailed proofs of those results. Since the quantum theory of LQC models is well understood, this analysis also serves to shed new light on some long standing issues in the spin foam and group field theory literature. In particular, it suggests an intriguing possibility for addressing the question of why the cosmological constant is positive and small.


Physics Letters B | 2009

Loop quantum cosmology and spin foams

Abhay Ashtekar; Miguel Campiglia; Adam Henderson

Abstract Loop quantum cosmology (LQC) is used to provide concrete evidence in support of the general paradigm underlying spin foam models (SFMs). Specifically, it is shown that: (i) the physical inner product in the timeless framework equals the transition amplitude in the deparameterized theory; (ii) this quantity admits a vertex expansion a la SFMs in which the M-th term refers just to M volume transitions, without any reference to the time at which the transition takes place; (iii) the exact physical inner product is obtained by summing over just the discrete geometries; no ‘continuum limit’ is involved; and, (iv) the vertex expansion can be interpreted as a perturbative expansion in the spirit of group field theory. This sum over histories reformulation of LQC also addresses certain other issues which are briefly summarized.


Physical Review D | 2010

Path Integrals and the WKB approximation in Loop Quantum Cosmology

Abhay Ashtekar; Miguel Campiglia; Adam Henderson

We follow the Feynman procedure to obtain a path integral formulation of loop quantum cosmology starting from the Hilbert space framework. Quantum geometry effects modify the weight associated with each path so that the effective measure on the space of paths is different from that used in the Wheeler-DeWitt theory. These differences introduce some conceptual subtleties in arriving at the WKB approximation. But the approximation is well defined and provides intuition for the differences between loop quantum cosmology and the Wheeler-DeWitt theory from a path integral perspective.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2011

Local spinfoam expansion in loop quantum cosmology

Adam Henderson; Carlo Rovelli; Francesca Vidotto; Edward Wilson-Ewing

The quantum dynamics of the flat Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker and Bianchi I models defined by loop quantum cosmology have recently been translated into a spinfoam-like formalism. The construction is facilitated by the presence of a massless scalar field which is used as an internal clock. The implicit integration over the matter variable leads to a nonlocal spinfoam amplitude. In this paper we consider a vacuum Bianchi I universe and show that by choosing an appropriate regulator a spinfoam expansion can be obtained without selecting a clock variable and that the resulting spinfoam amplitude is local.


Physical Review D | 2013

Constraint algebra in loop quantum gravity reloaded. II. Toy model of an Abelian gauge theory: Spatial diffeomorphisms

Adam Henderson; Alok Laddha; Casey Tomlin

In [1] we initiated an approach towards quantizing the Hamiltonian constraint in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) by requiring that it generates an anomaly-free representation of constraint algebra off-shell. We investigated this issue in the case of a toy model of a 2+1-dimensional


Physical Review D | 2011

A Hamiltonian Formulation of the BKL Conjecture

Abhay Ashtekar; Adam Henderson; David Sloan

U(1)^{3}


Physical Review D | 2013

Constraint algebra in loop quantum gravity reloaded. I. Toy model of a

Adam Henderson; Alok Laddha; Casey Tomlin

gauge theory, which can be thought of as a weak coupling limit of Euclidean three dimensional gravity. However in [1] we only focused on the most non-trivial part of the constraint algebra that involves commutator of two Hamiltonian constraints. In this paper we continue with our analysis and obtain a representation of full constraint algebra in loop quantized framework. We show that there is a representation of the Diffeomorphism group with respect to which the Hamiltonian constraint quantized in [1] is diffeomorphism covariant. Our work can be thought of as a potential first step towards resolving some long standing issues with the Hamiltonian constraint in canonical LQG.


Physical Review D | 2010

U(1)^3

Miguel Campiglia; Adam Henderson; William Nelson

The Belinskii, Khalatnikov and Lifshitz conjecture [1] posits that on approach to a space-like singularity in general relativity the dynamics are well approximated by ‘ignoring spatial derivatives in favor of time derivatives.’ In [2] we examined this idea from within a Hamiltonian framework and provided a new formulation of the conjecture in terms of variables well suited to loop quantum gravity. We now present the details of the analytical part of that investigation. While our motivation came from quantum considerations, thanks to some of its new features, our formulation should be useful also for future analytical and numerical investigations within general relativity.


Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2009

gauge theory

Abhay Ashtekar; Adam Henderson; David Sloan


Physical Review D | 2011

Vertex Expansion for the Bianchi I model

Abhay Ashtekar; Adam Henderson; David Sloan

Collaboration


Dive into the Adam Henderson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abhay Ashtekar

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miguel Campiglia

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Sloan

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alok Laddha

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William Nelson

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward Wilson-Ewing

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carlo Rovelli

Aix-Marseille University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francesca Vidotto

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge