Adam Meneghetti

Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: 20-year experience at a Canadian centre

BACKGROUND Multiple techniques for splenectomy are now employed and include open, laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS). Concerns regarding a purely laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly (> 20 cm) arise from potentially longer operative times, higher conversion rates and increased blood loss. The HALS technique offers the potential advantages of laparoscopy, with the added safety of having the surgeons hand in the abdomen during the operation. In this study, we compared the HALS technique to standard open splenectomy for the management of massive splenomegaly. METHODS We reviewed all splenectomies performed at 5 hospitals in the greater Vancouver area between 1988 and 2007 for multiple demographic and outcome measures. Open splenectomies were compared with HALS procedures for spleens larger than 20 cm. Splenectomy reports without data on spleen size were excluded from the analysis. We performed Student t tests and Pearson χ(2) statistical analyses. RESULTS A total of 217 splenectomies were analyzed. Of these, 39 splenectomies were performed for spleens larger than 20 cm. We compared the open splenectomy group (19 patients) with the HALS group (20 patients). There was a 5% conversion rate in the HALS group. Estimated blood loss (375 mL v. 935 mL, p = 0.08) and the mean (and standard deviation [SD]) transfusion rates (0.0 [SD 0.0] units v. 0.8 [SD 1.7] units, p = 0.06) were lower in the HALS group. Length of stay in hospital was significantly shorter in the HALS group (4.2 v. 8.9 d, p = 0.001). Complication rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective technique for the management of spleens larger than 20 cm. The technique results in shorter hospital stays, and it is a good alternative to open splenectomy when treating patients with massive splenomegaly.

What Do Surgeons See: Capturing and Synchronizing Eye Gaze for Surgery Applications

Recording eye motions in surgical environments is challenging. This study describes the authors’ experiences with performing eye-tracking for improving surgery training, both in the laboratory and in the operating room (OR). Three different eye-trackers were used, each with different capabilities and requirements. For monitoring eye gaze shifts over the room scene in a simulated OR, a head-mounted system was used. The number of surgeons’ eye glances on the monitor displaying patient vital signs was successfully captured by this system. The resolution of the head-mounted eye-tracker was not sufficient to obtain the gaze coordinates in detail on the surgical display monitor. The authors then selected a high-resolution eye-tracker built in to a 17-inch computer monitor that is capable of recording gaze differences with resolution of 1° of visual angle. This system enables one to investigate surgeons’ eye–hand coordination on the surgical monitor in the laboratory environment. However, the limited effective tracking distance restricts the use of this system in the dynamic environment in the real OR. Another eye-tracker system was found with equally high level of resolution but with more flexibility on the tracking distance, as the eye-tracker camera was detached from the monitor. With this system, the surgeon’s gaze during 11 laparoscopic procedures in the OR was recorded successfully. There were many logistical challenges with unobtrusively integrating the eye-tracking equipment into the regular OR workflow and data processing issues in the form of image compatibility and data validation. The experiences and solutions to these challenges are discussed.

Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills Dual-Task Approach

Background. Assessment of surgical performance is often accomplished with traditional methods that often provide only subjective data. Trainees who perform well on a simulator in a controlled environment may not perform well in a real operating room environment with distractions. This project uses the ideas of dual-task methodology and applies them to the assessment of performance of laparoscopic surgical skills. The level of performance on distracting secondary tasks while trying to perform a primary task becomes an indirect but objective measure of the surgical skill of the trainee. Methods. Nine surgery residents and 6 experienced laparoscopic surgeons performed 3 primary tasks on a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator (camera position, grasping, and cholecystectomy) while being distracted by 3 secondary tasks (counting beeps, selective responses, and mental arithmetic). Completion time and error rates were recorded for each combination of tasks. Results. When performed separately, time to completion and error rates for primary and secondary tasks were similar for learners and experts. When performing the tasks simultaneously, learners had more errors than experts. Error rates increased for learners when distracting tasks became more difficult or required more attention. Expert surgeons maintained consistent error rates despite the increasing difficulty of task combinations. Conclusions. The use of dual-task methodology may help trainers to identify which surgical trainees require more preparation before entering the real operating room environment. Expert surgeons are capable of maintaining performance levels on a primary task in the face of distractions that may occur in the operating room.

Laparoscopic management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: review at a Canadian centre

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic wedge resection has been widely accepted for small benign gastric tumours. Large gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), however, can be difficult to manipulate laparoscopically and are at risk for capsule disruption, which can then result in peritoneal seeding. Some authors have suggested that large GISTs (> 8 cm) are best approached using an open technique. However, there has been no consensus as to what the cut-off size should be. We conducted one of the largest Canadian series to date to assess outcomes and follow-up of the laparoscopic management of GISTs. METHODS All patients with gastric GISTs presenting to Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia Hospital between 2000 and 2008 were reviewed. Most lesions were resected using a wedge technique with closure of the stomach facilitated by an endoscopic linear stapling device. RESULTS In all, 23 patients presented with GISTs; 19 patients underwent laparoscopic resection and, of these, 15 had a purely laparoscopic operation and 4 had a hand-assisted laparoscopic resection. Mean tumour size was 3.2 cm, with the largest tumour measuring 6.8 cm. There were no episodes of tumour rupture or spillage and no major intraoperative complications. All margins were negative. Mean follow-up was 13.3 (range 1-78) months. There was no evidence of recurrence or metastasis. CONCLUSION The laparoscopic management of gastric GISTs is safe and effective with short hospital stays and good results over a mean follow-up of 13.3 months. We believe that it should be the preferred technique offered to patients.

Fluorescent cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the initial Canadian experience

BACKGROUND Bile duct injury remains a worrisome complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography (FC) is a new approach that facilitates real-time intraoperative identification of biliary anatomy. This technology is hoped to improve the safety of dissection within Calots triangle. METHOD Demographics, intraoperative details, and subjective surgeon data were recorded for elective cholecystectomy cases involving ICG. Goals were to identify rates of bile duct identification, and assess the perceived benefit of the device. RESULTS ICG was used in 12 biliary cases in Canada. Visualization rates of the cystic and common bile ducts were 100% and 83%, respectively. Also, 83% of surgeons felt that FC incorporated smoothly into the operation. No complications have been related to the technology. CONCLUSIONS FC allows noninvasive real-time visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree. This novel technique has received positive feedback in its initial Canadian use and will likely be a durable adjunct for minimally invasive surgery.