Adam Popchak

Acute Response of the Infraspinatus and Biceps Tendons to Pitching in Youth Baseball

Purpose Youth baseball frequently results in repetitive strain injuries. Quantitative ultrasound allows real-time imaging with the ability to identify acute markers of tendon change. The study objective was to determine acute quantitative ultrasound changes in the long head of the biceps and infraspinatus tendons of the throwing and nonthrowing shoulders during a pitching performance. We hypothesized the tendons of the pitching arm would exhibit an increased width and decreased echogenicity after pitching and that tendons of the nonpitching arm would not demonstrate such changes. Methods Fifty youth baseball players, ages 9–14 yr, engaged in a simulated pitching performance that consisted of 50 pitches. Subjects underwent serial quantitative ultrasound imaging of the infraspinatus and the long head of the biceps before pitching and after 25 and 50 pitches were thrown. Results Testing of the change in tendon width revealed the infraspinatus (0.21 mm) and long head of the biceps tendons (0.18 mm) in the throwing shoulder had statistically significant increases (P = 0.03) in tendon width as an acute response to throwing 50 pitches, without such changes in the nonthrowing shoulder (P > 0.05). No tendon width change was found at 25 pitches in either arm or tendon (P > 0.05). No associated changes in echogenicity were found at any time point (P > 0.05). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that pitching acutely increases tendon width in two biomechanically important tendons of the shoulder as early as the 50 pitch mark. This change could be a normal physiological response or a potential warning sign of future pathology and requires further study.

Sports Participation Is an Appropriate Expectation for Recreational Athletes Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: Several studies have investigated sports participation in patients who undergo total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, there are limited data in the setting of hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), particularly regarding the frequency of participation in common sports. Hypothesis: The majority of patients who undergo TSA or HA will be able to maintain active lifestyles with high levels of sports participation after their procedure, while patients who undergo rTSA will have lower levels of sports participation. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We identified patients who underwent TSA, rTSA, stemmed HA, or humeral head resurfacing (the latter 2 were defined collectively as the HA group) by surgeons within our department since January 2004. We excluded patients who (1) underwent revision arthroplasty, (2) had a history of chronic pain syndrome, (3) experienced septic arthritis of the involved shoulder, and/or (4) were deceased at the time of follow-up. The minimum follow-up from the time of surgery was 2 years. Qualified patients were sent a questionnaire that asked about sports participation and the frequency of participation at the time of follow-up. Frequency was rated as 0, 1 to 3, or 4 to 7 times a week. Sports were defined as lower extremity sport, volleyball, tennis, skiing, bowling, swimming, weight lifting, golf, and other sport. Results: Overall, 95% of the TSA group, 40% of the rTSA group, and 76% of the HA group who had participated in at least 1 sport before surgery indicated that they were doing so at the time of follow-up. Among active patients in the TSA and HA groups, the most common sports at the time of follow-up were weight lifting (52%), swimming (36%), and golf (25%). For the 2 active patients in the rTSA group, 1 participated in swimming and hunting and fishing, while the other participated in weight lifting. For the active patients in the TSA and HA groups who were participating in at least 1 of the 3 most common sports, most patients indicated that they were doing so 1 to 3 times a week at the time of completing the questionnaire. Conclusion: Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty can maintain an active lifestyle with moderate to high frequencies of participation after surgery, particularly regarding weight lifting, swimming, and golf.

ACL: Time-Based Return to Play. “Role of Patient Reporting in Return to Play”

For the football athlete, returning to preinjury levels of participation is the primary objective after knee surgery. Assessment of return to football participation is often difficult and can be influenced by multiple factors and discrepancies in measurement methods. Considerable variation in return to participation in football exists in the literature, and in many cases a substantial proportion of athletes are unable to return to their preinjury level of sports participation. In addition to the multitude of physical and psychological factors that influence an athlete’s return to sports participation, the lack of a universally accepted definition of return to play that is utilized by all, also influences the reporting of return to play rates. In this chapter, the role of patient reporting in return to play decisions is discussed through evaluation of multiple, commonly utilized patient-reported measures of return to sports. Comparisons of the utility of unidimensional self-report and comprehensive assessments that require multidimensional information reveal the two methods of assessment may not provide similar information on return to play status and should not be used interchangeably. Multidimensional assessments that utilize the type and frequency of sports activity and participation assess multiple parameters of sports participation and provide the clinician with more information regarding sports participation status. There is need for clarity and standardization in regard to what patients and clinicians are assessing when evaluating return to play as an outcome.

Prognostic Scoring System for Patients Undergoing Reconstructive Foot and Ankle Surgery for Charcot Neuroarthropathy: The Charcot Reconstruction Preoperative Prognostic Score

ABSTRACT Charcot neuroarthropathy is a destructive process that occurs in patients with peripheral neuropathy, often due to poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Surgical reconstruction can be necessary to provide a plantigrade foot that is wound free. A risk of major amputation exists after a Charcot event and after attempted reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed the data from 34 patients (36 reconstructions) who had undergone reconstructive surgery for Charcot neuroarthropathy. The mean patient age was 56.44 years. The mean follow‐up period was 56 months. We collected patient age, body mass index, presence of wound or osteomyelitis, anatomic location, activity of disease, and hemoglobin A1c. Using these data, each patient was given a score using our novel prognostic scoring system, the Charcot Reconstruction Preoperative Prognostic Score (CRPPS). Our primary outcome measure was no wound and no major amputation at the final follow‐up visit. The limb salvage rate was 89% (32 of 36), and 78% (28 of 36) had no wound at the final follow‐up examination. For patients without a wound or major amputation at the final follow‐up visit, the mean CRPPS was 2.96 ± 1.23. The mean CRPPS for those with a wound or major amputation at the final follow‐up visit was 4.33 ± 1.07 (p = .0024). Univariate logistic regression revealed 2 statistically significant predictors of wound and/or amputation: anatomic location (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.051 to 23.789; p = .043) and CRPPS (OR 2.724, 95% CI 1.274 to 5.823, p = .01). A CRPPS of ≥4 was also predictive of a negative outcome (OR 7.286, 95% CI 1.508 to 35.211; p = .013). This scoring system, with a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 71%, and negative predictive value of 85%, is a potential starting point when educating patients and making treatment decisions in this exceptionally challenging group. Level of Clinical Evidence: 4

Osteochondral Allograft: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Osteochondral Allograft” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; and unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 15 statements on osteochondral allograft reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 14 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with osteochondral allograft as a treatment strategy for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Fixation Techniques: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Fixation Techniques” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; and unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 15 statements on fixation techniques reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. All 15 statements achieved strong consensus, with at least 82% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with using fixation techniques in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Revision and Salvage Management: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.

Subchondral Pathology: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Subchondral Pathology” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 9 statements on subchondral pathology reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. No statements achieved unanimous support, but all statements reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 81% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus statements regarding subchondral pathology of the talus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians in the assessment and management of this difficult pathology.

Scaffold-Based Therapies: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Scaffold-Based Therapies” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 9 statements on scaffold-based therapies reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support, 8 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement), and 1 was removed because of redundancy in the information provided. All statements reached at least 80% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with applying scaffold-based therapies as a treatment strategy for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus: 51 - 74%; strong consensus: 75 - 99%; unanimous: 100%. Results: A total of 12 statements on the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Two achieved unanimous support and 10 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 86% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians in the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle.