Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Adam R. Brentnall is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Adam R. Brentnall.


Disease Markers | 2011

Absolute Quantitation of DNA Methylation of 28 Candidate Genes in Prostate Cancer Using Pyrosequencing

Nataöa Vasiljević; Keqiang Wu; Adam R. Brentnall; Dae Cheol Kim; Mangesh A. Thorat; Sakunthala C. Kudahetti; Xueying Mao; Liyan Xue; Yongwei Yu; Greg Shaw; Luis Beltran; Yong-Jie Lu; Daniel M. Berney; Jack Cuzick; Attila T. Lorincz

Aberrant DNA methylation plays a pivotal role in carcinogenesis and its mapping is likely to provide biomarkers for improved diagnostic and risk assessment in prostate cancer (PCa). We quantified and compared absolute methylation levels among 28 candidate genes in 48 PCa and 29 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) samples using the pyrosequencing (PSQ) method to identify genes with diagnostic and prognostic potential. RARB, HIN1, BCL2, GSTP1, CCND2, EGFR5, APC, RASSF1A, MDR1, NKX2-5, CDH13, DPYS, PTGS2, EDNRB, MAL, PDLIM4, HLAa, ESR1 and TIG1 were highly methylated in PCa compared to BPH (p < 0.001), while SERPINB5, CDH1, TWIST1, DAPK1, THRB, MCAM, SLIT2, CDKN2a and SFN were not. RARB methylation above 21% completely distinguished PCa from BPH. Separation based on methylation level of SFN, SLIT2 and SERPINB5 distinguished low and high Gleason score cancers, e.g. SFN and SERPINB5 together correctly classified 81% and 77% of high and low Gleason score cancers respectively. Several genes including CDH1 previously reported as methylation markers in PCa were not confirmed in our study. Increasing age was positively associated with gene methylation (p < 0.0001). Accurate quantitative measurement of gene methylation in PCa appears promising and further validation of genes like RARB, HIN1, BCL2, APC and GSTP1 is warranted for diagnostic potential and SFN, SLIT2 and SERPINB5 for prognostic potential.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2014

Credentialing of DNA methylation assays for human genes as diagnostic biomarkers of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in high-risk HPV positive women

Nataša Vasiljević; Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska; Adam R. Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; Attila T. Lorincz

Objective Testing for high risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is increasing; however due to limitations in specificity there remains a need for better triage tests. Research efforts have focused recently on methylation of human genes which show promise as diagnostic classifiers. Methods Methylation of 26 genes: APC, CADM1, CCND2, CDH13, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, DAPK1, DPYS, EDNRB, EPB41L3, ESR1, GSTP1, HIN1, JAM3, LMX1, MAL, MDR1, PAX1, PTGS2, RARB, RASSF1, SLIT2, SOX1, SPARC, TERT and TWIST1 was measured by pyrosequencing in cytology specimens from a pilot set of women with normal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) histology. Six genes were selected for testing in Predictors 1, a colposcopy referral study comprising 799 women. The three genes EPB41L3, DPYS and MAL were further tested in a second colposcopy referral study, Predictors 2, comprising 884 women. Results The six genes selected from the pilot: EPB41L3, EDNRB, LMX1, DPYS, MAL and CADM1 showed significantly elevated methylation in CIN2 and CIN3 (CIN2/3) versus ≤CIN1 in Predictors 1 (p < 0.01). Highest methylation was observed in cancer tissues. EPB41L3 methylation was the best single classifier of CIN2/3 in both HR-HPV positive (p < 0.0001) and negative samples (p = 0.02). Logistic regression modeling showed that other genes did not add significantly to EPB41L3 and in Predictors 2, its classifier value was validated with AUC 0.69 (95% CI 0.65–0.73). Conclusion Several methylated genes show promise for detecting CIN2/3 of which EPB41L3 seems the best. Methylated human gene biomarkers used in combination may be clinically useful for triage of women with HR-HPV infections.


International Journal of Cancer | 2013

HPV16 L1 and L2 DNA methylation predicts high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with mildly abnormal cervical cytology.

Attila T. Lorincz; Adam R. Brentnall; Nataša Vasiljević; Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska; Alejandra Castanon; Alison Nina Fiander; Ned George Powell; Amanda Jane Tristram; Jack Cuzick; Peter Sasieni

DNA methylation changes in human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) DNA are common and might be important for identifying women at increased risk of cervical cancer. Using recently published data from Costa Rica we developed a classification score to differentiate women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN2/3) from those with no evident high‐grade lesions. Here, we aim to investigate the performance of the score using data from the UK. Exfoliated cervical cells at baseline and 6‐months follow‐up were analyzed in 84 women selected from a randomized clinical trial of women undergoing surveillance for low‐grade cytology. Selection of women for the methylation study was based on detectable HPV16 in the baseline sample. Purified DNA was bisulfite converted, amplified and pyrosequenced at selected CpG sites in the viral genome (URR, E6, L1 and L2), with blinding of laboratory personnel to the clinical data. The primary measure was a predefined score combining the mean methylation in L1 and any methylation in L2. At the second follow‐up visit, 73/84 (87%) women were HPV16 positive and of these 25 had a histopathological diagnosis of CIN2/3. The score was significantly associated with CIN2/3 (area under curve = 0.74, p = 0.002). For a cutoff with 92% sensitivity, colposcopy could have been avoided in 40% (95% CI 27–54%) of HPV16 positive women without CIN2/3; positive predictive value was 44% (32–58%) and negative predictive value was 90% (71–97%). We conclude that quantitative DNA methylation assays could help to improve triage among HPV16 positive women.


Breast Cancer Research | 2014

Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I

Jane Warwick; Hanna Birke; Jennifer Stone; Ruth Warren; Elizabeth Pinney; Adam R. Brentnall; Stephen W. Duffy; Anthony Howell; Jack Cuzick

IntroductionMammographic density is well-established as a risk factor for breast cancer, however, adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI) is vital to its clinical interpretation when assessing individual risk. In this paper we develop a model to adjust mammographic density for age and BMI and show how this adjusted mammographic density measure might be used with existing risk prediction models to identify high-risk women more precisely.MethodsWe explored the association between age, BMI, visually assessed percent dense area and breast cancer risk in a nested case-control study of women from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I (72 cases, 486 controls). Linear regression was used to adjust mammographic density for age and BMI. This adjusted measure was evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression model that included the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) risk score, which is based on classical breast cancer risk factors.ResultsPercent dense area adjusted for age and BMI (the density residual) was a stronger measure of breast cancer risk than unadjusted percent dense area (odds ratio per standard deviation 1.55 versus 1.38; area under the curve (AUC) 0.62 versus 0.59). Furthermore, in this population at increased risk of breast cancer, the density residual added information beyond that obtained from the TC model alone, with the AUC for the model containing both TC risk and density residual being 0.62 compared to 0.51 for the model containing TC risk alone (P =0.002).Approximately 16% of controls and 19% of cases moved into the highest risk group (8% or more absolute risk of developing breast cancer within 10 years) when the density residual was taken into account. The net reclassification index was +15.7%.ConclusionsIn women at high risk of breast cancer, adjusting percent mammographic density for age and BMI provides additional predictive information to the TC risk score, which already incorporates BMI, age, family history and other classic breast cancer risk factors. Furthermore, simple selection criteria can be developed using mammographic density, age and BMI to identify women at increased risk in a clinical setting.Clinical trial registration numberhttp://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN91879928 (Registered: 1 June 2006).


Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2014

Therapeutic Targeting of Integrin αvβ6 in Breast Cancer

Kate M. Moore; Gareth J. Thomas; Stephen W. Duffy; Jane Warwick; Rhian Gabe; Patrick Chou; Ian O. Ellis; Andrew R. Green; Syed Haider; Kellie Brouilette; Antonio Saha; Sabari Vallath; R L Bowen; Claude Chelala; Diana Eccles; William Tapper; Alastair M. Thompson; Phillip Quinlan; Lee Jordan; Cheryl Gillett; Adam R. Brentnall; Shelia M. Violette; Paul H. Weinreb; Jane Kendrew; Simon T. Barry; Ian R. Hart; J. Louise Jones; John Marshall

Background Integrin αvβ6 promotes migration, invasion, and survival of cancer cells; however, the relevance and role of αvβ6 has yet to be elucidated in breast cancer. Methods Protein expression of integrin subunit beta6 (β6) was measured in breast cancers by immunohistochemistry (n > 2000) and ITGB6 mRNA expression measured in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium dataset. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan Meier curves, and bioinformatics statistical analyses were performed (Cox proportional hazards model, Wald test, and Chi-square test of association). Using antibody (264RAD) blockade and siRNA knockdown of β6 in breast cell lines, the role of αvβ6 in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) biology (expression, proliferation, invasion, growth in vivo) was assessed by flow cytometry, MTT, Transwell invasion, proximity ligation assay, and xenografts (n ≥ 3), respectively. A student’s t-test was used for two variables; three-plus variables used one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test. Xenograft growth was analyzed using linear mixed model analysis, followed by Wald testing and survival, analyzed using the Log-Rank test. All statistical tests were two sided. Results High expression of either the mRNA or protein for the integrin subunit β6 was associated with very poor survival (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.15, P = .002) and increased metastases to distant sites. Co-expression of β6 and HER2 was associated with worse prognosis (HR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.16 to 3.35, P = .01). Monotherapy with 264RAD or trastuzumab slowed growth of MCF-7/HER2-18 and BT-474 xenografts similarly (P < .001), but combining 264RAD with trastuzumab effectively stopped tumor growth, even in trastuzumab-resistant MCF-7/HER2-18 xenografts. Conclusions Targeting αvβ6 with 264RAD alone or in combination with trastuzumab may provide a novel therapy for treating high-risk and trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer patients.


The Journal of Pathology | 2011

Clinical and functional significance of α9β1 integrin expression in breast cancer: a novel cell-surface marker of the basal phenotype that promotes tumour cell invasion.

Michael D. Allen; Reza Vaziri; Michael Green; Claude Chelala; Adam R. Brentnall; Sally Dreger; Sabarinath Vallath; Harriet Nitch-Smith; Jane Hayward; Robert Carpenter; Deborah L Holliday; Rosemary A. Walker; Ian R. Hart; J. Louise Jones

Integrin α9β1 is a receptor for ECM proteins, including Tenascin‐C and the EDA domain of fibronectin, and has been shown to transduce TGFβ signalling. This study has examined the expression pattern of α9β1 in 141 frozen breast carcinoma samples and related expression to prognostic indices, molecular subtype and patient outcome. Effects of α9β1 on tumour cell migration and invasion were assessed using blocking antibody and gene transduction approaches. Integrin α9β1 localized to myoepithelial cells in normal ducts and acini, a pattern maintained in DCIS. A subset (17%) of invasive carcinomas exhibited tumour cell expression of α9β1, which related significantly to the basal‐like phenotype, as defined by either CK5/6 or CK14 expression. Tumour expression of α9β1 showed a significant association with reduced overall patient survival (p < 0.0001; HR 5.94, 95%CI 3.26–10.82) and with reduced distant‐metastasis‐free survival (p < 0.0001; HR 6.37, CI 3.51–11.58). A series of breast cancer cell lines was screened for α9β1 with the highly invasive basal‐like GI‐101 cell line expressing significant levels. Both migration and invasion of this line were reduced significantly in the presence of α9‐blocking antibody and following α9‐knockdown with siRNA. Conversely, migratory and invasive behaviour of α9‐negative MCF7 cells and α9‐low MDA MB468 cells was enhanced significantly by over‐expression of α9. Thus, α9β1 acts as a novel marker of the basal‐like breast cancer subtype and expression is associated with reduced survival, while its ability to promote breast cancer cell migration and invasion suggests that it contributes to the aggressive clinical behaviour of this tumour subtype. Copyright


International Journal of Cancer | 2014

A DNA methylation classifier of cervical precancer based on human papillomavirus and human genes

Adam R. Brentnall; Nataša Vasiljević; Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska; Louise Cadman; Janet Austin; Anne Szarewski; Jack Cuzick; Attila T. Lorincz

Testing for high‐risk (hr) types of human papillomavirus (HPV) is highly sensitive as a screening test of high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplastic (CIN2/3) disease, the precursor of cervical cancer. However, it has a relatively low specificity. Our objective was to develop a prediction rule with a higher specificity, using combinations of human and HPV DNA methylation. Exfoliated cervical specimens from colposcopy‐referral cohorts in London were analyzed for DNA methylation levels by pyrosequencing in the L1 and L2 regions of HPV16, HPV18, HPV31 and human genes EPB41L3, DPYS and MAL. Samples from 1,493 hrHPV‐positive women were assessed and of these 556 were found to have CIN2/3 at biopsy; 556 tested positive for HPV16 (323 CIN2/3), 201 for HPV18 (73 CIN2/3) and 202 for HPV31 (98 CIN2/3). The prediction rule included EPB41L3 and HPV and had area under curve 0.80 (95% CI 0.78–0.82). For 90% sensitivity, specificity was 36% (33–40) and positive predictive value (PPV) was 46% (43–48). By HPV type, 90% sensitivity corresponded to the following specificities and PPV, respectively: HPV16, 38% (32–45) and 67% (63–71); HPV18, 53% (45–62) and 52% (45–59); HPV31, 39% (31–49) and 58% (51–65); HPV16, 18 or 31, 44% (40–49) and 62% (59–65) and other hrHPV 17% (14–21) and 21% (18–24). We conclude that a methylation assay in hrHPV‐positive women might improve PPV with minimal sensitivity loss.


Journal of Clinical Virology | 2014

A comparison of methylation levels in HPV18, HPV31 and HPV33 genomes reveals similar associations with cervical precancers

Nataša Vasiljević; Dorota Scibior-Bentkowska; Adam R. Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; Attila T. Lorincz

Background High risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is common and only a small minority of infections become persistent and lead to cervical cancers. Women positive for HR-HPV usually require a second test to avoid unnecessary colposcopies and over treatment. Elevated DNA methylation of HR-HPV L1 and L2 genes in high grade disease has emerged as a promising molecular triage tool. Objectives Our aim was to accurately measure methylation levels at selected CpG positions in the HPV18, HPV31 and HPV33 genomes. We focused on the L2, L1, URR and E6 regions because these were previously shown to be interesting areas for study. Study design Pyrosequencing was used to measure methylation in 208 HPV18, 207 HPV31, and 126 HPV33 positive women selected from a London colposcopy referral population. Results After adjustment for multiple testing, at FDR 5%, elevated methylation was significantly associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or worse (CIN2+) in all investigated CpGs in HPV18 L2 and L1. Two of 6 L2 and 12 of 15 L1 sites in HPV31 and 6 of 8 L2 and 3 of 13 L1 sites in HPV33 showed significantly elevated methylation in CIN2+. Methylation of CpG sites in the URR and E6 region of the HPV types was low and most differences were not significant. Conclusion Elevated methylation of CpG sites in the L1 and L2 regions of HPV18, HPV31 and HPV33 is associated with CIN2+ and a panel test may be useful for triage of women with HR-HPV infections.


Cancer | 2014

C-Met in Invasive Breast Cancer Is There a Relationship With the Basal-Like Subtype?

Colan M Ho-Yen; Andrew R. Green; Emad A. Rakha; Adam R. Brentnall; Ian O. Ellis; Stéphanie Kermorgant; J. L. Jones

Basal‐like (BL) breast cancer is an aggressive form of breast cancer with limited treatment options. Recent work has identified BL breast cancer as a biologically distinct form of triple‐negative breast cancer, with a worse outlook. The receptor tyrosine kinase c‐Met is a novel therapeutic target associated with reduced survival in breast cancer. Few studies have specifically addressed the association between c‐Met and molecular subtype of breast cancer, yet this is a key consideration when selecting patients for clinical trials. The aim of this study is to evaluate c‐Met expression in a large cohort of invasive breast cancers and in particular, its correlation with molecular subtype.


British Journal of Cancer | 2014

Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK

Adam R. Brentnall; D G R Evans; Jack Cuzick

The validation of breast cancer risk models is important, and that by MacInnis et al (2013) of the BOADICEA model, which is based solely on family history, is very welcome. A recent development has been the identification of 67 breast cancer risk SNPs (Michailidou et al, 2013), whose main use will be together as a panel to identify women at increased risk of breast cancer. We investigated how a polygenic SNP score based on these SNPs would compare with classical risk factors including family history, and how much information it might add to risk assessment.

Collaboration


Dive into the Adam R. Brentnall's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jack Cuzick

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony Howell

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paula Stavrinos

University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen W. Duffy

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Jacob

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Wilson

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge