Adam Sokal

Mid-term outcomes of triple-site vs. conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND The primary objectives of this study were to compare the implantation course of triple-site (double left-single right) and conventional cardiac resynchronization devices. The secondary target was to assess mid-term outcomes of both types of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS Fifty-four patients with NYHA classes III-IV, left ventricular EF<or=35% and QRS>or=120 ms were included; 27 received triple-site pacemakers (TRIV group), 27 conventional CRT devices (BIV group). Procedural course, clinical data, QRS duration, echocardiographic parameters, peak oxygen consumption (VO2max) and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) were screened for inter-group differences. RESULTS Procedure duration was higher in TRIV than in BIV group (197.6 vs. 137.6 min, P<0.001), fluoroscopy exposure and complication-rates were similar. After 3 months of CRT, triple-site pacing was associated with a more significant (P<0.05) NYHA class reduction (by 1.4 vs. 1.0 class, respectively), increase in VO(2) max (2.9 vs. 1.1 mL/kg/min) and 6MWD (98.7 vs. 51.6 m) than conventional CRT. A higher EF and more improved intraventricular synchrony were observed in the TRIV than in the BIV group. The response rate in the TRIV group was 96.3% vs. 62.9% in the conventional group (P=0.002). Triple-site stimulation was an independent predictor of response to CRT (adjusted odds ratio 26.4, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Triple-site resynchronization appears to be more beneficial than conventional CRT. Upgrade to triple-site CRT may be considered in non-responders to standard resynchronization.

In Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block Single Lead MultiSpot Left Ventricular Pacing Does Not Improve Acute Hemodynamic Response To Conventional Biventricular Pacing. A Multicenter Prospective, Interventional, Non-Randomized Study

Introduction Recent efforts to increase CRT response by multiSPOT pacing (MSP) from multiple bipols on the same left ventricular lead are still inconclusive. Aim The Left Ventricular (LV) MultiSPOTpacing for CRT (iSPOT) study compared the acute hemodynamic response of MSP pacing by using 3 electrodes on a quadripolar lead compared with conventional biventricular pacing (BiV). Methods Patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) underwent an acute hemodynamic study to determine the %change in LV+dP/dtmax from baseline atrial pacing compared to the following configurations: BiV pacing with the LV lead in a one of lateral veins, while pacing from the distal, mid, or proximal electrode and all 3 electrodes together (i.e. MSP). All measurements were repeated 4 times at 5 different atrioventricular delays. We also measured QRS-width and individual Q-LV durations. Results Protocol was completed in 24 patients, all with LBBB (QRS width 171±20 ms) and 58% ischemic aetiology. The percentage change in LV+dP/dtmax for MSP pacing was 31.0±3.3% (Mean±SE), which was not significantly superior to any BiV pacing configuration: 28.9±3.2% (LV-distal), 28.3±2.7% (LV-mid), and 29.5±3.0% (LV-prox), respectively. Correlation between LV+dP/dtmax and either QRS-width or Q-LV ratio was poor. Conclusions In patients with LBBB MultiSPOT LV pacing demonstrated comparable improvement in contractility to best conventional BiV pacing. Optimization of atrioventricular delay is important for the best performance for both BiV and MultiSPOT pacing configurations. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NTC01883141

Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization on Gradient Reduction in Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Preliminary Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in terms of outflow tract gradient reduction and functional improvement in symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) requiring implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) implantation.

Quality of Life in Cardiac Resynchronization Recipients: Association with Response and Impact on Outcome

The prognostic impact of improvement in health‐related quality of life (QoL) and its relation to response in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients remains unknown.

Long-term outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy are worse in patients who require atrioventricular junction ablation for atrial fibrillation than in those with sinus rhythm

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to assess the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without the need for atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation on outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS A single center cohort of 200 consecutive CRT patients was divided into three groups: 1) AF with CRT pacing < 95% in which AVJ ablation was performed (AF-ABL, n = 40; 20%), 2) AF without the need for AVJ ablation (AF-non ABL, n = 40; 20%), 3) sinus rhythm (SR, n = 120; 60%). All patients were assessed before CRT implantation and at 6-month follow-up. Positive clinical response to CRT was considered alive status without the need for heart transplantation and improvement ≥ 1 NYHA after 6 months. The comparative analysis among all study groups with respect to response-rate and long-term survival was performed. RESULTS The 6-month response-rate in both AF-ABL and AF-nonABL was significantly lower than in SR (52.5 and 50 vs.77.5%, respectively; both p < 0.017), though there were no differences in baseline characteristics among study groups apart from higher baseline NT-proBNP levels in AF-ABL. However, after adjustment for this confounder, and despite optimal CRT pacing burden in study groups, the remote all-cause mortality during median follow-up of 36.1 months was significantly higher in AF-ABL than in SR (adjusted HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.09-6.02, p = 0.03). What is more, no difference in long-term survival between SR and AF-nonABL was observed. CONCLUSIONS Despite the improvement of CRT pacing burden and thus response-rate up to the level of AF subjects without the need for ablation, the long-term survival of AF patients requiring AVJ ablation remains still worse than in SR.

Polish and European management strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation. Data from the EURObservational Research Programme-Atrial Fibrillation General Registry Pilot Phase (EORP-AF Pilot).

INTRODUCTION Despite continued efforts of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to unify management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) across Europe, interregional differences in guideline adherence are likely. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to compare treatment strategies depending on baseline characteristics of AF patients between Poland and other members of the European Union (EU). PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the baseline data and treatment strategies in participants of the ESC registry: the EURObservational Research Programme-Atrial Fibrillation General Registry Pilot Phase. A total of 3119 consecutive patients with AF diagnosed within the last year were included in 67 centers from 9 countries, including 419 patients enrolled in 15 Polish centers. RESULTS A rhythm control strategy was more frequent in Poland than in other EU countries (20.8% vs 11.9%; P <0.0001). Catheter ablation for AF was also used more frequently in Polish cardiology wards (13.9% vs 8.3%; P = 0.0017), while amiodarone at discharge was used less frequently (12.0% vs 22.7%; P <0.0001). In-hospital use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKA anticoagulants was less frequent in Polish patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or higher than in patients from other EU countries (61.1% vs 79.0%; P <0.0001), but overall anticoagulation rates at discharge were similar to those in other countries (83.3% vs 82.6%). CONCLUSIONS A rhythm control-oriented strategy in patients with AF with the use of ablation in cardiology wards is more frequent in Poland than in other EU countries. Similar to other EU countries, compliance with the ESC guidelines regarding anticoagulation in AF patients is suboptimal in Poland. Undertreatment was observed in a significant proportion of patients at high risk of stroke, while a large group of low-risk patients are overtreated. Differences between the types of recruiting centers in Poland and other EU countries might have influenced the results.

Efficacy of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in the treatment of end-stage inotrope-dependent heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Currently, cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is recommended only for New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV ambulatory patients. However, some recent reports have suggested that CRT could also be beneficial for end-stage inotrope-dependent heart failure (HF) NYHA class IV patients. In this report, we summarise the results of CRT implantation in a group of 11 HF inotrope-dependent patients who were not candidates for urgent orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS AND RESULTS Between August 2006 and June 2011, 11 end-stage inotrope-dependent HF patients with wide QRS complex, ineligible for urgent OHT, were implanted with CRT in the Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases in Zabrze. Dependence on inotropic therapy was defined as an inability to stop the infusion of the drug without the occurrence of hypotension, oligooranuria and/or hypoxaemia. All patients were successfully implanted with CRT and subsequently weaned from inotropes in a median time of two (1-17) days. Mean QRS duration shortened from 190 ± 34 ms at baseline to 142 ± 25 ms (p < 0.001) after the procedure. Average left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 19 ± 4% to 25 ± 4% (p < 0.001). All patients were discharged from hospital. Median hospital stay after the procedure was ten (5-56) days. During the median follow-upof 1,212 (182-2,048) days, four patients died (one due to arrhythmic storm, three others due to progressive pump failure). During that period, 57 adequate device interventions occurred in three patients, including 52 therapies in one fatal case. CONCLUSIONS CRT can be an alternative for end-stage inotrope-dependent HF patients with wide QRS who are ineligible for urgent heart transplantation.

Can we rely on machines? Device-detected atrial high rates correspond well with atrial arrhythmias in cardiac resynchronization recipients

AIMS The aim of the study was to verify in what proportion of patients, device-detected atrial high rate (AHR) episodes are indeed atrial arrhythmias (AAs). We investigated also the reasons for inappropriate arrhythmia classification and assessed if patients with misdiagnosed arrhythmias have distinct characteristics that would help to identify them. METHODS AND RESULTS The study population consisted of 304 consecutive patients implanted with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds) and subsequently monitored via remote monitoring for a median follow-up (FU) of 30.5 months. Intracardiac electrograms of every recorded AHR episode were assessed and classified (AA vs. no AA) by two experienced cardiologists. During FU, 14 386 episodes of AHR were recorded and classified in 176 (57.9%) patients. In 89.2% of them, these episodes were true AA (94% atrial fibrillation, 62% de novo). The reasons for AHR misdiagnosis were atrial far-field signals (89.5%) and noise (10.5%). The mean per cent of day spent in AHR (54.9 vs. 5.86%; P < 0.001) and the occurrence of periods with low CRT pacing (82.8 vs. 55%; P = 0.003) were significantly higher in AA subjects than in those with misdiagnosed AHR. Episode duration of properly detected AHRs was longer than that of misdiagnosed AHRs. Higher per cent of time spent in AHR was an independent marker of appropriate arrhythmia detection [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.04; P = 0.023]. CONCLUSION Nearly two-thirds of CRT-D patients had AHR episodes within 2.5 years after implantation. Almost 90% of AHRs were indeed AA. Misdetections were caused by far-field sensing or noise. A two-step diagnostic algorithm (>9% of time spent in AHRs and episode duration >36 s) allowed for proper detection of AA with a high hit-rate and specificity.

REmote SUpervision to Decrease HospitaLization RaTe. Unified and integrated platform for data collected from devices manufactured by different companies: Design and rationale of the RESULT study.

The number of patients with heart failure implantable cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs) is growing. Hospitalization rate in this group is very high and generates enormous costs. To avoid the need for hospital treatment, optimized monitoring and follow‐up is crucial. Remote monitoring (RM) has been widely put into practice in the management of CIEDs but it may be difficult due to the presence of differences in systems provided by device manufacturers and loss of gathered data in case of device reimplantation. Additionally, conclusions derived from studies about usefulness of RM in clinical practice apply to devices coming only from a single company. An integrated monitoring platform allows for more comprehensive data analysis and interpretation. Therefore, the primary objective of Remote Supervision to Decrease Hospitalization Rate (RESULT) study is to evaluate the impact of RM on the clinical status of patients with ICDs or CRT‐Ds using an integrated platform. Six hundred consecutive patients with ICDs or CRT‐Ds implanted will be prospectively randomized to either a traditional or RM‐based follow‐up model. The primary clinical endpoint will be a composite of all‐cause mortality or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons within 12 months after randomization. The primary technical endpoint will be to construct and evaluate a unified and integrated platform for the data collected from RM devices manufactured by different companies. This manuscript describes the design and methodology of the prospective, randomized trial designed to determine whether remote monitoring using an integrated platform for different companies is safe, feasible, and efficacious (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02409225).

Device-related infective endocarditis in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients — Single center registry with over 2500 person-years follow up

AIM To assess incidence, predisposing factors and outcomes of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS High-volume, single-center cardiology database was screened to identify all CDRIE cases, based on modified Duke criteria, amongst 765 consecutive CRT implantations between 2002 and 2015 (70.8% de novo implantations, 13.7% and 15.5% up-grades from pacemaker and implantable cardioverter–defibrillator [ICD], respectively). During the median follow-up (FU) of 1207 days (range: 256–2664) overall 38 CDRIE (4.97%) cases were identified (incidence: 15/1000 person-years). Multivariate Cox regression model, incorporating significant baseline differences as covariates (model 1), demonstrated that both up-grade from ICD to CRT and higher baseline NYHA class were independently associated with increased risk of CDRIE (adjusted HR 4.29, 95%CI 1.93–9.57; and HR 2.43, 95%CI 1.32–4.49, respectively). In the second model (including all differences with P < 0.2) up-grade from ICD (HR 4.36, 95%CI 1.96–9.69), higher NYHA class (HR 2.04, 95%CI 1.11–3.75), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 5.85, 95% CI 1.46–23.52), lower baseline hemoglobin level (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.50–0.94) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.05–5.77) were all independently associated with higher risk of CDRIE. All-cause mortality in patients with CDRIE was significantly higher than in subjects without infective complications (68.4% vs. 33.7%, P < 0.001), and 50% of patients with CDRIE died during index hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of CDRIE in CRT recipients is almost 5% within 3.5 years post implantation. Up-grade from ICD and high baseline NYHA class flag up patients at high-risk of CDRIE. CRT-related infective complications are associated with very poor prognosis.