Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Adam Varble is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Adam Varble.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Evaluation of cloud‐resolving and limited area model intercomparison simulations using TWP‐ICE observations: 1. Deep convective updraft properties

Adam Varble; Edward J. Zipser; Ann M. Fridlind; Ping Zhu; Andrew S. Ackerman; Jean Pierre Chaboureau; Scott Collis; Jiwen Fan; Adrian Hill; Ben Shipway

Ten 3-D cloud-resolving model simulations and four 3-D limited area model simulations of an intense mesoscale convective system observed on 23–24 January 2006 during the Tropical Warm Pool-International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE) are compared with each other and with observed radar reflectivity fields and dual-Doppler retrievals of vertical wind speeds in an attempt to explain published results showing a high bias in simulated convective radar reflectivity aloft. This high-bias results from ice water content being large, which is a product of large, strong convective updrafts, although hydrometeor size distribution assumptions modulate the size of this bias. Making snow mass more realistically proportional to D2 rather than D3 eliminates unrealistically large snow reflectivities over 40 dBZ in some simulations. Graupel, unlike snow, produces high biased reflectivity in all simulations, which is partly a result of parameterized microphysics but also partly a result of overly intense simulated updrafts. Peak vertical velocities in deep convective updrafts are greater than dual-Doppler-retrieved values, especially in the upper troposphere. Freezing of liquid condensate, often rain, lofted above the freezing level in simulated updraft cores greatly contributes to these excessive upper tropospheric vertical velocities. The strongest simulated updraft cores are nearly undiluted, with some of the strongest showing supercell characteristics during the multicellular (presquall) stage of the event. Decreasing horizontal grid spacing from 900 to 100 m slightly weakens deep updraft vertical velocity and moderately decreases the amount of condensate aloft but not enough to match observational retrievals. Therefore, overly intense simulated updrafts may additionally be a product of unrealistic interactions between convective dynamics, parameterized microphysics, and large-scale model forcing that promote different convective strengths than observed.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Evaluation of cloud-resolving and limited area model intercomparison simulations using TWP-ICE observations: 2. Precipitation microphysics

Adam Varble; Edward J. Zipser; Ann M. Fridlind; Ping Zhu; Andrew S. Ackerman; Jean Pierre Chaboureau; Jiwen Fan; Adrian Hill; Ben Shipway; Christopher Williams

Ten 3-D cloud-resolving model (CRM) simulations and four 3-D limited area model (LAM) simulations of an intense mesoscale convective system observed on 23-24 January 2006 during the Tropical Warm Pool-International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE) are compared with each other and with observations and retrievals from a scanning polarimetric radar, colocated UHF and VHF vertical profilers, and a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer in an attempt to explain a low bias in simulated stratiform rainfall. Despite different forcing methodologies, similar precipitation microphysics errors appear in CRMs and LAMs with differences that depend on the details of the bulk microphysics scheme used. One-moment schemes produce too many small raindrops, which biases Doppler velocities low, but produces rainwater contents (RWCs) that are similar to observed. Two-moment rain schemes with a gamma shape parameter (mu) of 0 produce excessive size sorting, which leads to larger Doppler velocities than those produced in one-moment schemes but lower RWCs. Two-moment schemes also produce a convective median volume diameter distribution that is too broad relative to observations and, thus, may have issues balancing raindrop formation, collision-coalescence, and raindrop breakup. Assuming a mu of 2.5 rather than 0 for the raindrop size distribution improves one-moment scheme biases, and allowing mu to have values greater than 0 may improve excessive size sorting in two-moment schemes. Underpredicted stratiform rain rates are associated with underpredicted ice water contents at the melting level rather than excessive rain evaporation, in turn likely associated with convective detrainment that is too high in the troposphere and mesoscale circulations that are too weak. A limited domain size also prevents a large, well-developed stratiform region like the one observed from developing in CRMs, although LAMs also fail to produce such a region.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

Cloud-resolving model intercomparison of an MC3E squall line case: Part I-Convective updrafts

Jiwen Fan; Bin Han; Adam Varble; Hugh Morrison; Kirk North; Pavlos Kollias; Baojun Chen; Xiquan Dong; Scott E. Giangrande; A. Khain; Yun Lin; Edward R. Mansell; Jason A. Milbrandt; Ronald Stenz; Gregory Thompson; Yuan Wang

An intercomparison study of a midlatitude mesoscale squall line is performed using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 1 km horizontal grid spacing with eight different cloud microphysics schemes to investigate processes that contribute to the large variability in simulated cloud and precipitation properties. All simulations tend to produce a wider area of high radar reflectivity (Z_e > 45 dBZ) than observed but a much narrower stratiform area. The magnitude of the virtual potential temperature drop associated with the gust front passage is similar in simulations and observations, while the pressure rise and peak wind speed are smaller than observed, possibly suggesting that simulated cold pools are shallower than observed. Most of the microphysics schemes overestimate vertical velocity and Ze in convective updrafts as compared with observational retrievals. Simulated precipitation rates and updraft velocities have significant variability across the eight schemes, even in this strongly dynamically driven system. Differences in simulated updraft velocity correlate well with differences in simulated buoyancy and low-level vertical perturbation pressure gradient, which appears related to cold pool intensity that is controlled by the evaporation rate. Simulations with stronger updrafts have a more optimal convective state, with stronger cold pools, ambient low-level vertical wind shear, and rear-inflow jets. Updraft velocity variability between schemes is mainly controlled by differences in simulated ice-related processes, which impact the overall latent heating rate, whereas surface rainfall variability increases in no-ice simulations mainly because of scheme differences in collision-coalescence parameterizations.


Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2018

Erroneous attribution of deep convective invigoration to aerosol concentration

Adam Varble

AbstractContiguous time–height cloud objects at the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains (SGP) site are matched with surface condensation nuclei (CN) concent...


Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology | 2018

Relationships between Extreme Rain Rates and Convective Intensities from the Perspectives of TRMM and WSR-88D Radars

Alexandria Gingrey; Adam Varble; Edward J. Zipser

AbstractTRMM PR 2A25, version 7 (V7), retrievals of reflectivity Z and rainfall rate R are compared with WSR-88D dual-polarimetric S-band radar data for 28 radars over the southeastern United States after matching their horizontal resolution and sampling. TRMM Ku-band measurements are converted to S-band approximations to more directly compare reflectivity estimates. Rain rates are approximated from WSR-88D data using the CSU–hydrometeor identification rainfall optimization (HIDRO) algorithm. Tropics-wide TRMM retrievals confirm previous findings of a low overlap fraction between extreme convective intensity, as approximated by the maximum 40-dBZ height, and extreme near-surface rain rates. WSR-88D data also confirm this low overlap but show that it is likely higher than TRMM PR retrievals indicate. For maximum 40-dBZ echo heights that extend above the freezing level, mean WSR-88D reflectivities at low levels are approximately 2 dB higher than TRMM PR reflectivities. Higher WSR-88D-retrieved rain rates fo...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

A comparison of TWP-ICE observational data with cloud-resolving model results

Ann M. Fridlind; Andrew S. Ackerman; Jean-Pierre Chaboureau; Jiwen Fan; Wojciech W. Grabowski; Adrian Hill; T. R. Jones; M. M. Khaiyer; Guosheng Liu; Patrick Minnis; Hugh Morrison; Louis Nguyen; S. Park; Jon Petch; Jean-Pierre Pinty; Courtney Schumacher; Ben Shipway; Adam Varble; Xiaoqing Wu; Shaocheng Xie; Minghua Zhang


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011

Evaluation of Cloud-Resolving Model Intercomparison Simulations Using TWP-ICE Observations: Precipitation and Cloud Structure

Adam Varble; Ann M. Fridlind; Edward J. Zipser; Andrew S. Ackerman; Jean Pierre Chaboureau; Jiwen Fan; Adrian Hill; Sally A. McFarlane; Jean Pierre Pinty; Ben Shipway


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

A limited area model (LAM) intercomparison study of a TWP‐ICE active monsoon mesoscale convective event

Ping Zhu; Jim Dudhia; P. R. Field; Kathrin Wapler; Ann M. Fridlind; Adam Varble; Edward J. Zipser; Jon Petch; Ming Chen; Zhenduo Zhu


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

Analysis of cloud‐resolving simulations of a tropical mesoscale convective system observed during TWP‐ICE: Vertical fluxes and draft properties in convective and stratiform regions

Agnieszka A. Mrowiec; Catherine Rio; Ann M. Fridlind; Andrew S. Ackerman; Anthony D. Del Genio; Olivier Pauluis; Adam Varble; Jiwen Fan


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017

A ubiquitous ice size bias in simulations of tropical deep convection

McKenna W. Stanford; Adam Varble; Edward J. Zipser; J. Walter Strapp; Delphine Leroy; Alfons Schwarzenboeck; Rodney J. Potts; Alain Protat

Collaboration


Dive into the Adam Varble's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann M. Fridlind

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jiwen Fan

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew S. Ackerman

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ping Zhu

Florida International University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugh Morrison

National Center for Atmospheric Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge