Addison K. May

Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection in Adults and Children: Guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with intra-abdominal infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those previously published in 2002 and 2003. The guidelines are intended for treating patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. New information, based on publications from the period 2003-2008, is incorporated into this guideline document. The panel has also added recommendations for managing intra-abdominal infection in children, particularly where such management differs from that of adults; for appendicitis in patients of all ages; and for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.

Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with intra-abdominal infection were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. These updated guidelines replace those previously published in 2002 and 2003. The guidelines are intended for treating patients who either have these infections or may be at risk for them. New information, based on publications from the period 2003-2008, is incorporated into this guideline document. The panel has also added recommendations for managing intra-abdominal infection in children, particularly where such management differs from that of adults; for appendicitis in patients of all ages; and for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates.

Prehospital statin and aspirin use and the prevalence of severe sepsis and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Objectives: To determine whether prehospital statin use is associated with a lower risk of sepsis, acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality in critically ill patients. We also investigated the effect of combined prehospital use of both statins and aspirin. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort. Patients: A total of 575 critically ill patients admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care unit of an academic tertiary-care hospital. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Of 575 patients, 149 (26%) were on statin therapy before hospitalization. A multivariable analysis including age, gender, current tobacco use, prehospital aspirin use, race, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score revealed that patients on statin therapy before hospitalization were less likely to have or develop severe sepsis (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40–0.96) or acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.99) during the first four intensive care unit days. In-hospital mortalities for patients with and without prehospital statin use (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.62–1.83) were similar. Patients who had prehospital use of both statins and aspirin had the lowest rates of severe sepsis, acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality. Conclusions: Prehospital use of statins may be protective against sepsis and acute lung injury. This effect may be potentiated by prehospital aspirin use.

Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Skin and soft tissue infections are a common cause of hospitalization and use of antibiotic therapy, and may result in significant disability. Infections managed by surgeons may vary from simple, noncomplicated cellulitis to severe necrotizing soft tissue infections. The differentiation of necrotizing infections from nonnecrotizing infections is critical to achieving adequate surgical therapy. An understanding of the changing epidemiology of all complicated skin and soft tissue infections is required for selection of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy.

Acute lung injury in patients with traumatic injuries: utility of a panel of biomarkers for diagnosis and pathogenesis.

BACKGROUND The diagnosis of acute lung injury (ALI) is based on a consensus clinical definition. Despite the simplicity of this definition, ALI remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Severe trauma is a well-described cause of ALI that represents a relatively homogeneous subset of patients with ALI. The aims of this study were to develop a panel of plasma biomarkers to facilitate diagnosis of trauma-induced ALI and to enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of human ALI. METHODS A retrospective nested case control of 192 patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit at a university hospital between 2002 and 2006. We compared 107 patients with ALI to 85 patients without ALI. Plasma was collected within 72 hours of intensive care unit admission. Twenty-one plasma biomarkers were measured in duplicate in each plasma sample. RESULTS Patients with ALI had higher severity of illness scores, more days of mechanical ventilation, longer hospital stays, and higher mortality versus controls. Seven biomarkers (receptor for advanced glycation end products, procollagen peptide III, brain natriuretic peptide, angiopoietin-2, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-8) had a high diagnostic accuracy as reflected by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92) in differentiating ALI from controls. CONCLUSIONS A model using seven plasma biomarkers had a high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating patients with trauma-induced ALI from trauma patients without ALI. In addition, use of a panel of biomarkers provides insight into the likely importance of alveolar epithelial injury in the pathogenesis of early ALI.

Elevated Urinary IL-18 Levels at the Time of ICU Admission Predict Adverse Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Urine IL-18 (uIL-18) has demonstrated moderate capacity to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) and adverse outcomes in defined settings. Its ability to predict AKI and provide prognostic information in broadly selected, critically ill adults remains unknown. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS The study prospectively evaluated the capacity of uIL-18 measured within 24 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission to predict AKI, death, and receipt of acute dialysis in a large mixed-adult ICU population. RESULTS Of 451 patients, 86 developed AKI within 48 hours of enrollment and had higher median uIL-18 levels [426 (interquartile range [IQR]: 152 to 1183) pg/mg creatinine] compared with those without AKI [248 (IQR: 120 to 559) pg/mg]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for uIL-18 predicting subsequent AKI within 24 hours was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.69) and improved modestly to 0.67 (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.81) in patients whose enrollment eGFR was >or=75 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The highest median uIL-18 levels were observed in patients with sepsis at enrollment [508 (IQR: 230 to 1281) pg/mg], those receiving acute dialysis [571 (IQR: 161 to 1614) pg/mg] or dying [532 (IQR: 210 to 1614) pg/mg] within 28 days of ascertainment. After adjustment for a priori selected clinical predictors, uIL-18 remained independently predictive of composite outcome of death or acute dialysis within 28 days of ascertainment (odds ratio, 1.86 [95% CI: 1.31 to 2.64]). CONCLUSIONS uIL-18 did not reliably predict AKI development, but did predict poor clinical outcomes in a broadly selected, critically ill adult population.

Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status.

OBJECTIVES Clearing the cervical spine in a time-sensitive fashion is difficult. We hypothesized that admission computed tomographic scan of the occiput to T1 (CTS) with multiplanar reformatted images will replace five-view (odontoid, anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique) plain films of the cervical spine (CSX) in the initial evaluation of blunt trauma patients with altered mental status. METHODS Between January and July 2001, all patients aged 16 years or older with altered mental status undergoing both CTS and CSX were prospectively entered into the study group. Attending physician interpretation defined the presence of cervical spine injury. Unstable fractures were defined as requiring surgical or halo stabilization. RESULTS One thousand six patients met study criteria. One hundred sixteen patients had 172 cervical spine injuries (CSIs) (fracture and subluxation). CSX missed 90 of 172 (52.3%) CSIs in 65 of 172 (56.0%) patients. Anatomically, CSX failed to identify 14 of 15 occipital fractures (93.3%), 17 of 36 (47.2%) C1-3 fractures, and 59 of 121 (48.8%) C4-T1 CSIs. CSX failed to identify 5 of 29 (17.2%) patients with unstable CSIs. CTS failed to diagnose 3 of 172 (1.7%) CSIs that were stable (spinous process fractures at C6-7). Two patients exhibited spinal cord injury without radiologic abnormality missed by both modalities. CTS had a sensitivity of 97.4%, a specificity of 100%, a prevalence of 11.5%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 99.7%. CSX had a sensitivity of 44.0%, a specificity of 100%, a prevalence of 11.5%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 93.2%. CONCLUSION CTS outperformed five-view CSX in a group of patients with altered mental status or distracting injuries. Five-view CSX failed to diagnose 52.3% of cervical spine fractures identified by CTS. Five-view CSX failed to diagnose five patients with unstable cervical fractures and failed to identify 93.3% of patients with occipital condyle fractures.

Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

BACKGROUND Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) may produce substantial morbidity and mortality rates, particularly those classified as complicated or necrotizing. OBJECTIVE To weigh the strength of recommendations using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology and to provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management for SSTIs. DATA SOURCES Computerized identification of published research and review of relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION All published reports on the management of complicated and necrotizing SSTIs were evaluated by an expert panel of members of the Surgical Infection Society according to published guidelines for evidence-based medicine. The quality of the evidence was judged by the GRADE methodology and criteria. Practice surveys, pharmacokinetic studies, and reviews or duplicative publications presenting primary data already considered were excluded from analysis. DATA EXTRACTION Information on demographics, study dates, microbiology findings, antibiotic type, surgical interventions, infection-related outcomes, and the methodologic quality of the studies was extracted. Results were submitted to the Therapeutic Agents Committee of the Surgical Infection Society for review prior to creation of the final consensus document. DATA SYNTHESIS Current surgical and antibiotic management of complicated SSTIs is based on a small number of studies that often have insufficient power to draw well-supported conclusions, with the exception of antimicrobial therapy for non-necrotizing soft tissue infections, for which ample data are available.

Glucose Control and the Inflammatory Response

Though first introduced more than 130 years ago, the concept of stress diabetes or stress hyperglycemia has gained tremendous attention in recent years in view of the landmark article by van den Berghe and colleagues in 2001. As opposed to earlier work that suggested that hyperglycemia in the acute clinical setting may be beneficial, it now appears that lower glucose levels are associated with improved outcomes. The mechanisms behind the improved outcomes are numerous and seem to be tied to the inflammatory process. Both lower glucose values and insulin therapy seem to be anti-inflammatory, whereas hyperglycemia increases the proinflammatory process and negatively affects the innate immune system. Despite the numerous approaches to achieve normoglycemia described in the literature, only modest success has been achieved. Understanding the pathophysiology driving stress hyperglycemia-the stress response and modulation of the inflammatory process-seems to be the key to improving the care of the most critically ill and injured patients.

Computer-based Insulin Infusion Protocol Improves Glycemia Control over Manual Protocol

OBJECTIVE Hyperglycemia worsens clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. Precise glycemia control using intravenous insulin improves outcomes. To determine if we could improve glycemia control over a previous paper-based, manual protocol, authors implemented, in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU), an intravenous insulin protocol integrated into a care provider order entry (CPOE) system. DESIGN Retrospective before-after study of consecutive adult patients admitted to a SICU during pre (manual protocol, 32 days) and post (computer-based protocol, 49 days) periods. MEASUREMENTS Percentage of glucose readings in ideal range of 70-109 mg/dl, and minutes spent in ideal range of control during the first 5 days of SICU stay. RESULTS The computer-based protocol reduced time from first glucose measurement to initiation of insulin protocol, improved the percentage of all SICU glucose readings in the ideal range, and improved control in patients on IV insulin for > or =24 hours. Hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dl) was rare in both groups. CONCLUSION The CPOE-based intravenous insulin protocol improved glycemia control in SICU patients compared to a previous manual protocol, and reduced time to insulin therapy initiation. Integrating a computer-based insulin protocol into a CPOE system achieved efficient, safe, and effective glycemia control in SICU patients.