Adejumoke A. Adeyemi

The effect of bleaching, varying the shade or thickness of composite veneers on final colour: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether bleaching prior to placement of a composite veneer had an effect on the final shade of the restoration and whether this was affected by the thickness or shade of the veneer. METHODS Twenty bovine teeth were collected, sectioned and divided into two groups. One group was the non-bleached control, while the other was the bleached group. A colour reading was recorded using a spectrophotometer. The bleached group then underwent external bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide and a colour reading was recorded. Each of these two groups were further sub-divided into four subgroups, on which composite veneers were placed. These subgroups were: 0.5 m thick A1, 1 m thick A1, 0.5 mm thick A4 and 1 mm thick A4 composite veneers. Colour readings were recorded after veneer placement. Statistical significance was assessed using analysis of variance. RESULTS There was a difference between the colour produced for the same veneer properties, between the bleached and non-bleached groups. For a thin (0.5mm) A4 veneer bleaching produced a statistically significant difference in the amount of colour change (DeltaE) compared to veneering alone. For A1, non-bleached group there is a significant difference in the DeltaE produced by altering the thickness of the veneer. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, we can conclude that bleaching prior to placement of a thin A4 dark veneer produces a significant difference in colour change. If no bleaching is performed, altering the thickness of an A1 veneer produces a significant colour difference DeltaE. However, if bleaching is carried out there is no significant difference.

The whitening effect of chlorine dioxide--an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the whitening properties and rate of bleaching action of chlorine dioxide and compare them with those of hydrogen peroxide of similar concentration. METHODS Sixty bovine central incisor crowns were ground and polished until flat surfaces were obtained. The crowns were subjected to extensive staining cycles of artificial saliva, chlorehexidine and tea before being randomly assigned to three groups: chlorine dioxide (ClO2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and deionised water (H2O). The crowns in each group were subjected to seven 2 min exposure cycles in addition to an extra 30 min cycle. CIE LAB spectrophotometric measurements were taken at baseline, after each 2 min, and each extended 30 min bleaching cycle. RESULTS L* for ClO2 specimens was significantly higher only after the first 2 min cycle (p<0.001) while for H2O2 specimens, L* significantly increased after the first two cycles (p<0.001) and continued to increase, at a slower rate, until the end of the treatment cycles. ΔE was significantly greater within H2O2 than within ClO2 specimens (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Chlorine dioxide whitens teeth at a faster rate than hydrogen peroxide. Specimens treated with chlorine dioxide were significantly lighter than those treated with hydrogen peroxide at the end of the first 2 min application cycle, however, extended exposures did not enhance color.

Assessing the Association between Oral Hygiene and Preterm Birth by Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence

The aim of this study was to investigate the purported link between oral hygiene and preterm birth by using image analysis tools to quantify dental plaque biofilm. Volunteers (n = 91) attending an antenatal clinic were identified as those considered to be “at high risk” of preterm delivery (i.e., a previous history of idiopathic preterm delivery, case group) or those who were not considered to be at risk (control group). The women had images of their anterior teeth captured using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). These images were analysed to calculate the amount of red fluorescent plaque (ΔR%) and percentage of plaque coverage. QLF showed little difference in ΔR% between the two groups, 65.00% case versus 68.70% control, whereas there was 19.29% difference with regard to the mean plaque coverage, 25.50% case versus 20.58% control. A logistic regression model showed a significant association between plaque coverage and case/control status (P = 0.031), controlling for other potential predictor variables, namely, smoking status, maternal age, and body mass index (BMI).