Adel Fattah

Facial nerve grading instruments: systematic review of the literature and suggestion for uniformity.

Background: A variety of facial nerve grading scales have been developed over the years with the intended goals of objectively documenting facial nerve function, tracking recovery, and facilitating communication between practitioners. Numerous scales have been proposed; however, all are subject to limitation because of varying degrees of subjectivity, reliability, or longitudinal applicability. At present, such scales remain the only widely accessible modalities for facial functional assessment. The authors’ objective was to ascertain which scales(s) best accomplish the goals of objective assessment. Methods: A systematic review of the English language literature was performed to identify facial nerve grading instruments. Each system was evaluated against the following criteria: convenience of clinical use, regional scoring, static and dynamic measures, features secondary to facial palsy (e.g., synkinesis), reproducibility with low interobserver and intraobserver variability, and sensitivity to changes over time and/or following interventions. Results: From 666 articles, 19 facial nerve grading scales were identified. Only the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale satisfied all criteria. The Facial Nerve Grading Scale 2.0 (or revised House-Brackmann Scale) fulfilled all criteria except intraobserver reliability, which has not been assessed. Conclusions: Facial nerve grading scales intend to provide objectivity and uniformity of reporting to otherwise subjective analysis. The Facial Nerve Grading Scale 2.0 requires further evaluation for intraobserver reliability. The Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale has been robustly evaluated with respect to the criteria prescribed in this article. Although sophisticated technology-based methodologies are being developed for potential clinical application, the authors recommend widespread adoption of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale as the current standard in reporting outcomes of facial nerve disorders.

Facial palsy and reconstruction.

This article outlines a thorough approach to facial nerve palsy and reconstruction.

The degree of facial movement following microvascular muscle transfer in pediatric facial reanimation depends on donor motor nerve axonal density.

Background: Free functional muscle transfer to the face is a standard of facial animation. The contralateral facial nerve, via a cross-face nerve graft, provides spontaneous innervation for the transferred muscle, but is not universally available and has additional shortcomings. The motor nerve to the masseter provides an alternative innervation source. In this study, the authors compared donor nerve histomorphometry and clinical outcomes in a single patient population undergoing free muscle transfer to the face. Methods: Pediatric patients undergoing dynamic facial (re-)animation with intraoperative nerve biopsies and gracilis transfer to the face powered by either the contralateral facial nerve via a cross-face nerve graft or the motor nerve to the masseter were reviewed over a 7-year period. Myelinated nerve counts were assessed histomorphometrically, and functional outcomes were evaluated with the Scaled Measurement of Improvement in Lip Excursion software. Results: From 2004 to 2011, 91 facial (re-)animation procedures satisfied study inclusion criteria. Average myelinated fiber counts were 6757 per mm2 in the donor facial nerve branch, 1647 per mm2 in the downstream cross-face nerve graft at the second stage, and 5289 per mm2 in the masseteric nerve. Reconstructions with either innervation source resulted in improvements in oral commissure excursion and smile symmetry, with the greatest amounts of oral commissure excursion noted in the masseteric nerve group. Conclusions: Facial (re-)animation procedures with use of the cross-face nerve graft or masseteric nerve are effective and result in symmetric smiles. The masseteric nerve provides a more robust innervation source and results in greater commissure excursion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Survey of methods of facial palsy documentation in use by members of the Sir Charles Bell Society

Facial palsy manifests a broad array of deficits affecting function, form, and psychological well‐being. Assessment scales were introduced to standardize and document the features of facial palsy and to facilitate the exchange of information and comparison of outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine which assessment methodologies are currently employed by those involved in the care of patients with facial palsy as a first step toward the development of consensus on the appropriate assessments for this patient population.

The First Successful Lower Extremity Transplantation: 6-Year Follow-Up and Implications for Cortical Plasticity

Vascularized composite allotransplantation as a viable reconstructive option is gaining recognition and new cases are being reported with increasing frequency including hand, face and laryngeal transplantation. However, only one successful complete lower limb transplantation has been reported to date, in which a functioning limb from one ischiopagus twin with a lethal cardiac anomaly was transplanted to the other. Six years later, the patient is mobilizing well and engaging in sporting activities with her peers in a mainstream school. Clinical evaluation of motor and sensory modalities demonstrated a good functional result. Quality of life was assessed using the short form‐36 health survey and lower extremity functional scale disclosing a high level of social and physical capacity. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed and showed cortical integration of the limb; the implications of cortical plasticity and vascularized composite allotransplantation for the correction of congenital limb anomalies are presented.

Reconstruction of facial nerve injuries in children.

Facial nerve trauma is uncommon in children, and many spontaneously recover some function; nonetheless, loss of facial nerve activity leads to functional impairment of ocular and oral sphincters and nasal orifice. In many cases, the impediment posed by facial asymmetry and reduced mimetic function more significantly affects the childs psychosocial interactions. As such, reconstruction of the facial nerve affords great benefits in quality of life. The therapeutic strategy is dependent on numerous factors, including the cause of facial nerve injury, the deficit, the prognosis for recovery, and the time elapsed since the injury. The options for treatment include a diverse range of surgical techniques including static lifts and slings, nerve repairs, nerve grafts and nerve transfers, regional, and microvascular free muscle transfer. We review our strategies for addressing facial nerve injuries in children.

Cephalometric outcomes of orthognathic surgery in hemifacial microsomia.

Abstract Hemifacial microsomia is a hypoplastic disorder of the first and second branchial arches that significantly impacts on the development of the jaws, leading to malocclusion and facial asymmetry. There is little in the literature regarding the application of orthodontic/orthognathic approaches to the correction of these deformities and the stability of the surgical results. To address this, a retrospective chart review of 10 patients with complete orthodontic records and greater than 1 year of follow-up was performed. Posteroanterior cephalograms were assessed by modified Grummons analysis to determine mandibular offset (deviation of the chin point from the skeletal midline) and occlusal cant. These measurements were performed at 3 time points (T1: preoperative, T2: immediate postoperative, T3: follow-up) to elucidate the surgical movement (T2–T1), the postoperative relapse (T3–T2), and the net gain movement (T3–T1). Maxillary movements were quantified, and the occlusal cant was expressed as a ratio between vertical heights of the maxilla at the first molar on each side. One sample t test demonstrated statistically significant surgical movement and net gain. Relapse was statistically insignificant. Repeated-measures analysis of variance demonstrated similar results for chin point position relative to the putative midline. Our results suggest that a combined orthodontic/orthognathic approach at skeletal maturity delivers improved occlusal outcomes in the long term as assessed by chin point deviation and occlusal cant, but secondary surgery rates are higher than those for orthognathic surgery in other patient groups. We advocate limiting surgery to skeletal maturity whenever possible to achieve stable long-term results while limiting morbidity and number of procedures.

Worldwide Testing of the eFACE Facial Nerve Clinician-Graded Scale

Background: The electronic, clinician-graded facial function scale (eFACE) is a potentially useful tool for assessing facial function. Beneficial features include its digital nature, use of visual analogue scales, and provision of graphic outputs and scores. The authors introduced the instrument to experienced facial nerve clinicians for feedback, and examined the effect of viewing a video tutorial on score agreement. Methods: Videos of 30 patients with facial palsy were embedded in an Apple eFACE application. Facial nerve clinicians were invited to perform eFACE video rating and tutorial observation. Participants downloaded the application, viewed the clips, and applied the scoring. They then viewed the tutorial and rescored the clips. Analysis of mean, standard deviation, and confidence interval were performed. Values were compared before and after tutorial viewing, and against scores obtained by an experienced eFACE user. Results: eFACE feedback was positive; participants reported eagerness to apply the instrument in clinical practice. Standard deviation decreased significantly in only two of the 16 categories after tutorial viewing. Subscores for static, dynamic, and synkinesis all demonstrated stable standard deviations, suggesting that the instrument is intuitive. Participants achieved posttutorial scores closer to the experienced eFACE user in 14 of 16 scores, although only a single score, nasolabial fold orientation with smiling, achieved statistically significant improvement. Conclusions: The eFACE may be a suitable, cross-platform, digital instrument for facial function assessment, and was well received by facial nerve experts. Tutorial viewing does not appear to be necessary to achieve agreement, although it does mildly improve agreement between occasional and frequent eFACE users.