Adisak Maneesai
Mahidol University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Adisak Maneesai.
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | 2008
Rungroj Krittayaphong; Pansak Laksanabunsong; Adisak Maneesai; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Suthipol Udompunturak; Vithaya Chaithiraphan
BackgroundThe objective was to compare the value of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in predicting recovery of left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).MethodsWe enrolled patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% who were scheduled for CABG. Regional contractility was assessed by cine CMR at baseline and 4 months after CABG. EDWT and LGE were assessed at baseline. Predictors for improvement of regional contractility were analyzed.ResultsWe studied 46 men and 4 women with an average age of 61 years. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 13%. A total of 2,020 myocardial segments were analyzed. Abnormal wall motion and the LGE area were detected in 1,446 segments (71.6%) and 1,196 segments (59.2%) respectively. Wall motion improvement was demonstrated in 481 of 1,227 segments (39.2%) that initially had wall motion abnormalities at baseline. Logistic regression analysis showed that the LGE area, EDWT and resting wall motion grade predicted wall motion improvement. Comparison of Receiver-Operator-Characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that the LGE area was the most important predictor (p < 0.001). Adding information from LGE to the EDWT can decrease the number of false predictions by EDWT alone from 483 to 127 segments.ConclusionLGE and EDWT are independent predictors for functional recovery after revascularization. However, LGE appears to be a more important factor and independent of EDWT.
American Journal of Cardiology | 2009
Rungroj Krittayaphong; Adisak Maneesai; Vithaya Chaithiraphan; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Olaree Chaiphet; Suthipol Udompunturak
The accuracy of various electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction (MI) has never been validated. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy and prognostic value of standard ECG criteria for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were referred for CMR were studied. Twelve-lead electrocardiography and CMR were performed the same day. A standard CMR protocol including a delayed-enhancement (DE) technique was performed. The prognostic value of using various ECG criteria and DE-CMR was assessed for the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, or major adverse cardiac events. We studied 1,366 patients. Average follow-up was 31.4 +/- 15.8 months. Myocardial scar was detected in 507 patients (37.1%) using DE-CMR. Healed MI using various ECG criteria had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 44% to 59%, 91% to 95%, and 75% to 79% compared with DE-CMR, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that myocardial scar using DE-CMR was the most powerful predictor for cardiac events, followed by left ventricular ejection fraction. In the absence of DE-CMR data, MI using European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) 2000 criteria was the most powerful predictor. In conclusion, various ECG criteria had limited sensitivity, but high specificity, for the diagnosis of healed MI compared with myocardial scar using DE-CMR. Myocardial scar, left ventricular ejection fraction, and MI using ESC/ACC 2000 criteria were important predictors for cardiac events.
Clinical Cardiology | 2015
Nattawut Wongpraparut; Sudarat Piyophirapong; Adisak Maneesai; Kosit Sribhen; Rungroj Krittayaphong; Rungtiwa Pongakasira; Harvey D. White
Acute changes in high‐sensitivity troponin T (hs‐TnT) are induced by myocardial ischemia during exercise stress testing, but there are no reports of pharmacological stress testing.
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2010
Rungroj Krittayaphong; Thananya Boonyasirinant; Vithaya Chaithiraphan; Adisak Maneesai; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Supaporn Nakyen; Prajak Thanapiboonpol; Ahthit Yindeengam; Suthipol Udompanturak
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2011
Rungroj Krittayaphong; Vithaya Chaithiraphan; Adisak Maneesai; Suthipol Udompanturak
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet | 2014
Rungroj Krittayaphong; Adisak Maneesai; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Supaporn Nakyen; Prajak Thanapiboonpol; Ahthit Yindeengam
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet | 2012
Pairash Saiviroonporn; Vip Viprakasit; Adisak Maneesai; Noppadol Siritanaratkul; Bunchoo Pongtanakul; John C. Wood; Rungroj Krittayaphong
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet | 2012
Wiwun Tungsubutra; Chunhakasem Chotnaiwattarakul; Adisak Maneesai; Saowanee Naowapanich; Panchavinnin P; Damras Tresukosol; Rewat Phankingtongkhum; Nattawut Wongpraparut
Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand Chotmaihet thangphaet | 2011
Nitipatana Chierakul; Supot Pongprasobchai; Kanokwan Boonyapisit; Yingyong Chinthammitr; Manop Pithukpakorn; Adisak Maneesai; Apiradee Srivijitkamol; Pornpan Koomanachai; Ajchara Koolvisoot; Tawesak Tanwandee; Chairat Shayakul; Udom Kachintorn
Siriraj Medical Journal - สารศิริราช | 2009
Kanit Reesukumal; Busadee Pratumvinit; Adisak Maneesai; Damras Tresukosol; Nisarat Opartkiattikul