Aditya Konar
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Aditya Konar.
Cancer Science | 2012
Jayashree Bagchi Chakraborty; Sanjit K. Mahato; Kalpana Joshi; Vaibhav Shinde; Srabanti Rakshit; Nabendu Biswas; Indrani Choudhury (Mukherjee); Labanya Mandal; Dipyaman Ganguly; Avik Acharya Chowdhury; Jaydeep Chaudhuri; Kausik Paul; Bikas Chandra Pal; Jayaraman Vinayagam; Churala Pal; Anirban Manna; Parasuraman Jaisankar; Utpal Chaudhuri; Aditya Konar; Siddhartha Roy; Santu Bandyopadhyay
Alcoholic extract of Piperbetle (Piper betle L.) leaves was recently found to induce apoptosis of CML cells expressing wild type and mutated Bcr‐Abl with imatinib resistance phenotype. Hydroxychavicol (HCH), a constituent of the alcoholic extract of Piper betle leaves, was evaluated for anti‐CML activity. Here, we report that HCH and its analogues induce killing of primary cells in CML patients and leukemic cell lines expressing wild type and mutated Bcr‐Abl, including the T315I mutation, with minimal toxicity to normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. HCH causes early but transient increase of mitochondria‐derived reactive oxygen species. Reactive oxygen species‐dependent persistent activation of JNK leads to an increase in endothelial nitric oxide synthase‐mediated nitric oxide generation. This causes loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, cleavage of caspase 9, 3 and poly‐adenosine diphosphate‐ribose polymerase leading to apoptosis. One HCH analogue was also effective in vivo in SCID mice against grafts expressing the T315I mutation, although to a lesser extent than grafts expressing wild type Bcr‐Abl, without showing significant bodyweight loss. Our data describe the role of JNK‐dependent endothelial nitric oxide synthase‐mediated nitric oxide for anti‐CML activity of HCH and this molecule merits further testing in pre‐clinical and clinical settings. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 88–99)
Biopolymers | 2014
Amlanjyoti Dhar; Shampa Mallick; Piya Ghosh; Atanu Maiti; Israr Ahmed; Seemana Bhattacharya; Tapashi Mandal; Asit Manna; Koushik Roy; Sandeep Singh; Dipak Kumar Nayak; Paul T. Wilder; Joseph Markowitz; David J. Weber; Mrinal K. Ghosh; Samit Chattopadhyay; Rajdeep Guha; Aditya Konar; Santu Bandyopadhyay; Siddhartha Roy
Protein–protein interactions are part of a large number of signaling networks and potential targets for drug development. However, discovering molecules that can specifically inhibit such interactions is a major challenge. S100B, a calcium‐regulated protein, plays a crucial role in the proliferation of melanoma cells through protein–protein interactions. In this article, we report the design and development of a bidentate conformationally constrained peptide against dimeric S100B based on a natural tight‐binding peptide, TRTK‐12. The helical conformation of the peptide was constrained by the substitution of α‐amino isobutyric acid—an amino acid having high helical propensity—in positions which do not interact with S100B. A branched bidentate version of the peptide was bound to S100B tightly with a dissociation constant of 8 nM. When conjugated to a cell‐penetrating peptide, it caused growth inhibition and rapid apoptosis in melanoma cells. The molecule exerts antiproliferative action through simultaneous inhibition of key growth pathways, including reactivation of wild‐type p53 and inhibition of Akt and STAT3 phosphorylation. The apoptosis induced by the bidentate constrained helix is caused by direct migration of p53 to mitochondria. At moderate intravenous dose, the peptide completely inhibits melanoma growth in a mouse model without any significant observable toxicity. The specificity was shown by lack of ability of a double mutant peptide to cause tumor regression at the same dose level. The methodology described here for direct protein–protein interaction inhibition may be effective for rapid development of inhibitors against relatively weak protein–protein interactions for de novo drug development.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics | 2017
Phillip Dixon; Richard C. Fentzke; Arnab Bhattacharya; Aditya Konar; Sarbani Hazra; Anuj Chauhan
ABSTRACT Cystinosis is an orphan disease caused by a genetic mutation that leads to deposition of cystine crystals in many organs including cornea. Ophthalmic manifestation of the disease can be treated with hourly instillation of cysteamine eye drops. The hourly eye drop instillation is tedious to the patients leading to poor compliance and additionally, significant degradation of the drug occurs within one week of opening the bottle, which further complicates this delivery approach. This paper focuses on designing a contact lens to treat the disease with improved efficacy compared to eye drops, and also exploring safety of the drug eluding contact lens in an animal model. Our goal is to design a lens that is safe and that can deliver a daily therapeutic dose of cysteamine to the cornea while retaining drug stability. We show that cysteamine diffuses out rapidly from all lenses due to its small size. Vitamin E incorporation increases the release duration of both ACUVUE®OASYS® and ACUVUE® TruEyeTM but the effect is more pronounced in TruEyeTM likely due to the low solubility of vitamin E in the lens matrix and higher aspect ratio of the barriers. The barriers are not effective in hydrogel lenses, which along with the high aspect ratio in silicone hydrogels suggests that barriers could be forming at the interface of the silicone and hydrogel phases. The presence of vitamin E has an additional beneficial effect of reduction in the oxidation rates, likely due to a transport barrier between the oxygen diffusing through the silicone channels and drug located in the hydrogel phase. Based on this study, both Acuvue®OASYS® and ACUVUE® TruEyeTM can be loaded with vitamin E to design a cysteamine eluting contact lenses for effective therapy of cystinosis. The lenses must be worn for about 4–5 hr. each day, which is less than the typical duration of daily‐wear. The vitamin E and cysteamine loaded lenses did not exhibit any toxicity in a rabbit model over a period of 7‐days.
Current Eye Research | 2017
Ramesh Jha; Vismapratap Sur; Arnab Bhattacharjee; Tanushri Ghosh; Vinod Kumar; Aditya Konar; Sarbani Hazra
ABSTRACT Purpose: To test the intracameral safety of nepafenac and its efficacy in inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis during phacoemulsification surgery. Methods: The safety evaluation was conducted in normal eyes of rabbits, 0.1ml of 0.3% and 1% nepafenac was injected intracamerally. Extensive studies to detect adverse response ranged from a gross examination of eyes under slit lamp biomicroscope, fluorescein dye test, Schirmer tear test, test for corneal sensitivity, intraocular pressure measurement (IOP), specular microscopy, electroretinography(ERG), and histopathological examination of intraocular tissues. Efficacy of nepafenac was studied by intracameral injection of 0.1%, 0.3% nepafenac, nepafenac 0.3%+1% lignocaine, and 1% lignocaine alone, before phacoemulsification surgery and intraoperative mydriasis along with PGE2(ProstaglandinE2) secretion were recorded. Results: Single 0.1ml of 0.3% or 1% nepafenac did not significantly (p > 0.05) alter physiological parameters and histology of cornea, iris, and retina. Nepafenac 0.3% effectively inhibited PGE2 secretion. No significant (p > 0.05) prevention of miosis was recorded with 0.1% or 0.3% nepafenac. However, a combination of 0.3% nepafenac + 1% lignocaine and 1% lignocaine alone significantly (p < 0.05) arrested miosis during the intraoperative period. Conclusion: An intracameral concentration of up to 1% nepafenac does not adversely affect the rabbit eye. Nepafenac fails to prevent miosis but inhibits prostaglandin release during phacoemulsification surgery.
Archive | 2005
Santu Bandyopadhyay; Bikas Chandra Pal; Samir Bhattacharyay; Swapan Mondal; Chhabinath Mandal; Aditya Konar; Keshab Chandra Roy; Tanusree Biswas; Gautam Bandyopadhyay
Archive | 2012
Sibabrata Mukhopadhyay; Mumu Chakraborty; Tulika Mukherjee; Arun Bandyopadhyay; Dipak Kar; Tanima Banerjee; Aditya Konar; Debaprasad Jana; Siddhartha Roy; Santu Bandyopadhyay; Balram Ghosh; Mabalirajan Ulaganathan; Rakesh Kamal Johri; Subhash Chander Sharma; Gurdarshan Singh; Bholanath Paul; Vasanta Madhava Sharma Gangavaram; J. S. Yadav; Radha Krishna Palakodety
Archive | 2004
Debleena Dey; Swapan Kumar Mandal; Mohua Mukherjee; Bikash Chandra Pal; Tanushree Biswas; Malabika Datta; Sib Sankar Roy; Arun Bandyopadhyay; Samir Bhattacharya; Bir Bhanu Giri; Santu Bandopadhyay; Aditya Konar
Drug Delivery and Translational Research | 2018
Phillip Dixon; Tanushri Ghosh; Kalyani Mondal; Aditya Konar; Anuj Chauhan; Sarbani Hazra
Drug Delivery and Translational Research | 2018
Phillip Dixon; Tanushri Ghosh; Kalyani Mondal; Aditya Konar; Anuj Chauhan; Sarbani Hazra
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
Sarbani Hazra; B.N.M Khalida Khatun; Sudip Nandi; Rajdeep Guha; Sushovan Chowdhury; Samar Basak; Subramanian Krishnakumar; Aditya Konar